Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Note: this is not a PRO, but it's definitely worth noting: If you join ExGfBox directly, you are charged $29.95/month recurring. But if you join through Teen Mega World, you are charged $14.95 (with a PU discount).
-ExGfBox is included in the Teen Mega World (TMW) network.
Membership in any one of the Teen Mega World sites gives you access to all the sites in the network.
There are no premium sites that you have to pay extra for.
-Can somewhat switch between different sites in the network without having to re-enter your login details. The switching process is sloppy--see details in the con section.
-Can use download managers.
-Unlimited downloads.
-TMW has over 30 sites in the network.
-Daily updates to the TMW network.
Cons:
-Do not join this site directly. Instead, join TMW or one of the other TMW sites for a cheaper price of $14.95/month instead of $29.95/month.
-The last site/network software update they did made using the site and network more difficult and time-consuming.
Now a search for a model is site-specific. That means you are only returned the hits at one site, instead of the entire network. So you need to know which sites the model appears at, to find her content, instead of doing a simple search for the model which would formerly show all the sites she appears at, with links to her content.
-Because of the recent structure update, when you switch between sites, the switch is incomplete. You do not enter the next site completely, but are still logged in to your membership-join site, which makes searching and using the next site content more difficult.
-Archive site. Has not updated since November 1, 2011.
CONS CONTINUE IN THE NEXT SECTION:
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
-Many videos do not have a thumbnail, so you don't know what the model looks like until you watch her video.
-Many videos can not be streamed online. Have to download the video to play it.
-Many of the videos do not have an accompanying photo set.
-The quality of the videos is poor: they were shot when the site and network was making low-grade sex videos: the settings were cheap, the costumes were cheap (low-cost street clothes, etc.), the visuals were poor (poor lighting, girls were put into a cheap room and told to fuck, without dressing them up to look attractive, no makeup, no special costumes, just a low-grade fuck session).
-The default biller is FXBilling. I prefer CCBill or Epoch, which are reliable, easy to use billers.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Many of the network sites do not update. Or update very infrequently. But the network as a whole updates daily.
BOTTOM LINE (START OF):
The ExGfBox site is one of the poorest sites in the TMW network.
And if you join the site directly, you will pay a higher membership price than joining TMW directly, or by joining most of the other sites in TMW.
The reasons ExGfBox site is poor:
-It's an archive site, has not been updated since November 1, 2011.
-The videos are poor quality: low quality sets, cheap costumes, poor lighting, low definition.
-The site, in addition to poor navigation issues, has been allowed to degrade over time: many thumbnails of the model listing are missing, you can't stream many of the videos but have to download them instead, many of the photosets appear to have disappeared.
-Overall, the network would present a better overall experience if they just deleted the site.
(In spite of the fact that I personally like to have access to all the models that appeared at the network, the quality of this site is so poor, it just drags down the quality of the network.)
TMW is one of my favorite Teen Hardcore networks.
Over the years, they have put time and money into improving the quality of the network, and it really shows, if you compare today's network to the network of years ago.
The network is mainly far easier to use.
(Except the most recent update to the structure made navigation harder, harder to find the content of different models, harder to search the content of each site, and you no longer fully enter the different sites, but are still logged into the site you joined through, with only partial entry to the other sites--which makes navigation and searching the other sites more difficult.
The main strengths of the network:
-Good looking, mostly young European models.
They have over 1,800 models.
-Daily updates.
-They introduced UHD (Ultra High Definition) videos years ago. Even have a site dedicated to UHD videos.
-They introduced VR videos years ago. Even have a VR site.
-Over the years, they have spent time and money improving the quality of their videos: higher definition videos, better lighting, more professional camera-work, better sets, better costumes, more attention paid to making the models more attractive (most of the models are young teens who are naturally attractive, but sets, costumes, makeup, etc. all help in the presentation).
Higher quality photo sets. Many photo sets are worth collecting, because of the attractiveness of the models and the upgraded quality of the photos.
-The recent network update was a step back: the changes make accessing the content harder and more time-consuming.
-They raised the membership price recently. So it's more expensive. But based on access to over 30 sites, it's still a worthwhile join.
TMW is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks.
Along with Diesel Access network.
Lovely teen models.
High quality videos and photos.
Some scenes can be really hot.
It doesn't get much better than that.
The ExGfBox site is poor.
And only deserves a score of 70 or less.
(Which is earned by access to the TMW network, which is worth far more than the ExGfBox site.)
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I AM WRITING IN CAPS BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE. NOT TRYING TO BE RUDE OR SHOUT.
-SECURE LOGIN PAGE. A NICE FEATURE.
-YOU GET 2 CONFIRMING EMAIL ON JOINING THE SITE. THEY GIVE YOUR LOGIN DETAILS, MEMBERSHIP DETAILS (PRICE, LENGTH OF MEMBERSHIP, LAST 4 DIGITS OF CREDIT CARD USED). ALL THESE DETAILS ARE HANDY IF NEEDED.
-SUPPORT IS 24/7, AND IS RESPONSIVE. I'VE CONTACTED CHAT SUPPORT TWICE, AND BOTH TIMES THEY RESPONDED WITHIN A FEW MINUTES, WHICH IS AMAZING FOR A PORN SITE SUPPORT.
-NO DRM. NO DOWNLOAD LIMITS.
-ACCEPTS DOWNLOAD MANAGERS.
-SITE IS PART OF THE FAME DIGITAL NETWORK, WHICH IS A LARGE NETWORK OF HARDCORE SITES.
Cons:
-THEY DID A SITE/NETWORK UPDATE RECENTLY. MADE THE SITE/NETWORK LOOK BRIGHTER, MORE MODERN.
HOWEVER, IT'S NOW HARDER TO NAVIGATE THE DIFFERENT SITES.
THAT IS A MAJOR MISTAKE: MAKING THE SITE AND NETWORK HARDER TO USE.
I'M DEDUCTING 18 POINTS FROM THE SITE SCORE, BECAUSE IT'S HARD AS HECK FOR ME TO SWITCH FROM ONE SITE TO ANOTHER, TO ENTER A SITE.
THE OLD LAYOUT WAS:
1. FAMILIAR, EASIER TO USE.
2. HAD THE HOT LINKS EASILY VISIBLE.
3. THE HOT LINKS WERE FAST AND RESPONSIVE.
THE NEW LAYOUT:
1. SEEMS LIKE A FUCKING JUMBLED MESS.
2. HAVE TO SEARCH FOR THE HOT LINKS.
3. THE NEW HOT LINKS SEEM TO BE SLOW TO RESPOND.
I SUGGEST BRINGING BACK THE OLDER STRUCTURE, THAT WAS WORKABLE, EVEN IF IT WASN'T FLASHY OR BRIGHTLY-COLORED.
OR GIVE THE MEMBERSHIP A CHOICE OF THE USING THE OLD STRUCTURE OR THE NEWER STRUCTURE.
Bottom Line:
SILVIA SAINT IS ONE OF THE BIGGEST NAMES IN PORN.
SHE WAS PENTHOUSE PET OF YEAR IN 1996 IN THE CZECH EDITION.
1996 SEEMS LIKE ANCIENT HISTORY IN THE WORLD OF PORN MODELS, BUT THIS WOMAN STILL LOOKS ATTRACTIVE.
SHE'S NOT A TEEN ANY MORE, BUT FOR A WOMAN BORN 1976-02-12, HER PHYSICAL SHAPE IS JUST AMAZING.
ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING SHE'S BEEN IN OVER 300 PORN MOVIES, WHICH NORMALLY WEARS THESE MODELS OUT FAST.
BUT IF YOU WATCH HER VIDEOS, SHE'S ENERGETIC, ENTHUSIASTIC, AND FUN-LOVING, WITHOUT A LOT OF OVER-THE-TOP FALSE THEATRICS THAT MANY PORN STARS USE.
SHE COMES ACROSS AS A REAL PERSON, WHICH IS RARE IN PORN.
MOST OF THE MOVIES SILVIA PERFORMS IN ARE LESBIAN SEX MOVIES.
IN INTERVIEW ON HER SITE, SHE STATES THAT SHE IS STRAIGHT.
SO WHY CHOOSE LESBIAN PORN?
PROBABLY A BUNCH OF DIFFERENT REASONS, THAT SHE DOESN'T BOTHER TO STATE.
THE SITE FEATURES SILVIA FROM HER EARLY DAYS TO TODAY.
EXCEPT I HAVE A HARD TIME ORGANIZING THE VIDEOS INTO SECTIONS THAT MAKE SENSE TO ME.
SILVIA DOES NOT ACT IN MOST OF THE NEWER VIDEOS.
SILVIA SAINT IS A FAN FAVORITE. BUT I THINK THEY FUCKED UP THE SITE AND NETWORK WITH THE RECENT UPGRADE.
I'M GIVING THE SITE A SCORE OF 70. THAT'S IN SPITE OF NETWORK ACCESS, WHICH NORMALLY BRINGS A SITE'S SCORE INTO THE 80s. BUT FINDING THE CONTENT FROM THIS SITE, AND THE NETWORK SITES, IS DIFFICULT, INSTEAD OF THE SIMPLE, EASY WAY IT USED TO BE.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-NOTE: I AM WRITING IN CAP LETTERS, BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ, WRITE, AND EDIT. NOT TRYING TO BE RUDE.
-NICE PU DISCOUNT $17.95 FOR THE FIRST MONTH. BUT RENEWS AT $29.95/MONTH.
-I USED CCBILL AS THE PAYMENT PROCESSOR. A TRUSTED NAME.
-CCBILL SENT A CONFIRMING EMAIL ON SIGN-UP, WITH LOGIN DETAILS (USERNAME, PASSWORD), PLUS THE TERMS OF THE MEMBERSHIP (PRICE PAID, LENGTH OF MEMBERSHIP, AND NON-RECURRING STATUS).
-THE ATTRACTIVE LEVEL OF THE MODELS CAN RANGE FROM GOOD TO VERY GOOD.
THESE ARE YOUNG, LATE-TEEN OR EARLY TWENTIES MODELS.
THE BANGABLE SITE USED TO HAVE WONDERFULLY ATTRACTIVE MODELS IN SHORT TEASER CLIPS (NON-NUDE, LINGERIE MODELS).
Cons:
-LOGIN PAGE IS NON-SECURE. MY FIREFOX BROWSER HAS A POPUP FOR THE LOGIN PAGE STATING THAT LOGIN DETAILS SENT TO LOGIN MAY BE COMPROMISED.
-THERE ARE 4 MAIN SITES IN THE NETWORK, BESIDES THE PARTNER SITES.
THE 4 MAIN SITES HAVE ALL STOPPED UPDATING.
-IF YOU TRY TO FAST-FORWARD A STREAMING VIDEO, THE SCREEN TURNS GREEN FOR SEVERAL SECONDS, BEFORE THE SCREEN RETURNS TO A NORMAL VIEW.
-CAPTCHA REQUIRED FOR LOGIN.
-SOMETIMES THE SITE LINKS ARE BROKEN. FOR A WHILE, I COULDN'T LOG IN TO THE PORN MASTERMIND CENTRAL SITE, AND HAD TO LOGIN THROUGH ONE OF THE SUB SITES.
SOME OF THE PARTNER SITES ARE HIGH QUALITY, SO YOU GET TO SAMPLE THEIR WARES AND MAKE A BETTER-INFORMED DECISION ON JOINING.
SPECIFICALLY, THE BETTER SITES INCLUDE: JOYMII NUBILE FILMS NUBILES PORN SEX ART WOW PORN
MR SKIN IS WORTH A ONE-MONTH JOIN, IF YOU ARE INTO SHORT CLIPS OF CELEBRITIES.
FUCKED HARD 18 IS MY FAVORITE SITE OF THE NETWORK.
THE THEME IS A GIRL GETS AN EROTIC MASSAGE, THE MASSEUSE THEN HAS SEX WITH THE AROUSED FEMALE, AND LEAVES HER SATISFIED.
