| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1226
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Couldn't the answer simply be....Why Not.
|
05-19-13 12:00pm
|
Reply
1227
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I don't like facials so you can just imagine how much I dislike this fetish. I know that there is a percentage of people that love this fetish but I don't know why. Maybe some day I'll get an answer that I understand.
|
05-17-13 04:30am
|
Reply
1228
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
A full access trial membership is rare so even if you don't find as many great videos as I did then you are still getting plenty for your money.
|
05-16-13 06:37pm
|
Reply
1229
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
My issues with the network was never about cost. Of course I'd be happier if they charged less but that never stopped me from joining in the past. That changed when they started to use more and more leased material becausae the join price didn't go down. These days only the new members get their money's worth since there is a lot of great older stuff but any returning member is paying way too much for content that he could find elsewhere for a lot less money.
|
05-16-13 06:36pm
|
Reply
1230
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
Great review to what was once a really great network of sites. I used to love joining this network because they always seemed to have the cutest Eastern European models doing the nastiest kinds of porn.
That changed a few years ago. I suspect that Tube and torrent sites have a lot to do with that plus the recession and finally Russia passing stringent laws regarding the shotting of porn on their soil.
I knew it was the beginning of the end when so much of their content was leased material available on so many cheaper sites. These days the bulk of their updates is all leased material. If they were a less expensive network then I could overlook that part but they aren't and therefore they are on my list of sites to be avoided.
|
05-15-13 05:23pm
|
Reply
1231
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
I've always used a desktop. I like the fact that it's easy to do upgrades.
|
05-15-13 05:14pm
|
Review
1232
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
98.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+The content is all exclusif and they add a new scene each week.
+You get access to teen fidelity as well.
+All videos can be downloaded in at least 480p which they increased to 540p in 2008 and most of the videos after that date are also offered in 720p
+The 100 more recent videos are now also offered in 1080p.
+They offer a B.T.S video of each shoot.
+All scenes have an photoset that can be downloaded as a single zip file. Resolution is approximately 900x600.
+Their selection of performers is top notch.
+You can stream the videos online and you can even jump to a specific part of the scene based on keywords.
+They have a playlist editor where you can create your own clips of the scenes.
+You can search based on whether a performer has natural breats or implants. |
| Cons: |
-There is very little not to like about the site except that the number of enhanced performers significantly outnumber the natural ones.
-Another negative is that a good portion of the models have tattoos.many of the models
-The only two performers are Kelly and her husband Ryan.(not an issue for me but could be for some). |
| Bottom Line: |
*I keep returning to this site because they keep putting out some of the best porn I've seen. There's very little that I don't like. That's not to say that all the scenes are as good as the others but there is a certain consistency in regards to quality. They even do some scenario based scenes from time to time which is a nice bonus for people like me who like their porn with a story.
*I didn't find anything really wrong with the site except that I would love to see two or more updates per week as opposed to just one. I know I'd be willing to pay more for that since it would mean a lot more of what I like.
**The only reason why I'm not giving the site a perfect score is because I want to see them hire a few more natural models. |
|
05-13-13 06:32pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
1233
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'd much rather they didn't exist but a few are okay since most if not all porn sites need the money they get from those adds to survive.
|
05-11-13 09:23am
|
Reply
1234
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Poll
I agree with everyone who said that it depends on the girl and the style of glasses. I think Penny Pax is the only current new porn girl who actually wears glasses in most of her scenes and I don't think it's a fashion statement.
|
05-07-13 06:36pm
|
Reply
1235
|
Nicole Peters
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
She is an attractive woman so I can see why you might get distracted.
I don't think the difference in score makes too much of a difference since sites in the 60's are normally the ones to be avoided at all cost. The ones in the 50's are the same but the person feels even more cheated and/or is royally pissed.
You gave sufficient data that anyone curious will know whether it's worth trying or avoiding.
|
05-07-13 03:34am
|
Review
1236
|
DogFart
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+The content is all exclusif and they fill a niche that is poorly represented.
+You get access to 20 hetero/lesbian sites and also 2 gay sites.
+They are remastering their older content.
+You can search by model name to find all the videos she shot for the different sites.
+They now update their Blacks on Blonde site with 2 videos per week as oppose to just one.
+They update with about 3 videos per week.
+They list the upcoming updates for each site and give the date on which content will be uploaded.
+They still manage to hire some really hot looking performers who always do great scenes. |
| Cons: |
-Only about half a dozen of the 20 or so sites are still regularly updating with brand new content.
-They started to offer some older content in HD (their term) but the source material is of a lower resolution and the finish product is not really HD and they had to reduce to size of the video in the process.
-This is Interracial porn so if you aren't into this then that is amajor con for you.
-They do not tag their scenes and the synopsis is not always accurate so you may have to view part of the video prior to downloading. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I keep returning to this network of sites and I'm never disapointed with the content. I'd be happier if the join price was lower and they may have to drop their price one day or suffer a drop in paid members. If they had multiple sites all updating with actual brand new content then I could understand why they charge a lot more than many other sites but the reality is that only a couple of sites are still updating on a weekly basis while most of the others offer remastered content. You still get the never before seen video but those are getting to be rare for me and I suspect the same for any returning members.
