| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
501
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I agree with Marquis. I think for a number of reasons, sites have raised prices to get the most they can out of someone after a month assuming they will leave. Perhaps they can have a program that allows greater access to the site as you continue membership (I think Abbey Winters does this to an extent) to KEEP someone a member. I guarantee I would spend more to stay connected to a site for a longer period of time. So, a variety of picture sizes isn't really going to do that.
|
02-21-07 09:46am
|
Reply
502
|
Jack Lawrence XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
Reno911's Review
Ok, so you are admitting it has some negatives and you still gave it a perfect score? What pains me about reviews like this is that I would rarely score even my favorite sites ever above 95 since a site can ALWAYS improve. Unfortunately, the result is that my fav sites get lower scores while reviews like this send their reviewed site straight to the top. Yes, I could go ahead and give sites a perfect score just because they are my favorite, but does that help anyone else decide whether or not to join?
Thoughts?
|
02-20-07 02:04pm
|
Reply
503
|
Playboy's CyberClub
(0)
|
Reply of
Horny Ryan's Reply
Well, that sucks...and not literally, which is unfortunate. ;)
|
02-20-07 01:59pm
|
Reply
504
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I admit that I sometimes forget about what I've downloaded since I'm often getting as much stuff off the site as I can before my membership runs out. However, it ends up being a nice surprise when I go back through. That or I delete it/throw it out because it sucks. ;)
|
02-20-07 01:57pm
|
Reply
505
|
Dainews
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Always nice to hear! :)
|
02-19-07 02:41pm
|
Reply
506
|
Dainews
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thanks Khan! I only wish I had more of a porn budget so I could do more reviews as I've really enjoyed doing them. Just got 3 more until I get that rookie reviewer badge. Yipee! ;)
|
02-19-07 01:31pm
|
Reply
507
|
Dainews
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
Thanks roseman! I should be more vocal in my assessment of your reviews which have been awesome. I'll try to do better in the future. Thanks!
|
02-19-07 01:29pm
|
Reply
508
|
Jen Madison.com
(0)
|
Reply of
heynow's Comment
I reviewed this site right in the middle of the change from MyWifeJen to JenMadison. I think she abandoned the MyWifeJen too quickly after getting everyone used to it not being JenUncut anymore. I'm sure it's left some members scratching their heads and even more confused after the second change! In her defense, I think the cam show thing that has her still listed as JenUncut is because she either hasn't thought to change it (sometimes what the cam show operator sees isn't what we see, so they don't notice) or she can't change it without opening another account. Bottom Line: It's eyebrow raising as a prospective member and curious to current members, but once you get inside the site it isn't really a big deal.
|
02-19-07 12:35pm
|
Review
509
|
Dainews
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Over 200,000 celeb pics and growing every day
-Very cheap for what you get in return
-Excellent search options
-Easy and simple navigation |
| Cons: |
-Not really a porn site
-Many pics are fully clothed or only see-through clothing shots
-Site design is plain and boring
-Search options could still be improved |
| Bottom Line: |
Recently I submitted a review of a celebrity movie site that charges per video download which I rated very highly. Some PU members said the pay per view system was a pain, so I decided to check out a flat monthly rate celeb site. Although this site only has pictures, it has an incredible variety of celebs and adds new ones daily at a great price.
The first thing you notice on the site is the very outdated and plain design, but the abundant search features and ability to customize the layout more than compenstates. Every pic has been rated on a 5 point scale for nudity and quality which you can enter into the search. I'd prefer to be able to select a specific level of these options rather than a span (you can choose 1 to 5, 2 to 5, 3 to 5, etc., not just 1 or just 3) but complaining about a feature that goes beyond any site I have ever seen is like complaining about a free meal.
The pics rated at 5 are very high quality and anything above a 2 is still quite good. The site does rate see-through pics as full nudity which isn't really true, but they are as close as you can get without being nude and you can still see all the goods.
Bottom Line: The variety of celebs, the search options, and the very inexpensive price make the pluses outweigh any negatives. Yes, you can find some gripes but as I said it's only because you get spoiled and want more. I guarantee you'll find other sites lacking for these options and I can definitely give the site a very high recommendation. |
|
02-19-07 12:27pm
Replies (6)
|
Reply
510
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I used to feel like I could just take them witha grain of salt, but I have seen too many that leave out obvious flaws. I can always find at least a couple flaws with even my favorite sites, so if a reviewer can't be bothered to say at least 1 thing that could be improved I don't give it any attention.
|
02-19-07 11:46am
|
Comment
511
|
Hungarian Honeys
(0)
|
|
02-15-07 01:42pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
512
|
Erotic Bitch
(0)
62.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Countless feeds: video, pics, cams, etc.
-Fairly well organized
-3 day trial subscription is free
-Very clear and extensive support section |
| Cons: |
-None of the content appears exlcusive
-Monthly membership is very expensive
-Nothing remarkable about the site, very standard content
-You could get bored after awhile |
| Bottom Line: |
I was intrigued by the fact that it was free to sign up for a 3 day trial to this site (you do have to provide a credit card) before being charged a monthly fee. I doubted highly that I would maintain membership, but if they'd let me look at everything for 3 days with no risk I thought it was worth a shot.
As I might have expected, the entire site is made up of feeds and no real central exclusive focus. There is an amazing number of feeds however and I think everyone could find something they like with this site. You get an automatic connection to a number of well known cam programs and their selection of adult games is very extensive.