THE PLOT IS SIMPLE, BUT EFFECTIVE.
SOME VIEWERS MIGHT COMPLAIN THAT THE THEME GETS REPETITIOUS AFTER A WHILE.
THE SAME SETUP, THE SAME SETTING, THE SAME STUNT COCK.
I THOUGHT THE STUNT COCK WAS A GOOD CHOICE: HE WAS NOT ABUSIVE, HE DID A GREAT JOB AROUSING THE GIRL WITH HIS HANDS BEFORE TAKING OUT HIS COCK, AND HE DID A GREAT JOB FUCKING HER. END OF STORY.
MASSAGE GIRLS 18 - PU LISTS THE SITE AS NO LONGER ACTIVE, OR NO LONGER EXISTS.
HOWEVER, IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF PORN MASTERMIND, MASSAGE GIRLS 18 IS ACTIVE. IT'S AN ARCHIVE SITE
THAT IS NOT UPDATING. THE MOST RECENT UPDATE I FOUND WAS FROM JUNE, 2015. MASSAGE GIRLS 18 IS THE COUNTERPART OF FUCKED HARD 18: IN MASSAGE GIRLS 18, THE MASSEUSE IS A FEMALE.
THE PROBLEM IS THAT THE GIRLS ARE NOT GOOD ACTORS. SO THE PLOT IS THE GIRL IS MASSAGING THE STUNT COCK, GOES TO THE GUY'S COCK, AND THEY HAVE SEX. NO ACTING. JUST SEX. THERE'S NO BUILD-UP TO THE SEX. IF THE GIRLS WERE BETTER ACTORS, AND MADE THE MASSAGE MORE BELIEVABLE, IT WOULD BE OK. BUT IT'S NOT BELIEVABLE. THE SEX LACKS HEAT. EVEN THOUGH THE GIRLS ARE, IN THE MAIN, ATTRACTIVE, THE POOR ACTING AND NO BUILDUP TO THE SEX MAKES THE SITE CONTENTS BARELY WORTH VIEWING.
THE SITE STRUCTURE FOR FUCKED HARD 18 AND MASSAGE GIRLS 18 ARE SIMILAR:
YOU CAN STREAM OR DOWNLOAD THE VIDEO.
YOU CAN ALSO STREAM OR DOWNLOAD SELECTED CLIPS OF THE VIDEO.
IF YOU STREAM THE VIDEO, AND TRY TO FAST-FORWARD, THE SCREEN TURNS GREEN FOR SEVERAL SECONDS, BEFORE RETURNING TO A NORMAL-COLORED VIEW.
CONTINUED IN THE REPLY SECTION BELOW:
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Low membership price.
PU lists discounted price of $24.95/month (recurring) for My Dad's Hot Girlfriend.
Join through Naughty America instead of through My Dad's Hot Girlfriend, and save $15.
-Multiple definition choices to download a video:
For the full movie: 4k, 1080p, 720p, 480p.
For specific clips of the movie: Quicktime (Apple), DVD, Normal, Mobile.
-Can stream videos on Roku on your TV.
-Zip file for each photoset.
-Epoch is the billing agent. A trusted name.
-The site (and network) offers a guarantee: if you are not completely satisfied for any reason within 30 days of purchasing a membership, contact customer service and they will refund your membership price.
I purchased a membership. I don't like their videos. But that is personal preference. The videos are professionally shot. With a lot of big-name porn stars. With high production values. So I think it would be wrong for me to ask for a refund. The site offers a lot of value for people who like their videos.
Cons:
-Navigation could be much simpler.
-Too many ads on each page.
-Very large files for the video downloads.
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page.
Bottom Line:
Site has 315 videos.
Site has 315 matching galleries.
Starting around October 2013, the site offers 4k definition for some videos.
Starting in late December 2013, all the videos from that date on are offered in 4k definition.
My Dad's Hot Girlfriend theme is about guys making it with their dads' hot girlfriends.
So I guess the fantasy is that you are getting revenge on your dad for whatever he did to you in the past.
Showing him that you are a bigger man than he is.
With the added bonus that this is behind his back, the more fool him.
If that fantasy rocks your boat, then this site was made for you.
Otherwise, it's just a lame premise.
However, not all the videos feature a woman playing the girlfriend of a man who fucks the son.
Some of the videos have the woman playing the wife of the man.
So--depending on the audience, that might be a con, because it breaks the theme of site.
These are porn actors. So don't expect Academy award performances. The script is usually lame, the dialog is lame, the plot is lame, the actors are lame.
As I mentioned in my review of Naughty America, it helps to drink a few beers (or some hard liquor) before watching these videos, to help suspend your disbelief. That way you are more free to enjoy these stupid videos.
Personally, I think the videos at most other porn sites are easier to enjoy. The many other sites give you straight porn videos, whether it's gonzo sex or glamcore sex or some other variation. But I have a hard time watching the My Dad's Hot Girlfriend videos and getting in the mood to appreciate what I'm watching.
The site offers multiple download options:
For the full movie: 4k, 1080p, 720p, 480p.
For clips of the movie: Quicktime (Apple), DVD, Normal, Mobile.
Some PU members have reported problems downloading files from Naughty America. They say that downloading a file can crash their computer, or that the download speed is extremely slow.
From most porn paysites other than Naughty America, I can often get 3-5 MB/sec.
At Naughty America, I average around 1-2 MB/sec download speeds.
That is far faster than what other PU members report.
There was a recent comment (dated 2016-05-22) by PU member Divinx on Naughty America that reports "Downloads below 50 KB/s. Nobody does it worse."
If that is what I experienced, I would ask for a refund. Because the file sizes of a video are so large, that it would make downloading a video extremely difficult.
For example, a single video, runtime 29 minutes 39 seconds, 720p definition, has a file size of 1.11 GB.
That is a huge file size for a single video of that definition and runtime.
The file size for the 1080p definition of the same file would be 2.57 GB. So even at today's prices, you would quickly run out of storage space if you want to archive many of these videos.
The only way that someone can store these videos is because hard drive storage prices keep dropping. 5 or 10 years ago, it would have been far too expensive to buy the drives to store many of these videos.
Even at today's prices, you really should use some program to compress the files, if you want to store them on a personal hard drive.
When I report the specifications for my download speeds, I should note that I am not downloading more than one file at a time. Also, I am not streaming any videos while I am downloading.
On a simple basis, I can report that if I am streaming a video and downloading a video at the same time, the video I am streaming can exhibit playback problems: the video can stutter during playback. And the download speeds will drop. So the fact that I am not downloading multiple files at the same time, and not streaming at the same time I am downloading, might help to explain why I am getting faster download speeds than some people report.
But I do get slower download speeds at Naughty America, and its sites, than I get from other paysites. Most other paysites will give me a download speed of 4-5 MB/sec.
Theodore Sturgeon (the science fiction author and critc) wrote Sturgeon's Revelation (commonly referred to as Sturgeon's Law): 90% of SF is crap. But he also said that applies to most other fields: 90% of film, literature, consumer goods, etc. is crap.
In my opinion, 100% of My Dad's Hot Girlfriend is crap.
Naughty America is a low-priced network. It has a low membership price of $9.95 for the first month with a PU discount. And you can sometimes find special offers with an even lower introductory price.
Is it worth joining the network?
Even at that low price point, unless you like the videos offered, it is not worth joining.
But if you do like the videos, then it's a worthwhile join. Unless you experience the problems that other people have reported.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Uncensored Japanese porn (no mosaic effect to hide the genitals).
-$19.95/month with PU discount.
-Epoch is the biller. A trusted name.
-Can stream or download the videos.
--Each video gives you streaming choice of 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-Each video download gives you choice of 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-The codec for the files is extremely efficient. The file size for a download is amazingly small.
For example, a video with a runtime of 12 minutes 48 seconds, has a file size of:
240p 56 MB
480p 102 MB
720p 195 MB
1080p 377 MB
-Each video has a matching photoset.
-The software mechanism to view all the photos in a photoset online is easy to use.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sell on the join page.
-Poor search engine. If you enter a model's name, it returns her name and many different names.
-No zip file for any photo set.
-Some of the photos are not well-focused. Not well cropped. I'm assuming there is some software that creates a photo set from a video, and that is how the photo sets are produced--instead of using the traditional method of shooting a photo set with a camera, you shoot a video, and use software to create the photo set from the video. That is my guess on how the photo sets are created at some porn sites. This makes a better-looking product than the older style screencaps.
If anyone has knowledge about this process, I would certainly appreciate either denial or confirmation of my theory.
-Download speeds average 1 to 2 MB/sec. Not terrible, but could be improved.
Bottom Line:
Site themes: blowjobs. facials. cum swallowing. asian models. uncensored (no mosaic) hd porn.
Site statistics: 1,138 videos.
There's not a lot of variety in the scenes.
The videos are mainly a girl giving a blowjob to one or more guys.
You have one girl doing one guy, two guys, three guys, a bunch of guys.
Personally, this is not my favorite niche. I don't care how cute the girl is, it's hard for the girl to look cute or attractive when she has one or more cocks stuffed in her mouth. That's just my opinion.
You have over 1,100 scenes of models giving blowjobs. To add a little variety, you can throw in some masturbation with toys. Also some fucking.
In one scene, a Japanese schoolgirl is playing a video game on her cellphone, and licking an ice cream cone. She is so engrossed in the game, that when a boy pulls down his pants and puts his cock against her lips and against the ice cream
cone, she starts licking the cock as well as the ice cream.
Then the boy takes the ice cream cone away from her, and she continues licking his cock, while still staring at the cellphone game she has continued to play. Finally, the boy pushes his cock against her lips a few times, and she seems to notice his cock for the first time, and says "What are you doing?" (I'm guessing at what she says, because the language is Japanese.)
She pushes the boy away, lays down on the couch, and continues playing her cellphone game. The boy and another guy come back, touch her ass. she ignores them while playing the video game. The two guys use vibrators on her pussy, and undress
her, and she gives one a blow job.
There's almost a zen-like quality to the video. The first guy, who puts his penis against the girl's mouth while she is licking the ice cream cone, seems almost simple-minded.
However, the girl is almost simple-minded as well, because when the boy puts his penis against her mouth, she continues to lick the ice cream cone, as well as the boy's penis, and she seems unaware that she is licking a penis.
It's not like she is being naughty or mischievous, she is acting as if she's completely unaware there is a penis on her tongue, and she is totally focused on the cell phone game she is playing (as well as the ice cream cone she's licking).
I think the porn director is referencing George Lucas' Jedi wisdom, that states "Your focus is your reality".
The girl's reality is the video game, plus the ice cream cone. And the penis does not intrude.
I can't say the video is that hot or sexy. But it can be amusing.
For one thing, you wonder when the girl will wake up and notice she is licking the guy's penis. Even when he takes the ice cream cone away from her, she continues playing the video game, and licking his penis, but pretending the guy is not there.
Only when he pushes his penis against her, trying to force it into her mouth, does she seem to wake up and realize what is going on, and she tells the guy and his buddy (the buddy has been watching the action) to get lost.
The two guys leave the room momentarily, then return while the girl is stretched out on a couch still playing the game.
The guys remove the girl's panties, use a vibrator on her, and she finally wakes up to what they are doing, protests, but then is forced (with no violence) to give one a blowjob while the other guy fucks her with a vibrating dildo.
This is a strange or amusing video, but it's not really hot. It's more like: What the fuck????
If you like watching blowjobs or facials, this might hit your button.
Otherwise, the site gets boring very fast.
As I said, I don't think it improves a girl's allure when she has one or more penises stuck in her mouth. I much prefer traditional fucking.
Let me compare this site to Rocco Siffredi site. Almost all the Rocco Siffredi videos feature some cocksucking or blowjobs, along with vaginal and/or anal fucking, plus ass rimming. The Rocco Siffredi videos can be very hot. The sex is forceful. The videos are professionally shot, but with an amateur feel. The lighting and colors and camera work are just OK, but far below what you can get at sites like X-Art or ferame. But that is deliberate, Rocco Siffredi is trying to give you an atmosphere of "You are there, watching the action". And the action can be intense. It's not as cruel as Pierre Woodman, but the girls are definitely feeling some pain when the stunt cock (mainly Rocco Siffredi) rams his cock down their throat and makes them gag. Or pushes his penis into their ass or vagina with force.
