| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Victoria Pink
(0)
64.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Great body on the babe that is the focus of the site.
- Nice variety from non-nude to hard core.
- Very well organized and easy navigation.
- No DRM |
| Cons: |
- Only one or two updates over the last 2+ years
- Vids are 352 or lower and are badly pixillated at full screen.
- Very small amount of content Appears to have become inactive
- Several of the older videos have disappeared including some really good ones.
- Advertises 37 video clips but there are really only 5 or 6 videos (now) and are downloadable in several 2 minute segments.
-Aspect ratio issues with some scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
Victoria appears on no other sites and is a great looking babe so for 10 bucks (TBP discounted rate) you can download everything in a few hours. But the site needs to be upgraded to a much better resolution and needs much, much more content. |
|
05-08-07 11:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
27
|
Busty College Coeds
(0)
56.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
From my previous review [current review is in brackets]:
Pros: Reasonably fresh roster of busty young models. [Nothing at all added since the first review.]
Two "bonus" sites, identical interface:
- Fuck for dollars
- I film myself
[Now part of the New Sensations network, so the entire NS network is now available for $15, a great price.]
Great TBP discounted price makes it worth 1 month. [See above.]
Simple navigation, but with so little content, that's no big deal.[Ditto.]
Galleries are Zip downloadable [Ditto]
No DRM [Ditto] |
| Cons: |
Only 19 models/video scenes on Busty College Coeds and, with some duplications, 61 models/videos on the two bonus sites combined. [Now part of New Sensations. No longer a "con" because of that.]
They claim to update every Tuesday but I haven't seen any updates in 2 months. [No updates since 7/26/2007]
Videos not top quality, slow loading [Ditto]
Photos are quite small [Ditto]
Content not dated. [Ditto] |
| Bottom Line: |
The site is probably wrapping up its existence. [Not true. It's dormant and hasn't changed, but it still tries to recruit new business.]
Tired structure and appearance with no effort to create any excitement at all. With so little content and no updates, there's no chance to "grab" a member for any length of time. (I am a 2 month member because I forgot to cancel in month 1. I actually forgot I signed up until I saw it hit my credit card.) At the price, you can find enough stuff to warrant a membership. And with a good download mgr, it won't take more than a few hours to drain it dry. [Ditto.]
NEW: I'm back on the site because I signed up for New Sensations this morning and this site was a part of the network.
I reduced my score because the site is dormant and based on what is now available on other sites, this site is now a total pass.
It gets 6 points over minimum only because it has single scenes of Natasha Nice and Sara Stone, two of my favorite big titted babes and 3 or 4 other scenes that are worthy of download. |
|
05-13-09 06:27pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
28
|
Victoria Pink
(0)
51.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
My original review:
Pros: - Great body on the babe that is the focus of the site.
- Nice variety from non-nude to hard core.
- Very well organized and easy navigation.
- No DRM
Update: Some added "bonus content" since my last review. |
| Cons: |
My original review:
Cons: - Only one or two updates over the last 2+ years
- Vids are 352 or lower and are badly pixillated at full screen.
- Very small amount of content. Appears to have become inactive
- Several of the older videos have disappeared including some really good ones.
- Advertises 37 video clips but there are really only 5 or 6 videos (now) and are downloadable in several 2 minute segments.
-Aspect ratio issues with some scenes.
-No zip for photos
Update:
No new vids since last review, no changes in review. |
| Bottom Line: |
My original review:
Bottom Line: Victoria appears on no other sites and is a great looking babe so for 10 bucks (TBP discounted rate) you can download everything in a few hours. But the site needs to be upgraded to a much better resolution and needs much, much more content.
Update:
Same except the current trial (go outside the TBP/PU link to VictoriaPink.com) is $1.00 for 7 days so if you have any interest in a nice looking babe with great natural tits and a nice meaty labia, skip the $1.00 burger tomorrow and spend it instead on this site...but be sure to cancel after signup so you can avoid a ridiculous $40.00 one month renewal.
51 score this time just because I love her tits and pussy. |
|
09-30-09 11:20pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
29
|
Jana Rocks
(0)
51.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Jana Jordan is the featured model, needless to say, and even when fully clothed she's still a "dy-no-mite" babe.
