| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
|
Reply of
Jack P's Comment
I've always wondered, is it mainly just a BJ site or does he normally fuck every girl? Or does it just depend?
|
05-12-09 07:13am
|
Reply
52
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
zzzins's Reply
Thanks for the reply. It looks like Met Art is atop my list of sites to try soon.
|
05-11-09 05:51am
|
Reply
53
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
zzzins's Review
Nice review. I've always wanted to give this site a try but I'm just wondering, do they start the photo sets off already nude? Or are they clothed at the beginning and then strip to full nude?
That was one thing that killed me about FemJoy, was that 90% of the gallerys the model was already full nude at the start. To me just kinda makes all the photos run together. So was just wondering if that's the way it is here?
|
05-10-09 08:20pm
|
Reply
54
|
Premium Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
nostromo's Comment
Are you referring to the access key in this picture http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z288/...ey9910/accesskey.jpg ? If so, while I'm not a member of the site, I having no problems being able to see it or make it out.
So you've tried it on two pc's and two browsers (both IE and Firefox) and both had the same problems? What happens if you try direct linking the log in page: http://exclusive.premiumpass.com/Login/login/ ? Other then that, I'm lost.
|
05-10-09 09:18am
|
Rating
55
|
Porn Access
(0)
70.0
|
No Review.
|
05-10-09 06:23am
|
Reply
56
|
Porn Access
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
I completely agree with your review. I also signed up for the $5 access but just didn't really feel like writing a review. The site wasn't even worth my time for that. :)
|
05-10-09 06:23am
|
Reply
57
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thanks, Khan. That done the trick. I'm now seeing $14.95 again after clearing Firefoxs private data.
|
05-09-09 09:07am
|
Comment
58
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
|
05-09-09 05:47am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
59
|
Finest Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Nice review. The whole not being able to save image by image and the low resolution of the images will probably keep me from giving the site a try. Sucks too, as it sounded like one I'd probably like if they fix those two things.
|
05-09-09 04:40am
|
Reply
60
|
Brooke Lee Playmates
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
You have to have a password to extract the files? That sucks. Guess it's okay as long as your a member but what happens if over time you wanna check them out again, you'll prety much be screwed if you can't remember the password. Guess you could always just always extract the rars and then rezip them with no password but that's a step that shouldn't be needed.
|
05-07-09 05:12am
|
Reply
61
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Review
Nice review. Currently a member there now and have to agree that the bonus sites are complete crap. I love how they try to make it out that they are saving you like $50 on access to the bonus sites. However I think they all quit updating like 5 years ago.
|
05-01-09 01:03pm
|
Reply
62
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Nice review roseman but I have to disagree with a few points that people are making.
People actually complain about 25 Gb a day limit? Who the hell can seriously hit that? That's pretty much impossible for 99% of people to hit.
As for the updates, do you guys realize he could do what sites like Nubiles does and seperate each gallery into seperate updates. Would that make you happier? He'd be updating the site daily but it'd just be galleries that are included in the big weekly update now.
How it's overrated in quality is beyond me. The videos can't get any better looking at 8000kbps. I'll give you that the pictures could stand to be bigger and the price for a single site is a bit steep these days.
I think FTV is a 85-90 rated site but again, good review Roseman. Nice and full review.
|
05-01-09 01:00pm
|
Reply
63
|
Playboy's CyberClub
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
I never have had any problem cancelling online. Once you log in, you can go to member services and it'll give you a list of all active & cancelled services and you can cancel from there. And so far, I see no difference between the free month and the access I had before when I was a member.
|
04-28-09 06:13pm
|
Comment
64
|
Playboy's CyberClub
(0)
|
|
04-28-09 02:36pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
65
|
Sun Devil Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
carydjh's Review
Thanks for the review. I've been wanting to check out that site for awhile, guess I don't need to know. Looks like it's kinda trying to be a hardcore version of FTV. But thought it was pretty new. But not having whats on the preview page and not updating regularly, won't get you very far.
|
04-28-09 02:28pm
|
Reply
66
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Nice review. I've always loved the style of the of OT, however I can't really handle non-nude or topless sites. To me, the tease should have always been the first 75% of the gallery. Would live if they'd created a site or to find a site just like OT outfit wise but where every women ended up with full frontal nudity. Not looking for spread eagle or masturbation, just full nude.
|
04-18-09 05:13am
|
Review
67
|
Reality Kings
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Great content and tons of it
+Good quality videos (720x480 @ 1500kbps)
+Access to 26 sites.
+Most of the 26 sites are updated weekly, a few aren't updated anymore.
+Nice price from TBP, $17.95 a month. Otherwise it's $24.95 a month. |
| Cons: |
-Doesn't use CCBill (Uses Secure Billing Worldwide, SBW)
-Pictures are nothing more then vid caps and poor quality (900x602)
-Doesn't allow use of Download Managers |
| Bottom Line: |
I really liked the content of RealityKings and based on content alone, the site would rate high 80's or low 90's.
However what kills me about the site is that download managers aren't allowed. Well technically you can use them but you can only download 3 movies at once. You cannot que up 10 or so movies and let them download throughout the day. If you do que up lets say 5 movies, once it gets to the 4th or 5th one, it'll end up saving it as a .html file. If you open that it says "Your BigMovie link has expired! Please revisit the update page to regenerate a new one" So it comes down to only being allowed to download 3-4 files at a time. I don't know how it works with the smaller files, as I have no interest in downloading a ton of them when they have the full links available.
