| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1051
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I said softcore, but the problem is the choices are not mutually exclusive.
I like FTV a lot, for example. Is that softcore or teen? I also like DDF a lot which has a lot of solo girl stuff but also does some b/g as well.
I am losing interest in Brazzers, mainly because the majority of models are excessively siliconed these days, but where a natural babe is doing it I like it as well.
So just because my preference is a gorgeous natural babe showing off her assets whether or not there's a penis, a toy, another babe, bondage, whatever, in the scene, I would have voted "all the above" if that was a choice. It wasn't a choice so I went with softcore.
|
12-10-09 04:48pm
|
Reply
1052
|
Cum In My Wife Please
(0)
|
Reply of
Jimmi's Reply
What about his points about the discount and the technique of splitting videos into small segments?
|
12-09-09 08:02am
|
Reply
1053
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
I'm still pissed about the misleading (fraudulent?) Danni's Pledge and how they totally misrepresented their DRM policy when they had it.
They promised that anything downloaded would continue to be accessible even after a member resigned so long as it was not moved to another drive.
I loaded up some external hard drives based on that promise, only to find out they lied. Even after signing up again my entire stash remained inaccessible.
That experience left a very bad taste in my mouth and should be a warning to others who believe the site actually cares about its customers.
|
12-08-09 11:58pm
|
Reply
1054
|
For The Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Denner says: A serious welcome to maki from Spain....hope everybody will make her feel good here..."
I will.
I know here in the west San Fernando Valley (Calif) there are a lot of babes who are porn users but I don't know any who are PU members.
A BIG WELCOME Maki, and I'm looking forward to seeing more of your thoughts and ideas on PU.
Jack
|
12-07-09 11:54am
|
Reply
1055
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Reply
Cumming on a belly or back was, in the earlier days of Porn, a contribution to the notion of avoiding pregnancy rather than the characteristic now known as "the money shot."
Back in the 70's it was not uncommon to hear the guy saying "I'm coming" followed by the babe pleading with the stud to "pull it out. I don't want a baby."
|
12-06-09 09:17pm
|
Reply
1056
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Ditto that. I signed up for a full year that gave me an additional 6 free months. Not that sorry I did because the price per posted DVD is $.0367 (less than 4 US cents per video) which is pretty damned cheap. If I catch one video in 100 that is worth downloading my cost is $3.67, which is about the cost of a video rental these days.
But I am finding an average of 2 or 3 DVD's a week that have some good stuff so I've got no price complaints.
The only complaint is that I've got to weed through the crap to find the few good ones.
|
12-06-09 09:14pm
|
Reply
1057
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Review
I agree with the comments about the navigation and site design, but one thing I'd like to see added is a posting history with dates PLUS a preview of upcoming material. A calendar would work fine.
By the way, I really enjoyed your review and suggest you not try to condense your writing. Rather do as others have done...continue your review in a reply.
Keep 'em coming. Good stuff, friend.
|
12-06-09 10:25am
|
Reply
1058
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
Also missing as a choice: "Smoker" movies.
At 14. It was a 16mm "smoker" movie purloined by a friend from his dad's stash.
|
12-06-09 08:17am
|
Reply
1059
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Personally I enjoy weird shit like panty and/or bra stuffing, fisting, bananas, hammers, screwdrivers, pencils, bottles, cell phone, beads, golf balls, you name it, stuffing.
Plastic dicks or strapons don't do it, just other objects that weren't intended for the way some of these babes use them.
And when a girlfriend pulls panties out of a girl's vagina slowly and erotically with her teeth, Little Richard magically becomes Big Dick.
That's my answer. Bring on the babes and their playthings. I much prefer that over some stunt cock's hairy ass placed in front of the camera.
|
12-05-09 01:52pm
|
Reply
1060
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
FYI, Jana Jordan uses the name Yana on FTV.
Thanks for the Celine tip. That was one I missed.
|
12-03-09 11:55pm
|
Reply
1061
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
I aqree with the "con" about no full scene download option, but I have another that, being a long term subscriber, would really make the site better, IMHO.
Watching a gorgeous/pretty/sexy babe pleasuring herself with fingers, dildos and/or toys is always a good thing, there is something called "too much of a good thing." Some episodes have 8 to 10 minutes of the girl in the same basic position doing the same basic thing gets rather tedious and boring.
But there are other episodes where, because the babe really turns me on, the 8 to tem minutes seems too short.
I would like an additional option of being able to download an edited down 10 minute (or longer) "highlights" video so I can save space and stay interested.
BTW, There are other porn babes with stuff in their early years as well. Gianna Michaels, Phoenix Ray, Jana Jordan (aka Jana Foxy) and Andie Valentino, for example, show off their assets beautifully.
|
12-03-09 08:12am
|
Reply
1062
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Denner, Almost all of their stuff since last year is in HD quality with some remastering of older material that improves the quality (not HD but far better than before). I say "almost" because there are a few (very few) clips thrown in on some sets that are not HD but they are short set up or close down scenes with no erotic material.
|
12-03-09 07:58am
|
Reply
1063
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Reply
Agree with all of BabyGetReal's list....plus excessive time given to the guy's ass, dick and scrotum...plus the guy blocking the view of PTA.
