| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
101
|
Girls Gone Wild
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+If you have seen any of the videos, then you know what to expect.
+Normal Girls Gone Wild content. Alot of flashing and alittle bit of lesbian play. |
| Cons: |
-Pricey $$, frankly for the content it's a rip off.
-ALL videos are streaming. If you do work around it to get it to download, it has DRM. So you'll have to go through more hassles to remove that.
-Videos are crappy quality. Was probably decent 5-6 years ago but to today standards, not up to par.
-Photos are pretty much nothing but screen caps and pretty poor quality at that.
-Videos they have available in the members area are not the ones shown on the main page. The ones in the members area appear to be 3-4 years old and are the ones that they can't make any more money on. |
| Bottom Line: |
This has to be one of the biggest ripoffs I've ever seen for a adult site. $30 for a site with crappy screen shot photos and only lets you stream videos? That may have been okay back in the early days of the internet but not in the year 2008. It's been a bit since I was a member and I don't remember the exact size of the videos but once blown to full screen, they weren't very good.
If you want Girls Gone Wild content, Amazon has Blu Ray dvd's for $13-$20 and regular dvd's are even cheaper. You'd be better off buying a few of those for the same price as a month of this site. I can guantee that the quality will be light years beyond whats available on the website.
Again sorry for not being specific on video and photos sizes. I've just recently started paying attention to those details. |
|
11-11-08 11:44am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
102
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Comment
After doing some testing it appears the site has probelems with Firefox. If I download any images using IE or the IE Tab of Firefox, it'll download just fine. It's just I lose all my features that make downloading soo much easier in FF. And if I download the full zips, then it works fine too.
Webmaster has replied to my message board thread. So if if they figure something out, I'll add it to here.
|
11-08-08 06:38am
|
Comment
103
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
|
11-07-08 05:49pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
104
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
11-07-08 04:53am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
105
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm a newb here but is there anyway to tell what a person gave you a positive or negative review for? For example if I post 2-3 reviews in a couple days time, can I tell which of those reviews got me positivea and which of those reviews got me negative?
|
11-07-08 03:12am
|
Reply
106
|
Playboy's CyberClub
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
It really depends. Cyber Girl of the Week pictorials are normally 10-12 images and 1 pictorial. Cyber Girl of the Month are normally 3-4 pictorials with 20-25 images per set. Very seldom your get a set that has 30+ images in it.
I'd say on average most sets have right around 20 images.
|
11-06-08 01:27pm
|
Reply
107
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Sorry don't have much to add about Ron Harris. Was really disappointed after such hype, especially for the price.
As for the videos they are available in 720p and 1080p to download. I've never had problems playing hd videos on my pc but the 1080p wouldn't play on my machine. Quality was good for the 720p if you could get past the stuff I said in my review. As for how many, just depended on the model. Some like his main girl Kara(who he shoots alot compared to everyone else) had probably 10-12, while most girls had 2-3.
While the videos look great, I couldn't get past the jerky cam, bad zoom and him talking all the time.
|
11-06-08 08:12am
|
Reply
108
|
Playboy's CyberClub
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
I never had any problems downloading movies with Firefox. I'd say there is 1-2 movies available for each model, depending of rather she's a Cyber Girl of the Month or Week or a Casting Call model, etc. Some are in quicktime or windows HD, others are just one or the other. Older ones are just widescreen/decent quality. It's not till you get to the real old ones that quality looks bad.
|
11-06-08 08:05am
|
Review
109
|
Playboy's Fresh Faces
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
12-31-08 07:50am (Update History)
Reason: Wanted to add specs to photos and videos. This review also applys to the other Girls of sites.
|
| Pros: |
+You get acess to 6 sites. All are clones of each other layout wise but different content. Some models are on 2 or 3 pages but it's different sets. You get access to: Fresh Faces, Sexy Wives, Student Bodies, All Naturals, Women Of, Busty Babes.
+Playboy quality
+Great quality HD vidoes
+If you do the monthly option, after 3 months you can add another site for free. That site can be another Playboy site (Cyber Club, Special Editions, etc) or even a more explict Spice site.
+Easy to change, add or cancel subscriptions right there on the website.
+Seems to show all of the womans body more then the Magazine or Cyber Club. Videos don't seem to be as overedited as much as the Cyber Club. |
| Cons: |
-Not updated daily. But between all the sites, it's updated about a couple times a week.
-Can't view large photos from the site. You have to download the zip. Large photos aren't as large as other sites. About as large as the XL in the cyber club. EDIT: See specs at bottom of review.
