Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Easy site log-in.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Zip file for each photoset. (The site has 2 photosets total. That is not a joke.)
-Small amount of site contents. With a fast Internet connection, you can download the entire site contents in 1 day. And then review the contents at your leisure.
-Some attractive models.
Cons:
-Archive site. No updates since 2006.
-Small site.
-The site has only 2 photosets, which are a low-quality photographic record of a video shoot. Even though you can download a zip file for each
photoset, I don't know who would want to keep a zip file of these photosets.
-Site contents are not dated, except for the two photosets, which are from 2006. Apparently the last update for the site was in April, 2006.
-Most videos have only one download option, a low-quality WMV file. A few videos have a choice of download as low-quality WMV or low-quality MPEG file.
-The default option for filename of each video downloads as 001.wmv, which means you have to manually rename each file, to avoid overwriting with the next download. And also to separate the files from one another, because a bunch of files with the filename of 001.wmv are hard to distinguish from one another.
-No bio for the models. They don't even bother to name the models.
Bottom Line:
CONS (continued):
-Navigation is basic. You get a list of the videos, in apparent chronological order (but no date is listed). That's it.
-No search feature.
BOTTOM LINE:
Site contents:
This is a small archive site that has not been updated since 2006. It has 25 videos, and 2 photosets.
The 2 photosets are a photographic record of 2 video shoots. The photosets are poor quality photographs, more like screen captures (or maybe they are screen captures).
videos: 25
Sample video file size: about 250 MB, for a runtime of 34 minutes.
Total bitrate: 1017kbps (very low bitrate, indicating poor quality of video).
Frame width x height: 400x300.
photosets: 2
photoset 1 has 115 photos.
photoset 2 has 100 photos.
Individual photos have a file size of about 60-80 KB, 1024x576 pixels.
This site is supposed to be a reality porn series. The site theme is 2 cops who play practical jokes on women who are applying for a driver's license. The two cops, one who is dressed as a doctor, make the women applicants undress and then have sex as part of the medical exam. This is a very stupid idea, and the two "cops" are sort of acting like an updated
version of the three stooges. But the women go along with the idea, and have sex with the two cops: bj, vaginal, maybe anal, whatever. At the end, because the women had sex with the two guys, the women are told they passed their medical exam needed for a driver's license.
One model asks: What does a gynecological exam have to do with a driver's license?
The cop dressed as a doctor answers: We have to make sure you don't wiggle around on the seat when driving.
(There are subtitles, because the models are speaking whatever European language they use.)
Some of the models are attractive. I wish the quality of the videos was better. The camera-work is ok to good, the lighting is ok to good (these
are indoor scenes shot in a small room), but the definition/clarity of the videos could be greatly improved.
This is part of the Diesel network. If you joined this site by itself, you would feel that not only the models were getting screwed, but that you had been screwed as well.
But if you get this site as part of the Diesel network, then the site is worth glancing over. Many of the models are cute. I only wish the videos were better quality (higher definition, mainly).
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Content is dated. The video dates range from November 2006 thru November 2008. The photosets are from 2007 and 2008.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Can download the videos.
-Zip file for each photoset.
-Good download speeds. I get 1.3MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-DownThemAll file manager works at this site.
Cons:
-Primitive site layout.
-No search.
-Archive site. No updates.
-Videos are from years ago. The definition is very low.
-Videos download with the default filename of full.avi or full.wmv. So you have to re-name each download, or else the succeeding videos will either over-write the previous video, or it won't download. Also need to rewrite the filename so
you know what the video is about.
-No model bios.
-Models not named in the videos or photosets.
-No streaming option for videos. Have to download the file to watch.
-Only one definition for each video.
-Only one definition for each photoset.
-You have a thumbnail illustrating each photoset and video. But the thumbnail is so small, and such poor quality, you don't really know what the model looks like.
Bottom Line:
Videos:
Number of videos: 106
Width by height: 360x240 or 288x216
Total bitrate: 1340 kbps or 216 kbps
Runtime: 8 to 23 minutes
Photosets:
Number of photosets: 532
Number of photos per photoset: 70 to 170
Photo: 370x560 pixels or 600x336 pixels or 768x1024 pixels
This is a hardcore teen site.
Because of the low definition of the videos, they are only useful as a reminder of the early days of internet porn. No one who has access to most internet porn sites today would want to watch, or be satisfied with, the low-definition videos available at this site.
I didn't save a single video from this site. The girls might be attractive, but they are so blurry, and the videos are so low-definition, it's just a waste of time looking at them.
The photosets are like screenshots. The photoset is usually like a video-capture of a video shoot. So there is no posing for best effect, no artistic or sensual value to the photos. The colors are poor.