PTA = Pussy tits and ass.
|
12-02-09 08:46pm
|
Reply
1064
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
Must have been a short time offer because the preview site linked from PU still says $29.95.
|
12-01-09 01:11pm
|
Reply
1065
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Knoman's Review
Great site but it sure ain't perfect.
Some cons:
They have some total crap videos
Indexing is very sloppy
Misidentified models - way too many
Boolean logic is not used in the search function
Aspect ratio problems with streaming videos
Some "DVD quality" videos, esp. older ones, aren't
But the biggest pro:
I agree with all of your pros and would add the one incredible feature: at $14.95 a month and with 150 videos added per month, you pay only 10 cents per video. Now that's one helluva deal for first rate (for the most part) videos.
I gave it a 90 (see my review for the reasons), but no way could I ever give it 100 points.
|
11-30-09 06:27pm
|
Reply
1066
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
wetandpuffy's Reply
The listing on this site (PornUsers) says the trial offers limited access only (11-12-09)
Is P.U. mistaken?
|
11-29-09 12:21pm
|
Reply
1067
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Reply
Better yet, they've extended the 3 month option $74.95 ($25 per month) on a RE-BILLING basis as per the PU listing.
In my opinion, this guy Denys Defrancesco produces the best porn on the web.
That means he shoots nothing but incredibly gorgeous babes, uses HD, superlative camera work and perfect lighting.
And at $25 per month and with 20 updates per week, I have only one major gripe about the site. I am spending more on 1Tb hard drives to keep up with his output.
|
11-29-09 11:10am
|
Reply
1068
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Ditto that. I'll look for as much as I can of one babe, but there are few that I will chase down to the point of joining a site just to get more content.
I keep a list of my favorites that I will look for when I join a new site, but that's about it.
|
11-28-09 12:10pm
|
Reply
1069
|
N/A
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
That explains, at least in part, the pricing of the IOmega special deals; they're dumping the old guys.
Saw a 2 Tb (no-name) on sale today for $188.00. I remember in 2006 a good price was determined by it being under $1.00 per Gb. Now it's under $0.10 per Gb.
The solid state drives that haven't really been a big deal yet, will likely replace the current drives and, when an SSD price comes down more, it will probably bring the price of the current hardware down a whole lot more before they become dinosaurs.
Here's more: Review: Hard disk vs. solid-state drive -- is an SSD worth the money?
|
11-27-09 08:18pm
|
Reply
1070
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
I agree.
Just out of curiosity and not because I would invest that kind of money, I would like to see what's in a site that wants such an outrageous price and am happy that TBP actually reviewed it.
|
11-26-09 07:36pm
|
Reply
1071
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
They all were FAT32 out of the box. Seagate and WD had software onboard that I copied off then reformatted to NTSF. No problem at all.
IOmega, however, had software that was copyright protected so I could not copy it. The software was not important to me because it was a basic automatic backup utility so I decided to just reformat the drive and lose the software.
But the copy protection apparently blocked the reformat
|
11-26-09 06:47pm
|
Reply
1072
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
I have 1 IOmega 1Tb, 1 Seagate 1.5Tb and 1 1Tb WD (plus a few 750's and 640's).
The IOmega works intermittently, and clicks a lot, a very bad sign. Neither IOmega nor the retailer will work with me because I, unfortunately, told the truth, that the drive worked sometimes and others just sat there doing nothing. It must be inoperative, and only during the warranty period.
The Seagate 1.5 Tb works fast, quietly and reliably and has a few nice software features as well. And, unlike the IOmega, but like the WD, I was able to reformat to NTSF for better performance before loading my stash. And at $119.00 the cost per Gig was the lowest.
The WD is fine. Slower at times and I can't play some HD vids without some stuttering on occasion, but it cost me only $89 so I can't complain.
My next one will probably be another Seagate. WD maybe. IOmega, never.
Somewhat off topic; with the lower cost of drives, likely to go even lower, I'm thinking about redundant backups so if I have a drive go bad, I won't lose my stash.
|
11-26-09 11:56am
|
Reply
1073
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
If a PU review is lousy, that's the ballgame. I will not sign up for any site that PU members is unhappy with. Ever.
I also will not join a site that has not been reviewed by anyone on PU even if my libido is activated by the preview site.
Life is too short and there are so many superb sites out there it makes no sense to gamble even a few bucks on a site no one here has visited.
|
11-23-09 05:32pm
|
Reply
1074
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
That says what I was about to say.
TBP was my go to site before PU came along anyway, so when I checked it out I really liked it.
I voted interaction, but the no bullshit reviews as well as the occasional posts by webmasters explaining why they do what they do is not available anywhere at all on the internet.
I said before and it bears repeating. PornUsers is the Consumers Reports of porn. The only source for unbiased, real people info and an opportunity to share with others infp about sites, downloading, organizing, etc.
|
11-22-09 10:10am
|
Reply
1075
|
Big Tits At Work
(0)
|
Reply of
oxymoron's Review
I agree with the score of 80. My reason is that the babes on that site must have depleted the world's stockpile of silicone.
I favor natural titties but I am also turned on by aftermarket enhancements that are done well and improve the natural look of the boob.
But this site seems to use models with excessive implants that make the babes look more like blow-up dolls than real sexy ladies.
|
11-19-09 11:04am
|
