| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
101
|
Jelena Jensen
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Easy site to roam
-Good locations, sets, photos.
-This 5'10" vixen is the premier combination of legs/bust/butt/facial beauty with no one feature overwhelming the others.
-Several scenes shot sans makeup and labeled accordingly. |
| Cons: |
-Dull lesbo scenes. All except those with pal Aria Giovanni, appear forced, little chemistry. She and the others are clearly hetros just going thru the motions.
-Some outfits she strips from are just plain goofy. |
| Bottom Line: |
A fine example of a seemless solo site that can hold the viewer's interest until he's screened every last gallery. If you are sick to death of bottle-blondes with underfed size one frames, then you have crossed the River Jordan. I'm glad its not hardcore: Nearly all partners would be several rungs down the ladder of beauty. |
|
05-25-08 08:39am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
102
|
Jurassic Cock
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
...THE PEOPLE I KNOW WHO WOULD PREFER LARGE-TYPE BOOKS COMPLAIN THAT PUBLISHERS HAVE LIMITED THEIR FONT CHOICES TO JUST TWO, MAYBE THREE, STYLES OUT OF THE 177,012 CHOICES AVAILABLE. AND THESE THREE ARE UGLY.
|
07-04-17 06:50pm
|
Reply
103
|
Jurassic Cock
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
By golly, that's the one
excellent reason for using upper case.
I won't release the dobermans...
As for getting old, expect befuddled me
to forget your explanation & post a
similar comment inside of six months.
|
04-20-17 06:30pm
|
Reply
104
|
Jurassic Cock
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Bad news: this review and many of your other ones are in upper case.
|
04-20-17 01:11pm
|
Review
105
|
Land of Venus
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Her real first name is posted in the bio's newspaper clippings (Or did when I was a member, circa 2004).
Venus has a world class, ripped body that makes most men stare without apology.
The site has branched out considerably since I left, with some models posing, others in hardcore action. |
| Cons: |
When I signed on, nearly all pages were devoted to its namesake: Venus, former military brat and winner of bodybuilding and wrestling trophys during her late teens. Lots of fake tits on display and the monthly price tag is too steep. Venus remains an alluring doll, but others here have gone too far down the bodybuilding highway, leaving outward hints of feminity several exits back.
The site has been up for 11 years but still has a raw, just thrown together look by a webmaster with limited experience. |
| Bottom Line: |
For a select crowd desiring bodybuilders getting fucked or posing nude in (mostly)non-glamorous settings. |
|
05-22-08 08:59pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
106
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
haagar's Reply
Ah.. your reply is the wording I was searching for to explain why this site raises not my wang but the hair on the back of my neck. Your theory rings true.
Its the Enron of porn.
|
07-29-17 09:01am
|
Reply
107
|
Low Art Films
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
I remain impressed by your detailed reviews.
|
11-16-17 04:08am
|
Review
108
|
Lust Cinema
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Unique format: audience participation. Details in BL.
-Careful attention to believable dialogue and real-world, non-motel room settings.
-Peopled by unknowns.
-Wide range of sexual activities
-Sizable % of directors are female and/or former performers. Your Significant Other will appreciate.
-The Xconfessions section of the site claims actual couples are hired. If true, they appear to make up just under half of performers. 'Couples' available in search. Own a large room? Host a screening!
-Several ethnics on display. I believe there's two Roma.
-Under eighteen bucks per month via pornusers.com
-Maybe its acting, but everyone appears to be having a grand time.
-Some scenes are just as I like them: women loud as a drunken Irish bee hive. |
| Cons: |
-One DVD release a week.
-Some descriptions are in French or Spanish.
-For those into gonzo, your succor will be small.
-Male homosexual acts appear in a handful of vids presented as hetro. This is not counting the six or seven which are fully male and described as such. I’m assuming this is an enormous road block for some viewers. |
| Bottom Line: |
Idea wise, the porn world has been in arrears. Thankfully, in the xconfessions section, members can submit written sexual fantasies, which if okayed by founder Erika Lust, are farmed out to various directors.
Neat, huh? Those that don't make the grade but are still considered somewhat exciting are posted.
Despite the relatively small output, I admire Lust trying to make a go at this. Lust entered porn in the late ‘90s and, I'm happy to report, received a thorough grounding in wickedness.
For those feeling soiled by owning, say, twenty gigs of bestiality, shot without a tripod inside a badly lit storage shed with beauty impaired performers, here's a chance to add class to your stash. Your estate executor will appreciate it. |
|
12-03-17 10:40am
Replies (1)
|
Review
109
|
Mad Sex Party
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Orgies with plots: the wedding reception, the recording deal celebration, ladies night out, etc.