The truth is, I've been spoiled by the good and fine and excellent quality of the videos and photosets at today's porn sites. Looking at the content of this site makes me realize how far we've come in a few short years. This site might
have some curiosity value. But comparing the contents to what is available at other sites, this site is a waste of time and money.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discount of $14.95 for the first month, recurring at $29.95/month.
-Devils Film Parodies is part of the Adult Time network, so you should get access to the Adult Time network. But see the bottom line why I recommend getting access to Devils Film Parodies either from a direct sub through Adult Time or from another satellite site of Adult Time that specifically states you get access to the Adult Time network when joining through that satellite site.
-The site features trannys (transsexual models).
-Site login and member pages are https (secure pages).
Cons:
-The biggest con is that this site is a member of the Adult Time network. But when you go to the site public pages, there is no mention of Adult Time. Nor is there a mention of Adult Time on the join page. So there is no guarantee that you will get Adult Time access when joining this site, even though customer service appears to state (if you contact them) that you will get access to the Adult Time network if you join through this site.
See the bottom line for examples of when salespersons either lied to me or misrepresented the facts on joining a service.
If you join this site and don't automatically get free access to Adult Time, you have been screwed: because the Adult Time network is a gold mine of hardcore porn, and any one of the sites in the network has far less value if it does not give access to Adult Time.
-This is a small site. 75 videos total.
-This is an archive site. No updates since 2015.
-The models (trannys) are not cute or attractive,
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
The stunt cocks are not cute or attractive. Normally, this is not important, but the site models and stunt cocks are just unattractive to me, which helps turn me off from the site.
-The models often wear wigs that are fake and cheap.
-The videos are supposed to be parodies of TV shows and movies. But the parodies are stupid, with little wit or sense.
-The trannies are plain-looking, the sex is boring. I've seen other sites where the trannies can be attractive, but not at this site.
-Private biller. I'm more accustomed to CCBill and Epoch, where cancelling is easy. But I've never had a problem with fameadvice.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Although the Devils Film Parodies site is part of the Adult Time network, no mention of the Adult Time network is made on the public pages of the site, or on the join page.
If you want to sample the site contents, I suggest joining the Adult Time network, or one of the satellite sites that specifically states you get fee Adult Time network access with joining that site.
Joining Devils Film Parodies directly should give you access to the Adult Time network, but screw-ups happen, and you can't always depend on what a customer service rep tells you.
A while ago, I did a live chat with an Adult Time network satellite site customer service and was told that joining any one of the satellite sites should give you access to the entire Adult Time network.
However, I did another live chat with an Adult Time network customer service rep, and was told that Adult Time network memberships were given out on a random basis when joining one of the Adult Time network sites.
Two different stories. This was while Adult Time was still in beta testing.
Since Adult Time network access is the main value when you join any one of its member sites, I would make sure you are getting the Adult Time network as a free add-on when you join one of the member sites.
Or, you can join the Adult Time network directly.
Also, I recommend waiting for a holiday, since they frequently have discounted membership prices during holidays throughout the year.
Note: I did a live chat with Adult Time customer service yesterday.
I specifically asked if you join through the Devils Film Parodies site, do you get free access to the Adult Time network.
The customer service rep said that Adult Time network includes the Devils Film Parodies site.
When I asked, a second time, if you join through the Devils Film Parodies site, do you get access to the Adult Time network, the customer service rep seemed to ignore the question.
(I don't know if the rep thought the question was already answered, or the rep didn't understand the question I was asking.)
However, call me a pessimist, but I have found that you can't depend on what a salesperson or customer service rep tells you 100%.
See the reply section below for examples of why you can't depend on what a customer service rep says.
Basically, the Devils Film Parodies site has little value:
it's a small archive site of 75 videos.
The last update was about 4 years ago.
The site is supposed to feature parodies of TV shows, like the Brady Bunch, or popular movies, like the Twilight movies.
The models wear cheap wigs that look cheap and stupid.
The plots are stupid.
Am I being overly harsh on the site?
I suggest drinking a few beers before watching the videos, and maybe you will appreciate them more.
Or maybe a few shots of tequila or your favorite liquor.
Anyway, I have fond memories of Fast Times at Ridgemont High.
Jennifer Jason Leigh and Phoebe Cates were awesome babes.
Their sex scenes were hot.
The Devils Film Parodies knock-off of this movie tries to be funny and/or hot, but it's a piece of shit compared to the original movie.
The sex is boring.
I have see other sites where there are attractive trans models, and the sex could be hot.
But not at this site.
And most of the non-trans models are not cute or attractive.
And the acting is poor.
If you have access to the Adult Time network, you might want to browse some of the videos at Devils Film Parodies site, to see what they are.