Whereas ferame is almost entirely cocksucking. But on a much milder level than Rocco Siffredi. So there's less heat in the ferame videos.
Giving the ferame site a score of 70. That is very subjective. If you are a fan of blowjobs or facials, this site probably deserves a much higher score. You get over 1,100 videos, professionally shot, well lighted, good camera-work, good sound control. The video quality is excellent, but the content gets boring fast.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Brief description given for each video and photoset to explain what is happening.
-The photosets are dated by the date they were posted to the site.
-Zip files for the photosets.
-Photoset zip files download with the default filename of the date the photoset was posted at the site. E.g., 03-09-07.zip or 11-09-2007.zip.
Cons:
-Archive site. No updates since September 2007.
-Small site. 44 videos, 57 photosets.
-Only 2 models at the site: LayTheKat and her girlfriend.
-More models would add variety. More locations in the shoots would add variety. All the videos and photosets are basically shot in a house or apartment.
-Not much variety in what the photos and videos show. You have 1 or 2 girls, undressing, touching themselves or each other.
-The videos are not dated.
-No search function.
-No model bio.
-No streaming option.
-Videos download in one size only, one format only. No choice of low, medium, high for videos.
-Photos download in one size only. No choice of low, medium, high definition.
-Default filename for videos is "video.wmv". So have to rename video files, or you will overwrite the previous video you downloaded.
Bottom Line:
The site is part of the Diesel Access network.
The site only has 2 models: LayTheKat and her girlfriend and sexual partner, a slender, slightly taller brown-haired girl. The site contents are videos and photos of LayTheKat and her girlfriend, exploring themselves and each other. They show nudity, masturbation, lesbian sex. A few brief videos of LayTheKat or her girlfriend peeing.
LayTheKat is a small, very slender young teen. She is a cute girl. She seems like a girl who is new to porn, a little embarrassed to be performing in front of a camera, but giving a good performance. And her emotions seem real: the embarrassment, the smiles, the sexual excitement she is feeling. Which adds a lot to the simple scenes, compared to the fake moans and groans of many porn models. The same is true for her girlfriend.
LayTheKat has additional photosets and videos at other sites in the Diesel Access network:
At Young Legal Porn, she is listed under the name of Kat, where she has 3 videos and 20 photosets.
At 18 Only Girls, she is listed under the name of Kat, where she has 17 videos and 33 photosets.
Site design/navigation is very basic. But because the site contents are so limited, it's fairly easy to look through the site contents. The contents are split into two groups: videos and photosets.
Video stats:
Number of videos: 44
Each video has only a single file for download, or is split into 2 parts for download.
Sample dimensions:
Height x Width: 852x480
Total bitrate: 4258 kbps
Photos stats:
Number of photosets: 57
Number of photos per photoset: 80+
Width x Height: 799x1200
or
Width x Height: 1198x1800
Considering that the latest videos were probably posted by 2007, the video quality is surprisingly high. There is good definition, excellent lighting, good colors and skin tones, good camera work, good focus, good framing, etc.
The photos were also well shot, by someone who knew how to use a camera. They are far better than screenshots. This is not glamor-style photography, but the images of the girls are clear and well-focused.
Bottom Line:
Unless you are a real fan of the model, LayTheKat, it's probably not worth getting a
membership to this single site. For one, the site hasn't updated since September, 2007. For another, it's a small site, with only a small number of videos and photosets, and even though the videos and photosets are good considering they are 5 years old or more, they were not the highest quality even when they were first posted.
However, if you get a general pass to all the sites in the Diesel Access network, it's worth looking the site over, to see if you can find any contents that you might like.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The photosets and videos are dated by when they were posted to the site.
-The zip file for each photoset has the name of the model in the filename.
-There is a small bio for each model. Gives her name, age and hair color.
Also gives some background on the model, which is probably fiction.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Good download speed. I got 1.0 to 1.4 MB/sec at this site (which is my maximum download speed).
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Because the videos are so short (3 to 4 minutes runtime), the file size is very small: 50 MB or less.
Cons:
-On login, have to enter a captcha, which is a moving string of 5 numbers. You have to watch the captcha for a minute or two, to try to read all the numbers, since the string is moving on and off the screen. Just a minor annoyance, but it indicates poor site design, along with a bunch of other site design problems. Logging into Met-art or Erotic Beauties, major porn sites, is so easy and effortless. Why can't other sites make it easy to log in?
-Archive site. Stopped updating in 2009.
-Although photosets download with the name of the model and a unique number, videos download with the default filename of "full.wmv" or "full.avi" (depending on whether you chose the wmv or avi file format).
So you have to rename each video you download, to know what model is in the video. And there's no description on the site of what the video is about.
-Navigation is very basic.
-No search function.
-Site only has 3 models. Very limited selection of models.
Bottom Line:
This is a very softcore teen site.
Their model listing consists of 3 models:
Diana, brown hair
Liza, black hair
Nika, blonde hair
I thought at first I was mistaken. Where are all the different models? But those three models are used for all the photosets and videos. So if you
like those three models, you will find plenty of photos and videos with them.
There is very little eroticism. Very little touching themselves. No masturbation. Little or no spreading of the legs. This is really very
softcore. Met-art is the biggest teen softcore site there is, for photographs. But the Met-art photos, if you can imagine, are harder edged than what this site offers.
In a way, that's good. It almost makes you feel like a "clean" pervert looking at these innocent photos of naked teens.
No boys at this site interacting with the girls. This is a girl-only site.
In some of the photosets and videos, there are two girls. But the only touching between the two girls is girly innocence. I mean, these girls
hardly ever kiss the other girl softly on the lips. They are playing around, maybe touching one another's arm or leg. But really innocent. This
is the very softest of softcore.
Site statistics:
Photosets
Number of photosets: 167
Number of photos per set: around 70+
Each photo has 3 sizes: Low Res., Medium Res., Original size. The original size is between the low res and the medium res.
Original res dimensions: 800 x 1200 pixels, or 1500 x 1000 pixels
Each photoset has a zip file option. You can download a zip file in your choice of low res, medium res, or original size.
Number of videos: 88
Video runtime: 3 to 4 minutes.
Frame width x height: 720 x 480
Total bitrate: 6096 kbps
You can download the videos as WMV or AVI files.
There is no choice of definition for the videos. Videos download in one definition only.
The videos are really short. A lot of the videos have a runtime of 3 or 4
minutes. The video file size is small, 50 MB or less.
The videos have more tease to them than the photosets. There is stripping in the videos. But it's done in a girlish way, very innocent, not even midcore, just young teens taking off their clothes and playing in an innocent manner to an unseen audience. No sex, no masturbation, very
little touching of their own body, no spread legs, no close-ups of the groin or ass.
The videos are poor to just OK. The girls go in and out of focus, which is annoying. This is not an artistic effect, but the camera operator just
can't keep the model in focus, even though she is barely moving from one spot to another. The camera operator is definitely not a professional.
There is no story line to the videos, it's just a girl or 2 girls getting naked, moving around, flashing parts of their bodies. They are interacting with the camera, being teasing, but innocent.
The lighting is OK, the colors are OK. These are scenes shot indoors, so the lighting is easily controlled, and there is little or no annoying
random noises in the soundtrack. The soundtrack is canned music, which I wouldn't mind hearing eliminated. But I've heard worse canned music.
The site design and navigation is basic but acceptable. There is no search function. But you have pages listing the photosets, and other pages
listing the videos. The listing shows what model (or sometimes 2 models) is in the photoset or video. But there is no description of what the
photoset or video is about. But then again, it's basically a girl getting undressed, and flashing her body at the camera. That's it. No script, or
story.
I am giving this site a score of 70. But I think, unless you know that this is a very softcore site, with just 3 teen models, and that it hasn't updated in over 3 years, and that the photos and videos are poor or just OK in technical quality, you will be disappointed you spent your money on this site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No site timeout.
-No DRM.
-Exclusive videos.
-Can watch videos in streaming: low, high, high definition quality.
-Can download videos in WMV format in low or high quality.
-The videos are professionally shot: good focus, good lighting.
-The model's name in each video is listed, with a nice sized thumbnail that shows what the model looks like. That is a really nice, simple
feature that more porn sites should have.
-The videos are dated
-There is a page where the models at the site are shown with their name and a nice-size thumbnail of the model. It would be better if the models were shown in alphabetical order, but the simple page layout is really helpful if you are searching through thumbnails of the models, because you can easily get a nice idea of what each model looks like.
-There is also a very basic search where you can enter a model's name, and it will return a list of the different sites at the network the model is featured.
Cons:
-The site uses the same stupid program for displaying photos that is used at other sites in the network. The program will load a thumbnail picture slowly, then it's hard to get an enlarged image of the thumbnail. I try and try, then usually give up trying to see the enlarged photo. And the next photo in the series is also a slow-loading thumbnail.
-The photos are clear and crisp, but the models are not to my taste.
-TBP reports 55 photo shoots. But I could only find 12 photosets at the site (when I look at the page for "pictures"). How to get to the other
photosets is unclear.
-Each photoset is around 25 photos.
-No zip file for the photoset. But who wants to keep these photos anyway?
-Search is very basic. Can search by model's name, but not by description of model, type of sexual activity, or any other factor.
Bottom Line:
I always wanted to be a rock star. I can't play a musical instrument, or sing, but rock stars get the chicks. And now you can get the chicks as well. Just join the rockstarpornstar site and you can dream you are a massively tattooed male rockstar who gets to bang away on pornstars when
he is not banging away on the stage with his favorite instrument.
The female models at this site are past the teeny stage, but if you close your eyes, and listen to the moans and groans, you can reach rocker's
fantasy heaven. The only male model here is one guy, who is playing a rock star, who bangs a bunch of female models. The guy is heavily tattooed.
From the site stats, you can see this is a small site, when the total size is 18 GB. I assume that all the regular PU members here have a personal
porn collection that is many times that size. Most PU members could download the entire site contents in 1-2 days. I personally did not find
anything at this site that was worth keeping. Or even worth viewing, for that matter. But personal tastes vary, so maybe someone might find a
worthwhile video here.
The fake moans and screams from the female models are way overdone and totally unbelievable. The girls act as if the guy is using an electric prod instead of a normal penis. The guy is mildly rough, likes to slap the girl's face and ass, gag her with his penis. The guy is acting like a
really masterful, take-charge sexual stud putting these bitches through the paces. Except that it's phony as hell. Pierre Woodman can give a great
sexual performance with his models, but this guy is just a waste of time to watch.
I do like, quite a lot, the nice-sized, very clear thumbnails with the model's name, for each video/photoset. This gives you an easy way to
search through the videos and photosets you might want to look at more closely. This is a very simple and basic structure, and I wish more porn
sites used it. Because at many porn sites, it's hard to get an idea of what the models look like until you watch the video or look through each
photoset, which can be very time-consuming and a lot of work.
You get access to this site through the netFameSolutions network, which has some nice sites. This site is not one of them.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Niche: Indian models (from India).
-$14.95/month special price thru PU/TBP.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Small watermark bottom right corner on videos.
-Can search by series, title of DVD, actor, etc.
-Can view videos streaming in high or low quality.
-Can download videos in high or low quality.
-Screenshots illustrate the video action.
Cons:
-mbaya pointed out in a comment dated 08-26-08 that some of the "Indian". models are non-Indians dressed up to look like Indians.
-WMV format only for downloads.
-No photos except for screenshots.
Bottom Line:
Site stats:
Movies: 92
Hours: 45
Site size: 41 GB
General category: Indian/Hindu (92 movies)
Subcategories:
-Anal (7)
-Big Breast (14)
-Cream pie (49)
-Cum swallow (3)
-Stats for videos:
-Bit rate: 2115 kbps
-Dimensions: 720x480
Videos are nice-quality, average about 30 minutes each.
