| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1501
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have no problem with medical use of marijuna or decriminalising marijuna but legalising it is just asking for trouble. We already have huge problems with people drinking and driving. Do we really need to add pot to the damn equation?
|
11-08-12 06:40pm
|
Reply
1502
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I picked yes, somewhat but the number of good dp's is quite tiny vs the number of bad ones.
|
11-06-12 06:18pm
|
Reply
1503
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If I see a typo than I have to correct it.
|
11-04-12 01:17pm
|
Reply
1504
|
Tamed Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
tetros's Reply
I think you and I agree that the content of the site is very good but that is a different thing than the site being good. It would be good if it wasn't 30$ because that's too much money for a dead site with non-exlusif content.
|
11-04-12 10:58am
|
Reply
1505
|
Tamed Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
tetros's Reply
I'm sorry if I seem harsh but you gave your review a high score but very little positive info to justify that score. If a review as a high score but very little info to justify that score than I tend to consider that it's a fake review meant to increase traffic to a dying site(s). The other reason is usually fans that can't be objective and therefore their review is also to be taken with a huge grain of salt. I don't know which one you are and I don't care. I'll know more if you do another review and I see about the same thing yopu did with this one.
Let me address so me of your comments.
-I'm sorry but "because of 10$" is a ludricous statement. We aren't talking about pennies but half the cost of most porn sites. You can join 21sextury for 20$ and they probably have scenes with most of the performers that appeared on tamed teens.
-Regional pricing is a huge problem which is compounded when the site is so expensive.
-The site being dead for 3 years should have been in the cons as it is a very important piece of information that a person doing a casual look over of your revbiew might not catch in the bottom line section.
-You mentioned the high quality photosets but did not give enough info except to give the number of pics per set and to say that some are good. I simply informed you that your statement was unfounded based on what you wrote.
-You mention 155 movies but you meant to say videos since you are talking about individual scenes. Evil Angel has 240 Raul Cristian scenes so that's nearly 100 more than this site and again it is a lot cheaper. Not to mention that you get a lot more for your money.
-I visted the site and it's clearly written in the top part of the screen "Fresh Updates in 2012: A new movie 3x a week". Now you and I both know that is bullshit.
**If this site had been 15$ or even maybe 20$ than I might have been forgiving but a dead site cannot charge 30$US or GOd forbid 30€ for 3 to 6 years old content. They especially can't claim new stuff as the reason why they are charging so much money.
|
11-03-12 06:32am
|
Reply
1506
|
Tamed Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
tetros's Review
I can't understand why you gave this site such a high score. I also don't understand why there aren't more negative comments in the con section. You only mention that that the site is inactive but you fail to mention that it has been for 3 years. This is your first review and that is always the hardest one to do but doing one like this for a dead site smells of a advertising.
Here's my list of cons:
The site is 30$ when it should be at least 10$ cheaper.
The site has been dead for 3 years.
All these movies can now be found on other sites like Evil Angel and for a lot less than what you will pay on this site.
There is regional pricing.
I'm sorry but anyone interested in phototsets would laugh at 20 to 50 pic sets.
Now Raul may have started the live gonzo site but the entire appeal of a live shoot is that it's live so a director makes very little sense unless he's directing all the action and if you have read what most people think od directors who talk during the shoot then you know most people really dislike that.
I'm not going to give you a negative score based on one review but I would hope that you will pay attention to how other people do their review and try to emulate them. I know that's what I did and still do.
|
10-31-12 06:15pm
|
Reply
1507
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I don't know if regular posters have a superior IQ but if they don't then based on the the amazing stuff they write then they should. I'm not sure what my IQ is because my last test was a very long time ago. I seem to remember that is was near 120 or above but I guess I'd have to take anothe rone to be certain.
IQ is not the most important thing in life. There are plenty of amazing people with an average IQ just as there plenty of SOB's with above average IQ's. All those Wall Street brockers who made millions by screwing other people out of their savings by doing dishonest tradings probably have an above average IQ but their heart and sould is way below the average.
|
10-31-12 04:02pm
|
Reply
1508
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
doodoo's Comment
Now is it possible that instead of this content being from beauty angels. It is beauty angels that is buying content from spahhic? I mean Teen Mega World used to be an amazing network of sites and although they never claimed to have all exclusif content. They did have some hard to find stuff, a wide variety to choose from and the quality was there. It wouldn't surprise me if they are buying some of spahhic's content.
|
10-30-12 06:34pm
|
Reply
1509
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
bestimmt's Reply
Probably very few and only because I believe he shoots girls from the mideast or midwest. These girls probably never planned to go to the East Cost or West Coast anyway. The site is designed to make it look like he's a kind of dick but the shoots themselves aren't very hard for the girls. I mean it's a one-on-one sex scene with no one else in the room and the guy isn't carrying a deadly weapon in his pants.
