| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
776
|
Sin Drive
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Thanks. I was really curious. I on the other hand am not remotely interested in 1080p porn so you can imagine what my feelings must be in regards to 4k. I don't think that there is a single piece of porn that can be improved if it is in HD and I think most actually look worse because of it.
|
08-25-14 01:28pm
|
Reply
777
|
Sin Drive
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
Are you saying that if you only have 1080p videos than that is no longer sufficient for your porn needs and you won't be satisfied with anything less than 4K?
|
08-24-14 06:07pm
|
Reply
778
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think that no matter if you are a mostly video only site. The moment you offer pics you must also offer zip downloads.
|
08-24-14 06:03pm
|
Reply
779
|
Porn Duty
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
I don't know if it's just me but I got a strong sense that this is old content and not just a year old but much older. The interface is crisp but it's still circa mid 2000.
|
08-22-14 03:49pm
|
Reply
780
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't mind it but most performers don't stimulate me.
|
08-20-14 03:44pm
|
Reply
781
|
Everything Butt
(0)
|
Reply of
martinlongbow's Reply
There is recycling and than there is excessive recycling. I am a fan of Sarah or at least I was prior to her desire to show rosebuds in every one of her anal scenes but I don't need or want to see her do another EB scene. I think her first 8 were more than enough. In fact I think that five was already more than I needed.
That's not to say that I don't agree with your statement because I do believe it's getting harder to find women willing to go the extreme anal penetration route. In fact I would say that EB is already there now because some of the last performers to have appeared on EB have had only toys in their asses as opposed to fist.
|
08-20-14 03:42pm
|
Comment
782
|
Everything Butt
(0)
|
|
08-19-14 06:12pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
783
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Although I agree that 24 hrs is a reasonable time. I think 36 is more acceptable because these people also have to sleep and the problem may be one that requires more time than just a day. That said anyone going above 36 is not doing his or her job properly.
|
08-18-14 06:45pm
|
Reply
784
|
Everything Butt
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
Are you still having some issue because I just tried to download a video and I was getting about 1.6Mb of download speed.
|
08-16-14 12:04pm
|
Reply
785
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I said not at all but that is only because there is not any site that I actually care to stay for more than a month. I had a long term membership to Brazzer which got on me and this was a 2 year old membership and I visit the site a couple times a week and there is not a single video that I really want to download and none of the upcoming stuff is any better.
I wish there was at least one site that I could say I want to join long term but there is not.
|
08-16-14 12:01pm
|
Reply
786
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I'll second Cybertoad's comments.
|
08-14-14 03:28pm
|
Reply
787
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
It's a happened a couple of times and both times it was because someone had supposedly stolen my log in info. I say supposedly because I have no idea how they could have done that but it was resolved so it is now water under the bridge.
|
08-12-14 06:20pm
|
Reply
788
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I like what Drooler said and that's why I picked at least 100. The odds are a lot better that you will find enough pics to satisfy your needs and not so many that you will spend too much time finding them.
|
08-10-14 10:29am
|
Reply
789
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No but then again I also don't think guys should be allowed topless except on beaches, near pools or in water parks. I seem to remember a similar question being asked in the past but I could be wrong. In any case a topless woman is not the same thing as a topless man because men's breast are not considered sexual objects the way women's breasts are. I'm not arguing whether it's fair or not but it's a reality. Guys enjoy watching topless women. I don't know if the same can be said for women when it comes to topless men.
|
08-08-14 01:53pm
|
Reply
790
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I have never been a fan of FTV but it's not because of the models they hire or the way they look on their site. It's a question of the type of content they offer. Solo stuff does very little for me. I'm glad they still exist and seem to still be able to make money because you at least get to see how beautiful some porn performers truly are.
|
08-08-14 01:47pm
|
Reply
791
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
ghosty's Comment
To be honest I wasn't aware that you could use debit cards to buy porn so is that what you are taking about?
|
08-06-14 07:06pm
|
Reply
792
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
It's very important to me and probably the main reason why I don't enjoy most of the porn made in the last few years. It's not even that I'm not a demanding person because I don't need a long intro but a nice little set up with some dialogue is all I need to be happy.
|
08-06-14 07:04pm
|
Reply
793
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
I also do that because these days it's not wise to assume that an established site is still as good as what you thought it was.
|
08-05-14 06:06pm
|
Reply
794
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
In my case it has to be all of the above. I think PU and TBP reviews are a great resource but I still have to check out the site myself because the info in the review may be accurate but it won't change the fact that I would not join that site because I already have those videos/photos or I don't want them.
|
08-04-14 03:39am
|
Reply
795
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
I don't know if you are aware of this but it's actually quite common for many porn starlet to appear on FTV. Most of them do it prior to doing porn but that doesn't change to fact that they wind up in porn anyway and it's not like any of them change their looks so much as FTV does a superior job in making them look more appealing.
Mind you this may have a lot more to do with the type of content FTV offers VS what hardcore porn companies do.
|
08-03-14 06:50pm
|
Reply
796
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
I get their 19.95$ offer by email so I haven't used a TBP link in a while but I'm pretty sure you are correct that there used to be one.
Too bad for Jules if he has removed it because his site is not worth 30$.
|
08-03-14 10:01am
|
Reply
797
|
Blacked.com
(0)
|
Reply of
daytonamike's Review
Dear Daytonamike. This is your first review and that is usually the hardest one so you can be forgiven for not being sure of what to put in it but if you want people to take it seriously than you might want to add more than six lines. Otherwise I know I'm not going to be able to trust the review as the score is way too high for what is inside the review.
|
07-30-14 06:00pm
|
Reply
798
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
mediafan's Reply
I check their site out about 3 times a week since they update daily so I know I'm not going to miss on anything that I would really want.
I know that it's not going to be this week because I also checked out their upcoming stuff and there is not one single videos that I care for.
|
07-29-14 06:48pm
|
Reply
799
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I do from time to time.
|
07-29-14 06:23pm
|
Reply
800
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Twotails's Comment
I would also like that but you are looking for something that is usually quite rare because there is a significant cost involved in offering very high resolution videos and photosets. Most studios have to pick and choose which one they can afford offer and still make a profit.
I`m pretty sure that True HD means that the resolution is 1080p. if it`s lower than that then it`s not HD. Of course that doesn`t mean the video isn`t going to look amazing at a lower resolution but it won`t be HD. I mostly only download stuff that is below 1080p and I have no complain with the resolution. Mind you I enjoy 640x480 stuff so I`m not a picky kind of guy. I`d also like to point that I doubt true HD existed 8 years ago. At least on the net.
4k is a new beast and one that currently makes little sense. I mean the type of porn being shot these days does not need to be released in 4k and I think is better served if it`s in a lower resolution.
The sites tend to all buy their content from the same source. I don`t know how long you have been reading stuff on TBP/PU so if you know this than I apologize. These sites buy a lot of their content. Some sites will buy both pics and videos and others will buy one or the other. Since they can also buy the content in various resolution than you will see a variation on the resolution based on the site you join.
|
07-28-14 04:47pm
|
