| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
851
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment
I have had no recent trouble with Bang Brothers. Before I posted this reply I accessed the site and downloaded the Raylene update posted on 4/23 with no difficulty.
I suggest you contact their support people. Not the fastest in their response but they will get back to you with real suggestions, not blather.
|
04-25-11 10:29am
|
Reply
852
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Back in the day (over 5 years ago) Danni.com had great webcam stuff as part of their basic package with videos of the sessions available for download a few days later.
That is something I would go for; but sadly I don't know any sites at all that do that today.
|
04-25-11 10:19am
|
Reply
853
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yote78's Poll
My crush was on my sixth grade teacher, Miss Stein. As with Yote, I enjoyed it when she flashed her charlies when she sat down or bent over. The real problem was that, at that age, I was just beginning to experience boners. And being asked to stand or go to the front of the class got a bit awkward.
My most memorable moment was when Miss Stein's panties were a bit tight and she showed a great cameltoe.
I really learned a lot from Miss Stein.
|
04-16-11 09:59am
|
Reply
854
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
After a long relationship with RK (over 18 months straight) I also threw in the towel.
Main reasons are:
Several download problems.
Non responsive customer support.
Less than exciting updates compared to other sites.
I found two sites that are great and are working hard to keep my business: 21sextury and DDFProd. They have convinced me that RK is no longer worth continuing.
The signs are there that you may be right; the site may well be on its way to oblivion.
|
03-19-11 11:56am
|
Reply
855
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Me too.
Pantyhose hide the genitalia and don't do anything to enhance the view. Long stockings enhance the legs and stop where the fundamental interest starts.
I really get off on legs along with anything that enhances the pussy, especially crotchless panties that are on top of long, sheer nylons.
|
03-19-11 11:49am
|
Reply
856
|
Nude Fight Club
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
Rusty's review and the two that precede his, are accurate and all three are from the same basic perspective; guys who aren't into the genre but who checked out the site as part of the 21Sextury network.
I agree that the video quality and photo quality are top notch and the videography is generally well done such that it captures what those who enjoy the "catfight" genre are interested in. And that would be checking out gorgeous babes and their body parts in some lesbian action beyond basic mutual masturbation and pussy munching.
The only possible quarrel I would have with the site is the inclusion of videocams in so many of the scenes. On the one hand they're a distraction but on the other hand, it adds a bit to the reality of the scenes by suggesting that the action is spontaneous and not staged.
As for a score, I give it an 88. I ranked it at a mid to high 80 because of the high quality, the consistently gorgeous babes and the loyalty to the genre. It doesn't get a 90+ score because it doesn't have a lot of content, yet, and the scenes are very repetitive...but I'm not really sure how they could introduce any more variety than they already have.
|
03-18-11 08:12am
|
Reply
857
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Comment
I'm very happy with the current quality, but am very unhappy with the limitations placed on the downloads.
I can only D/L one video at a time and worse, I can't get speeds better than about 67.0 Kb/S. The only saving grace is that the speed maintains at that level while I do high speed D/L's from other sites like 21Sextury.
I use Down Them All and IE for my downloads. Because you did not mention speed in your comment I'm curious if you are having the same slow speeds as I experience.
|
03-17-11 10:44pm
|
Reply
858
|
21 Sextreme
(0)
|
Reply of
Sandstone's Reply
I'm a bit confused. I joined last year. I think I'm still getting everything on all of your sites, both the regular site and the extreme site.
In other words, the change is only for new subscribers, not us "oldtimers" who are continuing our subscriptions uninterrupted.
Is that correct?
By the way, I really love your site and the very broad assortment of material...and especially the consistently excellent quality of you high def material and of your videography.
|
03-05-11 01:28pm
|
Reply
859
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
That's why I dropped out a few years ago. But I've decided to try again taking advantage of their on again, off again $20 price, which is now available through TBP right now.
I'm a video guy and know that I won't get too much good stuff but I am interested in seeing if their photos have returned to their normally high quality.
I'll be reporting back once I've checked the site out in more detail.
|
03-05-11 01:13pm
|
Reply
860
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Normally I would have said 3-5 years but two things have occurred that make the period longer: 1) Windows Vista & Windows 7 both make me want to keep my Windows XP computer; and, 2) Toshiba offers, and I bought, a long term warranty that has done quite well in keeping my older laptop functioning as well as any new one might.
|
03-05-11 10:32am
|
Reply
861
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
Ditto, but they cost $1 in tokens on 42nd Street in NYC. Don't dig BJ's in my porn (unless I'm getting serviced at the same time) and don't have any interest in watching a guy's dick sticking through a hole in the wall. Ugh.
There's only one saving grace; we don't have to hear the guy blabbering and/or moaning.
When a glory hole scene comes on, I move on to other stuff.
|
02-10-11 07:52am
|
Reply
862
|
Pure CFNM
(0)
|
Reply of
FZKK's Review
CFNM=Clothed Female Nude Male
I did what the webmaster suggested and found the preview site to have some real babes. I'm not into that genre, but a specialty site that lasts for 6 years obviously is doing a good job satisfying its market niche.
|
02-01-11 08:19am
|
Reply
863
|
Sex Video Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Yes, there is real hardcore, but no, not a lot. My cynical mind says the two or three guys who are there for the audition shoot check out the babe to see how far she'll go without causing trouble. And we get to share those few cases where it actually happens.
|
01-30-11 05:28pm
|
Reply
864
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Ever since I encountered the well endowed Catalina L'Amour in the late 90's and enjoyed her magnificent labia I have been a big fan of "outies."
