| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1201
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I checked your first review in 2007 of AW and the one you did in 2011 and they aren't comparable because they are like night and day. The original one had no data. There's nothing wrong per say but is that really a review or just a fan talking about his favorite site.
I would have been fine if one person had made a review of Jo's site and picked a score that was at least close to what TBP gave the site but you got 3 people in a row who scored the site at 95, 98 and 100 and none of them could actually say anything except that the content is artistic(what does that even mean?). There is now a 4th review but we finally see a score that makes sense and there is info that is important to someone who wants to make an educated choice.
I don't know if the reviews were planted by someone associated with the site but 4 reviews in a 3 day period of a site that had none looks suspicious.
|
06-02-13 12:05pm
|
Reply
1202
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've done it a few times and I even suggested it to a couple of other people. I can't remember most of them but pricing was involved in one or more of my reports.
|
06-02-13 09:00am
|
Reply
1203
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
None of the reviews are of any value because the reviewers are either trolling for traffic or simply can't get a clue that this is not how you do a review. In any case. Maybe someone(other than TBP) who can do a decent review will join her site and then we will actually know what the site is about. For now I'm out of here. I won't post any other comments.
|
06-01-13 05:46pm
|
Reply
1204
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
I don't know but the really sad part here is that her site looks decent. Of course you wouldn't know it based on the 3 recent reviews because there is nothing in them to excite a possible fan in joining.
I think the opposite is likely to happen because some people like me will feel that a site with such high scores and no hard data to support them is either a fraud or not a very good site at all.
|
06-01-13 10:44am
|
Reply
1205
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Randyman's Reply
Obviously it won't let you join with the same card since the card has been declined. Did you by chance check with the bank to see if what EA is saying is true. I'm a current member of EA and I've never had one problem with them and this is at least my third time with them.
|
06-01-13 10:41am
|
Reply
1206
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
Elmien's Reply
Tell you what. Take a look at the reviewers with the most reviews and see what their reviews have in common. Then look at all of the recent reviews for Jo's site and you will notice that they don't have any of the important stuff needed to make a good review. What you basically have right now are a bunch of fans fawning over a porn performer and who cannot remove their feelings from their reviews.
The people who might be interested in joining want to know what they will find inside the members area and not that Jo is a girl next door type. They want to know if she does solo, b/g and g/g. What quantity of each. They want to know video resolution and photo resolution.
Let me see if I can make this simple. They want facts first and then fawning.
|
06-01-13 10:38am
|
Reply
1207
|
Teen Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
That is an excellent question but I don't think my answer will be as good but here goes. I don't think that there's a single site on the net today that's perfect and therefore none of them deserve a perfect score. Both porn fidelity and teen fidelity are very close but they are not there yet. I've ever given a site a 100. I gave Brazzer a 99% in large part because they offer so much porn that you are bound to find enough of what you like to warrant that score. If PF and TF ever release more scenes per week then I might give them a 99% and if those scenes are as good as the ones they do now then I might give them a 100%.
|
05-31-13 06:32pm
|
Reply
1208
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I chose sometimes because I do it from time to time but I must confess that I didn't really understand the question.
|
05-31-13 03:54pm
|
Reply
1209
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
All I'll say is that a high score with no supporting data except for the insane adulation of the reviewer is a sure way to make the review useless. Case in point the two reviews for I dream of Jo. Sorry but you lose me when you describe a 32 year old woman has having a girl next door look. Jo/Monika is still an amazing looking woman but she has not looked like a girl in a very long time.
This may be a great site but none of the most I'll even go so far as to say that I'm now a little more nervous about content because of the reviews.
|
05-31-13 03:51pm
|
Reply
1210
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I checked the site out and I count 50 updates this year. That's 50 if you count videos and pic sets separately. Otherwise there have been only 25 updates this year. What I found interesting is that some of the new updates are actually from the future because they are dated Nov 2013. I think the webmaster should use that for promo because they are the only site that is able to release content ahead of it's being done.
