| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2226
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
You are correct that on paper they would make more money but the reality is that if they made each scene only one kink then every dick head content thief would buy those scenes and post them on free sites and there goes their extra money. By making them so expensive then they don't get as many thieves.
It's possible that you saw a different screen then me but the sites that I saw at 14$ are really 29.95 for 2 month memberships. The 14$ is not a lie so much as a little bit of misinformation. The only way you can get that price is if you join for a year. Mind you 29.95$ for 2 months is an amzing deal for any of their sites.
|
08-07-11 09:26am
|
Reply
2227
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
I've never really understood the pricing for this site. The only thing that I can see is that they offer it because people might want to stream some scenes rather than join the site. Maybe the reason why they charge such a high price for buying a scene is that they'd prefer the people buy a membership. There are plenty of deals where you get a 2 month membership for 29.95$. That's less than 15$ a month and that's hard to beat for such great content.
|
08-07-11 09:12am
|
Review
2228
|
Real Tampa Swingers
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+content is mostly all exclusif.
+There are 299 videos and they can all be downloaded in WMV.
+There are over 400 phototsets and they can be downloaded as complete zip files.
+You get access to 25 other sites.
+Content is all dated they are still be updating. |
| Cons: |
-There are only about 80 videos at 640x480. The bulk are only 320x240.
-Many of the newer videos are actually only part a complete scene and even some of those videos are split into 2 or more clips.
-I found that the cameran does a poor job on many of the videos and you often don't see the action from the right angles.
-The resolution for pics varies from set to set but anything prior to 2009 isn't worth downloading and I have seen some after 2009 that are only at 800x533.
-The large majority of photosets are taken from the video shoot so not very much variety.
-There is no search option. All you have is a choice between the year and whether it's a photoset or video.
-Site is pretty slow to surf because it takes about 4 seconds from the moment you press the icon to the moment somethin happens. |
| Bottom Line: |
*Tracy has been doing this since 1999 and she doesn't seem to be slowing down. She's a pretty attractyive blond woman in her 40's or maybe even in her early 50's with a very active sex life. She has a few lesbian videos but I never got the feeling that she's really into women. On the other hand she is definetely into men, and the age, number or race of these gentlemen is not important.
**The first major problem is that the bulk of the videos aren't worth looking at or saving because they are onlt at 320x240 and that's such a low resolution. The photoset seem to fair ven worse because most of them are from the video shoots and resolution is way below HD.
**I have a personal problem with the site in regards to anal. There is no anal to be found anywhere except if it's from other performers. She took a small toy in the very beginning but nothing since then. I was hoping that she would have at some point done some but I didn't see any on the site.
-It's difficult to give the site a good score because the content could be good but since you can't really see the bulk of it due to poor quality then all you are left with is stuff done in the last 3 years and that's not enough for me. |
|
08-06-11 07:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2229
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've never chosen a long term membership for any site but I have kept a couple of memberships for many months and one for a year. I would have to revisit the sites that I currently have long term to see what the advantage would be to buy a long term membership right away versus keeping my membership.
|
08-06-11 08:18am
|
Review
2230
|
My Sex Life
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Content is all exclusif and you get a sense that Lori is involved in it.
+There is a nice drop down menu for finding pics and videos using certain keywords.
+585 photosets which are boken down into sub-categories. The resolution varies from set to set but 800x1200 is common.
+353 videos which are also broken into
sub-categories. Resolution on many is now offered in 640x480 and you also have some with 720x480.
+You can book Lori for personal webcams.
+You get access to 25 other sites. |
| Cons: |
All the videos that are hardcore, BJ and handjob star Lori and only her husband. These are all shot using a tripod or handcam.
-The length on many of the vidoes is under 10 minutes.
-Resolution on a percentage of the videos is only 320x240.
-Content is not dated so hard to tell how old it is.
-All the pics except for the glamour sets are taken from the video shoots. Those seem to be the ones with the worst resolution. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is Lori Anderson's site and she's a 30+ yrs old blond woman with an all natural body that enjoys being filmed doing the nasty with herself, her girlfriends or mostly her husband. I often complain that solo model sites don't make their site more personal. This is not the case here. It looks like Lori is involved and she has done some really good things inside.
*The problem for a guy like me is that the one thing she does wrong are the videos. I like pics but I don't really collect them. I love videos and unless you have some good ones than I'm going to be disapointed. How much depends on how badly the videos are. The first thing that I noticed about the videos is that she has a lot of the same thing. 91 BJ videos with her husband is overkill. You add 63 handjob videos with her husband. Then there are 92 hardcore videos but again they are with her husband. The only ones that don't include her husband are the G/G videos but there are only 17 of these and a couple are barely 10 minutes long.
