| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
276
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Content is completely exclusive.
+Huge library of over 4000 videos to choose from.
+Has some of the only anal or dp videos of well known performers.
+You can stream all the videos directly online.
+All the videos can be donwloaded in the MP4 format and medium resolution is 960x540. You can also download multiple videos in the 1080pHD format as well.
+Over 360 4K videos.
+There is a very active forum where fans and members can interact with each other and with Pierre himself.
+The vast majority of performers appear to have multiple orgasm during their scene.
+All of the performers have an interview video that can include hardcore sex.
+For a small increase in the join price you also get access to Pierre's "wake up n fuck" site.
+Seems to add more North Americans to his site than in the past. |
| Cons: |
-Most of the videos are POV in nature so that limits the possible viewing angles.
-Pierre is usually the only male performer in the videos.(not a problem for me but worth mentioning).
-Something that many people complain about is that Pierre likes to hold on to some videos for months if not years so that although you know it exists. Better be very Patient because it will take longer than you want to see that video.
-Some of the content is many years old so video quality can be quite poor. |
| Bottom Line: |
**In my opinion there have only been two men who were able to get unknown women to do porn and they are Ed Powers and Pierre Woodman. Ed has long stopped doing it while Pierre is still going strong. Both men relied heavily on tripods and hand held cameras to shoot their porn because the women would have been uncomfortable with another person in the room. For that reason it tends to limit the kind of shots one can have but in return you can get content that few have managed to copy/emulate.
*Because Pierre is usually the only male in the scene than you have to be a fan otherwise the scene will not be worth watching. I am a huge fan because Pierre knows what he has to do to get the women to orgasm and in an era where gonzo is master and women fake it to such a level that it becomes comical. You still have places like here where it may or may not always be real but it always looks like it is.
*The biggest complaint people have toward Pierre is that he will tease his fans with a scene that you know exist because he will have shown a pic from the video but he will keep under wrap for years. Not sure why he does and frankly I don't care because while I might have to wait for that particular video to get released. I will get plenty of others that will be just as good while I wait.
*This may seem strange for some but I find that many of his interviews are somewhat bittersweet. The reason is that he has been doing this for such a long time that many of the women who first appeared in those interviews are now long gone from the industry and seeing them when they first started to the way they looked at the end is a little sad.
*I didn't put pricing in the cons because I think that site owners should charge what they want and in Pierre's case he more than deserves the price he asks for but be advised that his pricing is in Euro. |
|
03-06-17 06:44pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
277
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I used to belong to MR.Skin and I still from time to time check to see what has been added but for the most part celebrity content is a tiny portion of my overall collection.
|
03-04-17 10:55am
|
Reply
278
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
Don't get me wrong. I wasn't implying that cloud based companies have any rights to your data so much as they may simply access it for their own purposes and there is then very little you can do. Yes, if you find that they stole your data you can sue them but unless you are filthy rich, a huge corporation or some hot shot lawyer will take your case pro-bono than chances are you are screwed. In fact suing them will probably not mean that you aren't screwed anyway.
The best example was all those celebrities who had their personal data stolen and then posted to the net. Jennifer Lawrence can sue her cloud provider but it won't stop the millions of people who now have her naked pics and videos from looking at them or uploading them to the net over and over again.
|
03-04-17 10:54am
|
Reply
279
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Although for the courts there may not be a legal difference between someone stealing the content of your safety deposit box and someone stealing your cloud data. I think the first one is easier to prove because you can see that something is missing. The same can't be said for cloud based data. I mean our surfing data is already stolen and we aren't even using a cloud based system. What's to stop any company that accepts to store your data for free or for a minimal fee not to look through the data and see if there is anything they can use.
|
03-03-17 05:50pm
|
Reply
280
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Can't confirm if the celebrity photos were taken from a cloud based system but for me it's not a question of security so much as a legal one. Basically all content saved on a cloud based system is digital in nature. If the company offering you the service decides to use your data then aren't they partially the owners since you are saving it on their server. Isn't possession 9/10th of the law.
|
03-02-17 05:54pm
|
Reply
281
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your Poll
I have my computers hard drive and I also have 3 extra external drives. 1 x 500G, 1 x 1Tb and 1 x 2TB. I do not use any Cloud based system and I never will. Call me paranoid but I don't trust any company not to peak/steal my personal info.
|
03-01-17 02:57pm
|
Reply
282
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I only had the odd Playboy magazine for most of my teens and that is not porn by any stretch of the imagination. I might have seen part of a stag film one of my brothers friend had but quality was not indicative of stag films. VHS was just starting to be popular by the time I was in my late teens.
|
02-25-17 10:20am
|
Reply
283
|
N/A
|
Reply of
merc77's Poll
I picked 50$ but like Jay G I would gladly pay 100$ if the site in question produced the kind of porn that I love.
|
02-23-17 02:13pm
|
Reply
284
|
Hard X
(0)
|
Reply of
benmar51's Reply
I wasn't thrilled when I heard the owners of Hard X were creating a new interracial only site because I always found that the number of updates was on the low side and I haven't seen anything to make me change my mind. It would be a different thing if they did update with multiple videos each week because then I could see a reason for joining both sites. For now I will limit myself to Hard X.
|
02-22-17 03:44pm
|
Reply
285
|
N/A
|
Reply of
superjank's Poll
I picked nobody but technically speaking anyone who I've interacted with on this forum is likely aware that I have a stash or two or even three.
|
02-21-17 05:58pm
|
Reply
286
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
I usually stay with 720i unless it's not available.
