All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
26
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
|
06-30-12 11:56am
Replies (10)
|
Reply
27
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
Capn - I agree. I had rejoined a couple of months ago with a discount, partly because there were some Carmen December updates I wanted. I noticed the exact same improvements you mentioned.
In fact, I'm about to rejoin, because they've added some new girls that are quite cute. If they keep up the good work, I'm going to have to update my score for them once again.
To the powers that be at ATK Hairy: keep up the good work, it has not gone unnoticed.
|
03-29-12 09:02pm
|
Comment
28
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
|
10-15-11 12:44pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
29
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
This site has brought out the vigilante in me. They will not change until they start losing $$$. I will scream it from the mountaintops - "Don't join ATK Hairy unless you wanna see a few cute girls and a bunch of freaks"!
Bad economy = tons of cute girls ready to get nekkid, and tons of porn-fiends who can't afford to look at ug-chicks. This should be a no-fail operation. How are they screwing this up??
If they already have 'ATK Petites', why can't they just create 'ATK Scary Hairy', already? Or at this point, 'ATK Natural, Pretty, and Slightly Hairy', since they apparently changed it to 'Scary [and Ugly] Hairy' without proper notice.
|
09-08-11 09:59pm
|
Reply
30
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Thanks, man. I'm glad you spoke up about it first - I just wish I had listened. :) I had gotten one of those $20 email offers, I hadn't subscribed in a while, and there were a few chicks who had some new sets.
But even that wasn't worth it. With this being the beginning of the month - I just paid rent, and I'm wishing I hadn't even spent the $20, or at least spent it on better porn. It's sad.
|
09-06-11 10:02pm
|
Comment
31
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
|
09-06-11 01:09am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
32
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
No offense taken at all! You're probably right, once I thought about it. The technology I'm use at the moment is still a few years old, and when I think about how often I look at old sets from early-to-mid 2000s, I realize it's not very often - due to the size. I should probably start downloading the hi-res, and just find a viewer that makes it easier to set the magnification level. You have a very good point!
|
09-05-11 11:35pm
|
Reply
33
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
@ Messmer - sorry for the delay. If you haven't been on in a while, I'd suggest checking it out - they've probably acquired a few sets worth collecting. I don't recall any big changes regarding the undressing procedure. I feel the same as you - I hate it when they're nude ASAP. I think Sean R still draws it out the longest (although I wish he didn't have such a monopoly on the UK cutie dept).
Regarding the bigger photos, I never use them. They're too big (at least for my screen). If you're viewing on a T.V. they might be useful, but on a standard monitor you end up having to scroll too much. Luckily ATK quickly realized that, so they provide several viewing and download options.
|
06-03-11 08:58am
|
Reply
34
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Advent's Reply
Anytime. I must add, too, that I appreciate the effort you've been putting into making the ATK sites as good as possible. Great customer service, great interviews, and great value for the dollar - keep it up! Karups and Nubiles try to cop your style, but ATK gives so much more, thus my allegiance is strong. The old folks have Playboy, I have ATK.
|
06-03-11 08:34am
|
Reply
35
|
Throat Jobs
(0)
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
I agree. They have the most glacially slow update schedule I've seen. I've never felt compelled to rejoin.
|
05-24-11 01:10am
|
Reply
36
|
Throat Jobs
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Mmm, the vids aren't the highest quality. I personally don't mind, since the file sizes are smaller, resulting in faster download and ability to get more vids. However, those who value video quality will probably be disappointed.
|
04-11-10 11:10pm
|
Reply
37
|
Throat Jobs
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Very good point! I meant 'Creampie Surprise'. I have since corrected the mistake. Thanks.
|
04-11-10 11:07pm
|
Comment
38
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
|
12-05-08 11:02am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
39
|
Mano Job
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Hey man, sorry it took so long to reply.
To answer those very good questions:
1.) the vids are about 20 minutes each
2.) The trailers are truly appetizers for the videos. The vids are good, using excellent angles to please viewers of different tastes. The focus is on the girl the whole time. A+ on vid quality (shooting, image quality, performance, concept)
3.) The girls do a decent amount of teasing. Not too much (none of the hour of bullshit found in Bang Bus videos), and not too little. And, they change it up from video to video, per the requirements of the scenario. But they all have a good tease intro.