*I could have overlooked the fact that she only does hardcore with her husband but shooting all that content using a tripod or handcam is a deal breaker. It made sense that in the beginning they wanted to save money by shooting their own content but at some point they should have hired someone to film them. As it is. All you really have are variation of the same stuff.
***If you like or don't mind videos that are shot using a tripod or handcam than you will be happy with Lori's site. I'd recommend that anybody like me avoid it.***
-My score is based on what they offer and not what I took from it. |
|
08-05-11 07:33pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2231
|
Francine Dee
(0)
|
Reply of
SidBushi's Reply
Thanks for the quick reply, and yes you have answered all of my concerns. I'm glad that you enoy this type of content. Sadly this is not a site I'd ever consider if for no other reason than I must be able to download the videos. I've heard the argument why some sites choose to only stream their videos and I'm fine with it. In return they must understand that I will never join their site regardless of their reasons.
|
08-05-11 07:08pm
|
Reply
2232
|
Francine Dee
(0)
|
Reply of
SidBushi's Review
Hi SidBushi.
I appreciate that you like her site but a score of 91 without the supporting information always makes us nervous and tend to make your review look like a plug for the site more than anything else.
1-Could you tell us if you can now download her videos for anything larger than an ipod screen? The most recent review stated that you could only stream her videos in HD but the downloaded videos were only 320x112.
2-Is there hardcore content or is it mostly glamorous?
3-What's the average length of the videos?
|
08-05-11 06:37pm
|
Reply
2233
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
schlemihl's Review
Are you sure you logged in with the correct pasword? Any past memebr of the 21sextury sites can access all the content but can't download any of it. I'd say this is what happened to you based on what you have written. I'm a current long term member and the only time I see what you describe is when i visit 21sextreme. Both networks are on the same main page but since my membership in on 21sextury then all I can do on 21sextreme is look at the content.
As for that new lifetime point system that you talk about. I never look at it. I know i have accumulated some but frankly that's never been of great importance to me. This is one of the cheapeast network you can join who still offers such great content.
|
08-05-11 06:21am
|
Review
2234
|
Roxy Raye
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Roxy is at the top of the list for extreme anal queen of the US.
+She has 86 videos which can be downloaded in WMV and you get low or high quality(resolution for HQ is 960x540)
+There are 56 photosets which can be downloaded as complete zip files. (Resolution is 800x1200).
+They update every day or two and content is all dated.
+You get access to 7 other sites. |
| Cons: |
-There is a lack of variety in the different types of videos shoots because over 50 of them are of Roxy inserting various objects in her ass.
-She loves the extreme side of anal so you see her rosebud quite often.
-All the phototsets are from the video shoots so nothing extra. |
| Bottom Line: |
*Roxy is a such a cute girl that it's hard to believe that she's into extreme anal insertion. That's the good news for me. The bad one is that she's a little too extreme for my taste. I love seeing anal but seeing a girl try to push different size objetcs out of her is interesting but not necessarily sexually stimulating. Then there is the appearance of her rosebud in some of the videos and that's a major problem for me. I can't look at a girls rosebud. I'm glad that they seem to have no problem playing with it and don't seem to have any health issues but I still don't want to see it.
**This is a decent site for anyone looking for a girl that's into pushing different objhects out of her anal cavity and enjoy doing it. I really belive that Roxy loves this. Since m,any of the other sites have similar content than that's also a plus.**
***This site and most of the other whithin the network should be avoided by anyone who's not into extreme porn. Otherwise you will be very disapointed by the content***. |
|
08-04-11 07:26pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
2235
|
Teen Porno Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
I'll only add one warning about their content. A lot of it, if not all of it is leased. I have seen it on other sites. I'd hate for anyone to discover that after joining this site that most of their content is on their hard drive.
|
08-04-11 06:29pm
|
Reply
2236
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Just wanted to let you know that since my review was posted. I can no longer download videos in HD. It must have been a glicth.
|
08-04-11 11:15am
|
Reply
2237
|
Lily Wow
(0)
|
Reply of
grimmaronw's Review
Thanks for the info. The reason why I asked about other sites is that i found this offer online and where you get Lily's site as well as 14 others for 30$. See link. Of course they could all be similar to her site so not be worth it.
deluxekey.com
|
08-04-11 10:55am
|
Reply
2238
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
I about that scene and yes it is censored and will likely remain so.
