| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1251
|
Mandingo Mama
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
Don't worry about it. In my opinion. The site doesn't deserve a score above 50 but a score of 60 is not much better and you gave some good info to help people know why the site is so bad. I might have a different opinion about this site and the others associated with it if they were upfront about the quality of their content but they know that if that info gets out then no one will ever join again.
|
04-23-13 06:24pm
|
Reply
1252
|
Mandingo Mama
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
You are way more generous than I would be. I got screwed by this site but couldn't find a match on TBP so I didn't review it but it's a giant pile of poo.
|
04-22-13 06:33pm
|
Reply
1253
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Stas RC's Reply
Thanks for the news and sorry to be the bearer of bad news but the preview section is still showing the same scenes it was a month ago while the dates keep getting updated as though these were brand new scenes.
You guys have to fix that because it's giving your site a bad name. I know that I won't be joining until I see what the updates are and not just one or two but at least all of the updates going as far back as January. The options are on the site but you are limited to the same pictures you were a month ago and longer.
|
04-22-13 06:32pm
|
Reply
1254
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I think you will see stricter rules regarding porn in general and that's in large part because porn is just not very proactive when it comes to their industry. We've already seen laws being passed forcing companies to use condoms for all their penetration scenes. Many Countries are starting to limit access to some sites. CC processoirs are now advising porn sites that their content is no longer acceptable and if they don't remove it then they will lose them as a processor.
The simpel truth is porn is meant for an audience that is 18 years or older but that itso rampant on the net that anyone with internet access can view porn of all kind. I don't know about the rtest of you but I don't think a 13 year old should be able to view porn anymore than he or she should be able to view mainstream materialmeant for adults.
|
04-21-13 08:22am
|
Reply
1255
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
My suggestion about not posting anything was only in regards to RK's forum. Of course there are other places where you can discuss this and since he has already posted comments about it here then he has done that. He could even start a thread in our forum about this very same subject as long as he avoids insulting the talent because it's just not nice to do that.
|
04-21-13 08:14am
|
Reply
1256
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
audrina69's Reply
It's not as bad but since they only hire from a small group of male performers than those being described still know who you are talking about. That's not to say that you aren't correct in your assessment of the quality of their work. Just that posting comments on it is not a very good idea. Much better that you let your money do the talking.
|
04-20-13 01:48pm
|
Reply
1257
|
Mandy Roe
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Yeah but you're an old pro at it. My comment were for the newbies who still make those fatal errors. I really wish TBP and PU had existed when I first started surfing the net. I would have saved so much money that it's not even funny.
|
04-20-13 10:49am
|
Reply
1258
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
audrina69's Comment
Here's my view on comments. If you are going to comment negatively on any of the performers then don't. In the first place. It's bad manners and in the second it's not nice. The people who shoot those scenes might read your comments and no one likes to be talked about in a negative way. They may not be your cup of tea but if they are still being hired then they must be somebody else because the site would be loosing customers left and right. A sites comment section is more a privilege than a right. Your money gets you access to the content so if the scenes are so bad then do what I do and don't join that site.
The problem with some of the male talents you named is that they are popular performers who shoot their own stuff and also work for other companies so hiring them is probably harder(no pun intended) and maybe more expensive. We get a regular supply of new girls but male talent is rare. Let me rephrase that. Getting good male talent is getting really hard.
This is an old story for me but my view in regards to content and updates is that it was never a question of whether or not it was going to happen but when it was going to happen. I always knew that sooner or later all those Tube and Torrent Sites were going to affect the porn industry to the point where the few of us that still pay for it can't counter-balance all those that steal it. When you couple that with an unstable economy, 3 std scares in one year, a foolish fight on condoms in the industry and you just compound the problems.
P.S: My suggestion is that if you think that 18$ a month is too much for the content you like then just join every few months or never again. Posting comments is not the way to go about changing site policies because they are just words. Your money on the other hand is quite another thing. That is tangible and hurts them where it counts.
|
04-20-13 10:46am
|
Reply
1259
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
I found your question a little vague so my reply may not be what you are looking for but here goes anyway. Most of the popular Eastern European performers have at least one scene on a TMW sites while others have multiples scenes. There's no visible pattern where the popularity of a model equals more scenes and since TMW buys a lot of their stuff from different producers then I don't expect to see any changes.
|
04-19-13 09:18pm
|
Reply
1260
|
Mandy Roe
(0)
|
Reply of
Crispin's Reply
Bad reviews are a good thing for the rest of us because it saves us money but it's not so great for the people that paid to get access to the crappy site.
|
04-19-13 09:07pm
|
Reply
1261
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't have an issue with joining a site that no longer updates because there can still be plenty of great porn in the site. As long as I know what I'm getting for my money then where's the problem?
|
04-19-13 09:05pm
|
Reply
1262
|
Mandy Roe
(0)
|
Reply of
Crispin's Reply
It was my pleasure. Anything that helps other members save money and helps put a stop to sites like this one is a good thing. I know that I never join any site before visiting TBP and checking to see if there are any other sites associated with the parent company. If there are then I check to see if any have a review.