Refreshing after viewing the gonzo-style of US porn.
One of the few sites offering orgy scenes shot outdoors. I'd guess about one fourth of their scenes are outdoors, a strong preference of mine. |
| Cons: |
The same 12 or 13 guys appear...now I'm watching for the women, but they still need to flesh out their male ranks.
All hardcore is by adult stars: visit the companion site 'PartyHardCore' to see (mostly) amatuers swapping body fluids. |
| Bottom Line: |
No longer modestly priced now that the dollar is worth peanuts compared to the euro. Some of its sister sites, 'Fully Clothed Pissing' & "Pissing in Action' should not be watched directly after a full meal. |
|
05-23-08 03:32pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
110
|
Male Digital
(0)
|
|
03-29-11 10:51pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
111
|
MetArt
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Top of the line glamour photography...this ct from someone whose been working as a photographer for 22+ years. Some shooters used their real names...try to find that on an American site. |
| Cons: |
With notable exceptions, models tend to be under-fed, size one types.
Just a few non-Whites featured. |
| Bottom Line: |
Remains The Site for soft-core.
Not for those searching for ethnic flesh. |
|
05-23-08 05:20pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
112
|
Mexican Lust
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Models appear to be exclusive. Just my guess.
Beautiful Latins abound. Not a guess.
-About as raunchy a site to be found from conservative, catholic Mexico |
| Cons: |
-Maritza Mendez, the site's originator and flagship model appears in only hardcore pics not videos, a major disappointment. This home-wrecker with a staggeringly hourglass figure and bedroom eyes was my reason for signing and I am still hot under the collar as her image is thickly scattered across the preview pages. I can't be the only one who feels taken.
-Top shelf women are paired with only paunchy men with length-imperiled penis. |
| Bottom Line: |
With exceptions, models are of two types: Barely out of their teens, small or flat chested & open to lesbo and anal. The second batch runs late thirties to nearly fifty, usually with big boobs and ass, often wearing a mask.
Worth a multi-month membership? No. Single month? Yes, for lovers of Hispanic women. |
|
02-16-13 07:22pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
113
|
Mexican Lust
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
Its a fairly good site if interested in MILF Latinas. Otherwise no: small number of photo sets. During her first yr or so online her face wasn't shown. These sets are roughly one-third of the site's content. There are a few sets of other women but its mostly this Mexican hottie posing alone or blowing/banging husband number three. More than a hourglass figure...rather its a jaw dropping hour-and-a-half. She's appears to be in her early 40's.
No videos available during my month's m'ship in May '08.
|
10-31-08 11:34pm
|
Reply
114
|
Mike 18
(0)
|
Reply of
merc77's Review
Thanks for the review.
Mike....and its numerous satillite sites carry the strong scent of gay-for-pay, a real turn off at least for me. Costly for the number of videos offered.
|
06-09-16 08:25am
|
Reply
115
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
Reply of
LadyLover's Review
... I think I joined for two months
in 2001, back in the bronze age of porn. The site had maybe 50 photos and 20 clips over maybe two dozen pages and we were happy with that.
|
04-01-17 04:48pm
|
Reply
116
|
Orgy Max
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Visa charged me one buck foreign transaction fee for each monthly tab. Just another excuse for more $. I'm glad ya enjoyed the review. FistingInAction.com and PowerOfFeet.com have been added since my most recent m'ship.
|
06-06-09 11:40am
|
Reply
117
|
Orgy Max
(0)
|
Reply of
rome476's Reply
FullyclothedSex was updating weekly, but I only glanced at myfetish in passing so I can't say.
I'm still trying to run to earth a decent orgy site. Others claiming to offering this venue stock threesomes or foursomes. An orgy is an encounter where the models run out of endurance, not partners.
|
02-17-09 08:25pm
|
Reply
118
|
Orgy Max
(0)
|
Reply of
rome476's Reply
If memory serves, Fullyclothedsex is still active. Those that aren't are cumonjugs, peesquad and, I think, myfetish.
|
01-24-09 03:17pm
|
Review
119
|
Orgy Max
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-For certain fetishes like watersports or clothed intercourse, this is one of the very few locations offering quality work. Many fetish sites remain didactic bores.
-Women devour cock: many are veterans of Czech cathouses where they received a thorough grounding in wickedess.
-'Drunk Sex Orgy' has little drinking but lots of big group action that's well staged. Often outdoors with big casts. Ditto for 'Mad Sex Party' other than its mostly done indoors.
-'Pissing in Action' Well, jeepers.. where to begin? The non-pious proclivities on display are like nothing I've seen before.
-The oldest vids of each site were badly shot by someone who was (my guess) working his johnson with the other hand. But the vast majority of flicks are top-notch productions regarding focus, lighting, sound, close-ups of facials, et al.