This is a niche site, small-sized content, for Indian models.
The first video I saw at the site, the model spoke English with an American accent, like she grew up in the United States. No Indian accent at all. Had a jewel in her forehead, some necklace that might have been Indian, but no sense of being Indian at all, just a hardcore porn model with brownish skin-tone. So with the stream of "hot, dirty" talk out her mouth, there was no illusion of an Indian girl having sex. Instead, get a porn clip of a standard porn model-slut giving a bj and getting fucked, with a lot of fake moans, groans, dirty-talk, fake-excitement sex.
Is it better to watch a video with so much fake bullshit with the sound turned off? Since I didn't think the model was attractive, I thought it better to turn off the clip entirely, and watch a different clip in hopes of finding something better.
2nd clip I watched, same thing: A girl from United States claiming she was from Bombay, speaking American English, no accent, a lot of dirty sex talk before and during the sex coming out of her mouth, sort of like verbal diarrhea.
3rd clip I watched, a different girl with US English, no accent. This girl didn't bother with the dirty talk; her moans and groans, while still fake, were softer and less annoying than the first two girls. So she was a big improvement over the first two girls, though not Indian either.
Attractiveness of the models: Not gorgeous, not by a mile, but ok looking.
With a fast connection, you could download the entire site in a few days.
If you're into Indian women, or want a change from the Euro models of many sites, you can look through the site contents in a few days (with a fast connection and a lot of free time). Does it make a difference that many of the models aren't really Indian, but dressed up to look like Indian? That depends on your own mind-set. My problem is that many of the models act like standard porn sluts, especially with the dirty talk and the fake moans of passion, and that detracts from the sex. And the sex is straight bj, screwing vaginal, anal, whatever. No storyline, no buildup, no tenderness or anything to add to the fuck-fuck-fuck action.
If you enjoy straight fucking (with bj, vaginal and anal) with no bells or whistles, you might find the site worthwhile.
The videos are professionally shot of good quality and are decent to watch visually. My problem is the sex is straight hardcore sex with nothing to make it interesting to me. Curry Creampie is part of the netFameSolutions network of 19 sites. Membership in any one of the sites allows full access to all the sites, with a large mixture of good quality broad and niche content.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Niche: heavyset females.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Easy log-on. Enter username and password. No secret word usually.
-Movie options:
--Can watch streaming video high or low quality.
--Can download WMV format high or low quality.
-Screenshots clearly illustrate action in the video.
-Nice quality videos for porn (see bottom line).
Cons:
-Limited content: 63 videos at the site
-WMV format only for downloads.
-Infrequent updates. Site has been around since at least May 2007, has only 63 videos. Updates once every 1-8 weeks or so (very irregular updates).
Bottom Line:
Niche site of heavyset females.
Only 63 videos at the site. Total size of site: 25 Gb. The videos are nice quality.
Categories:
- Anal (9)
- Cream pie (36)
- Ebony (5)
- Mature/MILF (11)
-Stats:
-Videos run about 17-32 minutes
-Bit rate: 2115 kbps
-Dimensions: 720x480
Anyone who is into heavy-set females can download all the material at this site, with a fast connection, in a few days.
And then you can move on to the other sites in the netFameSolutions network that have much more content. Membership in any one of the sites offers access to all 19 sites. There are some sites in the network with broad appeal, and with large amount of good-quality videos (good video quality, good lighting, good color, good focus, good editing, etc. for a good quality porno video).
Some of the really nice sites in this network include: Devils Film Peter North Rocco Siffredi Silverstone DVD Silvia Saint
By itself, this site has limited value, for a score of 70, but the main value of site membership lies in access to all the network sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Screenshots illustrate the action in the video clips.
-Screenshots also show what the model looks like.
-No DRM
-No download limits
-Easy logon: enter username and password. Occasionally you might have to enter the secret word, but that is easily read, not heavily disguised
-No inactivity timeout from site
Cons:
-No photosets for picture lovers (video screenshots only)
-A series can be very repetitious. They follow the same script, the female model appears in the same room you saw a different model in, and does the same movements, then the male actor shows up and the sex is very similar.
-The site contents and site variety is smaller than the main sites in this network. This is a site for "hairy" models, models who have some pubic hair. But the site needs more content and variety in the video clips
-The video quality of the clips is ok to good, but the value of the clips is small. There are clips with more excitement or interest at other sites in the network
-Most content is non-exclusive. You can see most of the video clips at this site on other sites at the same network.
Bottom Line:
Site has limited content:
Movies 118
Total size 46 GB
compare the stats above to Devilsfilm:
movies 1,000+
total size 2,400 GB
This site is for those PU members who prefer models with some pubic hair. This is a site in the netFameSolutions network, where you get 19 sites for 1 membership price.
The basic site layout is the same for almost all sites in this network. I personally like pubic hair in the female model, but that was not enough for me to enjoy this site very much, because there are other network sites that have content that is larger and more varied, and the quality is as good or better than what is found here.
The model while having sex often appears as excited as if she is waiting for her pot pie to bake in the oven. Maybe if I moaned and groaned along with the model, it might increase my enjoyment, but then I have to worry what my neighbors might think. They might think I was having a heart attack or some other kind of physical or mental problem.
One way to easily improve the videos at this site would be to shoot the sound editor. Many of the models are continuously moaning and groaning with fake excitement, and it seriously detracts from any enjoyment you might have in watching these video clips. The male actors also tend to make a lot of fake-sounding moans and groans.
My bottom line is that this is a site with ice-cold girls and limited content. Am I being overly harsh? The technical specs/quality of the video clips is mainly ok to good for this site, as is true for most sites in this network. But the excitement factor, the personal enjoyment factor you get from watching the clips at this site, is at the boredom level. Even though a few of the models might be attractive, if they are just going through the motions of sex in a mechanical way, with their obviously fake moans and groans, I don't think the clips have much value.
I've seen clips (at other sites) where the gimmick is that the girl is supposedly sleeping and the guy has sex with her. In those clips, there was more erotic content, more excitement, partially because you didn't hear the obviously fake moans and groans from the "sleeping" girl, and partially because it's simpler for the girl to act like she's asleep than to act like she's enjoying the sex she is having with the guy who is bonking her.
Even though a girl has a pretty face and a nice body, maybe the guy should ignore her and screw the door knob or the keyhole instead.
Better yet, the girl could use the doorknob if she found it more attractive than the guy.
This site is one of the less valuable in the network. Glance through this site only after you've checked out the more important sites such as roccosiffredi, devilsfilm, silverstoneDVD and peternorth.
I am giving this site a score of 70. If the site was not part of a nice network, the score would be much lower.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
advertise:
-1,535 Porn Sites Available
-15,668 Porn Movies
-5,351,505 GB of Content
-4,901 Hours of Porn
-35+ Niches
-some vids (small percentage) are nice and clean: nice lighting, nice setting, good focus, good colors.
-simple system to cancel subscription on the internet.
-easy log on. Useful to get onto site, useful if disconnected from site.
-occasionally a very low membership fee is offered. I got a 30-day full membership for $5
-huge amount of vids (a lot with low quality)
-no DRM
-no download limits
Cons:
-navigation is extremely poor.
-to search for specific models is terrible.
-to search for specific videos is terrible.
-video clips are duplicated at many different sites. This makes navigation more difficult and
confusing, because the video clips are named by numbers, not by a simple descriptive name. So you
have to remember which clips you have already looked at if you don't want to keep checking some of the same vid clips over and over again.
-many of the sites are tiny, just a handful or more of videos, with poor-quality vid-caps to show what the video is. They should combine many of the sites to make a much smaller number of sites, to make it easier to find what there is, and delete the hundreds of duplicate clips.
-update schedule: no idea. The videos are not dated as to when they were posted.
-no simple listing of video title (just a number)
-no simple listing of what models are in the video.
Bottom Line:
Cons (continued):
-the screen shots are really poor quality, and small, so it's hard to see clearly what the video
they represent is supposed to be like.
-some links are misdirected. Instead of taking you to the clip that is described, it takes you to a different clip.
-lack of different formats. All the vid clips I've seen are in WMV format.
-poor quality of many vids. Vids are unattractive because models are not good-looking, lack of plot, poor lighting, poor soundtrack, etc.
-large size of videos: the higher quality videos can be 433 MB or more for a 29 minute clip. The
quality of the video is not that good, I don't understand why the size is so large.
-for many videos, if you want to download or watch the video, you can get an error message:
"SORRY, the video you requested is temporarily unavailable."
-there is no sense in having a lot of sites with 4-5 videos that are the same videos that are at other sites in your network, except for the false sense that your network has much more content than it really does. It just makes it harder to look thru all the junk on your network trying to find any good videos that you might like.
Bottom Line:
-I've said many times that I'm more into photos than vids. There are many reasons for that, the
primary reasons being it's easier to find good/interesting/erotic photos than videos, because of time needed to examine the photo versus the video, download the item, photos are easier and faster to make (therefore easier to make well), etc.
Trying to look thru the junk at pornacess takes a lot more patience than I have. I think this site is not worth even a reduced membership fee of $10-$15/month. I would rather hunt thru free sites, which are easier to look thru, and which have videos that are smaller in file size, that have at least a few videos that I might really enjoy or find interesting.
-This is not a photo site. The only photos are screen shots to illustrate the vids, and the screen shots are small, poor quality pix.
-most of the vids I saw are poor quality: models not attractive, lousy lighting, lousy sound track, fake moans and groans, little to no plot,
-The people who award the razzies for poor acting in a motion picture should watch some of these
porno clips. They would get a new appreciation for what terrible acting really is.
I am giving this site a score of 70. It is not a scam, there is a huge amount of vid clips here,
most of poor quality, but there have to be sites/networks (videobox or videosz) out there with easier navigation, better quality clips. Even if those sites charge more, the extra money would be worth it to most PU members. Few PU members would have the patience to search thru the junk here to find the worthwhile clips.
There is a huge amount of the network I did not examine, because I did not have the time or
patience or interest. I've been a member for 3 weeks, but to see all this site has to offer would take many months. I've got better things to do.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU DISCOUNT OF $14.95 FOR THE FIRST MONTH.
-SECURE LOGIN.
-SECURE MEMBER PAGES.
-PART OF THE DEVILS FILM NETWORK (FAME DOLLARS, GAMMA ENTERTAINMENT).
YOU GET ACCESS TO THE BASIC DEVILS FILM NETWORK OF SITES.
-EACH VIDEO HAS A TRAILER, THAT GIVES YOU A GOOD IDEA OF WHAT THE VIDEO IS.
(NOT A PRO: WHEN YOU PLAY A TRAILER, YOU ARE EJECTED FROM THE LOW ART FILMS SITE INTO THE MAIN NETWORK HOME AREA, AND HAVE TO CLICK ON HOT LINKS TO GET BACK INTO THE LOW ART FILMS SITE.)
Cons:
-ARCHIVE SITE. NO UPDATES SINCE 2012-01-07.
-SMALL SITE: 82 VIDS TOTAL.
-ONE OR TWO PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE AT JOIN PAGES.
-THE LAST RECENT UPDATE FOR THE NETWORK STRUCTURE (DONE AROUND 3 MONTHS AGO) ELIMINATED THE DROP-DOWN MENU THAT SHOWED ALL THE SITES YOU GET ACCESS TO, REPLACING IT WITH A FLOATING LIST OF LINKS THAT ARE HARDER TO USE. THE DROP-DOWN LIST WAS EASY TO SEE, EASY TO USE. THE NEW SYSTEM IS HARDER TO SWITCH BETWEEN SITES. AND THE CONTENTS OF EACH SITE ARE LESS EASY TO ACCESS IN THE NEW SYSTEM, EVEN AFTER YOU ARE INSIDE THE SELECTED SITE.
