| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
Sean Cody
(0)
|
Reply of
merc77's Review
I blame SeanCody for the brouhaha over the student. They're a well established studio yet lacked the grace to wait all of four months for him to graduate before posting. It would of meant no news trucks at his front door, no hounding by our sexually repressed news media. Those fucks will do anything for a dollar.
Last I heard, the lad had enlisted in the Army and had just completed basic training.
|
12-02-16 10:15pm
|
Reply
127
|
Sell Your GF
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
My parents mentioned that they would turn the tv off as they undress for bed. Then turn it back out once safely under the sheets.
|
07-19-20 09:22pm
|
Reply
128
|
Sexy Hub
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
This slice of life was more interesting than any review I have posted.
"....learn to talk to people with their mouth." Bemused resignation here.
|
05-21-18 09:00am
|
Reply
129
|
Staxus
(0)
|
Reply of
Chainy's Comment
Gay brother sadly informs me Staxus is now streaming only. By his expression, you'd of thought he had been diagnosed with a terrible disease.
|
11-05-15 09:24pm
|
Reply
130
|
Straight Naked Thugs
(0)
|
Reply of
merc77's Review
Here's a very early appearance by the model Wiley.
He appears at 0.30
https://www.xvideos.com/video2481692/ril...er_eats_straight_cum
|
02-09-18 09:10pm
|
Reply
131
|
Submissived
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
THERE'S PROBABLY A SIMPLE CLICK NEEDED TO DELETE THE WRONG SHEBANG, BUT I'M TOO THICK TO FIGURE IT OUT.
|
09-17-17 04:40pm
|
Review
132
|
Tara Radovic
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Very low price.
-Sultry Tara is the bee's knees.
Non-nude photos of trips to Paris and Denmark are a nice travelogue.
-Always changing hair colour is her trademark.
-Site focuses on her 38Ds, but the ass and legs are also model-grade material. |
| Cons: |
-Touring the site today revealed no new photo sets since I was a member circa 2004.
-The few videos are of poor quality
-No hardcore
-Some photos are poorly lit.
-Rustic site design. |
| Bottom Line: |
Nothing here that would make you want to choose a renewing m'ship. One visit will do. Just one sexy gal with a great pair of ta-tas.
Update: According to lanasbigboobs.com, TR left the site in '06 to continue her education full time but recently has returned to nude/ glamour photography part-time as Eva Svobodova. |
|
05-25-08 09:36am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
133
|
Teen Sex Movs
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
I'm 50! I recall Playboy not showing crotches (sp?). I prefer hanky-panky between similar age groups. I guess I'm pestering you with a reply only because of my shameless quest for a talk back badge.
|
12-06-11 09:22pm
|
Review
134
|
Teen Sex Movs
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Just one Andrew Jackson a month with PU discount
-Few of the tattoos & fake tits now obligatory of mainstream US porn starlets.
-Young women banged by young men, not men old enough to pass as their dads.
-Site nav is simple, clean.
-A host of fresh faces.
-I don't recall any music. Hallelujah! |
| Cons: |
-Locations are stiflingly provincial, filmed at various somnolent hamlets in Eastern Europe. Adrift in a perpetual economic gloaming, the lads and lasses drinking bathtub liquor from their best, least chipped glasses. All but three or four women appear in jeans & sneakers.
-Many scenes are shot without much technical finesse. Dialing the camera's ISO to 1600 won't compensate for the lack of proper lighting. |
| Bottom Line: |
My sole reason for membership was to see sexual hanky-panky between young people of similar ages. Here, TeenSexMovs succeeds with roughly two-thirds of the action. Am I the only voyeur officially freaked out by mainstream porn's zillion scenes of 20 yr old girls pounded by 45 yr old men?
Does the PU membership know of similar sites? Write in as immortality awaits!
The apparent lack of anyone else in the room besides the performers and the cameraman lends an air of spontaneity.
Rawness of production values wears after 20 or 30 scenes. They don't own a tripod or more than one lens. Blankets are nailed to walls for backdrops. My guess: the closest the cameramen came to formal training was the day they drove past the front door to the Prague Institute of Cinematography. They didn't stop. |
|
11-18-11 10:54am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
135
|
Teens Boys World
(0)
|
Reply of
merc77's Review
TeensBoysWorld has posted a notice that they will be shutting down on 10 July. I was a member for one month back in Feb. They have their share of gay-for-pay but I'll miss this one gazelle named Zoe (jeez!) whom for all of his 5'4" 135 lb fragility displays world class deep throat skills.
|
06-17-17 07:39pm
|
Review
136
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Some models perform with spunk, devoting much energy into their time on camera, be it wrestling or screwing.
-Pre and post-match interviews were a hoot.
-Everyone is breathing hard & sweating by the end of each clip. Lots of legit sounding gunts, groans and moans. |
| Cons: |
-Sex loses some spark when its always occuring on that hard floor.
-The site had five Black models, all of whom had their clocks cleaned by their White opponents. I know the outcome is rigged but how about some variation to this theme?