She is listed on the iadf.com data base as being 5'2" and 96 pounds, but she has the prettiest eyes and puffy nipples on top, a perfect pussy and an elegant pair of legs. And she loves to show off.
Jana, as far as I know, just does solo and lez stuff, but some of the lesbian material I've seen has been pretty nasty and never fails to transition Little Richard into Big Dick.
That's about it for the "pro's" ladies and gentlemen. The babe is the only thing going for this site. It sure ain't the content!
Worse, if you join this site to check out Jana's fine body parts, you'll be sorely disappointed. Go to one of the many "preview material" sites like freeones.com and you'll see a whole lot more of Jana than on this site. |
| Cons: |
The site has a total of 9 short videos (the same number as stated in the TBP "site facts" page for this site). There are 4 wmv's, 3 mov's 2 mpg's totaling about 25 minutes of Jana showing her car, magic tricks, bunnies and silly crap but no pussy, no boob.
There are 61 photo sets (nothing zipped, but in this case who cares) where TBP's "site facts says there were 55+).
All 9 movies and 61 photo sets showed Jana fully clothed, a few in semi sexy poses in bikini underwear. There are about 5 photos where she has wet toilet paper squares covering her nipples in a manner that suggests that hers are a bit on the puffy side (one of her main assets).
The TBP "site facts" was last updated on 12-24-05, which means the site has been dormant for three years.
There are 5 G-rated photo sets of her "friends" as well, that left limp Little Richard asking me why I bothered. I had no answer so I went back to my FTV Girls download to make the poor little guy turn back into Big Dick. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is suitable for kids because there is no, I repeat, no material that isn't available on basic over the air broadcast TV. I wondered as I went through the material if it wasn't, in fact, created before Jana Jordan turned 18 because it wouldn't bother a censor or a lawyer in the strictest of situations.
This site got my cancellation about 1 hour and 45 minutes after enrolling because I had completed a review of all of its content in about an hour. That was, for me, the fastest time from sign up to cancellation ever. (My last record was with the Shay Laren site that has a whole Helluva lot better content. That one took me about two days to drain everything and be done with the site.)
The only reason I scored it a 51 is because, although they had the usual check box option to sign up for another of their sites, Lili Jensen.com, they had the decency to have left the box unchecked rather than the usual trick of pre-checking the box.
That should earn them 1 point over the minimum.
FINAL COMMENT: If you had any thoughts about signing up for JanaRocks.com, you should reconsider. Give your $15 to that guy standing at the bottom of the freeway off ramp with the cardboard sign. You'll at least feel like you accomplished something with your money.
(Boy, I need an attaboy for wasting my time and money. But it shows what torture I'll put myself through in my quest for the PU team! ;o)) |
|
11-18-08 06:02pm
Replies (14)
|
Review
30
|
Angelica Costello
(0)
51.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
There are some photos of Venus Knight (aka Angelica Costello)
There are some photos of Venus Knight
There are some photos of Venus Knight
At least there is no scam billing. They take your money and then they take off.
That's all the Pro's I can come up with. Seriously |
| Cons: |
Dead site with no activity.
No customer support at all
Very sloppy navigation
Hardly any content
What's there is lousy quality |
| Bottom Line: |
Bottom line, forget this site.
I signed up because they sent me an email that offered a 2 month non-recurring at $19.99. Being a Venus Knight fan, BIG TIME, I figured that was a great deal although PU/TBP had no G2 at all about the site.
As soon as I accessed the site for the first time I went to work to find stuff about Venus. It took a while but I finally found a few photos, No videos, just photos.
Having committed my money I thought I'd see what else was there. Yes there was some low quality stuff but none of it was worth previewing, let alone downloading.
When you consider that you can get a ton more material on Venus Knight on Twistys for the same investment, you will conclude this site is a waste of time and money.
To give you some idea how bad it is, I'm as tight as they come when it's my money, so when I sign up for a site, I drain as much as I want as quickly as possible so I can cancel and move on within the first month. In this case, after day one when I determined what a crap site it was, I don't think I revisited it more that 3 or 4 times and that was just to see if I missed something the first time or if the webmaster woke up and worked on it.