4.) The trailer set is actually a true representation of the membership archive, and you can see EVERY trailer! Talk about testing the product. In fact, I keep tabs on what's new through the trailer page, and they update about once to twice a week.
5.) I experienced no limits on my downloads, and believe me, I got my $$$ worth! No DRM, and fast downloads. The vids were high quality, while still being decently sized (I don't like those 1 GB HD files, it's just a porno vid)
My bad again for being offline for so long, I had forgotten the password to this account. You might've already joined. If not, I highly suggest it, I still check up on their updates weekly.
And the Victoria Vonn videos are HOT! God, her tits are a delight.
|
11-17-08 01:22am
|
Reply
40
|
Mano Job
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Yeah, the $30.00 was worth it, because between the two sites you get over 300 exclusive, well-shot, easy to download videos. Before I joined, I had the same fear of getting ripped off, but I was highly impressed.
If you like what you see in the previews, you will be more than pleased. I have several gigs of their stuff from my membership a few months back, and I plan on joining again.
|
09-14-08 12:48pm
|
Reply
41
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Great review! The girls are indeed SUUUUUPPPPPEEEEERRRRRR HOT! Thomas performs satisfactorily, but his humor and routine do get annoying, kinda like the exploitedteens.com guy.
That redhead Kayla is divine!
|
09-08-08 02:40pm
|
Reply
42
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Those per-gallery-page zip downloads are a real drag. Great review.
|
08-15-08 05:09am
|
Reply
43
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Comment
Yeah, this site is pretty dang reliable. For a while about a year ago they were way too heavy on the Euro-chicks, so I didn't subscribe for a while.
But now they've got some new American photographers to replace the ones they'd lost, and it's a little closer to where it was before.
|
08-15-08 05:03am
|
Reply
44
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Review
I've been very curious about this site. I remember eyeing it when it came with Gloryhole.com. Then they separated the two sites, and made each $34.99 instead of $29.99.
Have you been to both? Is one better than the other?
|
08-15-08 04:56am
|
Reply
45
|
Innocent High
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Review
Charlotte muthafuckin' Stokely!! Where has she been?
That ass is Twilight Zone.
|
08-15-08 04:52am
|
Reply
46
|
Exploited Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Reply
I double-checked: there IS an update for "Rion". She is on page 13 of the Members page, next to "Aaralyn" Barra. I've noticed that the 'Blog' link from the main page does a more faithful job of representing the updates. It's thoroughly comprehensive.
If it's been a while since you joined, and you have to extra $$, I'd recommend it - solely on the hotness of a lot of the new girls (the pasty redhead named "Sarah" with the toe socks...jesus!). Just don't join expecting the other sites.
I know it's a tough battle - whether to give the fucker more money just to see the new, exclusive cuties; or boycott him so his practices change and/or he goes under.
If I could do it again, that "Sarah" chick would make me sellout...as "Rion" may do for you. Call me weak.
|
08-15-08 04:47am
|
Reply
47
|
My XXX Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
Sorry, aces of aces, I meant to put that on the review page. I thought I cancelled my reply in time.
I agree with your review completely, though.
|
08-12-08 02:36am
|
Reply
48
|
My XXX Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
This network is amazing. Organized, great content, great POV perspective, spiced up with other nice angles. The downloads are speedy, wide variety of video file sizes - for those who don't like losing half a gig on a porn scene. They know how to capture the hottness of the girls, and they camerawork is hot - close enough to catch the girls eye interaction, but far enough to catch the details of the body motion. They realize the eroticism of an aerial view of a BJ with the tits hanging out of the shirt.
Just look for clips on AskTiava to see. No dumb tomfoolery, no surprise close-ups of the dude's face right when you're about to nut, no stupid dialog. Just daily updates of hot girls, within no excessive makeup, going at it with full eye/body interaction (look at the network site, under our girls, surely some of your favs are included).
Various search options, great design. The closest thing to a virtual-reality bj - great sex scenes, too.
I don't work for the company, either. This just happens to be my first review. If you haven't joined this network, and you like the sample clips, you must join. The clips are honestly the tip of the iceberg - not the highlights.
|
08-12-08 12:54am
|
|