ALSO, THE NEW STRUCTURE IS LESS STABLE THAN THE OLD NETWORK STRUCTURE. SOMETIMES THE STANDARD HOME PAGE DISAPPEARS, AND YOU HAVE TO CLICK ON PARTS OF THE SCREEN TO BRING UP THE HOME PAGE LINKS THAT ALLOWS YOU TO ACCESS THE DIFFERENT SITES.
ALL IN ALL, THE OLD STRUCTURE WAS MORE STABLE, EASIER TO USE, THAN THE UPDATED STRUCTURE THAT IS MORE COLORFUL, BUT HARDER TO USE.
CONS ARE CONTINUED IN THE NEXT SECTION BELOW:
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
-YOU PLAY THE TRAILER FOR A VIDEO, AND WHEN THE TRAILER ENDS, YOU ARE PUT BACK INTO THE HOME PAGE OF THE NETWORK, AND HAVE TO NAVIGATE BACK TO THE LOW ART FILMS SITE, WHICH TAKES A COUPLE CLICKS
(-BECAUSE THE HOME PAGE DOES NOT SHOW THE LINK BACK TO THE LOW ART FILMS SITE, YOU HAVE TO CLICK THE RIGHT LINK TO BRING UP THE LOW ART FILMS SITE LISTING).
-THE LOW ART FILMS SITE FEATURES LOW-RENT PORN STARS IN ARTSY VIDEOS. NOT MY FAVORITE NICHE.
-PORN STARS FEATURE LOTS OF FAKE BOOBS AND TATTOOS.
-FAMEAID.COM IS THE PRIMARY BILLER. TRY TO GET EPOCH OR CCBILL WHEN JOINING. I HAVE NOTHING AGAINST FAMEAID, BUT EPOCH AND CCBILL ARE OUTSTANDING BILLERS, EASY TO ACCESS, REPUTABLE.
BOTTOM LINE (START OF): LOW ART FILMS IS AN ARCHIVE SITE. THE LAST UPDATE WAS JANUARY 2012.
SITE HAS 82 VIDEOS (AND ACCOMPANYING PHOTOSET FOR EACH VIDEO).
LOW ART FILMS IS PART OF THE FAME DOLLARS NETWORK (DEVILS FILM NETWORK, GAMMA ENTERTAINMENT, NETFAMESOLUTIONS). DEVILS FILM NETWORK INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING MAIN SITES: DEVILS FILM PETER NORTH ROCCO SIFFREDI SILVERSTONE DVD SILVIA SAINT
AS WELL AS A NUMBER OF OTHER SITES. SOME OF THE OTHER SITES IN THE NETWORK ARE WORTHWHILE SITES, WHILE SOME OF THE OTHER SITES ARE NICHES THAT MIGHT APPEAL TO DIFFERENT TASTES.
-OVER THE YEARS, THEY HAVE TRIED UPDATING THE NETWORK. YEARS AGO, MANY OF THE MODEL LISTINGS WERE INCOMPLETE: THEY WOULD SHOW A NAME, BUT NO THUMBNAIL OF THE MODEL. NOW THE MODEL'S PAGE HAS A THUMBNAIL TO SHOW YOU WHAT THE MODEL LOOKS LIKE, AS WELL AS LINKS TO HER VIDEOS. THAT IS A MAJOR IMPROVEMENT.
TBP CATEGORIZES THE SITE AS GLAMOUR.
I WOULD INSTEAD LIST THE SITE AS SLUTTY-LOOKING PORN STARS, WHICH GIVES A BETTER IDEA OF THE STYLE THE SITE IS GOING FOR.
THIS IS NOT A GLAMOUR SITE IN THE METART, FEMJOY, MPL STUDIOS STYLE.
THIS IS A SITE IN THE OLD "GIVE ME A BUNCH OF SLUTTY TRAMPS WHO WILL SHOW OFF THEIR SEX ACTS".
THEY ARE TRYING TO INTERJECT AN ARTY APPROACH, SO THEY USE LOTS OF DIM LIGHTING.
MOST OF THE VIDEOS ARE LESBIAN OR SELF-MASTURBATION.
THE SITE EMPHASIZES LESBIAN, BIG TITS, TOYS, TATTOOS, PIERCING (OF FEMALE NIPPLES), PUSSY-EATING,
THE NETWORK UPDATED THE SITE STRUCTURE A FEW MONTHS AGO.
THIS MADE NAVIGATING THE SITES MORE DIFFICULT.
THEY ELIMINATED THE DROP-DOWN LIST WHERE YOU COULD MOVE BETWEEN SITES EASILY, AND TELL WHAT SITES YOU HAD ACCESS TO.
INSTEAD, THEY REPLACED IT WITH FLASHIER LINKS THAT YOU SELECT WITH YOUR MOUSE: BUT SOME OF THE LINKS ARE HIDDEN UNDER OTHER LINKS, SO IT'S NOT AS OPEN OR EASY TO SEE WHAT YOUR SITES ARE, AND YOU HAVE TO REMEMBER WHICH SITE-LINKS ARE BURIED UNDER WHAT OTHER LINKS.
A POOR CHOICE FOR THE UPDATED STRUCTURE: MAKING IT HARDER TO ACCESS THE DIFFERENT SITES, TO SEE WHAT IS INSIDE EACH SITE.
ALSO, THE NEW HOT LINKS TO EACH SITE SEEM LESS RESPONSIVE THAN THE OLD DROP-DOWN LIST.
YOU CLICK ON THE LINK, MAYBE IT BRINGS UP THE SITE YOU WANT, OR MAYBE YOU CLICK A FEW TIMES, AND IT BRINGS UP A DIFFERENT SITE.
SO THE EASE OF USE OF THE SITE/NETWORK HAS DETERIORATED WITH THE NEW NETWORK STRUCTURE.
THERE IS NO BLOG WHERE MEMBERS CAN POST THEIR COMMENTS, I FIND IT HARD TO BELIEVE THAT I'M THE ONLY MEMBER WHO WISHES THE OLD SITE STRUCTURE WAS STILL AVAILABLE.
I'M GIVING THE SITE A SCOREOF 69.
THAT IS BASED ON:
IT'S AN ARCHIVE SITE, WITH ONLY 82 VIDEOS, THAT STOPPED UPDATING IN JANUARY 2012.
THE NICHE IS LOW-GRADE SLUTS PLEASURING THEMSELVES OR ANOTHER FEMALE. OCCASSIONALLY A MALE WILL MAKE AN APPEARANCE, BUT THE EMPHASIS IS ON FEMALE MASTURBATION OR LESBIAN SEX.
IT'S AN INTERESTING IDEA FOR THE SITE (TRYING A GLAMORIZED APPROACH TO LOW-GRADE SLUTS), BUT THE IDEA IN PRACTICE DOES NOT WORK WELL.
WHAT GIVES THE SITE VALUE IS THAT YOU GET FULL ACCESS TO THE BASIC DEVILS FILM NETWORK WITH ACCESS TO ANY ONE OF THE BASIC SITES.
BASED ON THAT CRITERIA, THE SITE VALUE JUMPS INTO THE 80+ RANGE.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
NOTE: I'M WRITING IN CAP LETTERS, BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO WRITE AND EDIT. I'M NOT TRYING TO SHOUT OR BE RUDE.
PROS
-PU DISCOUNT OF $17.87/MONTH (RECURRING)
-CAN CHOOSE YOUR OWN USERNAME AND PASSWORD.
-EPOCH IS THE PRIMARY BILLER. A TRUSTED NAME.
-YOU CAN CHOOSE TO EITHER STREAM OR DOWNLOAD THE VIDEOS AND PHOTOSETS.
-YOU HAVE A CHOICE OF STREAMING OF LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH, OR HD(720P) DEFINITION.
-YOU HAVE A CHOICE OF DOWNLOAD OF LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH, HD(720P), HD(1080P) DEFINITION.
-MOST OF THE MODELS ARE VERY ATTRACTIVE. SOME OF THE VIDEOS CAN BE HOT.
Cons:
-THE USERNAME AND PASSWORD YOU CHOOSE ARE TRANSMITTED ON A NON-SECURE PAGE WHEN JOINING.
-SITE LOGIN PAGE AND MEMBER PAGES ARE NON-SECURE. THAT MEANS THAT YOUR ISP WILL HAVE A RECORD OF YOUR SITE VISITS, WHICH THE U.S. GOVERNMENT CAN ACCESS.
-PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE.
-SLOW UPDATE RATE. 4 VIDEOS IN LAST 12 MONTHS.
-CONTENT IS NON-EXCLUSIVE. IF YOU'VE BEEN A MEMBER OF TEEN MEGA WORLD OR THE DIESEL NETWORK, YOU'VE PROBABLY SEEN MOST OF THE VIDEOS AT RUB A TEEN BEFORE.
-SOME PU MEMBERS HAVE REPORTED TERRIBLE DOWNLOAD SPEEDS WITH THIS NETWORK.
-THE MODELS ARE EASTERN EUROPEAN. THE LANGUAGE SPOKEN IS PROBABLY RUSSIAN. NO SUBTITLES. BUT WHAT THE MODELS SAY WOULDN'T MEAN MUCH ANYWAY: THE MASSAGE AND SEX IS WHAT COUNTS.
-DEAD LINKS:
WHEN YOU ARE INSIDE THE MEMBER'S AREA:
IF YOU CLICK ON THE FAQ'S HOT LINK, IT BRINGS UP: ERROR 404: PAGE NOT FOUND.
TERMS HOT LINK, BRINGS UP: ERROR 404: PAGE NOT FOUND.
HELP HOT LINK, BRINGS UP: ERROR 404: PAGE NOT FOUND
Bottom Line:
IF YOU HAVEN'T BEEN A MEMBER OF TEEN MEGA WORLD OR THE DIESEL ACCESS NETWORK, THESE MASSAGE VIDEOS WILL PROBABLY BE NEW TO YOU. THE GIRLS ARE ATTRACTIVE. SOME OF THE VIDEOS CAN BE HOT. RUB A TEEN CURRENTLY HAS 102 VIDEOS (AND MATCHING PHOTOSETS).
THE UPDATE RATE IS VERY SLOW: 4 NEW VIDEOS WERE ADDED OVER THE LAST 12 MONTHS.
HOWEVER, TO OFFSET THE SLOW UPDATE RATE, MEMBERSHIP IN RUB A TEEN INCLUDES ACCESS TO MOST OF THE TEAM SKEET SITES: THE NETWORK UPDATES WITH ONE NEW VIDEO DAILY.
THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK IS HIGHLY RATED BY SOME PU MEMBERS.
HOWEVER, AS I MENTIONED, SOME PU MEMBERS HAVE EXPERIENCED TERRIBLE DOWNLOAD SPEEDS AND NAVIGATION ISSUES. SO THOSE MEMBERS WOULD ADVISE AVOIDING A TEAM SKEET MEMBERSHIP (FOR ANY OF ITS SITES).
I HAVE NO IDEA WHY SOME MEMBERS GET ACCEPTABLE DOWNLOAD SPEEDS FROM THE SITE, AND OTHER MEMBERS GET HORRIBLE DOWNLOAD SPEEDS. I WOULD NOT JOIN A SITE/NETWORK THAT SO MANY PU MEMBERS HAVE REPORTED PROBLEMS WITH. BUT THE PROBLEMS SEEM HIT OR MISS, AND THE CONTENTS OF MANY OF THE SITES DO APPEAL TO SOME PU MEMBERS.
YESTERDAY, I TESTED THE DOWNLOAD SPEEDS AT RUB A TEEN.
THE FIRST 4 VIDEOS I TRIED TO DOWNLOAD, THE DOWNLOADS FAILED.
A COUPLE OF HOURS LATER, I TRIED AGAIN.
I GOT 5 MB/s to 10 MB/s DOWNLOAD SPEEDS (THE FASTEST DOWNLOAD SPEEDS I'VE EVER GOTTEN FROM A PAYSITE), AND THE FILES DOWNLOADED COMPLETELY.
I TRIED AGAIN A FEW HOURS LATER, AND GOT BETWEEN 1 MB/s and 2.5 MB/s. THE DOWNLOADS COMPLETED.