I think Jo is a very attractive woman and I may one day join her site but it certainly won't be from any of the recent reviews or comments because these don't appear to be impartial and that in my opinion does not help the site but actually make me weary of joining.
|
05-31-13 03:40am
|
Reply
1211
|
Girls For Old Men
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I don't doubt it. I once bought a full network access at something like 80 plus dollars and I didn't save a single scene from any of the sites. These days I would only try one of their trial memberships because I don't know if there is anything that I truly care to save for a rainy day.
|
05-29-13 06:23pm
|
Reply
1212
|
Girls For Old Men
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
I don't know if you are aware but ferro came up with a blog site where you can view the more recent updates. I often use it to see which sites might be worth joining based on the amount of recent updates.
|
05-29-13 06:04pm
|
Reply
1213
|
WTF Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I can't remember exactly when I was a member of the WTF network but I know it was sometime last year and you could already see that they were in deep trouble because the number of new scenes was less than it was the last time I'd been a member. I still visit the network once a month and frankly there is now nothing that I want to save and I don't expect that to change any time soon.
|
05-29-13 06:02pm
|
Reply
1214
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think several times a week is the best example of frequent updates. It's more than 2 and less than 7. I'm a lot less interested in the total number of new scenes per week as to the quality of those scenes.
|
05-29-13 05:57pm
|
Reply
1215
|
Teen Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
That and you can also get most if not all of porn fidelity's stuff as well.
|
05-29-13 05:54pm
|
Reply
1216
|
Teen Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I can't confirm if there is a 10GB daily limit because I've never downloaded that much in a single day. Mind you even if they have a limit and you only take the 3 day trial then you should still be able to download a good chunk of the sites content. Mind you I think if you truly want to download the entire library then you probably should join for the full month. This way you'll help the site stay alive and you won't have to worry about the limit since 30 days is more than enough time to download everything.
|
05-28-13 06:15pm
|
Review
1217
|
Teen Fidelity
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Content is all exclusif.
+They add one new scene per week and they are all dated.
+They hire the more popular teen models in North America.
+They shoot some best porn scenes I've ever seen and they know about lighting, camera angles and the proper way to apply makeup to their performers.
+All the videos can be downloaded in 3 resoolution. You have 480 or 540, then 720 and finally 1080.
+They offer a BTS video for all of their scenes.
+Their photosets can be downloaded as a single zip file and these are the sets for both the sex scene as well as the bts content.
+They have an in-browser playlist editor that allows the user to edit all the videos.
+You get access to porn fidelity with your membership. |
| Cons: |
-This isn't an issue for me because I enjoy his work but the only male to appear with the girls is Kelly's husband Ryan.
-The site has only 76 videos which is a decent amount considering that it's barely 3 years old but I'd love it if there was more content.
-There is no lesbian only content and that would be nice to have a few of those. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I honestly had a hard time thinking of cons to write because the site is near perfect. The ones I wrote are less cons for me and more general observations. Mind you since I'm a huge fan of porn fidelity and this is basically an off-shoot of that site but here the performers are all teens to very young women and they are all natural.
*If you seen some porn fidelity videos then you know that they understand how to properly light a scene, handle a camera to shoot from multiple angles and offer great views of the action and the performers and they know how to edit so that there is flow and rhythm to their scenes. The same is true for teen fidelity scenes.
*The only two things that I'd love to see more of is lesbian content and anal. Both of these are rather lacking. |
|
05-28-13 03:34am
Replies (6)
|
Comment
1218
|
Gang Bang Dee
(0)
|
|
05-27-13 06:03pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1219
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I name all my files in a certain way to make it a lot easier to find them later on but I definitely need to clean some of my stuff because there's just too much content and a large enough amount of it is duplication or stuff I'll never watch again.
|
05-27-13 04:54pm
|
Reply
1220
|
Wicked.com
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
I'm pretty sure that this is either a portal to wicked pictures or the site that Manwin has created to replace wicked pictures. Either way. You are not going to get more out of your membership except the movies they added since you were last on WP.
|
05-26-13 05:21pm
|
Reply
1221
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
jullie958's Comment
Wow! You are a demanding customer. I agree that it's great site but they already update with two new scenes per day, 7 days a week. I don't think they can updates more often. You are paying less than
20$ a month for 56 scenes. Many sites only update once a week and their membership cost is higher.