-The location has the same charm as a Greyhound bus station. |
| Bottom Line: |
Certainly an acquired taste, the single malt whiskey of the sapphic porn. Download limits dulled my m'ship experience, but I am led to understand these speedbumps have been revoked. |
|
05-24-08 08:11pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
137
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
Reply of
yujin's Reply
...whateveryou think is best..
Meanwhile, I've asked for another credit card number.
A quick glance at my various cts over the years should
reveal someone rather dull and not given to making false claims.
I think this is the first time I've posted a complaint
about billing issues.
|
12-04-18 09:37pm
|
Reply
138
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
$9.95? that appealed to my lickpenny personality.
Having downloaded what I wanted, we had to cancel via VXNBill. (Previously know as rocketgate).
Had to provide my zip code, full name, email and the first six and last four of the credit card. Was suspicious, as this is two-thirds of the card's numbers..but I wanted to cancel. Oh, and after coughing up this data we had to wait 14 minutes for live chat to confirm my cancellation.
Three minutes later there's a call from Visa to confirm that I'm buying jewellery in Tokyo.
We're in upstate New York.
Hence, beware vixen.com
|
11-29-18 10:10pm
|
Reply
139
|
What Boys Want
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
I've no idea from whom that 'No' hailed from. Maybe one of you computer jedis can unscramble his anonymous ID. My gut feeling is his dark designs haunt some other site, that he's an ex-member.
|
07-11-09 08:00pm
|
Reply
140
|
What Boys Want
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
I received the 'No trust' after reviewing nine sites. I had been a member of each for at least a month. Can't recall what led me to type "..I joined seven of the nine sites mentioned..." It should of read that of the nine, I belonged to seven for just a month.
I have since rejoined two but haven't updated my reviews due to sheer laziness.
So my rating is tagged with 'No' trust. That dude could of gilded the bitter pill by either not being anonymous or writing more than two sentences to explain his decision.
I appreciate your concern, Badandy400.
|
07-11-09 06:53am
|
Review
141
|
What Boys Want
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
07-11-09 08:18pm (Update History)
Reason: An update to my intital review of 4 mths ago, see 'bottom line redux'.
|
| Pros: |
-The elephant graveyard of amateur porn.
-Majority of clips have sound.
-Low price.
-Good international mix: just 33% of members are US citizens.
-42,000 movies & 938,000 pics as of 1 March 09.
-Peer review is fair and critical: out of 11K fuck pics, 190 are rated four or more stars on a scale of one to five. Just 38 of 7046 BJ clips are considered worthy of four or more stars. Other site contents are too often rated stellar, the porn version of grade inflation. |
| Cons: |
-No zip files.
-Low res: the number for an average picture sounds like a good golf score. 173 party clips occupies just 1.22 GB. The 597 for beach requires all of 3.92GB. So clarity is rough, almost never good enough to judge eye colour or fordyce spots.
-Search is horrific. More on that in BL.
-Watermarks are of a set size, so it appears large on too many clips.
-"To ensure pics and or movies are not randomly tagged and abuse, we ask you to have at least 250 postings before you can tag." Hence the lion share of images lack tags.
-Many vids are 10 to 20 seconds duration. The camera pans left to reveal a taunt, lithe, naked homewrecker fisting herself... "Now we'll see something.." I think, not without satifaction, and the clip ends. Ugh. |
| Bottom Line: |
This daedal maze would be time consuming even if the search was flawless. Its not. The huge number of images are slotted into a few sections: stripping, dance, facials, etc. These can be search verge to verge by tags or duration. In theory ya can hunt down the top rated 200 of any section, but the best of cute/sexy reveals the same 11 vids. The highest rated 200 fuck pics generates just 66 finds. Two emails to support generated a stock boilerplate response that their tech section is working on the problem.
So...what do boys want? Here its lots of bjs performed by bottle blond females on men who keep their shirts on. No safe sex. Big on threesomes so long as the 3rd person is female. Open to any Race so long as they are White.
This is the site if non-pro smut is your thing & if ya have the hours to devote to its thousands of pages. Dividing the wheat from chaff will probably give me carpet tunnel.
Some great examples of non-pious proclivities reside here but I'm guessing a multi-month m'ship will be require to run them to earth.
The bottom line redux: I'm adding this short ct four months later: this remains the best girl-next-door site, even with the flawed search feature.
Perhaps one pic in every 400-500 is that of a pro model. A good number of Ashley Juggs fotos have slipped in under the radar, but otherwise the site does a class A job of rooting out the non-amateur stuff. I've yet to stumble across any flick that I suspected was from a pro site.
The Euro has gained a bit in value and last month's tab was $14.03. My 1st mth of m'ship was appox twelve bucks. |
|
03-02-09 12:02pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
142
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
When I purchased three of his casting DVDs some years ago, those gals who did sign on had a little feature tagged to the tail of their casting: one to three minutes of her best hardcore stuff along with a list of which Woodman DVDS she performs in. Does the site offer this?? Hope to hear from ya.
|
06-10-10 08:56pm
|
