| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
Teens Boys World
(0)
|
Reply of
merc77's Review
I'm not into gay porn so I can't really comment on the content but this site has never gotten great scores with their reviews so that although the content may hold a certain level of appeal. I'm sure there are far better sites with similar content. if you look at Taylor's 2008 review. You will see that he also hoped the site would improve.
You mention that the site is recycling older content and using it as new stuff but do you know if they have remastered their older content or they are simply re-issuing it as new?
Is it possible that they had some kind of reciprocal arrangement with another gay site where they would exchange content and that's where they got their bonus stuff? If that's the case than maybe the other site is dead or maybe they had a falling out. Normally I would go check out the content of the site in question to see if I recognize the performers or the content itself but it would be a waste of time here because of the above stated reason regarding gay porn.
|
04-21-17 06:14pm
|
Reply
252
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
I think your review is excellent and quite detailed. I respect your reasons for giving the site the score you did but there is no way that any of the current Kink sites deserve a perfect score because by your own admission they aren't perfect. The fact that their search engine sucks, the fact that you are basically relegated to scrolling from page to page to find a specific scene, the fact that most of their scenarios are not well thought out or well executed mean that they are more a distraction than an advantage. That said you did your homework and bothered to explain why you gave the site 100. I may not agree with your score but I'm not going to lose any sleep over it.
|
04-20-17 05:50pm
|
Reply
253
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I agree with carey that you need at least three men for it to be a gangbang.
|
04-20-17 05:39pm
|
Reply
254
|
Analized
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Thanks for another great review. Now I can cross this one off my list of possible. Another con to add is that two of the models on the site appear in an anal scene but don't actually perform it and there is no way to know that unless you visit James site.
|
04-17-17 05:48pm
|
Reply
255
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surfingman's Poll
If the music distracts from the other sounds or from the action than it's a huge problem.
|
04-16-17 02:01pm
|
Reply
256
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I primarily use TBP and PU but I also use rabbits Review if they happen to have a more recent review.
I know there are a few more review sites but I only trust the reviews of the 3 I named.
|
04-14-17 09:06am
|
Reply
257
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I mostly glance at it because it's usually quite rare for me to discover a new model on a site. I already use multiple sources to find new models and then track down the sites they have worked for so that I can judge whether or not the site is worth joining to get those scenes.
|
04-12-17 05:50pm
|
Reply
258
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
For me to even consider a porn performer to be a possible pornstar requires that she be able to both play a role with a modicum of talent and also be believable in her sex scene. Most porn performers can usually manage the latter but fail miserably on the first.
|
04-10-17 03:27pm
|
Reply
259
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Yes women love sex but they don't actually need porn to get off. I'd even say that porn does little to stimulate them or help them achieve an orgasm. Part of the reason is that technology is significantly more generous when it comes to the ability to both stimulate and induce an orgasm in a woman. Ever heard of the pocket rocket?
|
04-08-17 10:48am
|
Reply
260
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
No it never would for the simple reason that it's barely surviving now and it caters to both men and women with a bigger emphasis on men.
|
04-08-17 10:42am
|
Reply
261
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
If we are talking about them achieving one in porn than the answer is probably no. The only exception that I can think of where I think some if not most of them do have an orgasm from anal stimulation is with Pierre Woodman but it's in large part because Pierre is also going down on them while he uses his fingers to stimulate the woman.
|
04-06-17 03:32pm
|
Review
262
|
Hardcore Gang Bang
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Content is all exclusive and they add one new videos every two weeks.
+This is the only American site that produces this type of porn. In fact there may only be one or two other sites on the net that offer similar content.
+You get access to all the other Kink sites.
+The videos can be streamed online.
+The videos can also be downloaded in the MP4 format.
+They have a surprisingly decent variety of performers with many that you wouldn't expect to see in this type of porn.
+The lighting and camera work is excellent. |
| Cons: |
-A few too many of their male talent leave a lot to be desired on looks, wood retention and overall performance.
-A few too many of their female performer sport multiple tattoos.
-The content is sometime a little too hardcore for my taste.
-It's not that unusual to see the same performer appear multiple times on the site.
-Some of the scenarios are just not that good and that makes the finish product that less appealing.
-Navigation is basically scrolling from page to page or searching by performers name. |
| Bottom Line: |
*The name of the site tells you exactly what you get for your money and Kink knows how to deliver. Your basic premise is one woman and at least four guys going non-stop. There is always a little scenario to go with the sex but I find that too often there is little taught put into it and it shows in the finish product.
*My two biggest issues are that a fairly large percentage of their male and female performers sport multiple tattoos and since I'm not a huge fan of those than I will often skip that scene. It also doesn't help that many of their recurring male performers are also performers that work on the gay/Trans side of the industry and that often shows in their looks and performance.