Now it would be different if you had said that you'd like them to update a particular series more often because it's one that you like.
|
05-25-13 09:15am
|
Reply
1222
|
Mom POV
(0)
|
Reply of
Roger Siskel's Reply
Let me first say that I tend to be rather intense in my feelings toward Tube and Torrent sites so some of my vocabulary tends to be more intense then maybe it should be.
Now it is quite possible that the people that own this site like many others in their position are now stuck at having to use tube sites to generate some revenue. I can assure you that they do not do it out of a true desire but because they need those extra dollars said revenue will bring them. I think they and us at TBP/PU would be a lot happier if people used a direct link to join or a review site like
us.
Here's an example to explain what I mean. Imagine you owned a cherry producing farm and for years thing were great. The crops were always pretty good and you could afford to hire many workers to work the property. The weather conditions were so good that there were plenty of other farms all doing quite well and then one day someone started to steal cherries from the different farms and offering them for free to anyone visiting their road side stand. At first no one noticed it because there weren't too many stands and people were still coming to the source for their cherries but as time went by more stands started to open and more cherries started to disappear from the different farms. Now some will argue that the cherries being given away aren't as good as those on the farms but they are free so people make do with their taste. It became so bad that farms started to fire their employees while others had to close their doors and those that remained open had to make some drastic changes to the production and marketing of their cherries to the point that they aren't as juicy and tasty as they once were.
Now transpose cherries for porn and this is the reality for every porn producers today. That is why a lot of the porn being made is not as good as it once was. why so many studios closed their doors, why porn performers spend more time on the escort sites then they do shooting porn and why so many new and established performers are no longer doing porn.
|
05-21-13 03:44am
|
Review
1223
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Huge network of sites which give you access to over 3000 videos and their accompanying photosets.
+They have an excellent selection of young Eastern European models.
+They update once a day and all content is dated.
+They have a very good search engine that allows searches based on keywords or the models name.
+There is a synopsis of each scenes content.
+There is a lot of variety in their sex scenes which includes b/g, g/g b/g/g and solo
+Most of the models have multiple scenes. |
| Cons: |
-The vast majority of the sites are now dead and no longer updating.
-They keep adding new sites but then stop adding new content within a few months.
-They recently altered their update schedule where now they release the photoset first and the videos is only released in the follwing day or days.
-Many of the models have more than one scene but sometimes there is not a lot of difference between each of them.
-The older content is not aging well and I don't belive that they plan on remastering any of those scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
*These guys recently fixed an issue with their preview site and I'm one of those people that was complaining about that so I thought I should check the site out again. Not much as changed since my last time except to say that the content seems to have improved. I suspect that they have found other sources to fill the void left by Russia's change in policy in regards to shooting porn. That is good news because I was a little distraught the last time.
*Their choice of model is still excellent and the porn is usually well shot, well lit and the action quite good. My only negative is that the male performers are not always as good as they should so the scene does not reach the potential it could have with a better male performer.
*My one big issue with the network, and this is an old one, is that they keep adding new sites to the network all the while stopping to update those that were already quite good. Not to mention that the new sites are not'necessarily that good and even if they are then they will also stop updating it within a very short amount of time.
**I truly hope that their new update schedule has less to do with lack of new content on their part and more some kind of gimmick to make it appear as though they have a brand new scene each day.
**I'm giving the network is better score this time because they have started to add some good content. |
|
05-20-13 09:16pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1224
|
Mom POV
(0)
|
Reply of
Roger Siskel's Comment
Let me ask you a huge favor and please do not ever mention free sites because you are talking about peoples lives here. There's no such thing as free porn. You and others that use tube and torrent sites may not have paid for it but someone like me and other members of PU have paid for it and we certainly never expected others to get it for free nor did any of the people producing and starring in those movies.
Now I'm getting off my soap box. I'm pretty sure the people behind this site are the same ones as girls do porn so whatever is wrong in regards to the navigation on GDP is also wrong here. At least the guy shooting the scenes here is a lot better than on GDP and they actually have a camera man who shoots the scene. Mind you he doesn't really know how to shoot porn so that doesn't help.
There is plenty wrong with Mom's POV but maybe they will fix it in time. The site is still quite young.
|
05-20-13 06:43pm
|
Reply
1225
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Sadly there are many performers with implants but I don't think they pick them because of it but rather because that's what is currently available.
|
05-20-13 06:32pm
|