But I found the site a waste of time.
I'm giving the site a score of 60.
The Adult Time network is a gold mine of high quality porn, and that network deserves a score in the 90s.
SEE THE REPLY SECTION BELOW FOR EXAMPLES WHY YOU CAN'T DEPEND 100% ON WHAT CUSTOMER SERVICE OR A SALES REP SAYS.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Zip file for each photoset.
-Video download formats:
WMV: high, medium, low quality
MPEG
Quicktime
High quality WMV is 1440x810 (6256kbps)
-Updates once a week video/photoset
-Video runtime : 20 minutes to 60 minutes
-Easy login.
-No DRM.
-Very fast response to an email from tech support. But the response was not helpful.
Cons:
-Only 1 size for the photos.
-Photos are a visual record of the video shoot, not an original shoot.
-No streaming option to view the videos.
-Some video files download with no estimate of file size or download time.
-The videos are overly long. A single sex scene should last from 10-20 minutes. There are many sex scenes that last 40-60 minutes, and the action gets boring and repetitious.
-It's strange the female model's face and body are not displayed clearly in the photoshoots.
I want to know what the model looks like, and the screenshots do a lousy job of that.
-Site navigation is poor.
-Search is poor.
-There is no simple listing of the models.
-Videos are large files. The high quality video file can be 1 - 2.3 GB or larger, for a video that runs 20 minutes to 60 minutes.
-Volume on some videos is too low.
-Download problems: on my last 2 video downloads, the download stops after downloading about 1 GB, and won't resume. Currently can't download any videos from this site.
Bottom Line:
This is a site for mild BDSM (Bondage,Discipline, Sado-Masochism).
I do not care for the niche.
But even if I did like the niche, I believe the site is not very good.
You can't get a good idea of what
the models look like until you play the video. The photosets should give an excellent idea of what the model looks like, but they mostly don't.
Instead of giving clear photos of the face and body of the model, the photos focus on the "action", the girl being tied or abused or whatever, but you can't see her face or body very clearly in most photos. It's just lousy photography. And in many cases, you are not able to tell the model in 2 different videos is the same girl, because you don't get a clear idea of her face and body.
The videos are too long. A single sex scene can last 20-60 minutes. Beyond 20 minutes, I think people tend to lose interest, find the action boring, repetitive, dull. This is
not a movie with a plot, where you have brief sex scenes along the way. Instead, it's a single sex scene that loses it's impact after you watch
the scene for 10 or 20 minutes.
This is basically dull spanking porn.
My fantasy, to improve the videos, would be to have some guy in a leather costume and mask, come into the scene, and bash the male model who is
doing the spanking, with a metal baseball bat. The girl could jump up and down, screaming, "My hero, my lord", until the spanker is unconscious or dead. Then the girl could give her hero a bj or whatever to finish the scene.
This would serve to add color to the scene (the red blood), plus serve as a break in the dull sex scene, and lead to renewed interest in the next
sex scene (the bj or whatever), and remove the idiot doing the spanking.
I don't usually appreciate watching this type of female abuse, even if it's supposed to be consensual.
On a more realistic note, I have seen a few BDSM scenes that were colorful or interesting or erotic. But not at this site. These vids are just boring and overly long.
The scenes can be 1 boy-1 girl, 2 boys-1 girl, 2 boys-2 girls, 1 boy-2 girls, 2-girls. Most common scene is 1 boy-1 girl and 2 boys-2 girls.
This is a site with a small amount of content. Site just started around middle of 2010. You probably have less than 40 videos, plus 40 photosets. With that small amount of content, you would think the navigation would be extremely simple. But searching through the content is difficult. Trying to look through each video or associated photoshoot is difficult.
The site design is clumsy. Sometimes you can't easily find the photoshoot or video that is supposed to be the mate of a video/photoshoot.
I give the site a score of 60, because of the poor site design, poor navigation, boring videos, stupidity in making the video runtime too long,
and other problems.
This site is a waste of time. And very frustrating. And irritating.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-FIRST MONTH IS $9.95 WITH PU DISCOUNT, RENEWS AT $29.99/MO.
-CCBILL AND EPOCH ARE THE MAIN BILLERS, BOTH ARE TRUSTED NAMES.
-MEMBERSHIP IN BANGABLE IS SUPPOSED TO GIVE YOU ACCESS TO FUCKED HARD 18 FUCKED HARD GFS
NEW GIRL POV
Cons:
-NO SEARCH FUNCTION.
-THE SITE HAS A LOT OF VERY ATTRACTIVE MODELS. BUT IT'S HARD TO FIND ANY VIDEOS THAT ARE WORTH WATCHING.