I believ that the scene will be made available to Roxy so that she can post it on her site. I'm going to review her site today or maybe tomorrow so I'll let you know what is available at the moment.
|
08-04-11 06:17am
|
Reply
2239
|
Lily Wow
(0)
|
Reply of
grimmaronw's Review
Thanks for the review. This site was on my list of those that I was considering joining. I probably won't based on your review.
1-Could you elaborate on the quantity of videos, the resolution, length, and which version exist(ie WMV, MP4)?
2-Do you get access to any other sites?
3-If yes, to the other sites then are they similar in style to this site?
|
08-04-11 06:14am
|
Reply
2240
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I now own 2 because the first one was too small and I needed a much larger storage space. The first one was a 500G and my new one is 2TB. I'm pretty selective on the porn that I download and even more on the one that makes it to the long term save so I have plenty of space left on the 2Tb drive.
|
08-04-11 06:11am
|
Reply
2241
|
Club Jana Jordan
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Thanks Monahan. I believe the site has actually dropped in whatever quality it had at the time of your review. I don't think it's worth spending a 1$. Jana had a baby pretty early in her career and stopped doing porn for quite a while. She might still be doing some stuff based on things said on freeones forum but I certainly haven't seen anything anywhere. She's one of those porn girls who I really wish had done more stuff but I crossed her name off my list a long time ago.
|
08-04-11 06:08am
|
Reply
2242
|
Club Jana Jordan
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
I've never been a member of either site and never will because this is the typical porn girl site that I got burned on when I first started surfing the net. There is no way I'm dishing out 30$ for a site that has no preview page to talk off. not too mention that i have just found another Jana site (see link). I read on freeones forum that she has implanst now so if any recent struff doesn't have her with implants then you know it's old content.
janarocks.com
|
08-03-11 11:38am
|
Reply
2243
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I like their official review and I agree with you that they are objective. I suspect they have a check list and they use that to base their score.
The one thing that is better at PU than TBP is in regards to sites with leased content or older material. I don't know if TBP doesn't use those two things when making a review but I often find sites that get a decent score and they are filled with leased content or older content.
|
08-02-11 07:26am
|
Reply
2244
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
Let me know which site you are interested. I'm a 21 sextury member at the moment. Here is a link you may not have that shows recent updates at 21sextury and also some upcoming ones as well. The only thing which I'm not completely sure is whether you get full access upfront of if you still have to wait 2 to 3 months like in the past.
http://pornpassforall.com/home?nats=cord...rall%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0
|
08-01-11 01:22pm
|
Reply
2245
|
Daily Sex Dose
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
Hi RustyJ.
Their last update was July 5 so almost one month without an update but looking at what was updated in the days prior to that makes me think that this might be old content either never released or maybe remastered. They have 2 updates with Victoria Sweet and I don't think they are too recent. Who know's if they'll bring the site back. It always felt like a usueless adder to me because this is the kind of content that could have been included in one of the other existing site instead of creating a new one.
|
08-01-11 09:49am
|
Reply
2246
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
The main themes for the 21sextury sites are mostly teens, anal, DP, and lesbian. There are still plenty of milf's the majority of the girls are under 30 and many are below 22.
|
08-01-11 09:29am
|
Reply
2247
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
It used to be very confusing but I they have finally found a way to make it easier to understand. You have the networks 21sextury and 21 sextreme. Joining either network gives you access to a list of sites only availble through that network. You can preview the content on the other network but that's all. The only decision to make is which has the most content you like. There are a couple of nice sites on 21sextreme but it doesn't compare to the number on 21sextury for the type of porn I like.
|
07-31-11 11:47am
|
Reply
2248
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The most I usually watch is about 2-3 hours a day.
Sometimes it's a little more but more often it's less. There are a couple of Discovery show that I'm starting to get addicted to. I watch very little network Tv and that's because I can't watch anything that is remotely refered to as reality TV.
I'd rather watch static on screen than be subjected to those shows.
|
07-31-11 11:37am
|
Reply
2249
|
Net Video Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
nastytodd's Review
Could you give us more info on what's inside the site because the preview pages aren't worth anything. I'd love to know the average video length. What kind of action there is on the videos. What kind of resolution are offered for the videos.
This is the perfect example of a site I would never join because you can't tell what's inside until you have joined.
|
07-30-11 09:08am
|
Reply
2250
|
Slut Wife Training
(0)
|
Reply of
pornagain's Reply
The idea isn't bad and these guys do a pretty decent job in the sex and filming or it. It was worth joining once but no need to ever comeback. It was even better since I got access for a lot less money than is posted.
|
07-30-11 09:03am
|