Mind you I rarely do that for single model sites because I know what to look for and that's why I knew this site was going to be a huge pile of crap just by visiting it.
|
04-18-13 06:15pm
|
Reply
1263
|
Mandy Roe
(0)
|
Reply of
Crispin's Review
Thanks for the review but I wish you hadn't wasted your money on what is an obviously bad site.
This is the proto-single model site with just a few inticing little tid bits to hook some poor unsuspecting person who the discovers that there is nothing else inside. I don't know if you checked out TBP before joining this site because this site didn't have a review but another site associated with the parent company had one and the score was only 69.5 3 years ago. If nothing else. That should have been your first warning. The other major warning was the lack of actual visible content in the preview section.
|
04-18-13 03:46pm
|
Reply
1264
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I rarely take the plunge these days and one reason why is because there are so few new sites being added to the net that discovering one that has no comments or review is quite rare. I guess another reason is that those that don't have a comment or review aren't worth joining.
|
04-17-13 06:37pm
|
Reply
1265
|
Roxy Raye
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
She is an attractive young womean and anyone who's into her and the more extreme kinds of anal penetration should join her site because you'll mostly get that. If you aren't into the extreme penetration thing then you'll want to avoid her site and probably most of the stuff she shoots.
|
04-15-13 03:42pm
|
Reply
1266
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
Thanks for the review. It is quite informative. Do you know what their update scheduled is like now?
I used to love this network but that sort of disapeared after my last visit because I found so little new that I wanted to wartch that I actually downloaded a bfew videos and I don't think any were worth keeping.
I do know that they had serious problems getting quality new content because of the issues in Russia and the overall downfall of porn due to the economy in Europe so they can be forgiven for that but their preview section is so bad and so misleading that I can no longer recommend this site to anyone except new members. Any returning member may be very disapointed with the newer stuff
|
04-14-13 05:59pm
|
Reply
1267
|
Ann Angel XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
dgerity's Review
I hope you don't mind but I'm too curious to know your answer to the following question. Did you join her site after Marcus's review or before? If it was before then that's one thing but if it's after then why would you even bother? He gave the site a very poor score but all the info pretty much made it clear that the site was a scam.
At least in my mind it is.
|
04-13-13 06:24pm
|
Reply
1268
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I suspect that 'm part of a small minority but I sort of like it. Definetely not all the time and
not from every girl that does it. The scene that seem to work best are those where the performer looks like she is into it. I wanted to say that they are all into it but I don't believe that so I'm not goign to say it.
Now it's true that this can be considered a circus act but I don't and the main reason why I don't is because I've seen some women who truly are into it.
while I don't think I've ever seen one who was in to what passes for porn circus acts.
|
04-13-13 06:17pm
|
Reply
1269
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
The content is the main reason why I tend to join sites.
|
04-11-13 06:09pm
|
Reply
1270
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I can't say that I never do but it is quite rare. I think TBP chose to stop using the join price as a parameter for their score a while back and I was not exactly in agreement with them at the time but I have since then changed my mind for the vast majority of the sites that I've reviewed.
The join price may not always be the best one but if I get over 30 scenes or more out of the site then can I really complain if I paid 30$ for my memebership? I mean that is a dollar a scene. That is basically iTune prices.
|
04-09-13 06:34pm
|
Reply
1271
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
Thanks.
|
04-09-13 06:29pm
|
Reply
1272
|
N/A
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
They currently have some kind of computer controlled Fleshlight so it's not unconceivable that they have already integrated something like that into a Real Doll. Cost must still be the biggest sticking point because not many people have the necessary 5000$ plus to spend on their sex doll. Mind you I checked the Real Doll site prior to writing my comment and they are now offering a much cheaper versions of their Real Doll.
|
04-08-13 03:27pm
|
Reply
1273
|
Hairy Twatter
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
This is one of my biggest pet peeves with the DDF Network. They decide many years ago that it was okay to use the content from one site to update another one. This is obvioulsy the case with this site. What they have done is taken content from some of their other sites where the performers had pubic hair and use it to update this site. The best example is on the main page where you see a video of Daria Glower. That thing has to be a few years old because she has been in the industry for a decade now and does not look like that anymore.
|
04-07-13 09:26am
|
Reply
1274
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Although having sex with a robot is many decades away. You can currently have sex with a Real Doll and how long is it before there is an animatronic version of the Real Doll? The only thing that is making the animatronic version of Real Doll rare is the huge amounts of money needed to buy a basic Real Doll. Who has over 5000$ to invest in a Real Doll? Let alone the kind of money you'd need to buy one that has animatronic options.
|
04-07-13 09:11am
|
Reply
1275
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
Thanks. Are there multiple options or is it only the flash version?
|
04-07-13 08:59am
|