Why a score of 51 and not 50? Remember, I'm a Venus Knight fan and there were a few photos of Venus Knight that I did not have nestled away on my harddrive.
That's it. |
|
06-02-08 07:23am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
31
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
My one negative about this site is ey too much anal and not enough vaginal. Also way too many prolapses.
|
04-02-19 12:00am
|
Reply
32
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
I've never been scammed this way but am still very wary of it. i have one credit card on which I requested a very low credit limit ($80.00) that I use exclusively for porn sites. I get notified whenever a charge appears on the account is made and pay it immediately in order to leave an open to spend of $80.00.
The few times I sign up for a high amount, usually for a term longer than one month, I will do so only with CCBill or Epoch.
|
03-31-19 02:40pm
|
Reply
33
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
I was a member for a very long time (started when they still added one new DVD per day) but dropped VB when I got tired of their lousy labeling. They have two major failings not mentioned in the review First is mis-identification of the talent. Some babes show up with obvious name errors. Seco0d is scenes where the models are not identified t all. The only good thing is when members see errors and include the info in the comments. But that doesn't help at all with the search function.
Dillion Harper, for example, has several scenes where she's mis-identified or not identified at all.
|
03-30-19 11:36pm
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Same for me PLUS no, or minimal, tattoos.
|
03-20-19 10:14pm
|
Reply
35
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
sean68's Reply
I would dearly love to see TBP do that...provide a list of the BS (bait and switch) sites.
|
02-05-19 08:28pm
|
Comment
36
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
|
01-21-19 12:06am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
37
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
|
12-25-18 11:21pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
38
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Outstanding review that tells me that ALS Scans should continue to be my primary ALS site with a periodic visit once in a while to catch up on their new stuff.
|
12-17-18 02:24pm
|
Reply
39
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
Definitely no, but in a few cases a little ankle or wrist tattoo is OK. But the full body crap is definitely no good.
|
11-11-18 12:46pm
|
Reply
40
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Poll
Rake tits are awful, but overstuffed lips are a close second.
|
10-19-18 09:41pm
|
Reply
41
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
Yes. I love the real pros who tease and grind maximizing their particular assets. Examp0les of top flight (IMHO) babes are Carmella Bing (I dislike home-made tits but hers are wonderful), Memphis Monroe (ditto the tits), Jana Jordan (aka Jana Foxy) (No tits but beautiful face and great moves (always solo or G/G), Mia Malkova (incredible flexibility = great positions), Alison Tyler (Amason body), Andrea Valentino (great meat curtaains and atrhleticism), Mandy Dee with incredible sexy moves during sex), Phoenix Ray (totally sexy moves, even when partially clothed) and Venus who ia just totally into raum=nchy sex),
|
09-15-18 01:53pm
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
I agree with RA. I've found some of my fave's from the good old days and am happy to reward the sites with long running memberships. My rationale is that my porn site budget is a whole lot cheaper than the 1980's and 1990's when porn magazines with action carried a $15-$20 price tag and the Pussycat Theaters hit you with $10 admissions. This was in 1980 and 1990 dollars.
|
09-04-18 10:27pm
|
Reply
43
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
Actually all he above. But what gets my credit card out is if the site has some real good samples to check out, such as short trailers.
|
09-02-18 11:24am
|
Reply
44
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
I have no interest in any of the award shows...especially porn. They are all promotional schemes to generate publicity.
|
09-02-18 11:09am
|
Reply
45
|
Solo Teen Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
yujin's Reply
Had to be a cookie issue. When I cleared cookies, the $14.95 popped in. Thanks.
|
08-19-18 06:26pm
|
Comment
46
|
Solo Teen Girls
(0)
|
|
08-15-18 02:09pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
47
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I'm with Rear Admiral. I usually get sold by the direction taken by the major sites.
|
07-10-18 08:21pm
|
Reply
48
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
I'm totally not interested in seeing the actress drinking cum. Similarly I relly don't see the attraction in actresses peeing into a container then drinking the pee.
Both practices seem to me to be both weird and very unhealthy.
|
06-24-18 08:54pm
|
Reply
49
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
Bang Brothers did that to me.
|
06-22-18 05:29pm
|
Reply
50
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
A few are really good at it but most are phony.
|
06-22-18 05:26pm
|