BUT I WAS GETTING POOR NAVIGATION SPEEDS, TRYING TO SWITCH BETWEEN SITE PAGES, FOR ALL MY TRIALS.
THERE ARE CURRENTLY 27 SITES IN THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK YOU HAVE ACCESS TO WITH A MEMBERSHIP IN ANY ONE OF THE BASIC SITES:
THE NAME OF EACH SITE, WITH THE CURRENT NUMBER OF VIDEOS AT THAT SITE, ON 2017-10-21:
(I AM NOT LISTING THE TEAM SKEET SITES THAT REQUIRE AN EXTRA PAYMENT TO ACCESS):
BAD MILFS 21
BRACE FACED 9 CFNM TEENS 30
DYKED 35 EXXXTRA SMALL 193
GINGERPATCH 9 HER FRESHMAN YEAR 20 INNOCENT HIGH 443 LUST HD 95
MY BABYSITTERS CLUB 60 OYE LOCA 225
P.O.V. LIFE 157 RUB A TEEN 102 SELF DESIRE 30
SHE'S NEW 226 SOLO INTERVIEWS 144 STEP SIBLINGS 38 TEAM SKEET EXTRAS 116 TEEN CURVES 69 TEEN PIES 93 TEENS DO PORN 88
TEENS LOVE ANAL 57 TEENS LOVE MONEY 53 TEENY BLACK 81 THE REAL WORKOUT 101 THIS GIRL SUCKS 220 TITTY ATTACK 90
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
NOTE: I AM WRITING IN CAP LETTERS, BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE. NOT SHOUTING.
-CAN STREAM VIDEOS IN HD OR STANDARD DEFINITION.
-CAN DOWNLOAD VIDEOS IN 480P OR 1080P DEFINITION.
-TRAILER GIVES YOU A PREVIEW FOR EACH VIDE0.
-LARGE-SIZED GALLERY FOR EACH VIDEO.
-GALLERIES HAVE A ZIP FILE.
-NO DOWNLOAD LIMITS.
-LONG TIME BEFORE SITE TIMEOUT DUE TO INACTIVITY.
-SITE MEMBERSHIP GIVES ACCESS TO THE BASIC PORN PROS NETWORK.
BUT ACCESS TO THE PREMIUM SITES REQUIRES AN UPGRADED MEMBERSHIP.
Cons:
-ARCHIVE SITE. LAST UPDATE NOVEMBER 2013.
-SMALL SITE. 97 SCENES.
-CAPTCHA REQUIRED TO ENTER SITE.
-HAVE TO ACCEPT OR DECLINE OFFER TO UPGRADE TO PREMIUM STATUS TO ENTER MEMBER'S AREA.
-ADDS ON EVERY PAGE.
-SOME VIDEOS STOP STREAMING WITH ERROR MESSAGE: html5: Video not properly encoded.
-SOME VIDEOS DO NOT PLAY, OR ARE VERY SLOW TO LOAD.
(I SELECT A VIDEO: IF IT DOES NOT LOAD ON THE PAGE AFTER A FEW MINUTES, I SELECT A DIFFERENT VIDEO: SO I DON'T KNOW IF I WAITED MORE MINUTES, THE VIDEO WILL LOAD, OR THE VIDEO LINK MIGHT BE BROKEN.)
-MOST VIDEOS AT THE SITE ONLY HAVE 2 DOWNLOAD OPTIONS: 480P AND 1080P. NO 720P AVAILABLE.
-NO SEARCH BOX. WHICH MAKES EXAMINING THE CONTENTS A TIME-CONSUMING CHORE.
Bottom Line:
16 SITES IN THE BASIC PORN PROS NETWORK. WITH CURRENT NUMBER OF SCENES ON 2017-02-25:
(NETWORK ADVERTISES 24 BASIC SITES, BUT THAT'S NOT ACCURATE: THEY HAVE ELIMINATED A FEW SITES IN THE LAST FEW MONTHS).
SITE THEME: ORIGINALLY, THE THEME WAS A PRIVATE EYE IS VIDEOTAPING WOMEN WHO ARE CHEATING ON THEIR HUSBANDS. EXCEPT THAT THE THEME WAS DROPPED ALONG THE WAY, AND MANY SCENES ARE JUST A GUY HAVING SEX WITH A GIRL. NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE IN THE TWO THEMES, EXCEPT THAT THE PI ELEMENT IS SUPPOSED TO ADD A BIT OF FORBIDDEN SEX TO THE SCENE, ALONG WITH AN ELEMENT OF VOYEURISM BECAUSE THE WOMAN IS NOT SUPPOSED TO KNOW THE SEX IS BEING TAPED.
THIS IS A SMALL, ARCHIVE SITE THAT STOPPED UPDATING IN NOVEMBER 2013. ONLY 97 SCENES.
I WOULD GRADE THE MODELS AS STANDARD PORNSTARS: A LOT OF ENLARGED BREASTS, THE MODELS ARE NOT PARTICULARLY ATTRACTIVE, MOST MODELS ARE IN THEIR MID-TWENTIES OR OLDER.
ALTHOUGH THE MODELS MAKE A LOT OF GROANING AND MOANING NOISES, TO SHOW THE SEX IS HOT, I DID NOT CONSIDER THE SCENES TO BE HOT: JUST NOISY.
GIVING THE SITE ITSELF A SCORE OF 69.
BECAUSE SITE MEMBERSHIP GIVES ACCESS TO THE BASIC PORN PROS NETWORK, I AM INCREASING THE SCORE TO 80, BECAUSE SOME OF THE OTHER SITES ARE WORTH VISITING. THERE ARE CURRENTLY 16 SITES IN THE BASIC PORN PROS NETWORK.
MY FAVORITE SITE IN THE NETWORK IS MASSAGE CREEP, WHICH HAS A ATTRACTIVE SELECTION OF MODELS, AND THE MASSAGE THEME IS BETTER PLAYED, WITH MORE BUILDUP IN MANY OF THE SCENES, BECAUSE THE MASSEUR SEDUCES THE WOMAN WITH HIS HANDS INTO AN EROTIC ENCOUNTER.
IN MY OPINION, SHADY PI IS A THROWAWAY SITE: YOU PAID FOR NETWORK ACCESS, SO YOU MIGHT AS WELL GLANCE THROUGH THE VIDEOS AT THE SITE TO SEE IF THERE'S ANYTHING OF INTEREST. BUT THE REAL VALUE LIES IN THE NETWORK ACCESS.
SOME OF THE SITES IN THE NETWORK ARE WORTH VISITING. WITH SCENES THAT MIGHT APPEAL TO DIFFERENT NICHES AND PERSONAL TASTES.
BUT OVERALL, I THINK THERE ARE BETTER NETWORKS AND SITES THAT ARE MORE DESERVING OF YOUR MONEY.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Good download speeds. I get 1 to 1.3 MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-Down Them All download manager works at this site.
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Site uses Epoch.com as the billing agent, a nationally recognized bill agent.
-The content is dated when posted to the site.
Cons:
-Site needs a complete makeover to make it easier to use.
-Search function is poor. You enter the name of a model, and it turns out that the model is not even in the videos or photosets that are returned from the search. So either different models are given the same name, or the search function is crap. Either way, if you want to search for videos that a model appears in, it seems like you will have to manually search through all the videos at this site, which is a complete waste of time.
-No simple lising of site models, with a nice thumbnail to identify what they look like.
-Lots of advertising for other sites on members pages.
-There is an amateur feel to the videos. They seem to shot by an amateur videographer who has an amateur camera: the focus could be better, the shots could be better framed, the lighting is ok but not professional, the colors are not super-crisp, the sets/background is cheap furniture inside a house or apartment.
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
-Videos download with a poor default filename such as "high.MP4, so you have to rename them to tell them apart.
-The site structure is poor. To go through the videos, you have to click on a number to go to a page that lists 5 videos, then click on the higher number go to the next page. But you get duplicates of videos that were found on earlier pages. A video that appears on page 3 might also appear on page 4. So it's not easy to navigate the site, and the duplicate listings make it harder.
-No simple lising of site models, with a nice thumbnail to identify what they look like. Trying to identify who the models are in the videos is a waste of time. Unless you recognize a model in a video from some other site, you don't know who the models are in a video, because the names the site lists (for who appears in a video) are useless.
-Videos have subtitles to translate the Russian the models speak. But the video download files do not have the subtitles. Not a big deal, because the subtitles are mainly boring. The sex action is what counts.
BOTTOM LINE:
Sorry for the poor language, but these site/network really needs a makeover to make the site contents easier to use.
When you compare Teen Mega World or Diesel Access networks or X-Art or other high grade sites to this site, you begin to realize how much thought was put into making the other sites/networks easier to use. At Young Sex Parties, there is little to no thought to making the site user-friendly. They opened a site, dumped cheap amateur-style, home made videos into the site, and let the members sort through the mess without any helpful model list, without any effort to name the models on a consistent basis, without bothering to add a listing of the models in the videos.
Choice of file types for download:
FLV For Windows,
MP4 For Windows, Mac, iPad, iPhone4
MP4 For iPhone3/iPod
MP4 For Sony PSP
3GP For mobile phones
Number of site videos:
The Best Porn (the parent of the PU site) lists the number of site videos at 117.
I believe The Best Porn site reviewer just took the number of videos from the site facts, instead of counting the videos themselves.
You have a sort-of-listing of the videos pages, 24 pages in all, with most pages showing 5 videos. The last page has 3 videos. But like I mentioned, there are duplicate listing of at least several videos on those pages.
So the 117 video count at this site means you have 117 videos if you include the duplicate videos.
If you want to follow that system, then if a site has 10 video, and they list those 10 videos twice, then the site can claim 20 videos. Or even 100 videos, if they are sloppy enough to list their videos duplicate times in a list.
The models are real teens. Both the girls and the boys. The girls are OK, not really cute or super-attractive. On average, the models are less attractive than the teens you will see at random at a hometown mall. Maybe that's partly because the models appear to wear very little make-up to make themselves more attractive. The models' clothes are what they could buy at a thrift shop or the Salvation Army store.
The bottom line is, after watching a number of these videos, I start to find them mostly boring and a waste of time to watch. I much prefer the glamcore videos at X-Art or Diesel Access network, where an effort is made to present the models attractively. Or even Teen Mega World videos, where less effort is made to make the models attractive, but the physical attractiveness of the models is higer than the models at Young Sex Parties, and the overall quality of the videos is better than the Young Sex Parties videos.
In my opinion, the amateurish feel of the videos just means cheap production values, unattractive selection of models, cheap clothes and cheap settings.
I hope that I will find better videos at the other bonus sites in this network.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-DRM: no.
-Download limits: no.
-Most models will be present at more than one TonyBucks network, but most of the models are not found at a large number of other sites. So the faces you see here are mainly fresh faces, at least until you have gone through the TonyBucks network.
-There are some models that are really cute or outstanding, that you will probably have seen at one or more other major sites.
-Multiple download formats:
--High, medium or low resolution WMV.
--MPG.
--QuickTime.
-Easy login.
-No site timeout.
Cons:
-The biggest con is that the site is not updating. The most recent update I saw was from January 2009.
-So this is an archive site. Some of the content is ok, but once you have downloaded the material you want, there is little reason to come back again. A shame, because they chose some nice models at this site, and you want to find more material on them, and that won't happen at this site.
-No zip file for photosets.
-1 size only for photos.
-No streaming option for videos.
-Watermark, bottom right corner of photos. Not large, but could be smaller, less noticeable.
-Download problems? I was downloading 2 videos from the site using DownThemAll download manager. Both videos stopped downloading, giving me a
"timeout" error message. Each download re-started from the beginning of the download. I do not know why each download stopped, or why each download could not resume from the point that it stopped.
Bottom Line:
This is part of the TonyBucks network. Joining any site in the network can give you access to 10 or less sites in the network, depending on when you
join and which site you join through. There are currently 11 sites in the TonyBucks network.