*I understand that budget is very important in this day and age I that's why it limits what Kink can do with some of the scenarios but I sometime wish that they would simply forgo the entire scenario instead of doing a half-ass job at it.
*The one thing that is constant here and with all other Kink sites is that they know how to shoot porn. The lighting is excellent and the camera shots are always top notch. You won't miss any of the action and it will be well lit.
*The fact that you get access to all the Kink site is both a major bonus and somewhat of a let down. The obvious bonus is that you don't need to join multiple Kink sites at for considerable amounts of money like you used to in the past but the downside is that if you are like me and only care for maybe 4 or 5 Kink sites than getting them all doesn't add anything. The fact that main pages shows all of their content means that you will have to scroll through what I consider gay porn. Not a big issue for me but might be one for others. |
|
04-03-17 06:30pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
263
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
All of the above.
|
03-31-17 04:03pm
|
Reply
264
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
My Pleasure. One of the biggest reasons why I am a huge fan of the site is because they have so many amazing movies from the good old days. Especially many from the French studio Marc Dorcel.
|
03-30-17 05:39pm
|
Reply
265
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
It's not a big surprise considering that they pay American performers significantly more money than their European counterpart. That said I think they are getting to the point where they will have a harder and harder time hiring new performers. It used to be that DAP's were only every few videos but they must have quickly discovered that this is by far their most requested type of scene because these days it's in almost every one of their videos. Call me crazy but I don't think European models are anymore interested in getting two guys to shove their huge dicks in their anal cavity.
|
03-29-17 03:35pm
|
Reply
266
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Can't say that they have changed.
|
03-29-17 03:28pm
|
Review
267
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+They have a library of over 10,500 movies to chose from.
+They have over 5000 performers to chose from.
+The videos can streamed online.
+The videos can be downloaded in the MP4 format.
+Many of their movies are not available anywhere else(except VOD sites).
+Many of the movies are in their original language(see cons).
+Many of the movies have tag words to help search for specific types of scenes.
+You can also search by production year, models name or just the first letter of the movie.
+They have added a series of photos to most of the performers portfolio and some appear to be from fans(they can't be downloaded). |
| Cons: |
-The site stopped updating on March 11 and it's not looking like they are about to start anytime soon.
-The video quality is varies a lot from movie to movie but it rarely gets better than mediocre to good.
-Because many of their movies aren't made in the USA than at least 1/3 are in a language other than English.
-It's common for an American made movie not to be in English because their source material is from another Country that the US.
-They haven't tagged all the movies so doing a search by keywords won't give all the possible results.
-The content is primarily from the 70's and 80's with a percentage from the 90's so not likely to appeal to anyone under 30. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This has always been one of my favorite sites because they have some of my favorite movies of all time and now that it appears that they are dead than I honestly don't know where I can go to find all those amazing classic porn movies from by gone days.
*Now I can understand why many people especially those under the age of thirty who would never join a site like this because the bulk of their movies are scenario driven where the sex scenes are often much shorter than today and the video quality is not all that stellar but to those people I say that there is a reason why many of these are true classics that are worth seeing if for no other reason than the people who produced them understood how to make movies and not just shoot porn.
*Another huge appeal for me is that because a portion of their movies are in their original language than movies made in France are in French and for someone like me who speaks French that is amazing.
*The reasons why I'm still giving this site a pretty good score is because their library is huge, they only offer a one month or three month membership and they made some improvements since my last membership. |
|
03-27-17 06:48pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
268
|
N/A
|
Reply of
merc77's Poll
I think I once kept a Brazzer membership for over a year. Not something I would do for that site now.
|
03-25-17 06:33pm
|
Reply
269
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
My favorite kind is the one where the guy let's the girl do all the work and shuts the fuck up. I'll add that I don't want to hear any gagging, retching or chocking sounds and I certainly don't want to see excessive drooling or vomit.
|
03-23-17 03:01pm
|
Reply
270
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
What rearadmiral wrote.
|
03-19-17 10:42am
|
Reply
271
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
It varies a lot because it depends on the site I've joined. Some I cancel within the first few days and others I wait until the last minute.
|
03-14-17 03:04pm
|
Reply
272
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I'm rather picky so I'd say that about 95% of all the porn I download I watch at least once but usually I will watch it multiple times.
|
03-11-17 05:28pm
|
Reply
273
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I second what merc wrote and add that if by some fluke the website does not email me a confirmation of their password than I'm screwed trying to log in to the site.
|
03-09-17 03:13pm
|
Reply
274
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I think that trial memberships should either not exist or be full access trials. Anything else is primarily a cash grab.
|
03-07-17 02:56pm
|
Reply
275
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Reply
I haven't actually counted them so my number is based on what Pierre has put on his site. Based on the listed info there are currently a little more than 1700 hardcore videos. Add another 210 if you count the wake up n fuck videos to that number. Part of the problem is that an interview only video will at one point include hardcore sex.
|
03-07-17 02:06pm
|