I could probably go as high as 1080i but don't see the point as it won't make the scene any better. It stands to reason that I avoid 4k like the plague because I truly don't see the point and would run out of space or have to invest in bigger drives to save all those 4k videos.
|
02-19-17 05:54pm
|
Reply
287
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
Since I've already said that I am a member of two primarily streaming only sites than obviously I have no problem with them. That said I don't think I would join any porn producing site that didn't allow downloads.
|
02-18-17 05:24pm
|
Reply
288
|
N/A
|
Reply of
LPee23's Poll
I have had unlimited data cap for a couple of years now and although I don't actually need it. I do not want to go back to the days when I had to be super cautious of not going over my limit because not doing so could cost a least 400$ in penalties.
|
02-15-17 05:40pm
|
Review
289
|
Brazzers
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+They have over 7400 all exclusive videos.
+They update with 2 new videos each day.
+They have one of the best scene tagging system on the net.
+You can use the scene taggings to actually jump to those part of the videos.
+All the videos can be downloaded in the MP4 format and resolution varies from video to video but since 2010 they offer 1080p HD resolution.
+They have an excellent selection of models to choose from that include late teens to more mature women and from petite sized models to more rounded women.
+They have a decent mix of content that includes lesbian, interracial, parodies, anal and dp to name a few.
+The majority of the content is scenario driven. |
| Cons: |
-A large amount of their models have implants and/or tattoos.
-It's quite common for the same model to appear multiple times on the site doing the exact same thing in each video so you aren't getting as much variety as you might expect.
-About a quarter of the main page is dedicated top third party advertising and it's not much better in any of the other pages.
-They have an annoying log in system where you have to choose pictograms to confirm you are not a machine.
-Rather short on the lesbian content.
-Some of their content is treaming only. |
| Bottom Line: |
*Brazzer is the McDonald of porn. It's likely never going to blow you away with it's porn but what it does have is good, it's hot and it is exactly what you were hoping for. That said it will from time to time produce a truly amazing video and like a pearl diver finding a rare black pearl. Those are the moments that make being a member well worth it.
*The site is clean and well designed but the third party advertising on the various pages is distracting and that makes it somewhat annoying to surf for content. Luckily their search engine is very good. Not to mention the option to jump to specific section of each video by using tags and keywords. I can't emphasize how nice that is because you don't have to fast forward to get to the parts you really like.
*I enjoy their selection of models but I sometime wish that there would be less body modified women on the list. On the flip side they seem to be able to get past performers to make a comeback so that is a plus for an older timer like me.
*The strange thing about the site is that the only content that is streaming only is all their live shows but since Brazzer stopped producing them a couple of years ago than why can't members download them. What is even stranger is that you used to be able to do it. |
|
02-13-17 06:55pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
290
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I've always been a fan of the act itself but not necessarily the individual scenes themselves. That's to say that I don't like all dp. I pick and choose the ones that I know I will want to watch multiple times.
|
02-11-17 10:50am
|
Reply
291
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I usually pick the one that she is best known under but I mostly do that only with Eastern European models who wind up with over five names in their career. Most North American model will have maybe one or two and usually one will be the one she is always known under.
|
02-09-17 06:32pm
|
Reply
292
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
No I only watch it at home. Traveling is either for work or it's a vacation and I prefer not to watch or think about porn during that time.
|
02-07-17 03:24pm
|
Reply
293
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Poll
I join more than five sites per year and they are always the same ones that I keep returning to but I would gladly join others if there were some new one that is worth it. Sadly there aren't any...For Now.
|
02-05-17 11:48am
|
Reply
294
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
I picked that it's more or less the same but I'm that's only if I go back maybe 3-4 year because the further back I go the worse it becomes. For me the best porn ever made was the one done in the 70's and 80's. That's not to say that you didn't have amazing porn movies in the 90's and early 2000. You bet your ass there are some amazing gems but they sort of get lost in all the other crap that it harder to remember them.
|
02-03-17 05:49pm
|
Reply
295
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I thought about doing it many years ago but never did and now I don't care.
|
02-01-17 05:12pm
|
Reply
296
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
All of the above.
|
01-30-17 05:23pm
|
Reply
297
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Possible but seeing as they are the ones who actually ripped their own dicks off than who exactly will they revenge against?
Mind you there was a discussion on another site regarding Darth Vader and whether or not he still had his original equipment and the answer that was given is that he lost it when he caught fire after loosing his battle with Obi Wan. Of course that's only if you accept that the prequels are an integral part of the entire Star wars series of movies. I do not because the prequels only borrow info from the other movies and manage to fuck up the logic and continuity of the story.
|
01-29-17 11:25am
|
Reply
298
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I'm a Jedi so when I no longer want to switch hands than I use the Force. Not recommended to Padawan's who might squeeze their dicks off by mistake.
|
01-28-17 11:14am
|
Reply
299
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
Variety is the spice of life so all of the above and I would add Disneyworld because I simply love Disneyworld.
|
01-24-17 06:02pm
|
Reply
300
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I picked somewhat important because I really like the stuff Pierre Woodman shoots and most of it is POV and I'm not a fan of the vast majority of POV content but he tends to be the exception to the rule. I much prefer multiple camera angles because I want to see different aspects of the action that a POV camera can not do.
|
01-22-17 10:04am
|