One babe who has left the biz but who has a superb set of lips and a great body is Andie Valentino. Unfortunately she did only softcore. It would have been great to see some lucky dude munching on her roast beef sandwich. She also appeared as Andrea on FTV Girls.
OOPS. You were discussing navels, not labias. Sorry.
Regarding navels, I normally don't even notice them except when there's an ugly tattoo that calls my attention to them.
|
01-20-11 12:45am
|
Reply
865
|
Lovely Vanessa
(0)
|
Reply of
Shap's Reply
Shap,
Thanks for your reply. I see that there have been several photosets added recently on Twistys but no recently added videos. Hopefully you have some additional video material on this gorgeous lady.
|
01-20-11 12:39am
|
Reply
866
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
In compar5ison to most other sites I find DDF Prod to be superior in many (most?) respects, such as video quality, variety (DDF has several specialty genres like Hands on Hardcore, House of Taboo, etc.) and the mainstream 1 by Day, all of which have extremely well produced exclusive content.
Yes, a few of the older material remains in multiple segments but the vast majority is done in one complete video.
The only issue of significance that I have is that some current updates are not available in WMV format and can only be downloaded in MOV (Apple)format.
The scoring is always a subjective matter but, having been a member of well over 30 sites over the last 6 or 7 years, this site (network) remains a leader in my opinion.
|
01-18-11 11:36pm
|
Reply
867
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yote78's Reply
Agreed. The question was framed as a personal preference, not a matter of morality or legality.
I understand kinky (I enjoy watching a babe peeing but not if she's peeing ON someone, or if the scene involves drinking it) and have no concerns if someone's "kink" is as odd as my kink in enjoying watching a babe pee.
So my comment was only my personal reaction to the practice, not to the practice itself.
|
01-16-11 12:23pm
|
Reply
868
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Just curious. Pussy eating can remind one of raw tuna, which is fine. And the tactile element of munching on labia lips and diddling a clitoris is really the best part for me.
But I wonder what an asshole tastes like and where the tactile element comes into the picture? Is it like my fond memories of the aromas I remember from latrine duty in the Army? Yuck.
|
01-16-11 10:51am
|
Reply
869
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Although it's really tough to figure out what graymane really thinks about ass licking, etc., I think I might agree.
For the life of me I can't remotely understand why anyone would do it, let alone enjoy watching it done in porn.
Pornography is about fantasy. Speaking for myself, the porn user is into porn primarily as a fantasy where the doers in a video are creating a vicarious experience for the porn user. I also really enjoy watching the female body and the female engaging in heavy tease.
I can even understand the amount of attention paid to blowjobs from the context of wanting to have my wang slurped by the babe on the screen. But who wants to see extended shots of a schlong?
But asshole licking!?! How is that gross activity even remotely entertaining? It's like my other question. In extreme porn one can see piss drinking and shit eating, which are, in my opinion, as disgusting as ass hole licking.
|
01-16-11 10:46am
|
Reply
870
|
Suburban Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
SimonSubAms's Reply
I like the site but a few samples would be nice to help evaluate the style and quality of reproduction.
|
01-16-11 10:14am
|
Reply
871
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Graymane's review said the videos were poorly done, but did not describe the nature of the videos...are they still just model shoots or is there even a little imagination involved/
Their babes are really outstanding and the quantity of photo material appears to be extremely huge. If the thematic aspect of their videos has moved on from just photo shoots to more serious focus on the model's attributes, even if thematically lousy, I may convince myself to drop a Benjamin and go for it.
By the way the listing on TBP/PU still says $109.99 for 1 yesr. The lowest (auto. renew) price is $99.99.
|
01-02-11 04:59pm
|
Reply
872
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Procrastination loses again. My nouveau annum gift to myself was going to be a one month membership in MetArt.
Well, anyway, the 365 day rate dropped from $109.99 to $99.99, so I may go for the long term deal. I usually stick around for 2-3 months anyway so....
Just one question. My last membership in MetArt was 3 or 4 years ago and I had two issues with them:
1. Inaccessibility. Frequently the site was down...or overloaded...so I couldn't access when I wanted to. Is that still an issue?
2. While I know it's primarily a photo site, I was not impressed by their videos which were nothing more than videos of their photoshoots. Boring as hell. Have they gotten any better lately?
|
01-02-11 10:12am
|
Comment
873
|
MetArt
(0)
|
|
01-01-11 07:04pm
Replies (7)
|
Reply
874
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Boy, you sound like me. I grew tired of the sameness. But worse was when the babe was a real turn on but the photographer was not into any eroticism.
The change to a bit more erotic stuff makes me interested in trying again.
|
12-05-10 11:56pm
|
Reply
875
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Interesting point.
I was a member about 12 months ago and have been thinking of rejoining just because the TBP price is very attractive. I hesitated only because I gravitate more to video than pix.
As for what galleries to check out, it's interesting that your issue seems to arise more from the HUGE volume of content than on anything else. My only issue is that there's so much content and their naming convention is so clumsy it's really hard to sort through the downloaded stuff.
This discussion has me thinking that it's about time that I plunk down $20.00 and give it another go.
|
12-04-10 10:01pm
|
