Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
Pornstar XS
(0)
91.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
*Lots of search options
*Pictures of actresses in the actress search section
*Large selection of videos
*Multiple download options
*Preview pics for movies give a good "picture" of what the video is about |
Cons: |
*Download times seem to vary a little
*A little more pricey than comparative sites
*Still seems a little bit in development, but it has alot of features |
Bottom Line: |
I really like this site. I usually only join sites for one month and then spend the next month sorting through what I have dowmloaded, but I will definitely come back to this site later. It is a good alternative to Video Box if you want to switch up and try something new.
It is a little pricey but I felt I definitely got my moneys worth on this one. I enjoyed it more and more as the month went on. |
|
07-30-08 06:09pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
2
|
Reality Kings
(0)
90.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Variety of models
-Price for all the sites you get
-Variety of video downloads (1 minute clips to full movie)
-Lots of high quality photos available in ZIPs
-Easy navigation (look up by models, or keywords) |
Cons: |
-Unnecessary talking from the cameramen that is distracting
-Condoms
-Sites use pretty much the same scripts, just different types of women and locations |
Bottom Line: |
I have been a member of this site on a few occasions and consider it to be a winner everytime. It has good navigation within each site and good navigation from site to site. Although I find that talking camermen and condoms distracting, I would recommnend that anyone who is into great looking women of all kinds join this site. |
|
06-07-08 05:30pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
3
|
Monster Curves
(0)
88.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Easy navigation
-Comes with Reality Kings so you can browse to find actresses on other sites within the betwork
-Variety of video lengths to download
-Nice looking actresses in a variety of location and situations
-FACESITTING |
Cons: |
-Newer site, needs more updates |
Bottom Line: |
Great site for butt lovers. Has alot of big name stars that are known for their asses and this site definitely features their assets. I particularly like the facesitting in many of the movies and cumshots on butts.
Add all this with the other sites you get with Reality Kings and it is a no brainer and worth the money |
|
06-08-08 01:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
4
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
*Very attractive models
*Exclusive models
*High quality pictures
*ZIP files for dowload
*Easy navigation
*Good updates
*Great closeups
*Photos are available to view by subject. For instance, close-ups, tits, ass. |
Cons: |
*Almost exclusivly Euro chicks. I like to see a variety
*Some photos seem obviously touched up which is distracting
*Mostly petite women. Not alot of body types which makes the sets kind of redundant
*Videos are just okay. Do not measure up to most sites. If you are joining this site for the videos I think you will be disapointed. |
Bottom Line: |
You ever go to a movie and see a trailer that is really great, then when you see that movie you realize that the trailer had all the good stuff?
Well, that is kind of how I felt about this site. I have seen plenty of galleries from this site and thought, although the niche isn't my usual one, that I would give it a try. When I got it I realized that there wasn't much more there than what you see in the previews. But there is alot of it.
I had a hard time rating this one because the site is great for what it is. If you want to see petite European women with high quality photos then it is a 95. If you like video, bubble butts and variety then it is about a 70.
I joined because I wanted to see some different kinds of women besides the porn stars you see on Reality Kings, Banbros, VideoBos and Pornstars XS. For that it was great. It just didn't have enough to keep my attention more than a few weeks. |
|
09-13-08 10:13am
Replies (15)
|
Review
5
|
DVD Box
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
*Variety of different niches
*Niches not found on other popular video sites (gay, fetish, shemale, bi. pregnant)
*Has actors names listed (rare to see the guys names)
*Great price on 2 day full access trial |
Cons: |
*Could use more search options to find categories
*Does not have videos of a lot of popular stars
*Many videos do not have the actress listed
*Preview pics could be more on target to niche (for instance, if the video is about titfucking, then at least one of the preview pics should show that)
*No pics of actresses in the search section |
Bottom Line: |
This site has a lot to offer and the price was reasonable. Particularly the trial. But, I chose not to renew to full subscription because it just didn’t fit my navigational style. On many scenes the actress field was left blank and I really like to find a good actress and then check out her scenes. I also don’t know most actresses by their names and since so many of them go by more than one name I like to have the actresses pics in the actress search by alphabet section. This site does not have them.
I didn't have any trouble with the downloading or quality of video, but I usually don't rate based on those things.
But, for the trial price it is definitely worth a look. The one thing this site has is a few niches that the bigger video sites do not cover well. Like shemales, gay and bisexual. I would not pay exclusively to see those but it is nice to check them out for a change in variety. I feel there are better alternatives in video sites for myself, but give it a try, it may be what you are looking for. |
|
06-29-08 02:15pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I am not sure what non-nude porn is, but I have gotten off to girls in bikinis so I guess that counts
|
03-25-16 04:12am
|
Comment
7
|
Burning Angel
(0)
|
|
03-02-15 05:56pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I honestly agonize over it for days. It is not about the money but the time I will spend.