RealityKings is pretty much a video only site. The pictures are nothing more then vidcaps and are 900x602. The videos are good quality, being 720x480 @ 1500kbps. The videos are available to download in 4 smaller parts or in 1 big wmv.
Overall, if they'd get rid of the stupid time expiring link to download the movies, the site would be great. However the fact that you can't even download more then 3 files without the link expiring, makes it a no go for me. So if you like to just que up a Manager with 10 or so files and leave it for the day, then I can't recommend this site. |
|
04-17-09 05:49am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
68
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
Addict's Comment
Nice to now. I've always wanted to give this site a try, just for the price, never have yet. No download managers is becoming a huge pet peeve of mine.
|
04-16-09 05:23am
|
Reply
69
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Well I shot them a email asking the question. They respond with a very generic email stating "Thanks for your email. Our biller CC Bill will be able to help you. You can contact them at: support@ccbill.com " And they respond with "Unfortunately, CCBill can not accept sign ups via e-mail or telephone. If you wish to join or re-join a Web site, you can do so by using the sign-up page for that particular site."
So it doesn't look like I'll be signing up to the site, since I guess neither site can understand my question.
|
03-30-09 08:24pm
|
Reply
70
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
That's good to see. As the videos were always pretty much useless before.
Is Only Tease still pretty much only a boob site? And not much full frontal nudity? I really like the site, clothing wise and shot wise but too many of the girls don't get full frontal for my tastes.
|
03-28-09 12:17pm
|
Comment
71
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
|
03-28-09 05:53am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
72
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
What few sites I've found like that has some of the worst quality I've seen in a while. I'm too much of a high quality fan to even waste my time on streaming video with a quality that looks like it's from the 90's.
|
03-27-09 04:08am
|
Reply
73
|
Kaya Luv
(0)
|
Reply of
joexdoe's Review
Would have to agree, not really a good review. How do you figure it goes to criminal activity, if it can't be proven? As said above, whats wrong with working with children from a sick hospital? How's that a con?
To be your review comes off sounding more like a guy pissed off that she wouldn't date you, then a honest review of a site.
|
03-19-09 07:10am
|
Review
74
|
Nicole Graves
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+Nicole is hot.
+Nice mixture in the scenes (solo, b/g, and a few g/g)
+Included in the Twistys bonus sites. |
| Cons: |
-Hasn't been updated with new NG stuff since June of 08. All the new updates are rehashed stuff from when she was NaughyCoco.
-Photos and videos could be better. All the photos are 768x1024.
-New videos decent quality (640x480 @ 1627kbps) The older Coco stuff is pretty bad @ 320x240 and from 700-900 kbps range, it seems to always be different. |
| Bottom Line: |
NicoleGraves.com seems to be one of the many sites that I've been a member of recently that has fallen off the face of the earth.
Ealier reviews comment on her interactivity with fans, however I can't comment on that. As there seems to be none anymore. I've even tried to email her a few times, with no success.
The photos and videos are decent quality but nothing that will strain your PC to run. In todays day and age of 3000 or 4000px images, NG's 768x1024 seems a bit behind the times. The only advantage to that is that all the images, even the older Naughty Coco ones, come in at the size.
The videos are on the low end of what I'd expect for a site in 2009, the newer stuff being 640x480/1627kbps. The older(or recently updated) Naughty Coco stuff is 320x240 and between 700-900kbps.
It is one of the bonus sites included in Twisty's so I'd recommend you sign up through Twistys as it'll save you $5.
The store, which on her page says it offers signed dvd's/photos/posters doesn't work. When you go there it's completely empty.
Overall I think I just seemed to miss what appears to have been a great website. Since the site is included with Twistys, I can't really knock it too bad. As your not paying $20 for just this one site. However coming from a fan of Nicole, if your only interested in this site and haven't been a member before, then I think it'd be worth it for a month. However if you've been a member of NG.com before, then I really don't think it's worth the money. I'd have no problem paying the $20 for this site alone, if it ever gets back to what it seemed to be in early to mid 2008. |
|
03-18-09 09:06am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
75
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
I've been a member of Twistys off and on, a month here and there over the past couple years. And I gave Twistys about 8 more points then you, I think you have some valid points in your review.
I'll agree with you on the bonus sites. I forgot what they are called but the ones with the exact same content as Twistys main page, really need to just be taken down. I don't really understand Twistys Hard, as it's also updated on the main page. So not really sure why it needs to be in two sections. As for the bonus site, NicoleGraves.com (the main reason why I keep joining Twistys), that sites pretty much dead since nothing new has been updated June 13th of 08. All the recent updates have been rehashed stuff from when she went by Naughty Coco.
The one huge bright side for Twistys though is the Member Forum and Shap. As he's on there all the time answering people's questions and interacting with the members. To be honest, that probably keeps me coming back more then the content.
Overall I think your review could use a bit more detail: photo sizes, video sizes, number of updates each week/day. Overall a decent review.
|
03-18-09 08:45am
|
