| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1526
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've never been interested and part of the reason is because the kind of relationship that I have with porn performers is pretty one sided. I watch them have sex and I jerk off. What exactly would I say to them except that they are more beautiful in real life than on film? That watching them have porn sex makes me cum? Now I know some might say that you can have other kinds of discussion but frankly their being at those conventions is a business decision so chit chat with fans is not likely to be all that long not will it be all that interesting. Now being near those conventions and meeting the grils in a more social environement might be interesting but that type of encounter is a double edged sword. if the girl is charming than you might walk away happy but if she isn't than you may walk away disapointed if not worse.
|
10-21-12 09:27am
|
Review
1527
|
Whipped Ass
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+They have over 1900 scenes to choose from.
+They manage to hire some really hot models all through the years and get them to do some intense BSDM.
+They update with one new scene each week.
+You can stream the videos online.
+You can download all the videos in the mp4 format with a resolution of
+All the videos from 2007 to now are offered in HD with the mp4 and WMV format.
+There is a calendar where you can view the upcoming shoots for all their sites.
+A membership to one site gives you discounts to the other Kink sites. |
| Cons: |
-I think my biggest issue with this site is that the BSDM is sometimes a little too intense for my taste.
-There are some doms that aren't as good as others or the chemistry between them and the sub is just not there and that tends to ruin the scene.
-They have some pics but they do such a poor job with them that they are almost worthless and you can't download the entire photoset into a single file because they split the sets in 3 or more parts.
-The quality of the videos for their eartly stuff ison the poor side of things. That's most of the stuff prior to 2006 |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is a Kink site so if you have been a member of any of their other sites then you know that these guys take their porn seriously and try to offer the best porn possible. That's probably why they are still dishing out top quality porn and able to hire the top girls. Even in these hard economic times and in the era of tube sites.
*This site is designed for people who like g/g porn but with the bsdm aspect added to it. The level of bsdm varies from video to video so it's hard to say just how intense it is but it feels like it has gotten a liitle more intense in recent months. Of course that could be because the performers being hired are more into it so the dom will give her sub a lot more then she might some a newbie.
*Anal penetration is common in many of the videos so that's something to consider if you aren't into that. There is some fisting but it is on the rare side so it shouldn't be an issue for most people.
**I tend to join about once every year or so but I would probably join more often if the level of bsdm was not as high as it is. My tolerance for it is rather low so more sex and less whipping would be great.
***The only people that should avoid this site are those that don't know what the words dom and sub mean or don't like bsdm. |
|
10-20-12 06:37pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1528
|
21 Sextreme
(0)
|
Reply of
oldfizzywig's Reply
Seeing as your a newbie to the network then your review is perfect since there would be now way for you to notice the update rate vs their more popular network 21sextury. I keep track of the updates on both networks because they sometime have a scene on 21sextreme that looks good. My suggestion is that if you like the stuff on 21sextury then join that network and use your accumulated points to buy the scenes you like from the 21sextreme with those points. I know that's what I do. Of course that means staying long term with the network but since the price keeps dropping each month to the point where you only pay 10$ a month then it's a very decent deal.
|
10-20-12 06:35am
|
Reply
1529
|
Naughty Allie
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
If you want my opinion then you will stay far away from this site. It's not cheap at 30$ and TBP updated their info in April and they have the number of videos at 165 and based on another sites' review dated August 2010 then she only added 3 videos between then and April of this year.
|
10-19-12 08:51pm
|
Reply
1530
|
21 Sextreme
(0)
|
Reply of
oldfizzywig's Review
Nice review but I would have thought that you would mention in the con that the network is really poor when it comes to updates. There are 21 new updates in the last 10 days at 21sextury compared to only 7 for 21sextreme. I mean that is pathetic. A newbie just joining will get plenty for his money but a returning member or God forbid someone who bought a long term membership is pretty screwed.
