| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
851
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If they take up 10% or less than they are fine but it's a problem for me once they get above that number because the space that would normally be reserved for better surfing experience is now taken up by third party crap that mostly annoys paying members.
|
05-06-14 06:13pm
|
Reply
852
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
I don't know any myself and the only ones that I've seen where rich with guys in the news. I know why they do it and I guess money is why the girls do it but I can't help and feel that these girls have very little respect for themselves. The money they are making won't ever erase from their minds what they had to do to get it.
To each their own I guess.
|
05-04-14 06:04pm
|
Reply
853
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm clearly in the yes they show way too many skin flaws but I'm not talking about something as common as bad skin but more a case of butt and pussy pimples. I've been watching porn for a long time and prior to HD these things were invisible. I don't know if it's because producers sued makeup artist to hide them from the camera of the capacity of the camera was such that they were not capable of seeing them but I do know that I have plenty of videos on my drive that I can't watch again because my eyes keep getting draw to those pimples and it's too distracting.
|
04-30-14 06:22pm
|
Reply
854
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't have any preference other than if it's a scenario based scene than I want the footwear to be appropriate to the scenario. The only thing that I usually find hard to watch is if they decide to do a standing up penetration scene and the woman is wearing high heels. I haven't seen many but the ones that I have tend to be bad because the woman is clearly having a hard time staying upright and that's a distraction.
|
04-26-14 09:25am
|
Reply
855
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
I know whipped ass is not having any problems at this moment because I just downloaded the most recent update in under 5 minutes.
|
04-25-14 05:15pm
|
Reply
856
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have 2 computers, a tablet and my Ipod so a Wi-Fi connection is a must.
|
04-24-14 01:49pm
|
Reply
857
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
I think they may have been a little too quick in saying that it was fixed. I know my EB update of yesterday is still not up so my guess is that it was a major server problem which is still not fixed. This will be the third time in a about a year that they are having server problems. The strange thing is that the server problems never affect all their sites because hardcore gangbang has their weekly update .
|
04-23-14 03:35pm
|
Reply
858
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Did they give you any reason or timeline before the problem is fixed?
|
04-22-14 01:46pm
|
Reply
859
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
It's probably a server problem. I know Everything Butt is slow but not as bad as S & S. It also doesn't help that this was the Easter Weekend so most staff must be on holiday.
|
04-21-14 05:45pm
|
Reply
860
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
I think prosecutors went after Seymore for only one reason and it's because he was a well known porn producer at that time so it was sure to get a lot of press. I can't speak for what was on the net at that time because I certainly wasn't but fisting on the net is a very different thing than fisting on VHS or DVD. if it wasn't then Kink's Everything Butt would have been charged a long time ago.
|
04-21-14 05:35pm
|
Reply
861
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
I second everything you wrote and add that fisting on VHS and DVD is a grey area. The only producer that I'm aware who mistakenly left fisting in one of his movies was Seymore Butts and as luck would have it he was charged with producing obscene material in California. The case was all set to go to trial but he pleaded no contest and paid a fine. Needless to say no one wanted to push the limits after that.
That's not to say that fisting was not shot before and after that but usually the scene is either nowhere to be found or in the case of dvd it's often in the bonus or BTS section.
|
04-20-14 10:41am
|
Reply
862
|
Anal Educator
(0)
|
Reply of
Freax Media Gro's Reply
I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt and assuming that you didn't understand my previous post so here goes.
1-I don't have a problem with you uploading old content but I do have a serious problem when you put a recent date on it to make it appear as though it's new. You and I both know that the stuff tagged 2014 is way older than that.
2-Of course you'd say that because you want some poor unsuspecting person to buy a year long membership when you know it's possible that you will be out of business before the year is over and you won't have ad to refund that person. That's basically what you did twice in the last 3 years with your "No rest for the a.." sites.
3-Who's talking about conversion rates? I'm talking about your join price of 30$ which shouldn't be higher than 20$. In fact seeing as the bulk of your current content is a few years old than it should be even lower. It's not like you need the money to pay for those shoots since they were paid a while back.
4-Just so you know that I'm quite knowledgeable. I checked the EBI link for your so called calendar and the updates stop on May 8 so anyone joining can expect to get updates only until then. Since we are already April 18 than that is less than one month of updates.
I appreciate that you need to make a living but I don't think it all right that you steal it out of our pockets. Good Luck with your so called new sites but it's just plain old stuff to me.
|
04-19-14 02:02pm
|
Reply
863
|
Anal Educator
(0)
|
Reply of
Freax Media Gro's Reply
Sorry for not having replied sooner. I never got your PM but I think I can offer tell you what I think is wrong with your site(s).
1-Changing the dates on content to make it appear as though it's new and not a couple of years old is a big problem because it makes you look dishonest right from the start. If you can't offer brand new content then simply say so.