-Layout kinda sucks. Just all the models headhots on the main page. Seems the number of model slots are limited and after that they seem to disappear. There is no archive or anything like that. |
| Bottom Line: |
If you like Playboy or the Cyber Club, odds are you'll like these sites. They aren't updated as much as I'd like but they photos and vidoes do seem to show alot more of the ladys then what they do in the Cyber Club. To me they aren't as overedited, especially the videos.Each model normally has 1 HD video, a few have 2. Most videos are just a strip tease and some closeups of the body. The vidoes aren't just behind the scenes of the photoshoot. They are normally completley different outfit and layout then eiher photoset.
The one huge downside seems to be that there is a set number of slots available for content and after that's full the oldest seems to just disappear each time new content is added. There is no archive or search function.
Overall it's pretty much just a extension of every other Playboy site. You know what to expect. But if you stay a member long enough you can get all of Playboys sites for $19.99 a month, which for this site alone is kinda overpriced but for 2-3 of their sites or 1 of the Spice sites, it really isn't a bad deal.
EDIT: I just recently canceled but now that I know a bit more about spec talks, wanted to add photo and video specs. Photos are in two sizes, on the site they can be viewed and downloaded in 611x917. If you download the large zip set they are 1152x1728. So as you can see, why they are decent quality, they aren't huge like Playboy wants you to believe. There are only roughly 24-30 images per set.
The videos are in widescreen HD WMV's. They are 1280x720 at 3000kbps. Most videos are around 3-5 mins long. They include a strip tease and then some closeups of the body.
Over the past couple months, while I was a member, I find myself visiting the Playboy sites less and less. There are just too few images per gallery and Playboy makes sure you only see what they want. If they merged this site with the Cyber Club then it might be worth it but right now in this economy, I can't see this site being worth $20. Unless you really like softcore glamour Playboy style images and videos. |
|
11-06-08 06:34am
Replies (0)
|
Review
110
|
Playboy's CyberClub
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
12-31-08 08:20am (Update History)
Reason: Wanted to add specs to photos and videos.
|
| Pros: |
+It's Playboy. Pretty much a extension the magazine.
+Finally upgraded and added a XL photo option. EDIT: See specs at bottom of review.
+Updated daily. And also has daily double, 2 pictures that change daily.
+HD Videoes that using Firefox can be downloaded with no problems.
+If you do the monthly option, after 3 months you can add another site for free. That site can be another Playboy site (Network sites, Special Editions, etc) or even a more explict Spice site.
+Easy to change, add or cancel subscriptions right there on the website. |
| Cons: |
-It's Playboy lol. So the photoshoping is still pretty prevelant. They seem to have a habit of trying to shade or hide the pussy if they do show it. You'll very seldom see a lady squatting down with full frontal nudity, unless she has a inner pussy.
-While the photos are finally a respectable size, they still aren't as big as other sites.
-Most Celebrity pictorials aren't available.
-Videos are great quality but they seem to have a habit of going super slow closeup from the face to the belly button and then zoom past the bottom half. Would be nice to see them pay equal attention to all of the ladys body. |
| Bottom Line: |
It's Playboy, if you don't like the content of the magazine then you won't like the site. Even though some have said all pictorials are available online, they aren't. Some celebrity ones like Christy Hemme or Pam Anderson 1994 spread isn't available online. Which is fine for older sets but even some of the newer ones, like UFC's Rachelle Leah which was in this months magazine, isn't available online. So if your joining for some celebrity pics, it can be hit or miss on whether it's available.
Photos are decent quality. I find the HD videos excellent quality. It just mainly comes down to how much they show as to rather I keep it and the over editing of the vidoes can really get on your nerves.
The site is updated daily with atleast a daily double, 2 random photos, but it normally is also updated with a new photoset. There is a lot of content but only the new stuff is available in the XL photos. Some of the older vidoes aren't hd but they are widescreen and look decent.
The one huge upside to any Playboy site is how easy it is to cancel. Just log in and go to "Member Services". From there you can cancel or renew any subscription. Playboy also has a loyalty program. Stay a member for 3 months and you can add another site free of charge. You can repeat the process every 3 months. Or if your only interest in the Cyber Club, you can save a decent amount of money doing the annual plan.
Overall if you like the content Playboy Magazine then you'll like the Cyber Club.