|
10-19-12 08:43pm
|
Reply
1531
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
I again can't take credit because someone else mentioned doing that and I thought it was an amazing idea.
|
10-19-12 07:53am
|
Reply
1532
|
Jessica Jaymes XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
My pleasure. Her site is 30$ and I don't think that a single one of the other performers in the network are actually still active.
|
10-18-12 07:47am
|
Reply
1533
|
Jessica Jaymes XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
I looked at what people wrote on her fan page at ADT and frankly I don't think she is shooting all that much porn. I checked some past post and you had some info in December of last year, then in May 2012 and finally a couple this month but this is mostly fans talking about her and not actually mentioning new stuff. I checked the blog on her site and there is a post done on September 24 and the first thing that came to mind was that she was escorting on that trip and the money is so much better than porn and no fear that your face is going to be plastered all over the net.
I can confirm that she has 5 scenes on Brazzer and also 5 scenes on Naughty America released this year.
|
10-17-12 11:40am
|
Reply
1534
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
I didn't mention bath but I also agree that it's a pretty bad place to shoot a porn scene. The difference is that most scenes are not shot with the people having sex in the bath but normally around it or over it.
I actually like scenes shot with the couch and I haven't seen too many where the use of the couch is wasted on the scene. Those are when the guy is fucking the girl in upside down mode. IE: where her head is on the floor and her feet are in the air. I don't care for the upside down scenes regardless that it's on a bed couch or floor but for some reason I find the couch and floor one to be hard to watch because i can't help but think that teh girl is uncomfortable and that ruins the scene for me.
My favorite couch scene is when the girl is straddling the armrest and is eitheir getting it vaginally or anally. Anally is slightly better but that's probably because I'm an anal fiend.
|
10-17-12 11:23am
|
Reply
1535
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Running shower is by far the worst one because the space is limited so you don't have too many angles to shoot the scene and since there is water than that limits even more the possible shots. Then you add the sound in an enclosed space and you get some echoes and the sound of the runnign water which probably surpasses the sound of the people having sex. It's a toss up between outside and a wharehouse to se which is the second worse one but I think outside is slightly worse only because you have the sound of wind, other natural sounds like birds singing, waves and waterfalls and then you also have all of the man made sounds. The biggest problems I can see with a wharehouse is that you could get an echo and cleanliness is not always something you associate with a wharehouse so that can make for a less than appealng scene.
I notice that underwater is not on the list but since there are so few videos shot underwater and frankly most of them aren't all underwater. Most of them usually get above water shots as well as below the water shots in the same scene. I think these types of scenes are in many ways the worse because you have almost everything that is wrong with the shower scene and many of the worst things with an outdoor scene.
|
10-17-12 08:22am
|
Reply
1536
|
Brandi Love
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
Nice review. Now many anal scenes does she have and is she the stra oir athey of other performers?
|
10-16-12 11:02am
|
Reply
1537
|
My Step Dad Made Me
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
The first problem with this site is that it's not really exclusif content. These are scenes taken from the studio Evasives Angles series My Stepfather Made me. Another problem is that it's a little older content since the last movies is already 2 years old and they only made 4 movies with a total of 19 scenes.
Now that doesn't mean that you can't join this site but be aware that the content you are talking about is pretty limited and I don't know if there will be anymore in the network access.
|
10-16-12 10:54am
|
Reply
1538
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
joekramer08's Reply
Moving is probably their only choice if they want to legally keep shooting porn but it won't change the fact that Russian girls aren't going to follow the companies anymore than they will fly to another Coiuntry to shoot porn so you are still in the same place.
Take a look at the below link to give you an idea of just how many amazing performers Russia and other Eastern European Countries put out. Hungary and The Czech Republic still put out a little more than Russia but you are still losing many amazing girls.
http://www.eurobabeindex.com/sbandoindex/appendix_2.html
|
10-16-12 05:22am
|
Reply
1539
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I believe you are correct and maybe I'm wrong but I think that they hire the more popular mature models and sadly the enhanced versions outnumber the natural ones. I am more forgiving of older women who get implants because time isn't kind to us and sagging breast does affect morale. Of course you would assume that more mature would equal better decision making abilities and therefore these older women would not get giant implants and that's where you would be wrong.