At this site the photosets outnumber the videos by a large margin. At most TonyBucks sites the photosets and videos are close in number, and several sites have each video paired with a photoset. Not here.
The size of a single photo (up to 250 KB) indicates high definition. But you don't get the "professional quality" you will find at top photo sites like Met Art or MPL Studios. The photos are "ok", but not high quality regarding colors, clarity, etc. There are some attractive Eastern European models, but they could look much better with professional photography.
The content is softcore teen nudity, with some masturbation. Even though the site was
launched in late 2008 and stopped updating a few months later, the photo quality seems more like something from the 1990s: some very pretty models, but the quality is not high. If you know Teen Stars Magazine, the photography style is very similar: more skin is shown at SpringTimeBeauties, there is some mild solo masturbation at SpringTimeBeauties(no masturbation that I can remember at Teen Stars
Magazine), but the photography is better at Teen Stars Magazine: the colors are better, the models look better.
With the large file size for the "high quality" videos, you expect high quality playback, but you don't get it. The first video I saw had a tiny jittery effect that creates eyestrain. The second video I watched did not have the jittery effect, but the video picture is not crisp. 572 MB for a 15 minute clip, so the video picture should be extremely sharp, but it's not: it's like you're watching the scene through a very faint fog.
You do get the impression you are watching amateur teen models who are just starting their porn modelling career, these girls are young and fresh. I just wish they were presented better (better photography).
The soundtrack of the videos I saw was music from a radio (music mixed with talking from an announcer). The volume level of the music is low, which is better than loud, but it would be better to have no background music at all. The music
is a minor distraction that does not really fit the video.
If you like softcore striptease videos, this would be a nice site, except:
1. The site is not updating.
2. The videos are just ok.
3. The photography is not excellent.
By itself, I don't think the site is worth joining. The videos I saw had some attractive models, but the video quality is just ok in spite of the large file size.
If you like this style of photography, I would choose a site like Teen Stars Magazine, which is a site that doesn't update, but the photos are
nicer, and they have zip files. Or choose the My Precious Virgins site, which has a similar photo style, and is supposed to be currently updating.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Content is dated.
-Zip files for photosets.
-Easy login: username, password, captcha (easily read letters).
-No site timeout.
-Streaming options: low, medium, high quality.
-Download options: low, medium, high quality WMV.
: MPEG.
: QuickTime.
-Little or no photoshopping in the photos.
-No download limits.
-Updates 1 photoset or video approximately every 10 days.
Cons:
-Only 1 size for photos.
-If you want to download individual photos instead of the full zip, you sometimes get a "show.php" file instead of the photo file you are trying to download.
-In some videos and photosets, it can be hard to see what the face or body of the model is like. This is true for outdoor scenes, where the
cameraman/photographer does a poorer job than if the scene is indoors.
-The index listing pages are cluttered with thumbnail photos advertising other sites.
-I found very few cute teen models at this site.
Bottom Line:
The theme of the site is interesting: young teen couples having sex in a natural way. But many photosets and videos are lacking. They are shot in an amateur way, especially the outdoor scenes.
The best way to improve this site would be to fire the photographer and video man and get someone who knows how to take a photograph, how to shoot a video. If you're shooting outdoor scenes, get a shooter who knows how to take a photo, how to shoot a video so the model is shown clearly and attractively.
In some outdoor photosets and videos, the face and body of the model is hard to see clearly. The camera is only a few feet away, but the model's face is not shown clearly, because of focus or lighting or shadows or some other reason.
-How a photographer shoots a model can make a huge difference in how attractive she appears. There is no effort to make these girls look more
attractive (from lighting, makeup, costumes, whatever). Even the two models I've seen at other sites that I thought are attractive, did not seem special in their appearances at this site.
The audio track is often poor. A boy and girl are in a meadow, nothing but plants and dirt around, and you hear loud microphone noises, you also hear what sounds like a jet plane overhead, but the sky is clear except for clouds. Maybe it's the wind you hear, because it's windy, and the
microphone noises are loud to begin with. But when you hear the couple speaking, it's not loud enough to make out the actual words. You can often hear the camera clicking in the background for a photoshoot of the video, and the cameraman and photographer walking behind the couple that are being shot can be making noises as well (footsteps).
The lighting outdoors is hard to control, and the model is in and out of shadow, it's distracting.
The indoor scenes are better shot than the outdoor scenes. You have less noise from the microphone, better closeups of the model and the sex action, better control of the lighting. The outdoor scenes are a nice idea in theory, but the photographer/cameraman need to improve his technique to make the outdoor scenes work well.
In a few scenes, where the boy and girl are playfully teasing each other before they start kissing and getting down to business, their acting is good enough that the scene is interesting, even though you can't
understand the actual words they are speaking(German, maybe?). But in other scenes, the prologue to the sex is just wasted time. Porn actors are not often noted for their acting ability, especially in low-budget shoots like these.
The site theme is "natural teens, natural love". This translates to teens making love in outdoor scenes: in a field or meadow, by a lake. If you've been a member of femjoy or zemani, you will have seen videos where, in addition to a lovely nude model, you also see some great outdoor scenery. At this site, the scenery is there, but it's not shown to advantage.
Bottom line: I found no photos worth saving, and only a few videos to save.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Some improvement in video qaulity over Young Sex Parties, a sister site in the Serious Cash network. But video quality seems amateurish which is not a plus, unless you like to watch poorly shot home sex videos.
-Easy login. Can save username and password for future logins.
-No DRM.
=Long time before site timeout.
-They have videos of some models that appear to be early in their career. I've seen some of these models at other sites. But the names they use for the models are basically random, having no relation to the names these models have at other sites.
-Down Them All download manager works.
-Good download speeds. I regularly get slightly over 2 MB/sec, which is close to my max download speed.
-Can stream or download movies.
Download choices are FLV, MP4, 3GP (for mobile phones).
Cons:
-I believe joining this network means your email address will be opened to lots of spam. Open a new email address for safety.
-Videos have a home-style, amateur feel.
-Search is poor. Many times you can enter a model's name and get 0 results, even though you copied her name from a video you just saw, where her name is listed.
-Advertising for other sites clutters up the members area pages.
-Videos download with generic filenames such as "movie.flv" or "high.mp4", so you have to rename the videos manually to identify who is in the video. But the model's names are generic, so unless you recognize her from other sites and remember her name, the name of a model is almost worthless.
-No list for models' names at the site. No listing of models' thumbnails to show what the models look like.
-No model bios.
-Models are foreign (Russia or from Eastern Europe). So the language spoken in the videos is usually foreign.
-Navigation is poor
Bottom Line:
The site theme is supposed to be amateur videos that are shot at home by amateurs.
There are a few videos I've seen from this site that I thought were good. But trying to search through the site to find those videos is a time-consuming task, because the search function is crap, there is no listing of models with a thumbnail to identify what the models look like, the names given to the models are apparently random, so even if you know what you are looking for, it's a question of whether you will run out of patience before you find it.
This site is a little better than Young Sex Partes because I think the models are a little more attractive. But the videos don't compare to the high quality videos found at quality teen sites. And the videos are also below the general quality of videos at Teen Mega World -in terms of focus, framing, definition, lighting, costumes, etc. I know they are going for an amateur feeling, but I much prefer professionally shot videos that have high quality.
The site design is poor, making site navigation a problem. This site makes you begin to appreciate how easy some other sites are to use. Where search is useful, where you get nice thumbnails to show you what the models look like (along with a name you can use).
You get about 21 sites included in your membership. Most of the sites feature teen hardcore.
I'm giving the site a score of 68. The site navigation is a problem. I don't care for the amateur feel of the videos. I wish the models were more attractive, or at least presented more attractively. I think there are much better sites available, in terms of how easy the sites are to use, the quality of the contents. The network has lots of hardcore videos (and pictures), so the quantity is good, but it's too difficult to slog through the content to find what I would like.
My score of 68 is based on the amount of content at the network. If I were grading this site on my personal enjoyment of the site, I would give it a score in the 50s.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Discount through PU. $14.95 instead of $29.99/month.
-Easy login. No captcha.
-Can view photosets as slide show or download the zip set.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Good download speeds. I'm getting 1.3 MB/sec, my max download speed.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Choice of download version quality: Many videos have a WVGA480, HD720, and a HD1080 version.
Cons:
-Uncheck pre-checked cross-sell.
-Search could be better. Search term "Christine Maddox" returns any photoset with the name of "Christine" as first name or last name, instead of specifically returning only photosets with the name of "Christine Maddox" included.
-Also, either they are missing photos of past playmates, or the search does not return all the photos of those playmates. For example, the annual photoguide of past playmates of the year photos are sometimes not included in the search result. There are other past photos of playmates and models that are either not on the site, or not returned by a search of the model's name.
-Some bugs in the navigation or site structure. You play a slide show of Susie Scott, and it only plays a few of the 24 photos in the set, then stops. Can't get it to play/show all the photos in the set.
-Photoset of a playmate does not include the data sheet.
Bottom Line:
-Back in the 1960s and 1970s, Playboy was the premier "gentleman's magazine". Penthouse was a close second. Both those magazines were renowned for their nude photography, as well as their articles and fiction and interviews. They were money-making machines that brought their founders vast wealth. Those days are history. Both Playboy and Penthouse have flirted with bankruptcy in recent years.
This is supposed to be a softcore glamor photo and video site. Given the Playboy name, you would expect to find superior, high quality photos and videos of their models.
-I don't know why, but there are superior copies of their onsite photos available elsewhere. Years ago, I belonged to a newsgroup, and I collected the photos of most playmates.
You look at the photos at this Playboy Plus site, and the photos just don't have the same impact as the photos that I collected. The basic image is the same, but the images I collected from the newsgroups were more striking.
-Some photos are mis-labeled. You play a slide show of a photoset, and instead of identifying the model(s) in each photo, the label shows the title of the photoset. So you have to know from other sources (or your own special knowledge) who these models are.
-No choice of download version quality for zip photosets. This is surprising. For a photo-oriented site, the only option I see is for one definition of a zip file download, not the standard 3 definitions that many photo sites have of low, medium, and high quality.
-The quality of the "high definition" video files can be poor. For example, the video for "stacy-fuson-paymate-of-the-month-vid-01.mp4" is 1920x1080, total bitrate is 6049 kbps, which would seem to indicate a high quality, high definition video. But the frame rate is 7 frames/second, which might explain why the video is a poorly defined video picture. I've seen the DVD which this video is made from, and the video is much sharper than the video you download from Playboy Plus.
Let me be clear. Watching the downloaded video is like watching a shitty version of the video you should be watching.
The streaming version of that video is better quality, but nowhere near the quality of Metart, Diesel Access network, or other fine sites. The video quality of a streaming video at Playboy Plus is actually below the quality of the Teen Mega World videos.
That is amazing to me. Don't the people running this site realize the video quality of their videos is so poor, compared to the better sites on the internet?
Maybe they are blind to the poor quality of their photographs, which is not as bad as the quality of their video downloads. But the obvious degradation of their video download files is pathetic, for a site that is supposed to empasize the beauty of the female form.
The site does not use DRM. But the poor quality of the video files I have downloaded, in effect, means you can not save a high quality video file. And I am going to sign up for a new membership to a newsgroup, because I believe I will be able to find better quality photos of past playmates from a newsgroup than I can find at this Playboy Plus pay site.
I don't believe my expectations for this site were too high. But what I've found at this site, in terms of photo image quality, and video image quality, is a massive disappointment.
Not all videos are as bad (poor definition) as these 2 videos of Stacy Fuson. The videos of Erika Eleniak are better. Not great, not as good or defined as high quality sites like Metart or Diesel Access, but still better than the Stacy Fuson videos.
Giving the site a score of 68. I believe the quality of the photos at the site is inferior to what you will find at high-quality sites like Metart and MPL Studios and Femjoy.
And the quality of the videos is even further below what you will find at those other sites.