*In case some of you have never read another review and don't plan to do so then this network is dedicated to interracial porn. In this case it's almsot exclusively black men/women with white men/Women. It would be nice to see some white men with black women and maybe that will happen but if thats what you want then skip this network.
**The one great new thing that's different from the last time I was a member is that their site Blacks on Blondes is now updating twice a week as opposed to only once per week. I'm adding an extra point to my score this time for that reason. I don't know if that will be enough for people interested in this type of content but it was for me. |
|
05-06-13 06:01pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1237
|
Nicole Peters
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Review
You are a generous man because I don't know if I could have given this site a score in the 60's. The preview section is pathetic so anyone thinking that the good content is inside would have to pay to discover that it isn't.
|
05-06-13 05:32pm
|
Reply
1238
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I always check to see if a site I'm about to join has at least one review and regardless that it's an older one. The info may no longer be accurate but I doubt that a site that got an horrendous score with supporting data will have improved to the point of where it is now a good site.
It's a little trickier with a site that was tagged as good or better and has no recent review because it may still be the same but it can also have had a serious drop in quality. The fact that a good site has not had a recent review can be cause for concern.
|
05-05-13 07:06am
|
Reply
1239
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I picked novels and books because I only recently bought a tablet but you can be certain that I will be buying some e-novels in the months to come.
|
05-03-13 05:59pm
|
Reply
1240
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have gote the one that came with my browser. It doesn't work as well on some things but for the most part. I'm satisfied.
|
05-01-13 06:03pm
|
Reply
1241
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Ther are some scenes were it might be nice to see some foot wear but for the most part. I prefer barefoot
|
04-30-13 06:28pm
|
Reply
1242
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Dracula's Reply
Your Welcome.
This is the kind of site that might be okay at 20$ and maybe even at 25$ (if you like their stuff) but not at 30$. The fact that there is a pretty large amount of leased material available elsewhere makes this a buyer beware kind of site. It can be great for newbies who have not joined any other Eastern European site but any other may discover that they already have many of tose sets or videos in their library.
|
04-28-13 09:49am
|
Reply
1243
|
Mandingo Mama
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
You would think that but you'd be wrong. This is one of the ways scam sites use to make money from unsuspecting people. They upload older content and pretend that it is new. One look can usually tell you that it can't be since the quality of the pic is so bad that it looks awfull in low resolution. These guys could never use larger pics because the image would be so blurry that you couldn't see what is happening in the pic.
|
04-28-13 09:42am
|
Reply
1244
|
Mandingo Mama
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
Actually I believe the below poster is right and the site is dead. Their claim of new updates is pure B.S on their part. If you look at the preview section where they show their most recent updates then these are all old content that is promoted as new stuff. Not too mention that the same scenes are used to update more than one day.
|
04-27-13 06:20pm
|
Reply
1245
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Dracula's Comment
I can't say for certain but I suspect the special price was dropped sometime after last September. I checked another review site who had an updated review in September 2012 and they were also claiming a special 19.95$ price then. Not to mention that there are two error reports in November 2012 with a note that the special price was no longer working.
|
04-27-13 06:11pm
|
Reply
1246
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Buckhead's Review
Good review. I'll only add one little thing and it's in regard to your comment that there are very few American stars. 21Sextury is a Eastern European site and they usually only hire European performers.
They do have a few scenes with Americans but I look at this more has filler than an actual plan to have a mix of Europeans and Americans.
|
04-27-13 06:02pm
|
Reply
1247
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
I haven't used tech support all that often so it's hard to have a well balanced opinion. I know that it is sometimes a little long before they answer a request but I usually assume that if it's a big issue and maybe they have a lot of people to help.
On other times it is quite fast, very efficient and also friendly.
|
04-27-13 05:56pm
|
Reply
1248
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Reply
Did you recently visit their preview section? They've finally added some brand new updates instead of using the same 28 scenes they were passing off as new stuff for the lat few weeks few months. Now that is good news but you still can't view any part of those 28 scenes, you can't see anything beyond those 28 scenes so all yo are left with is a pretty tiny pic with very little info about content and the location of the scene in question.
The fact that their content is non-exclusif was never an issue for me because it was always very good and their join price is cheap compared to similar sites. I just want to know what I'm paying for just like I do if I decide to join 21sextury and DDF Production. If your content is good then show it. Otherwise people like me will not join for fear that the content is simply no longer any good.
|
04-27-13 11:12am
|
Reply
1249
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I've never passed on a model solely based on how young she looks because that's not one of the main parameters that I use when searching for a model. I'm suspect the term "Too person so that makes it hard to agree on what constitute looking too young.
Maybe what I think is too young is significantly different than others. I still rmember watching Tracy Lords movies when they were still legal and there is no way that I would have believe that she was 15 at the time and yet she was indeed 15 in her first film.
|
04-26-13 03:57pm
|
Reply
1250
|
N/A
|
Reply of
plan b's Poll
I'm Canadian so I have to say hockey but the truth is that I don't really watch any. I'll catch part of a hockey game from time to time but that's about it.
|
04-23-13 06:26pm
|