I know you taste in women so it would be great if this site finally had something for you but I don't know if it really has.
|
10-15-12 05:53pm
|
Reply
1540
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Just join Blacks on Blondes and then you'll still get access to all of the other sites but you won't have to think about Dogfart. Mind you that title also doesn't make all that much sense since there are plenty of non-blondes on blacks on blondes. I overlook the name of the network because I really like their style of porn.
|
10-15-12 05:17am
|
Reply
1541
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Thank You for the compliment but I can't actually take all that much credit because my style is actually stuff I stole from all of you guys. All I did is look what others did and the way they did and I incoporated those things into my reviews.
I can't remember which member said that he did his review on a Word perfect spreadsheet and then transfered the info to the site but that was something that I had never thought about doing and which I know always do.
|
10-15-12 05:14am
|
Reply
1542
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
pawn3d's Review
Are you telling me that you only joined Brazzer because you thought that they would have hundreds upon hundreds of 18 or 19 years old models and that any girl above 19 is unacceptable? Unless I'm mistaken then that is what you are saying in your review. Did you check out their preview section prior to joining? I did and 11 of the 12 most updates with the teen tag doesn't even qualify since the girls are all over 19 and some of them by more than a couple of years.
If you had to join a site that mostly hires teens then why pick a site that clearly hires performers of different age groups but tends to always hire women older than 19?
I don't want to ruin your day but if you are looking for a site that only hires teens then you should quit now because it doesn't exist. You do get a decent percentage of teens girls who make the jump to porn each year but the number is never high enough that a site could hire them all and hope to survive with just them and even if they could then most of these girls don't do a lot of hardcore porn at first so that you would be stuck with some midcore to low key hardcore stuff anyway.
I have no problem with anyone awarding the score they believe a site earned but I need something more than vague opinions as to why the site got that score.
|
10-14-12 05:50pm
|
Reply
1543
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
I try to give credit to porn surfers so I just assume that they are all smart enough to visit TBP or PU before they join a site if for no other reason than you get some amazing deals.
Although 25$ is a much bigger amount than the one they get with TBP/PU. It's still a very reasonable amount for 5000 porn scenes and an additional 40 plus during the month you are a member.
|
10-14-12 09:36am
|
Reply
1544
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Those are excellent examples of models turned actor but I think that they are more the exception than the rule. It's been a while since I last saw King Kong but unless my memory is faulty then Jessica was rather good. At least as good as any actress could be in such a role. I didn't see too much of Peter Jackson's clusterfuck version of King Kong but Naomi Watts who's a very good actress didn't fair much better than Jessica did. I think Jessica's performance was a mixture of this being her first film, the writting and suggestions from the director in reagrds as to how she should handle the part. I got the distinct impression that he wanted her to be a little on the ditsy side. One thing is certain and that no matter what Jessica's backgroud was prior to doing acting. She certainly became one of the best American Actresses of her time. She is the perfect example
|
10-13-12 10:25pm
|
Reply
1545
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Is it possible that the videos Met-Art produces are bad because they consider themselves to be a mostly photo site and videos is just something they added to their library so that they could say they have some?
|
10-13-12 10:06pm
|
Reply
1546
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
sonofzog's Reply
I think his chances of appearing in front of a camera are next to impossible and he deserves it. I'm a pro-condom guy so seeing them in porn doesn't bother me but I think that I'm in the minority on this one.
|
10-13-12 10:00pm
|
Reply
1547
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
sonofzog's Reply
I don't know if you heard about the US outbreak but there was a much bigger one in Europe. Depending on who you believe then as many as 100 performers were infected in Europe. No one knows fr sure the exact number for the US because only 1 case was named and 9 others were identified.