-I'm not a cruel person, but I did enjoy seeing some women in 'Party Hardcore' become drunk as sailors. |
| Cons: |
-"13 sites for one low price." Well, no. Two haven't had a new posting in many months while 'Fully Clothed Pissing' is simply vids from 'Fully Clothed Sex' with five to ten minutes of watersports tagged on.
-Not a single vid in English.
-Episodes are usually broken into four chunks. Because of...
-Big file size, often 400 to 800 megs per episode. |
| Bottom Line: |
I've signed on for one month durations three times over the last three years. If you are a returning member, the old name Euromax.com, has been retired.
'Party Hardcore' remains my favourite of the lot with its lengthly prologues as the male strippers do their damnest to con boozing babes into casting off tops or performing BJs. I'll guess I'm the sole American reviewing this site who cares for the plot development. So many of us prefer gonzo style, but I won't hold it against you. PH is the closest thing I've come to true reality porn. The majority of the gals are not in the business, at least judging by the reactions when the strippers finally unveil their wangs: its like the hen-house at feeding time or the elephant scene in the opera Aida. I believe its an open bar for those attending. That's why the noise level equals a drunken Irish beehive. Admission is free with the understanding that the whole operation is being filmed. Clearly the gatekeepers let in only those within a set age and weight range. My guess: if you bought 8-tracks, you're too old. If your belt is equal in length to your height, you're not getting past the bouncer.
Despite being a motor mouth, I can't describe what it is about (some) pissing vids that push my button: that its the ultimate facial or an act of complete submission? Maybe I'm just a bastard. What induces a woman to perform for a watersports site? Is the money that good? Piss may be better than penury, but I suspect most were at the end of their tether when they agreed. |
|
01-21-09 09:41pm
Replies (9)
|
Reply
120
|
Party Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
pornjunkie's Review
Perhaps because I am a life-long chess player, I have the patience to not fast-forward to the skin-baring stuff. I enjoy the build up, the strippers talking the usually tipsy gals out of their tops or into giving a BJ. With a few remarkable exceptions, I'm sure that those whom disrobe completely are the site's 'undercover' girls ya mentioned.
The price continues to rise, thanks to the dollar's free-fall against the Euro.
|
06-13-08 08:07pm
|
Rating
121
|
Pissing in Action
(0)
88.0
|
No Review.
|
05-23-08 03:07pm
|
Review
122
|
Private Classics
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Photo sets from the 1960s and '70s display a playfulness, a carefree approach to hanky panky only possible in a HIV free era.
-1st month is under 21 bucks with PU's discount.
-Ah, memories: For those of a certain age, Private XXX magazines were the first taste of hardcore. VHS was still years away.
-Attn youngsters: see what postal inspectors used to devote thousands of work hours to intercept. |
| Cons: |
-Tagline .."..since 1965." yet the oldest videos only date to the late 1980s.
-Eye-watering, mind-boggling, erection-softening effect of clothes, hairdos, household interiors & infrequent shaving from the 60s and 70s. |
| Bottom Line: |
By the late 1980s, Private was on the cusp of cranking out a steady flow of hardcore films with high production values often filmed at exotic locations. To get to that future, Private had to shoot sets that, while not in the same league as say 'Deepthroat' or Playboy, kept the studio lights on, the staff paid. These are the results.
As stated the oldest vids date only to the late 1980s. That's my guess as none carry the production year. Obviously porn stars are desired when fresh then less so as they grow shop-worn then face a transition period when they are either snicked at or admired for their locked in an era appearance. IMAO the gals featured in this 1986-9 stuff have a way to go, dare I say ten years?, before they can be considered hot or even retro by today's audience. |
|
04-08-18 05:01pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
123
|
R18.com
(0)
|
Reply of
wannabe's Review
Unacceptable is the word! The last time a site pulled this stunt on me was circa 2002.
|
04-01-18 09:44am
|
Reply
124
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Great review (again).
I was the token straight friend of a lesbian couple back in the 90s.
Each claimed to have not used dildos either then or in previous relationships.
Their main gripe re porn was that the sex was too short. Three quarters of an hour
was common for their bedroom antics.
Tribbing was an integral part of their sex lives. I was bummed when they
moved four time zones away.
SE is one of just two lesbo site I've joined. I'm due for a m'ship again. I've always gotten off to their rimming scenes. But the percentage of non white women on display is small.
|
10-07-18 09:01pm
|
Reply
125
|
Sapphix
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
That one white leather conch used at Sapphix must smell like the toilet seat of a all-female crew's tuna boat.
|
11-12-19 08:56pm
|
