Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2201
|
Tonight's Girlfriend
(0)
|
Reply of
RomanceLover's Comment
Ione59 joined this site and posted a comment about it last week. You should ask him this question. Of course you may not care about his answer since the site is streaming only.
|
08-19-11 10:03am
|
Reply
2202
|
Christina Skye XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
It's possible that she wanted to do porn to earn a living but may have discovered that it's easier said than done these days. I'm sure that some girls are still making a decent living doing porn but the majority of porn girls aren't making enough to live on. Just look at the number of porn performers turning to prostitution. It's so high that it's less time consumming to write a list of which porn girl isn't escorting than the other way around.
|
08-18-11 06:09pm
|
Reply
2203
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have never seen any.
|
08-18-11 03:49am
|
Reply
2204
|
Christina Skye XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I agree with you. She's really good looking and she looks like she enjoys women.
|
08-16-11 01:39pm
|
Review
2205
|
Christina Skye XXX
(0)
62.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
+You get access to 7 other sites.
+26 phototsets and they can all be downloaded as a complete zip file.
+Pic resolution is 800x1200.
+They update with one new photoset every week.
+Content is dated. |
Cons: |
-There are only 5 videos. 1 BJ, 1 B/G, 1G/G and 2 solo.
-The majority of the videos are about 10 minutes or less.
-The majority of the content is mostly sofcore in nature.
-Last video was in June.
-The majority of the phototsets are solo shoots. |
Bottom Line: |
*Christina is an attractive blue eyed blond with all natural breast and no tattoos. Her site could be great because it is part of a network of other sites with some impressive content. I actually don't know why her site is attached to a network of extreme porn because the majority her content is softcore. The lack of video updates makes me think that she changed her mind rather quickly about porn or maybe something happenned in her personal life that prevents her from adding content.
*In any case there's no reason to join this site because you will be very disapointed. |
|
08-16-11 05:58am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
2206
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
trev's Comment
I know I just tried downloading a video and I had no problem. How long have you been a member? Were you able to log in to the site and download videos when you first joined?
|
08-16-11 05:22am
|
Reply
2207
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I do exactly like Denner.
|
08-16-11 05:04am
|
Reply
2208
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
Reply of
moby69's Review
Hi moby69.
You might want to add a larger amount of info than what you have if you're going to give this network for such a high score. I was a member last year and unless they have changed about everything then it's not even worth 30$.
|
08-15-11 01:34pm
|
Reply
2209
|
Kacey 18
(0)
|
Reply of
Caligula's Reply
Thanks Caligula. Did you get access to only her site or to the entire network? If it's the last then have you checked out any of the other sites?
|
08-15-11 08:40am
|
Reply
2210
|
Kacey 18
(0)
|
Reply of
Caligula's Review
Hiw caligula.
The site says that Kacey does hardcore shoots with older men and that she also does anal with some of them. is this true or is this a lie. Your review lacks a lot of important info. What are the video options? What's the qulaity of the videos?
|
08-14-11 08:03am
|
Reply
2211
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Since the question has the word "try" then yes I believe that some goverments will try. Most if not all will fail. The .XXX is probably one of the biggest scam happening to the net at this moment.
People are talking about porn being tagged but have you thought of all the corporations with an internet address that ends in .com, .net, .org and
so on. Don't you think they'll have to protect their address by buying into the scam? How about cnn.xxx and all the other reputable organisations that have a standard address. I think the people behind the ".xxx" scam may have started something that will comeback to bite them on the ass.
|
08-14-11 07:45am
|
Reply
2212
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm like Monahan and RustyJ except in reverse. IE for most of my regular surfing and Firefox for everything else.
|
08-12-11 05:20am
|
Reply
2213
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
Reply of
critic's Reply
I really liked what I saw before joining them. It was a different story afterwards. Even without the slow downs. The content is not what I thought or hoped it would be. They have a couple of really beautiful models but I prefer my porn a little more hardcore and my lesbian porn has to be more passionate.
|
08-11-11 10:02am
|
Reply
2214
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
Reply of
critic's Reply
Hi rinto.