If you want to see a site that has managed to destroy possible porn careers then check out facial abuse. Many a girls made the mistake of thinking that these guys are on the up and up and the claim of abuse is just for show. They are in many ways what Max Hardcore was in the last few years before he went to jail.
|
10-30-12 03:59pm
|
Reply
1510
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I still prefer natural to implants so I'd take the droopping ones if the women chose to stay natural but I can understand the reasoning for why they do it and accept that these older women often have huge mellons on their chest. At least they have the the wear and tear of time but a 20 years old with implants is mind boggling...Not really but that's for another discussion.
|
10-29-12 04:15pm
|
Reply
1511
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't follow any sports but I love listening to sports radio. I've neve thought too hard as to why I don't but I think a large part of the reason must be that players are no longer the heros they once were. These days money is their main interest
and therefore who ever offers them the biggest amount is who they will go with.
In return teams no longer care about their fans and will gadly trade a popular player to save money or will do all kinds of shitty things.
|
10-29-12 04:10pm
|
Reply
1512
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I'm less inclined to think that they were told to do that then that they chose on their own. As women age so does their body and breats seem to be of particular interest to women. Actually they are of interest to men as well.
I'm far more bafflked when a 19 years old gets huge implants because she definetely can't use age as the reason.
|
10-28-12 06:30pm
|
Reply
1513
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I don't know if they took people like you into consideration when they filmed the scenes but many of milf in the scene seem to always keep their tops on or they shoot in such a way that it's hard to be certain whether they have implants or not. I'm pretty sure that at least 4 to maybe 6 of them have natural breast as I'm also sure that at least 9 have implants. The last 4 or so are uncertain but I tend to lean in the direction of implants.
|
10-28-12 05:57pm
|
Reply
1514
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
It's a very good network of sites to join and the price is excellent.
Here is some info for you.
Moms Bang Teens is a nice addition since they have only been online since January. The downside is that they don't update on a regular basis so you have some months where there are 2-4 new scenes and then you have months where there are only 1. At least you have 31 scenes at the moment.
Milf Next Door suffers from low updating. They only have 6 scenes this year and 7 for last year. Basically it all went to hell in 2009 because that's when you saw a significant reduction in their upates.
|
10-28-12 09:00am
|
Reply
1515
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
bestimmt's Reply
This site has two things going for it. It features girls that would normally never get seen if it wasn't for this site and a tiny amount of them will shoot a few more scenes for other sites/companies.
|
10-28-12 08:30am
|
Reply
1516
|
Mature.nl
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
I have to thank you because this is one of those sites that I've always had of my radar and would probably have joined if it was any cheaper. You touched on all the key points and your score looks more than fair.
I suspect that you would have given the site a slightly better score if it was only 20$. I rarely use the cost in my score but if a site is significantly more expensive than another one then I expect to see value above other sites and if it isn't there then it will be reflected in my score.
Sorry that it cost you so much.
|
10-27-12 06:10pm
|
Reply
1517
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I find most of the words offensive and I'd rather not read them or hear them used to describe a girl appearing in a porn scene. The only exception I can think of is the word bitch but it must be used in a dialogue driven movie where the characters are talking about someone and they describe that person as being a bitch. I wouldnd't like to hear that word used during a sex.
|
10-27-12 10:12am
|
Reply
1518
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
I was surprise about the name thing. I think you are right and they are just too lazy to fix it. Although it's true that the older stuff is not very good. I can't give them a score below 90 plus because they have so much content that you do get your money's worth.
It would be nice if they trie to remaster their older stuff like Bangbros and Dogfart do but we have already established that they are lazy so doing that would really be too much work.
|
10-26-12 01:52pm
|
Review
1519
|
Reality Kings
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Over 7500 scenes to chose from.
+They have an excellent mix of North American, South American and European performers.
+They have over 500 interacial scenes and over 1100 lesbian scenes.
+They do an excellent job of tagging all their scenes so it's easy to search using keywords.
+All the videos from 2006 to now can be dowloaded in WMV and MP4 and the resolution is at least 768x432.