Let's just say that it seriously crippled porn production in Europe for most of the summer. No one is quite sure if the US patient zero is also responsible for all of the following infections in the US and Europe but if he isn't then it was a strange coincidence that a performer infected with syphilis in the US and who faked his test to work and was only discovered a couple of months after the fact did so at the same time as an outbreak was starting in Europe.
|
10-13-12 11:47am
|
Review
1548
|
Naughty America
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+There are over 5000 scene to choose from.
+They have a great mix of mostly US performers from teens to women of varying ages.
+They do an excellent job of tagging all their scenes so it's easy to search by keywords.
+You can stream the videos online.
+All videos can be downloaded in WMV and they started to offer the Quicktime version sometime in 2007. Video resolution from 2007 and onward is at least 720x400.
+Videos from 2009 to today are now also offered in two HD format: 720p and 1080p.
+You can view or download the photosets that accompany each scene.
+All content is dated and they appear to update with about a dozen new scenes per week. |
| Cons: |
-They actually have two real time feeds for cam sites running on a couple of their main pages.
-They have two side tabs on the right of the screen that have to be closed each time you change pages and although not that big. they are still a distraction.
-I didn't see a method to scroll back through their library so that you can see all their content. The only way you can view content past two months is if you use the porn finder option and select a tag word. Of course if the scene was not proprerrly tagged then you willnever find it.
-Using the back button to return to your previous page wil always bring you back to the first page no matter on what page you were.
-The site is clutered with advertising for their own sites or for third party stuff. |
| Bottom Line: |
***The 5$ join price was impossible to pass up. Especially for fans of sites like Brazzer, Bangbros and Reality King. There are some variations in the sites but they all pretty much offer the same type of content and they tend to also hire the same performers. This site may be a litttle more geared toward the couples market or at least people interested in scenario driven kind of porn. Now just because it might be more couple friendly does not mean that the sex isn't hot and raunchy because it is.
**If anyone saw my exchange with a webmaster on a recent review in regards to live feeds of cam sites then you can imagine that this site lost a lot more points because they actually have two of these. I'm sorry that sites feel the need to do that to make money but if they must then the least they can do is make sure that it is in a section that must be selected and not on the main pages of the site.
**There is a lot of advertising clutering the site and this takes up a lot of screen space. You even have to close one pop up and skip over an advertising page each time you log in.
**The bottom line is that for 5$ or even the normal 10$. You will more than get your moneys worth and even the annoying advertising and the stupid live feeds shouldn't be such a problem.
***My score would have been in the 90's if it wasn't for the live feeds.*** |
|
10-13-12 11:42am
Replies (6)
|
Reply
1549
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Comment
I just tried PU's link and it takes you to their site where you can get the 5$ monthly membership so no need to give out another link.
This may be just me but although I love that they are offering this deal. It also makes me very nervous because I feel that it's the kind of gimmick a site in financial trouble might do to help them survive for a little longer. They are already only chnarging 10$ for a monthly membership. I just hope that many people try NA because they dop make some good porn.
|
10-12-12 09:11am
|
Reply
1550
|
LeLu Love
(0)
|
Reply of
devmsr's Reply
I think your post makes perfect sense. I actually had to read again hat I had posted because I didn't remember much of it and I find that some of what I wrote makes no sense. I just re-read myself before clicking submit.
I hope you understand that the type of content that Lelu produces and me are not compatible and that's why I said I'd pass on it. I'm glad that she posted more info about her site nd I hope that other peole who read these and were on the fence before made the jump and joined her site. I get the distinct feeling that she tries really hard to get intimate with her fans. At least as intimate as one can in this kind of relationship and that is a cedit to her. If Lelu ever decides to start shooting hardcore porn using a cameran then I can see myself being interested but since she is mostly going for the cam/POV style porn site then I hope you understand that I will not join her site.
|
10-11-12 06:44pm
|