I'm not sure if the site is still deadly slow. I asked the person who did the most recent review if that was the case but he hasn't replied yet. As much as the site has a many super cute girls. I can't say that there's a lot of heat in most videos. It's not softcore porn but it certainly isn't hardcore either. It's about midcore.
|
08-11-11 06:28am
|
Review
2215
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
96.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
+There are 398 videos and they add a new one every week.
+All the videos after January 2008 can all be downloaded in WMV and Quictime at 960x540 and 1280x720. Videos prior to date are 640x480.
+You can download a solo and BTS video starring the model form each shoot.
+The videos are all extremely well shot with the right camera angles, lighting and an impressive job from all performers.
+There is a photoset for each video shoot and these can be download as complete zip files. Resolution varies from set to set but the medium qulaity are at least 900x600 and 1300x900 for high quality ones.
+You can search for scenes under ethnicity of the model and/or whether she has natural breast or implants.
+Content is all dated.
+You can use a download manager.
++You can get a 3 day full access for 10$. |
Cons: |
-A large percentage of the models have implants and/or tattoos.
-I wish their search option had more keywords to help members find certain types of videos.
-The only 2 performers appearing with the models are Kelly and her husband. |
Bottom Line: |
*This is my second time at porn fidelity and the site keeps getting better. I had a hard time coming up with anything substantialy wrong with the site. About the only thing that might be nice would be a greater number of natural bodied models. That said they still have 144 models that are all natural.
*Kelly and her husband are amazing performers and they always seem to have great chemistry with the models. It may be talent or they pick models knowing that there'll be great chemistry.
Whatever the reason. Their scenes are always hot.
**To be avoided by anyone who doesn't want to see Kelly or her husband on screen because one or both of them is always in the video.*** |
|
08-10-11 09:30am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2216
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I like it but there are 3 things that have to be present. 1-The person giving the massage must know what he's/she's doing. 2-The massage should have a level of tease. 3-The massage should be a prelude to sex.
|
08-10-11 09:14am
|
Reply
2217
|
Retro Raw
(0)
|
Reply of
whynot2's Reply
I'm not sure if it's going to work but I'd recommend you take a look at TBP's site and see if any other sites owned by the parent company include this site in their membership. This way you could get more for your money.
|
08-09-11 12:39pm
|
Reply
2218
|
Retro Raw
(0)
|
Reply of
whynot2's Comment
Be advised that I reviewed this site not so long ago and and it's a pretty bad site. If the membership was less than 10$ then it might not be so bad but you'll be spending 20$ for possibly nothing worth saving.
|
08-09-11 05:57am
|
Reply
2219
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I've never joined a femdom site because I have no desire to see guy abused anymore than I'm curious to see a guy take a strap-on. I'm fine that some people like that kind of stuff but I'm not one of them. I've been a member of fucking machines, ultimate surrender, public disgrace, whipped ass, sex & submission, everything butt and bound gangbang.
I didn't like the first 2 and I'm borderline on the third. I've already said that the machines make way too much noise for me to enjoy the scenes. Ultimate surrender is mostly wrestling in front of a crowd and less so about sex. Nothing wrong with that since that's how it's advertised but I wanted more than the site offers.
I enjoyed a couple of the public disgrace videos but the premise doesn't appeal to me. Seeing girls abused in front of a crowd is not my kind of porn. The only ones that I liked were filmed indoors.
Now I've been a member of all the other sites more than once except for bound gangbangs but that's only because the site is new. I always comeback to these sites. I have a soft spot for everything butt and whipped ass because these are mostly women with women and anl is always the main theme.
|
08-08-11 10:19am
|
Reply
2220
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I notice that my taste is different from younger porn surfers in reagrds to pubic hair, body shape and age of models. It's less so for tattoos and implants. The first three make sense because many of the first performers I saw and loved looked a little different to many of todays performers. An example might be that Marilyn Monroe is probably considered fat by todays Hollywood standards. where in my case she's just perfect with just the right body shape.