In the end I can't really recommend this site highly, although since it's free you don't have anything to lose by checking it out. I will say that if you like feeds and the variety that comes with them you may enjoy this site, but if you are loking for something unique you would definitely be better served elsewhere. |
|
02-15-07 12:23pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
513
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I joined Danni.com which has DRM and I swore I'd never do it again. It's possible I would join such a site, but the content would have to be 100% dead on for my tatses.
|
02-14-07 06:34pm
|
Reply
514
|
Gods Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
It is good to know all that Khan and it will eventually balance out. These are the growing pains of a new site and I'm sure ways to deal with it will appear over time or even take care of themselves. Thanks for letting us know what's going on behind the scenes!
|
02-13-07 01:41pm
|
Reply
515
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
If it's a site where you just download movies or pics I don't mind this, but with personal sites I wish the month to month charge was low enough to stay a member long term. There's a couple such sites I love but can't afford to maintain an uniterrputed membership.
|
02-13-07 08:07am
|
Reply
516
|
Gods Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
DpornGuy's Comment
I have been criticial of this too and I'm not sure what the admins can do about it. If the person really loves the site and can't think of any way it could improve I suppose we have to accept that as an honest opinion. I would argue that it hurts the site more than it helps because people won't take a review of 100 seriously. Perhaps I can join the site at some point to offer my fair evaluation and I encourage others to do so as the average of scores will eventually even things out. Hopefully after more reviews are done the average will balance everyone's views of the site, but for now I guess we'll have to accept that members who really like the site will use their platform here to express that opinion...that is the American way. :)
|
02-12-07 08:30pm
|
Reply
517
|
Baby Got Boobs
(0)
|
Reply of
gprime's Review
So, there's nothing this site could do better? Not a single thing? It's the most perfect site you've ever joined? I'd appreciate it if you elaborated some more because, frankly and with all respect, I find that hard to believe. If you really believe it has nothing it could do to improve I'll have to take your word for it, but if we want to make this a useful and meaningful site I think we need more information than wht you provided.
|
02-12-07 08:19pm
|
Reply
518
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
Price! 'nuff said! :)
|
02-12-07 07:01am
|
Reply
519
|
Lisa Sparxxx
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
Interesting! I just may have to give Lisa a try...well, her site anyway. ;)
|
02-12-07 06:17am
|
Reply
520
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I would only pay for such a service when the content is really something exciting. It isn't something I'd do very often and I agree with the previous reply that I'd be wondering the whole time if the performer was trying to keep me paying for as long as possible to increase their payday.
|
02-11-07 10:22am
|
Reply
521
|
Lisa Sparxxx
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
Thanks for the review and the follow up roseman! I'm definitely a Lisa fan, although TBP review made me hesitate because it said there was no interaction with Lisa. To me, that's the attraction of a site like this, so would you agree with TBP's review on that point? Also, how much content would you say there is overall?
|
02-11-07 10:20am
|
Reply
522
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
That's pretty cool...things just keep getting better and better! This really is a great site. Keep it up!
|
02-11-07 10:12am
|
Reply
523
|
India Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
Hereford's Reply
Now I can see why you gave it that rating and I just wanted to make sure you weren't giving the site a 50 if you honestly thought someone might think the pictures made the site worth it. However, with the additional negatives you mentioned along with the original review, even the greatest lover of this niche would likely leave the site unsatisifed. If anyone disagrees, bring it on! :)
Thanks for replying and for the review!
|
02-10-07 11:29pm
|
Review
524
|
Nerdpr0n
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-All content is 100% exclusive
-Great quality pictures
-Very unique and different from just about anything else out there
-Site is run by a girl who gets naked and knows what ASCII means |
| Cons: |
-Videos are scarce and quality is only average
-Site has personal feel, but interaction is less than you'd expect
-Navigation is confusing and disorganized
-Is definitely a niche that appeals only to a limited demographic |
| Bottom Line: |
From the first moment you'll see this isn't your average personal site. Anna's not an air-headed model, is actually intelligent, and loves sex. To encounter a girl who's smart and likes to take her clothes off is a huge turn on for me, but it clearly isn't for everyone and has room for improvement.
The site is organized around her blog which extends back a few years. Her picture sets are full of geek related themes that will arouse anyone who went through the 80s and wasn't a jock. Imagine that cute girl in class you dreamed about seeing naked, that dream coming true, and then having her tell you that computer geeks make her wet.
While pics are plentiful, there are very few videos on the site and what is there consists of her putting a computer together and a report on a book she read, although she is naked in both. While I am usually looking for hardcore videos I think the quality and creativity of the other content makes up for it, but for many that won't be enough.
Focusing the site on her blog is a nice touch, but getting around the site is maddening since it doesn't have a consistent style. The result is links varying between different pages with no central overview of the site's features.
Anna's site is clearly a work in progress but is always adding new content. If you only like glamour models with fake tits don't bother, but if you want a reasonably priced site offering a smart girl getting naked with a large variety of pics I can definitely recommend it. |
|
02-10-07 11:23pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
525
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
I honestly can't remember what site it was, but essentially I bought a trial and even though I had cancelled it they charged me past the end. I was downloading content off the site until I presumed they would lock me out. However, because I accessed the site after the trial it automatically charged me for the month. Fortunately, that hasn't happened in a long time (might even be illegal now) and my experiences have been very positive.
Hey roseman, how did you get to post a poll? Cool! :)
|
02-10-07 09:29pm
|