Should I go to one I have been to before and like? Should I try something new and possibly be disappointed?
And the main thing I always check on is what kind of chance will I get ripped off. That is about the only reason I will not join a site.
|
01-28-15 05:17pm
|
Reply
9
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
That's sad. You can look for stuff that people have scanned for free but that takes forever. I want to actually PAY Hustler for their work and they don't make it available.
Thanks for the information.
|
07-04-11 05:07am
|
Reply
10
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
Thanks for the review Rusty. I am not really concerned with any Hustler's new stuff. I have paid for plenty of that type of porn lately. What I would like to know is if they have scanned in any of their magazines from the 70's and 80's? I cannot tell from the previews. It mentions something about "magazine archives" however I don't know how far back it goes.
|
07-03-11 01:24pm
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I tried jelquing for awhile a few years back. I noticed that it did seem to make my erections stronger but it really took alot of time.
|
06-18-11 06:42am
|
Comment
12
|
Shakin Ass
(0)
|
|
05-01-11 10:21am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
13
|
Smother Me Now
(0)
|
|
04-22-10 05:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
14
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I have done it. But never any face shots and I make sure to obsure the background too.
|
07-31-09 07:01pm
|
Reply
15
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
First pay site I remember joining was Cumfiesta. It is ALOT bigger now but I still view some of the clips that I downloaded from it years ago.
|
07-31-09 06:55pm
|
Reply
16
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I have been getting off to porn for 25 years and it has never failed to arouse me. Having said that sometimes it doesn't arouse me to the point that I just HAVE to masturbate.
I will have to say that it does seem like you get a little desensetized. It seems like after awhile you have seen pretty much everything there is to see.
|
07-31-09 06:51pm
|
Comment
17
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
|
11-02-08 09:06am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
18
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I don't buy DVD's. First off, they are more expensive. ALOT more expensive. For $20 bucks you can download hours of porn from a website. Why spend $39 on four hours.
Second, it is much easier to keep online porn hidden from you wife. Married guys know what I am talking about.
I could go on.
|
09-28-08 06:16am
|
Reply
19
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I always look out for Brianna Love videos. In fact, I have bought three memberships to sited just because she was on them. What an ass.
|
09-22-08 09:36am
|
Comment
20
|
Sinful Comics
(0)
|
|
09-20-08 05:15am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I have tried to do all those positions that you see in videos in one session and found it to be kind of a distraction to love making. I think that having a director and editing makes the sex you see on video a little less than realistic.
|
09-14-08 04:36am
|
Reply
22
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Nubiles Captain's Reply
Please do not take my review wrong and think that I didn't enjoy your sight. If I had to make one comment it would be that the girls are TOO pretty. And I wouldn't expect you to change that. But I like to feel like I am not looking at living dolls all the time.
If it helps, I feel like most video oriented sites have terrible photos. Your site has excellent photography of course. My comments on the review were to point out that at least for now, to me, your site is a pic site with some videos added. Not a video site.
As far as the videos being just okay, I will be straight with you. If I want videos I am going to go to VideoBox. I want a sight like yours to be about photography. Your videos offer nothing that I can't get at VideoBox and don't have near the variety. I personally can only take so much watching masturbation.
I did have another user ask me about the photo size and quality and I replied with rave reviews on that.
I think your site gives exactly what you are wanting to sell. One thing that did annoy me though was that the niche shortcuts (ass, close up, tits) did not have the ability to be changed to the larger size. You have to go into the individual sets to find them an download large files.
|
09-13-08 04:45pm
|
Reply
23
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Reply
They have two sized available in both zips and individually The smaller size is 1200 x 800 and the larger is 2400 x 1600. Very good quality and I got great download speed.
The site just didn't trip my trigger. It was one of those cases were I went through the whole site to make sure I didn't miss anything and there where definitely some gems, but for the most part I thought it was redundant. But hey, if the girls are your type then redundant is GREAT!!
|
09-13-08 11:44am
|
Reply
24
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
I appreciate you reading my review.
I try my best not to compare sites to their competitors in a negative way in my reviews, but the truth is that I like Abby Winter or even amkingdom.com better when I want to see good quality softcore pics.
|
09-13-08 11:35am
|
Reply
25
|
Pornstar XS
(0)
|
Reply of
PornstarXS's Reply
I really liked your site. It seems that your main competition is Videobox (of course you already know that). One thing that you have that they don't is gay content. Some gay porn is pretty hot, and there are alot of straight guys that watch it when it is available but would never go out of their way to join an exclusive gay site.
Since Videobox has a Gay Videobox site that you have to pay extra for, maybe Pornstar XS could take advantage of that and put a larger gay selection out there.
|
09-01-08 07:46am
|