Now tattoos and implants is a tricky one. I think that many find them less than desirable but the number of people that are starting to not care or love them as increased over the years. The main reason is that it's really hard to find models that don't sport a tattoo or implants.
|
08-08-11 05:54am
|
Reply
2221
|
Smack My Bitch
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I really liked smack my bitch but I'd never join again. Not when teen mega world has the same content and offers more for my money. I don't know if you care but there is only one download option at SMB
in reagrds to video. They only offer HD. I know many don't care but I do because I'm limited to 120GB download limit per month.
|
08-08-11 05:40am
|
Reply
2222
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I agree that it would be nice if they offered some kind of group pricing but I don't really mind paying a little more than for other sites. The reason why I don't mind is that I find them to be one of the best internet porn companies and they've retained that quality with all the problems facing every other company. I don't know if you ever look at their calendar but Tanner Mayes did a fucking machine shoot on August 2. I don't know if this is a one time deal but I certainly hope not.
|
08-08-11 05:37am
|
Review
2223
|
Mrs. Siren
(0)
86.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
+All exclusif content that is dated.
+They update about once a week.
+There are 48 videos which can be downloaded in WMV and resolution is 720x480 1500kbps.
+They have 53 photosets and they can be dowloaded as complete zip files. The resolution varies from set to set but the lowest I found was 893x1344.
+Unlike most of the other models in the nework. Her content is less extreme.
+You can access videos from the photos section and vice-versa photos from the video section.
+You get access to 8 other sites. |
Cons: |
-The site is less than a year old so not that much content yet. Unless one or more of the other sites interest you than you might be a little disapointed.
-The majority of the pic sets are taken from the video shoot so not alot of variety.
-Site lacks the personality that a solo model should have.
-Although less extreme than most other models. Her content may still be a little more extreme than certain people enjoy.
-No search options available.
-Limited to 2 download at a time. |
Bottom Line: |
*Mrs sirens is a beautiful blond woman in her 30's with an all natural body and some pretty impressive breast. She seems to really like having sex and she's into some pretty intense vaginal and anal penetration. She loves to have more than one patner at the same time and she's willing to offer them all her openings so that there's no waiting.
*She only has one lesbian video but I'd say that she really enjoys women so I hope she'll do more in the future. I didn't find much to complain about except that it would be nice to see more interaction between Mrs Sirens and her members. As it is. All you get are her photosets and videos. The one thing that I enjoyed was that her husband isn't often in the videos and that was a plus for me because he's very tattooed.
*Some may complain that you can't download more than 2 videos at a time but they only take a couple of minutes to download so that wasn't an issue for me. |
|
08-07-11 03:38pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2224
|
Smack My Bitch
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
You are correct that the majority of the smack my bicth shoot are also available at teenmegaworld. They both buy shoots from adult labs. See link: http://adultlabs.com/new_faces.php. I would be a little leary to join smackmybicth because their preview pages aren`t the greatest and they didn`t seem to be updating as much as when they first started on the net. I did a review last year. I would recommend you join teenmegaworld instead. You`ll get most of SMB`s content and a lot more.
|
08-07-11 10:09am
|
Reply
2225
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
The only site that seems to have less tattooed girls is fucking machines but as much as I wanted to like the site. Those machines make a lot of noise and that overhadows whatever thrill I got from hearing the girls have an orgams.
Mind you 30$ for 2 months is really hard to pass up. Especially if you have never been a memeber of the site. I much prefer girls without tatoos and implants but I`m usually able to overlook that for the kink sites because unlike your standard porn. The girls that choose to do kink shoots are usually into this stuff or want to try it. In both cases it tends to make for great porn and when it doesn`t then the site is usually quite honest about it and tells the viewer that such and such scene had to be cut short because the shoot was too intense for the performer.
|
08-07-11 10:03am
|