| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
My one negative about this site is ey too much anal and not enough vaginal. Also way too many prolapses.
|
04-02-19 12:00am
|
Reply
2
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
I've never been scammed this way but am still very wary of it. i have one credit card on which I requested a very low credit limit ($80.00) that I use exclusively for porn sites. I get notified whenever a charge appears on the account is made and pay it immediately in order to leave an open to spend of $80.00.
The few times I sign up for a high amount, usually for a term longer than one month, I will do so only with CCBill or Epoch.
|
03-31-19 02:40pm
|
Reply
3
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
I was a member for a very long time (started when they still added one new DVD per day) but dropped VB when I got tired of their lousy labeling. They have two major failings not mentioned in the review First is mis-identification of the talent. Some babes show up with obvious name errors. Seco0d is scenes where the models are not identified t all. The only good thing is when members see errors and include the info in the comments. But that doesn't help at all with the search function.
Dillion Harper, for example, has several scenes where she's mis-identified or not identified at all.
|
03-30-19 11:36pm
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Same for me PLUS no, or minimal, tattoos.
|
03-20-19 10:14pm
|
Reply
5
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
sean68's Reply
I would dearly love to see TBP do that...provide a list of the BS (bait and switch) sites.
|
02-05-19 08:28pm
|
Comment
6
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
|
01-21-19 12:06am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
7
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
|
12-25-18 11:21pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
8
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Outstanding review that tells me that ALS Scans should continue to be my primary ALS site with a periodic visit once in a while to catch up on their new stuff.
|
12-17-18 02:24pm
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
Definitely no, but in a few cases a little ankle or wrist tattoo is OK. But the full body crap is definitely no good.
|
11-11-18 12:46pm
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Poll
Rake tits are awful, but overstuffed lips are a close second.
|
10-19-18 09:41pm
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
Yes. I love the real pros who tease and grind maximizing their particular assets. Examp0les of top flight (IMHO) babes are Carmella Bing (I dislike home-made tits but hers are wonderful), Memphis Monroe (ditto the tits), Jana Jordan (aka Jana Foxy) (No tits but beautiful face and great moves (always solo or G/G), Mia Malkova (incredible flexibility = great positions), Alison Tyler (Amason body), Andrea Valentino (great meat curtaains and atrhleticism), Mandy Dee with incredible sexy moves during sex), Phoenix Ray (totally sexy moves, even when partially clothed) and Venus who ia just totally into raum=nchy sex),
|
09-15-18 01:53pm
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
I agree with RA. I've found some of my fave's from the good old days and am happy to reward the sites with long running memberships. My rationale is that my porn site budget is a whole lot cheaper than the 1980's and 1990's when porn magazines with action carried a $15-$20 price tag and the Pussycat Theaters hit you with $10 admissions. This was in 1980 and 1990 dollars.
|
09-04-18 10:27pm
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
Actually all he above. But what gets my credit card out is if the site has some real good samples to check out, such as short trailers.
|
09-02-18 11:24am
|
Reply
14
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
I have no interest in any of the award shows...especially porn. They are all promotional schemes to generate publicity.
|
09-02-18 11:09am
|
Reply
15
|
Solo Teen Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
yujin's Reply
Had to be a cookie issue. When I cleared cookies, the $14.95 popped in. Thanks.
|
08-19-18 06:26pm
|
Comment
16
|
Solo Teen Girls
(0)
|
|
08-15-18 02:09pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
17
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I'm with Rear Admiral. I usually get sold by the direction taken by the major sites.
|
07-10-18 08:21pm
|
Reply
18
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
I'm totally not interested in seeing the actress drinking cum. Similarly I relly don't see the attraction in actresses peeing into a container then drinking the pee.
Both practices seem to me to be both weird and very unhealthy.
|
06-24-18 08:54pm
|
Reply
19
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
Bang Brothers did that to me.
|
06-22-18 05:29pm
|
Reply
20
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
A few are really good at it but most are phony.
|
06-22-18 05:26pm
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
My vote isn't recording. I vote that it can ruin a scene.
|
06-22-18 05:24pm
|
Reply
22
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
I've been a subscriber, off and on, as long as e..4me and agree almost completely with his review. 82 is a very fair score as well.
|
06-19-18 05:10pm
|
Reply
23
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Most porn directors seriously overdo bukkake.
|
06-09-18 09:05pm
|
Reply
24
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Jade1's Comment
Regarding the stuff in the "vault:"
If I sign up for a membership I gat access to about 30 days of updates. If I want to download a video posted in January that's now in the "vault," can I see at least a free trailer of the video? If I want to download it how much is the additional charge?
|
06-01-18 04:48pm
|
Reply
25
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Poll
John Leslie was #1 on my shit list. Way back in the early days of videotape porn he was all over the place and was totally disrespectful of the female talent. More than once did he do anal with gals who clearly said no. He spat on several babes after the scene was over.
|
05-14-18 01:15am
|