+All videos starting in late 2010 are now also available in MP4 1080p HD.
+They update with about 10 new videos per week and all content is dated
+The main pages aren't clutered with a lot of third party advertising. |
| Cons: |
-The most annoying thing about this site is that you only see the performers full name on the main page. So if you do a search by keyword then all you see is the models first name which isn't always correctly spelled.
-They do a lot of scenario porn but a lot of it is not as well done as it I'd like it to be.
-The content from sometime in 2004 and before is only available in multiple clips.
-The resolution for most of the videos may be 768x432 but the quality for the videos made from 2008 and before is average at best.
-Their preview section is one of the worst one for this type of site. |
| Bottom Line: |
**This is the top rated reality porn site and I can see why it is. They try to hit almost every type of porn and they to do a pretty decent job with most of them. They have a few faults but these are rather minor and are probably not much of an issue for most people.
*If you have been a member of Naughty America, Mofos, Brazzer or bangbros than you know what to expect since tese guys offer about the same type of content. The most obvious difference seems to be in the selection of models. Most sites prefer to stick with models from one or two Countries but these guys try to cover the whole world. They have over 900 scenes with European models, 350 scenes with Brazilian models and so many more with American models of different nationality. The only ethnic group not really represented are Asians.
*Their choice of models is a slight problem for me because I'm not generally a fan of Brazilain models or Brazilian porn so that's 350 less porn scene for me. Then there are the 900 Europeans scenes. They are for the most part good but I've been a member of so many great European sites that I already have many similar scenes starring these same girls so that means that I didn't really bother downloading most of their videos.
*The only thing that I wouldn't mind seeing is an improvement in the acting for the scenario driven scenes. The other sites do a much better job. The other improvment is in making sure that the models full name is visble on every screen so that you don't have to check out a different page to see if it's the correct model.
**If you have tried the other sites like this one then you have to try this one because there is so much content that you are bound to get your money's worth. |
|
10-25-12 06:29pm
Replies (11)
|
Reply
1520
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Never having been in a situation close to this then I really don't know what I would do but I'd like to think that I could be at least respectfull.
Of course I would probably be pissed that said person was not upfront about being a transvestite ahead of the date.
|
10-25-12 10:02am
|
Reply
1521
|
50Plus MILFs
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I was hoping that maybe some of the content from 50plus and 60 plus managed to wind up on scoreHd or score video without actually being mentioned but I guess that was too much to hope for. I don't know how they manage to survive. I guess they save some bandwidth money by not allowing downloads and since you can't actually steal the bulk of their content then tube sites can't use their content but does this really offset all the losses in profit from people like you and me who will never join these sites?
|
10-25-12 09:53am
|
Reply
1522
|
50Plus MILFs
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I don't know but I seriously doubt it. Since they aren't upfront about doing that then I won't be testing it. I do know that if you join either Score HD or Score Video then you get access to the other site and these sites seem to be getting the older videos from many of the other Score sites. I just don't know if this includes the content from this site or the 60plusnilf site. You did a review in 2009 so you probably already know the answer. There are some videos on this site that I'd love to get access to but I probably will never do that because of my above reason.
|
10-24-12 06:42pm
|
Reply
1523
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I say no but I believe that the number of women who regularily masturbate is a lot bigger today than it was a decade or more ago.
|
10-23-12 12:12pm
|
Reply
1524
|
Naughty Allie
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
The slippery slide started with the increase in popularity of tube and torrent sites. As more people got their porn fix from those places. You saw less of them spending their money on paying sites. Just look at the number of studios and sites that have either stopped producing porn or have significantly dropped their total output as proof.
Why should it be different for small sites with a lot less traffic, less money and no other means of making money? In fact it's much worse fo these small sites and that's why I say that there's no money for the amateur sites.
|
10-21-12 05:14pm
|
Reply
1525
|
Naughty Allie
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
I'm more forgiving of implants when the girl comes into the industry with them or if she already has them when I discover her. Her site is part of a small group of solo model sites that I always wanted to try but never did and probably never will. Her preview section was and still is on the poor side and her join price too high for me to want to invest in a membership.
It's possible that there are some jewels left to discover but I fear that I've joined most of the solo model sites whose content I like. Sadly most of these are now dead when it comes to updating with new content. I really wish there would be new solo model sites with hardcore in them but I just don't think there's money to be made for anyone to want to invest in that.
|
10-21-12 01:11pm
|