EDIT: I just recently canceled but now that I know a bit more about spec talks, wanted to add photo and video specs. Most "of the week" galleries have 1 set of 15-20 images with no video. "Of the month" galleries normally have 3 sets of 30-40 images with 3-4 videos. Photos are not available to download in zip. The photos default to coming up in medium, so you'll constantly have to change the photos to XL. They need to allow the option to make XL default.So as you can see, why they are decent quality, they aren't huge like Playboy wants you to believe.
The videos are available in Quicktime, WMV, & HD. Both quicktime and wmv want to stream but with Firefox there are ways around to download it. However I normally stuck with the HD videos. The HD videos are .mov files. Unfortunatly I don't know how to find out info on .mov files but they are widescreen and listed as 720p. Most videos are around 3-5 mins long. They include a strip tease and then some closeups of the body.
Over the past couple months, while I was a member, I find myself visiting the Playboy sites less and less. There are just too few images per gallery and Playboy makes sure you only see what they want. If they merged this site with the Girls of network sites then it might be worth it but right now in this economy, I can't see this site being worth $20. Unless you really like softcore glamour Playboy style images and videos |
|
11-06-08 06:28am
Replies (5)
|
Review
111
|
Ron Harris
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+High quality photos.
+Good quality vidoes with closeups of girls during orgasm. |
| Cons: |
-Pricey $$$ for a month to month. Gets better if you pay for 2 months at once.
-Blair Witch porn. Dude has problems keeping camera still.
-Can't seem to decide if he wants to focus on her face or pussy. So in turn you get the top of her mouth in the upper left corner and the top of her pussy in the bottom right. So in turn your pretty much looking at her belly.
-One of those great camerman who won't shut the F up.
-Not updated enough and he seems to have gotten stuck on shooting 3-4 certain models |
| Bottom Line: |
My biggest poroblem with Ron Harris Studio is his video work. He seems to not be able to decide what he wants to focus on. So in turn you end up focusing on her belly most of the time. He also has a really hard time keeping camera still. Not sure if he's trying to jack it while taping them or what but it makes Blair Witch or Cloverfield look they were taped on a tripod. On top of that, he doesn't know when to shut up.
It seems from looking at the updates that he's starting focusing on a certin 3-4 models. And even with that, there just aren't enough updates.
Overall every once in a while I'd come across a video that he'd be less jerky and keep it focused down below for the big O. But that seemed to be few and far between.
EDIT:As for the videos they are available in 720p and 1080p to download. I've never had problems playing hd videos on my pc but the 1080p wouldn't play on my machine. Quality was good for the 720p if you could get past the stuff I said in my review. As for how many, just depended on the model. Some like his main girl Kara(who he shoots alot compared to everyone else) had probably 10-12, while most girls had 2-3.
While the videos look great, I couldn't get past the jerky cam, bad zoom and him talking all the time. |
|
11-06-08 06:25am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
112
|
Alison Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
somedays's Comment
Damn that sucks. Guess nows a good time to sign back up to get all of her content.
|
11-05-08 12:28pm
|
Reply
113
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
I'd think the tease is the first 75-80% of the photos. Just to me there are too many sets that never get past the tease part.
But no there isn't any false advertising or anything going on. As they never do promise or say how nude the ladies get. To me OT is a jack of all trades and a master of none. It seems they can't make up their mind if they want to do full nudity, just topless or non-nude.
Guess I'm just not used to paying $25 for a non-nude site.
|
11-05-08 12:22pm
|
Comment
114
|
Teen Stars Magazine
(0)
|
|
11-05-08 02:51am
Replies (1)
|
Review
115
|
Twistys
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+TONS of content
+Good mixture of solo, girl/girl & boy/girl.
+Updated daily with 2-3 sets.
+You get access to a few other sites as well. Main one for me is NicoleGraves.com. |
| Cons: |
-No HD videos. However the November treat is in atleast widescreen but quality still isn't in HD.
-Only allows you to download 1 video at a time using a download manager. If your doing something while downloading, I've had it timeout on me and restart the download.
-Can not resume downloads using Firefox DownThemAll.
-Photos are decent quality but not as high resolution as some other sites (Femjoy, Penthouse)
-Too often they will go straight from taking off their panties to using a dildo. |
| Bottom Line: |
I've only been a member fo Twistys for about a month now. It'll take me forever to look at or download all the content available.Twistys has a great mixture of solo, girl/girl & boy/girl sets. As of now Twistys has no true HD videos. The November Twistys Treat is in widescreen and much better quality then their normal 640x480 videos but still not as good as other true HD videos I've seen. Most of the videos found on Twistys are 640x480, while there are a few that are 720xXXX.
