| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes, I have a PS3. However I"m one that has no interest in the whole digital only format. Maybe it's because I have horribly slow internet, so actually downloading a HD movie will take me days. Not to mention all the DRM that is included with purchased movies from places. I have no interest in watching a HD movie on a 19" computer screen when I have a PS3 and a 51" HD TV in the next room over.
However I will admit that due to financial reasons I haven't rented Blu Ray in a while. As of right now I can't see it worth the price increase over a place like RedBox where you can get a regular DVD for $1 a night.
|
03-20-10 11:04pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
About the most editing I've ever done is joining files together.
I just don't care enough to take the time to edit what parts out of the video that I don't like. Instead what I normally do is fast forward to the part(s) I want.
I've done editing before of video I've captured form TV or 360, so I've got experience doing it. Just feel it's too much of a hassle and time consuming without some nice ($$) software. Using the software I've used, the new video never looks as good as the original.
|
02-22-10 04:12pm
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I'm cool with 2-3 mins as long as it's a streamable preview. Due to my POS ISP, I have no interest in downloading a trailer. Takes long enough to download the full movies as is.
|
10-23-09 07:20pm
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I wish I could even sniff 500. LOL I live in a small town with crappy DSL. So, I'm really happy if I'm running in the 120 range bur normally it's between 80-100.
|
08-22-09 06:36am
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
It was a tough one between video and picture quality but in the end I went with Picture quality. It seems if sites have great HD qualty vieos, the photos suffer and if they have great qualty photos then the videos suffer. Seems to be hard to find one that has both.
|
05-28-09 02:10pm
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I think I've joined maybe two sites that were not based in the US and with the conversion rate made it $40+.
At this point and time, $30 is the max I'll spend per month and even then it must be a great reviewed site. As typically I stick to the $15-$25 price range.
|
05-18-09 07:07am
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
What few sites I've found like that has some of the worst quality I've seen in a while. I'm too much of a high quality fan to even waste my time on streaming video with a quality that looks like it's from the 90's.
|
03-27-09 04:08am
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
I guess my question is, would it have been considered porn before the interent? And I think most people would say yes.
In uptight America, I would still consider it porn but it's about as soft as you can go. Other countries where nudity is more acceptable, then I don't think it would be.
|
01-08-09 07:29am
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Most of the time, within a week. Unless it's a site that I really dislike or that doesn't update anymore, then I cancel pretty much days, if not hours within singing up.
|
01-04-09 08:49am
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
My first is price. Second would be if they use Epoch. The rest don't really bother me, as there are ways around DRM and/or streaming only video.
|
01-02-09 06:25am
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
No. Mainly for two reasons. My dsl isn't the fastest out there and it really isn't a realistic option for me to stream hi quality/HD videos.
Most videos I download, I like to skip around or fastly skim through it.
The only way I'd realistically think about doing it, was if it was only $10 or less per month. AS there are always ways around streaming only videos. It's just normally more of a pain in the ass then needed.
|
12-23-08 08:03am
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
Reply of
sitsat's Poll
My number one has to be dumbass guys talking in the background. I don't mind it too much on some sites like FTV where most of the talking is more of a interview kinda thing. But I hate the cameraman telling the girls exactly what to do.
My 2nd would have to be the camera snapping away. Mainly just because it normally follows a 3,2,1 or the guy telling the model how to pose.
|
12-16-08 01:01pm
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm a newb here but is there anyway to tell what a person gave you a positive or negative review for? For example if I post 2-3 reviews in a couple days time, can I tell which of those reviews got me positivea and which of those reviews got me negative?
|
11-07-08 03:12am
|
Reply
14
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Have to agree the system sucks.
I voted for Barr. We really need a 3rd party. It's completely stupid to only have 2 choices.
|
11-04-08 04:58am
|
Comment
15
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
|
01-27-11 06:13pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
16
|
Alison Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
somedays's Comment
Damn that sucks. Guess nows a good time to sign back up to get all of her content.
|
11-05-08 12:28pm
|
Reply
17
|
All Teen Rev Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
OneMan's Comment
They also instantly cancel your access to the sites when you cancel. So even though you paid for 30 days, if you cancel 10 days into your month, you lose access instantly. So I agree with OneMan, I'd highly recommend stay away from. They are a disgrace of a company. And on top of it all, the website they list for "Customer Service" responses doesn't exist.
|
11-04-09 06:32am
|
Reply
18
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Comment
"It involves the model deep throating the cock, and then when the guy is about to shoot his load, he rams his cock down her throat thereby directly depositing his entire load into her stomach."
That quote right there is enough to make me never visit either ALS site again. While I'm not against hardcore per se, the whole ramming or slamming just isn't for me.
|
03-21-10 06:36am
|
Reply
19
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Reply
You might be right, anything above a B might be on ALS Angels. If they'd just merge both sites into one, then it'd probably be alot better. Seems they are just trying to milk people out of money.
|
12-12-08 06:57am
|
Review
20
|
ALS Scan
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+Helps a charity (The only site I've ever known to do so)
+Great quality images(2592x3888 portrait/3888x2592 for landscape).
+Great quality videos. Had Divx (which my pc wouldn't play smoothly) and 720p MP4 videos.
+Most models are small chested and pretty skinny. Very seldom are any models C cup or bigger. |
| Cons: |
-Website must have been one of the first ever built and boy does it show. WAY past due for a upgrade.
-No easy navigation.
-Most vidoes are just behind the scenes of the photo shoots. |
| Bottom Line: |
As you can tell by the name of the site, every model is 100% shaved. At first it's pretty cool but then it starts to make every photo set and every model start to look the same. I love the fact that they have alot of smaller chested girls but after a while, they start to feel the same. Could really use some variation.
There are normally 100 or so photos per set. And the photos are great high quality images. The first 3/4 of the set is your normally glam style shoots but the last quarter can get pretty strange. From sticking normal every day items (food, end of a shovel, etc) in the pussy to pissing. Pissing seems to be a pretty big niche on the site, as it seems to happen alot.
The videos are great quality but most are behind the scens of the photo shoots. So you've always got the lovely cameraman talking through out the whole thing. When will these companies learn? Get rid of that shit.
Navigation for the site is complete crap.You've got either updates or all models. No way to search by cup size, hair color or even model name. To find certain model you have to go to the all models page and do a find within IE or Firefox.
For the price ($29.95 1st month/then $24.95) I think the site is past due for a upgrade. While the images are great quality, due to the navigation and the constant talking during videos, unless a your a image fan you'll probably be disappointed. If your a video fan like me, you'll quickly get sick of hearing the dumbass guys talking. |
|
12-11-08 02:17pm
Replies (5)
|
Comment
21
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
11-07-08 04:53am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
22
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
|
Reply of
Jack P's Comment
I've always wondered, is it mainly just a BJ site or does he normally fuck every girl? Or does it just depend?
|
05-12-09 07:13am
|
Comment
23
|
Art-Lingerie
(0)
|
|
08-27-21 05:58am
Replies (0)
|
Rating
24
|
Art-Lingerie
(0)
82.0
|
No Review.
|
08-27-21 05:48am
|
Comment
25
|
Art-Lingerie
(0)
|
|
08-10-21 07:33am
Replies (1)
|