Comparing the photo and video quality of this site to high grade sites on the internet, you begin to realize the Playboy brand has really fallen from its former quality standards.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A number of attractive female teen models.
-Update rate: 1 video and photoset every 5 days, until recently. Last few weeks the update rate has slowed. The photosets are a photo capture of the video shoot.
-No DRM.
-Long period before site timeout.
-Videos have subtitles for the Russian language. But once you see a few videos, you realize the words spoken are mainly very low-grade conversation that is better ignored. The idea of subtitles is nice, but the models say very little that is worth hearing.
-Most models have very little tattoos or piercings.
-Streaming option to view the videos.
-Can easily view single photos in a photoset, or download the photoset in a zip file.
-Content is dated.
-No download limit.
Cons:
-The main stunt cock can be really annoying. He is arrogant. He is supposed to be playing the part of a masseur, but the massages he performs are so poor most amateurs could do a better massage. And the stupid bullshit he speaks to the girls is really annoying.
-In contrast, the stunt cocks at Fucked Hard 18 and Massage Room Seduction are giving what appear to be sensual, real massages to the girls, making
the videos more believable and enjoyable.
-The videos at tricky masseur appear to be shot by a amateur camera-man who often can't hold the camera still and has trouble framing the scenes. He is poor framing the pre-sex scenes, and even worse framing the sex scenes.
-A small site that just started December 2010, currently has 34 videos.
-Watermark bottom right corner. Larger than necessary, but not overly intrusive.
-No model bios.
Bottom Line:
Tricky Masseur is part of the Teen Mega World/Royal Cash network.
The site is a collection of videos of a guy who's supposed to be a masseur who seduces teen girls during the massage. The same idea is done 100 times better at Fucked Hard 18 and Massage Room Seduction. The main tricky masseur stunt cock is an arrogant jerk who does a shitty job of giving a massage, and his line of bullshit to the girls is stupid and unbelievable.
The videos at Fucked Hard 18 and Massage Room Seduction are much better because the stunt cocks are more believable as masseurs, they come across
as less arrogant and less bullshit-talking, and the videos are shot with greater care and skill.
To improve the videos at tricky masseur, replace the stunt cock and replace the camera-man with people who know what they are doing.
Number of videos: 34
Video runtime: 30-40 minutes
Multiple formats for download: high and medium quality WMV, medium quality FLV, portable device format (iPod mp4).
File size for high quality WMV file:
runtime 30 minutes: about 1.1 GB
runtime 40 minutes: about 1.5 GB
Number of photosets: 34
Number of photos per photoset: around 200
The photoset is a visual record of a video shoot.
The photos are better than a screen cap, but do not have the quality of a professionally shot photo: the photos can be blurry, out-of-focus, or just lacking in erotic or sensual appeal.
The site has spent a lot of time and effort posting these large photosets.
It would be smarter to just post 20-30 photos, or less, instead of 200+ photos, of a video shoot, because the quality of the photos is not good.
The network/site offers a free live cam/chat show, that is the same offering at the Diesel network. This live cam/chat is basically a waste of time. To see any nudity in a private show or as part of the "public" show can get expensive fast. The real free show is no show, just different models waiting to be paid for a private show, who do almost nothing while waiting.
Bottom line: As a bonus site that's part of your network membership, the site is worth looking over. But the site itself is a poor version of the much better massage sites like Fucked Hard 18 and Massage Room Seduction.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has a discounted price of $24.95/month for this site.
Join Naughty Amnerica for $9.95 for the first month, and you get full access to this site.
-Epoch is the payment processor. A trusted name. Easy to cancel, easy to work with.
-Can stream or download videos.
-Can choose between multiple definitions for download.
-Choice of multiple definitions for download of full movie.
-Choice of multiple definitions for download of specific clips from each movie.
-Each video has an accompanying photoset that illustrates the action of the video.
-Zip file for each gallery.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-I don't find the models attractive. That's personal taste. I don't like fake boobs. Don't like tattoos. The models are below average in looks. They aren't cute or pretty or lovely--unlike many porn models at glamor sites or hardcore sites like Teen Mega World or Diesel network.
Bottom Line:
Site statistics:
8 videos.
8 matching galleries.
Lesbian Girl on Girl is one of my favorite sites on Naughty America.
The site has 8 videos and 8 matching photo sets. That's it.
The first video has a posting date of 2012-12-12.
The last video has a posting date of 2013-01-15.
The reason it is my favorite site at Naughty America is that it gives me faith that I can open up my own porn site.
And maybe make a lot of money.
If Naughty America can offer a site with only 8 videos (and matching photo sets), there nothing to stop me from doing it as well.
To open my site, I would be willing to buy 10 videos, which is two more than what Lesbian Girl on Girl boasts.
Edit: some of my remarks are meant as tongue in cheek.
Why have a site with only 8 videos? The owners probably thought it would be a useful site to offer some content in this niche. So they opened the site, and posted 8 videos. And stopped posting new videos within the first month.
So, why keep it as a separate site? The main reason would be to advertise that Naughty America has one additional site to offer customers. And you don't find out that this site is so tiny until after you sign up.
As far the videos are concerned:
I actually prefer these videos over some of the other niches that Naughty America features.
The reason is the story or plot is minimal. So there is less of the bad acting these models do in leading up to the sex.
The sex itself is not very believable. These are porn stars getting paid to act sexy, make a lot of fake moaning noises to show how aroused they are. The acting is not convincing, the sex is not hot. Some lesbian porn can be hot, but none of the videos at this site are very interesting. They are basically a waste of time to watch.
This is personal opinion, but I don't find most of the models at Lesbian Girl on Girl (or Naughty America) that attractive. I don't like fake boobs. I don't like tattoos on women.
Bottom line: Even if you like lesbian porn, I doubt this site will have much value, because it's so tiny. And the videos are plain vanilla. They have no heat. No interest.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
-High quality softcore photosets.
-Glamor style photography.
-This is a Richard Murrian site (some contributions by other photographers).
-There are some yummy-looking models here.
-Most models are teens, some in early 20s.
-Photo series come in 3 resolutions: 2500 px, 1500 px, 1000 px.
-Zip file for download of the photo series.
-Low annual fee ($59 per year).
-Exclusive content.
-No DRM.
-Billing by CCBILL.
Cons:
_The photosets are small with only a few photos per set.
-Because of the small number of photos per set, it's not a satisfying experience looking at a photoset. I want more photos in a set, which I can get at met-art, metmodels, mpl studios, femjoy, justteensite, or any of the softcore megasites.
-There are some videos, but the main focus is on photos.
-Updates are very irregular.
-No response to emails from customer service.
Bottom Line:
Problems at muse:
I joined muse with a 12-month membership in March, 2009. Because the site had no updates for most of 2009, the site advertised that members who had a 12-month membership in the un-updated part of 2009, would get a free 6-month extension of their membership.
I emailed the site requesting the membership extension, but received no reply. My membership was not extended.
Also, it was difficult trying to log into the site while my membership was still active. I often got the error message: "Sorry, the
page you requested could not be found or you do not have the necessary authorization."
My experience at the site was unfavorable. I wasted my membership money, and was left with a bitter aftertaste.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The only reason I am writing pros is because PU wants a balanced review. But basically, this site has little or no value. Anyone who subscribes to this site is wasting their time and money.
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-DownThemAll manager works at this site.
-Good download speeds. I get 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-Some videos can be downloaded as either MPG or WMV files. Some videos only have a WMV option.
Cons:
-Zip file for each photoset downloads with the default filename of "gallery.zip". So you have to rename the zip to know what photoset you have downloaded.
-Video files download with a generic default filename. So you have to re-write the filename to know what the video is. And since the model is not usually identified, and there is no description of what the action is, you make up your own description if you want to save the file.
-No streaming option to view the video before downloading it. So, you have to download each video and play it, before you can decide if the video is worth viewing or saving.
-But there are only 13 videos at this site, and none of them are worth saving. Or even viewing.
-Only have one option for the videos and photosets for definition. No high, medium or low choices.
-The photosets and videos are very low definition.
-This is an archive site. No updates in years.
-Tiny site. 13 videos. 55 photosets.
-Navigation is primitive.
-No search.
Bottom Line:
CONS(continued):
-No posting date for videos or photosets.
-No model bio data.
-No models are named in any of the photosets.
-A few models are named in a few of the videos. But most of the models in the videos are not named.
-The video files are very low definition.
BOTTOM LINE:
Site stats:
Number of videos: 13
Video size: 320x240 352x240 720x480
Total bitrate: 712 kbps 1628kbps
Different video files will have their own specifications. You don't get a choice of specifications. Most of the videos have the low 320x240 size. A few have 720x480, but even then, the video is poor, maybe from lack of focus or other factors.
Number of photosets: 55
Photo dimensions: 768x1152p or 1024x683p
Number of photos per set: 33 to 141
This is a hardcore teen site.
This is an archive site. The content was made years ago.
You get better looking photos at archive sites like My Precious Vigins and Teen Stars Magazines, as well as better looking models at those other sites.
If you like this style of photography, Amour Angels is a site that is still updating, and has superior photography and more attractive models, as well as superior site design.
There are some cute models at this site, and their photosets are OK. Not great, but OK. And if you're already a member, it's pobably worth saving some of their sets for completeness.
The videos are worthless, because of the low definition. Even if some of the models are cute, the picture is so poor no PU member would waste his time watching these videos.
Bottom line:
Because of the small amount of content, the poor quality of the content, poor site design, most PU members would give this site a miss.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Zip files for photosets.
-Can download videos as AVI or WMV files.
-Can download a video as a single file, or download segments of the video.
-Can use a download manager. I used DownThemAll.
-Good download speeds. I regularly got about 1.3MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
Cons:
-Content not dated.
-The zip file for a single photoset offers only one size definiton. There is no low, medium, high quality choices.
-The models in the photosets are not named.
-You only get a single, low-definition choice for the videos. No medium or high definition option. And the low-definition is really poor, 400x300.
-The photosets download with the default filename of "gallery.zip". So you have to rename each download, or the following zip files either won't
download, or will over-write the previous "gallery.zip" file.
-The captcha on login is hard to read.
-No search function.
-Navigation is basic.
-I found no videos worth keeping.
-The photos are better quality than the videos, but I found no photos worth keeping.
-No streaming. Have to download a video to watch it.
-No model index.
-No model bios.
-Some WMV video files can't be played, because neither Windows Media Player or VLC Player could recognize the file's input.
Bottom Line:
Site specs:
Number of videos: 38
Average runtime of video: from 10 to 40 minutes.
Videos can be downloaded in AVI and WMV format.
AVI files:
400x300 width x height.
1,213 kbps total bitrate
WMV files:
400x300 width x height.
1,214 kbps total bitrate
Number of photosets: 219
Average number of photos per set: from 25 to 40.
Photo dimensions: 768x1024 pixels.
The number of photosets seems large. Certainly far larger than the 38 videos. But the reason for the large number of photosets is that photos of
a single video shoot are often separated into a number of photosets, so that the site contents appear larger. A single photoset is small, usually between 20 and 40 photos.
This is a hardcore teen site.
This is an archive site. Even though the content is not dated, I believe the content was shot years ago.
The video quality is poor. There are many reasons for the poor video quality. The main factor is the low definition of the videos. You only get
one definition in the video, and this is such a low definition that you see lines in the video on playback. This is such a low-definition video
that it's lower than the lowest definition offered at major sites like Teen Mega World or Nubiles. The colors in the videos are poor. The
costumes the models wear are cheap. The sets are cheap.
The models can be good looking, and they can put on a good show sexually. But they are wasted in these low-quality videos.
The photos are better quality than the videos. The video quality is just awful. The photos are decently photographed softcore and hardcore. Not
artistic, or sensual, but ok shots of hardcore action. The photos are low-definition, very little production values, but still better than the god-awful videos.
This site's contents might have had some value maybe 10 years ago. But compared to what is being offered today at other teen sites, this site is a waste of time and money.
Truthfully, you will find better quality videos at free tube sites than what you can find at this site.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