The photos found on Twistys are of good quality and a decent resolution. However they still aren't as big as photos found on some sites like Femjoy or Penthouse. Twistys is updated with 2-3 sets per day. It also has a nice catalog system you can use to search for models. By name, or by breast size, clothing, girl/girl or boy/girl and many more.
If you are one who likes to setup a que to download 3,4,5 videos on a manager at night or during the day, then you will be disappointed. Using DownThemAll with Firefox, I can only download one video at a time. And it has to be using all of my connection, otherwise the connection will timeout and it'll restart downloading from 0. You can not pause your downloads.You also can not set a que and then come back a couple hours later and download them. As appears the adress changes, as it gives me a error and wont' download.
Twistys also uses the stupid squiggly word, which you'll have to fill in each time you log into the site. It's currently not working correctly, so they have disabled it. But I'm guessing they will get it working again shortly.
Overall, I'd highly recommend checking out Twistys if your a photo fan. If your mainly a video fan, then as of right now I think your be disappointed.
UPDATE:I've decided to cancel after this month. I think the biggest disappointment about Twistys is the photo and video quality. No HD video and no pics larger then 1500-2000px, where as some sites are up to 3000-4000px.
Overall I feel Twistys moto is quantity over quality and couldn't really see it for the $24.95 price point. |
|
11-04-08 06:41am
Replies (0)
|
Review
116
|
Only Tease
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+High Quality photos
+Great mixture in styles of clothing.
+Updated daily.
+Has a nice catalog style. Makes it easy to search for what you want, rather that be full nude or blonde or etc. |
| Cons: |
-Really softcore. Too many models that don't even get full nude or if they do, they don't give you a good shot of their pussy.
-Videos are pretty much useless. Seem to be nothing more then behind the scenes videos of the photo shoots. |
| Bottom Line: |
I really like OnlyTease and the other Only sites. The one and only huge downside for me was that there were way too many photo sets that were either non nude or only topless. Being a fan of full frontal nudity, it seems 1 outta 5 models/sets would show full frontal nudity. Only Tease does have a option to search for "Full Figure Nude" but the problem with that is, that anytime a model takes off her panties, they label it as full figure nude. Even if they do nothing with the panties down but show ass.
Overall the Only Sites are ones that I'd sign up for once every 6 months for a month. There just isn't enough content to please me to stay a member month after month. |
|
11-04-08 06:07am
Replies (3)
|
Review
117
|
Femjoy
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+High Quality photos
+HD Quality videos
+Lots of updates
+Good mix of models |
| Cons: |
-Every set pretty much starts off with the model already nude. No teasing and/or clothes at all.
-Each gallery is set up where the top 1/3 is the highest quality(normally 3000 or 4000px) the middle is 2nd highest and bottom 1/3 is lowest. Would be nice if you could set it up so each gallery automatically came up in the highest quality.
-With no clothing, all the sets seem to start running together and looking the same.
-And as others have stated, most of the photos don't seem to have much life.
-Videos appear to be nothing more then moving photoshoots. You'll get a few closeups but doesn't really seem to be much reason to watch them. |
| Bottom Line: |
I logged into my Playboy Cyber Club account the other day and saw a offer for so much off a FemJoy subscription for Playboy subscribers. So figured I'd give it a shot. The quality of the site is outstanding, both photos and videos. Unfortuantly each set starts with the model fully nude. No clothes, lingerie, bra & panties or anything else like that. So after awhile each model and each of her sets start to blur together and feel the same.
While the photos are great quality, I didn't like how in the preview gallery the top 1/3 is the highest quality(normally 3000 or 4000px) the middle is 2nd highest and bottom 1/3 is lowest. Would be nice if you could set it up so each gallery automatically came up in the highest quality.
The vidoes are in HD and as good of qualty as other sites HD videos (Playboy, MCNudes). But with no clothing or anything else, there doesn't seem to really be much of a reason to watch the videos.
Overall the site is great at what it does. Nice quality photos and vidoes, which is a big selling point for me. Most of the models are very attractive. It's just the sets seem blah. With no clothing, the only real difference between each set is the background. I myself like the mixing it up that other sites do. So if you want nothing but nude women, then this site would be great for you. If you like any kind of tease, then I'd advise against FemJoy. |
|
11-04-08 06:00am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
118
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Have to agree the system sucks.
I voted for Barr. We really need a 3rd party. It's completely stupid to only have 2 choices.
|
11-04-08 04:58am
|
|