2-Offering any membership longer than one month is not a good thing for someone who has already cheated his customers twice in the past few years.
3-Charging more than 20$ for what is essentially old content is just not a nice thing to do.
4-A banner which links to your join page claims 30 updates per month which is a blatant lie since gags girl has only 2 videos, pupil teens won't be online until April 23 (if then) and dildo and fisting links back to anal educator so you aren't really getting seven bonus sites.
My theory is that you suspected that almost no one was going to pay money to join no rest for the ass because you screwed too many past members so you came up with a new site which contains all of your old scenes with maybe some new ones and this was another quick cash and grab scam where you won't be updating with actual new content and charge customers a premium price.
If you think that anything I wrote is incorrect then please tell me where and offer proof to validate your claim.
4-
|
04-18-14 09:35am
|
Reply
864
|
N/A
|
Reply of
LPee23's Poll
I have never seen this so I can't comment.
|
04-18-14 08:54am
|
Reply
865
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I have never seen a model with an instrument so I can't say if I would or wouldn't.
|
04-16-14 05:59pm
|
Reply
866
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
It didn't turn out so well for the guys in Westworld. Call me weird but sticking my dick in any machine just doesn't sounf very appealing or safe.
|
04-14-14 05:31pm
|
Reply
867
|
Bree Olson
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
Some of the women on this network used to be prolific performers but they are now all retired. The only ones that still shoot the odd scene are Allie, Aaliyah, Ashley, and Anissa.
|
04-14-14 05:29pm
|
Reply
868
|
Wow Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Pedrote's Comment
I don't know how honest any site is when it comes to making sure that your personal info remains personal. All I know I that I get tons of spam emails on a weekly basis so someone at some point sold my email to someone else and now it's out there. I don't care because if I wanted to change tat an all I would have to do is create an email address for just my porn and another for everything else.
|
04-13-14 09:31am
|
Reply
869
|
Bree Olson
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
Bree has been retired for at least 2 years so any content on her site must be that old or older. In fact I believe most of the performers on the network are semi-retired to completely retired.
I think the fact that the entire network is available for 15$ is why I don't really mind that you are getting old content but I can't see too many people coming back for more since there won't be much.
|
04-13-14 09:21am
|
Reply
870
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I usually download in order of most recent to older.
|
04-12-14 10:09am
|
Reply
871
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
I thinks it's even more impressive when you consider the type of porn she has done in those 9 years. I think the only stuff that Amber hasn't done is stuff that is illegal to do.
|
04-12-14 10:08am
|
Reply
872
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
There are actually two different and yet accurate answers to this poll question. In the first place a performer's shelf life can be many decades long as proven by performers like Nina Hartley 30 years and Lisa Ann 20 years. There are a few more that are getting close to 10 years and many that are over 5 years. Of course there is the opposite of the spectrum which can be proven by choosing almost any performer that started doing porn in last 5 years. The average shelf life for almost every performer today is less than a year. It's to the point where if you blink then you will miss their blip on the porn radar.
|
04-10-14 05:55pm
|
Reply
873
|
Anal Educator
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
I hope not because if you join through no rest for the ass then you also get this one. I'm pretty sure you will get the entire network and I hope you don't regret it.
I know I'm not joining because Girgio's past business practices pissed me off so now I refuse to give him my money.
|
04-10-14 01:56pm
|
Reply
874
|
Anal Educator
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Comment
I think Duke and probably anybody else associated with TBP and PU can be forgiven for any lack of current news on this site and any other associated with the No Rest For... network. Here is what I can tell you. Giorgio Grandi is the man responsible for all the content on the network and he posted on the EBI forum on April 5 that he would again start to update the network with new stuff and this site is now part of the network.
On the surface this sounds like great news and maybe it will but let say a few words about Giorgio for one minute. This is the man who in 2011 stopped updating his sites but never told anyone that he was doing that and certainly never stopped offering year long memberships to his customers. He sort of came back in 2012 with some new stuff and some sweet words that he was back but that was BS since the sites stopped updating only a couple of months after the announcement. Now he's saying that he's back and will update the network with some new content (were did I read that story before?) and if you are a newbie and visit his sites then you would believe that it's true because there is some content dated 2014. The first problem is that the dated is a complete lie since the content is a lot older and worse is stuff he already had released in years past but probably removed for just this kind of occasion.
It's your money and you can do what you like with it but don't come crying to me if you feel cheated and please do not buy a membership longer than one month because you will definitely regret it for at least 365 days.
|
04-09-14 06:29pm
|
Reply
875
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I once joined the 90$ Ferro network and I have not seen another site that is more expensive so my porn budget is as high as I'm willing to spend. That said. I find that any site that charges more than
30$ is overpriced.
|
04-09-14 10:52am
|