TWO MAIN REASONS.
1. THE BULK OF THE SITE CONTENT IS SHORT VIDEOS WHERE THE MODELS DANCE IN THEIR UNDERWEAR, AS A SOFTCORE TEASE.
2. TRYING TO FIND A WORTHWHILE HARDCORE VIDEO IS TIME-CONSUMING. I DON'T THINK IT'S WORTH THE TIME OR EFFORT.
-THE MUSIC ON MOST OF THE VIDS IS ANNOYING. IT'S BETTER TO MUTE THE VIDEOS.
-NO MODEL BIO.
-THE MODELS THAT ARE IDENTIFIED USE ONLY ONE NAME. SO IT'S DIFFICULT TO CATEGORIZE THE MODELS, UNLESS YOU RECOGNIZE THEM FROM ANOTHER SITE. AND MANY MODELS IN THE SHORT VIDEOS ARE NOT GIVEN A NAME.
-THE TAGS DESCRIBING THE VIDEOS ARE WORTHLESS. ON MANY/MOST OF THE TEASE VIDEOS WHERE A GIRL IS DANCING IN HER UNDERWEAR, THE TAGS SHOW: babe, Bangable, Horny, Looking for sex, Ready to Fuck, Sexy.
THAT IS FOR SOFTCORE TEASE VIDEOS, WHERE THE GIRL IS DANCING IN HER UNDERWEAR.
CONS CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION:
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
THE SOFTCORE TEASE VIDEOS:
THERE IS NOTHING TO SHOW THE GIRL IS READY FOR SEX, UNLESS IT'S YOUR OWN IMAGINATION.
-THEY OFFER A DISCOUNTED MEMBERSHIP TO PORN MASTERMIND IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF BANGABLE.
HOWEVER, IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF PORN MASTERMIND, YOU GET COMPLETE ACCESS TO BANGABLE, WITH YOUR PORN MASTERMIND MEMBERSHIP. I DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS AN ERROR.
-SEPARATELY, I CAN'T ENTER THE PORN MASTERMIND SITE, BECAUSE THE LOGIN LINK IS BROKEN. IT LEADS TO A SUPPORT PAGE THAT ASKS FOR USERNAME AND PASSWORD, BUT WARNS THAT THE PAGE IS NOT SECURE, AND THAT SENDING THE USERNAME AND PASSWORD MAY COMPROMISE YOUR LOGIN.
BOTTOM LINE:
BANGABLE USED TO BE A SOFTCORE TEASE SITE FEATURING VERY SHORT VIDEOS (RUNTIME 3 MINUTES OR LESS, MANY LESS THAN 1 MINUTE) OF ATTRACTIVE MODELS WHO WERE DANCING TO MUSIC.
RECENTLY, THE SITE HAS STARTED ADDING HARDCORE VIDEOS FROM OTHER PAYSITES AS A FORM OF CROSS-ADVERTISING, AND TO EXPAND THE CONTENT OF THE SITE. THESE VIDEOS ARE FROM WELL-KNOWN PAYSITES SUCH AS JOYMII, SEX ART, WOW GIRLS, WOW PORN, ETC.
THE SITE HAS A LOT OF VERY ATTRACTIVE MODELS.
MOST OF THE VIDEOS ARE VERY SHORT, UNDER 3 MINUTES, WITH THE GIRLS DANCING TO MUSIC, WEARING UNDERWEAR OR BIKINIS.
IT'S DIFFICULT TO FIND ANY VIDEOS WORTH WATCHING.
IT'S MUCH EASIER TO GO TO A TUBE SITE AND FIND A LOT OF VIDEOS WORTH WATCHING, AND THAT IS FREE.
BANGABLE CHARGES YOU MONEY FOR A SITE THAT IS A WASTE OF TIME AND EFFORT.
I THINK THE SITE MADE MORE SENSE WHEN IT WAS JUST THE SHORT, SOFTCORE TEASE VIDEOS. THAT WAS MAYBE A YEAR AGO.
THEN YOU WOULD THINK, OK, IT'S JUST SOFTCORE TEASE, WITH ANNOYING MUSIC TRACKS, BUT THE GIRLS ARE YOUNG AND PRETTY.
NOW, WITH THE MIX OF SOFTCORE AND OCCASIONAL HARDCORE VIDEOS, YOU ARE LEFT WANTING SOME GOOD HARDCORE VIDEOS TO WATCH, AND IT'S HARD AS HELL TO FIND THEM. BECAUSE THE BULK OF THE CONTENT ARE THE SOFTCORE TEASE VIDEOS. AND THERE'S NO SEARCH FUNCTION, TO HELP YOU FIND THE HARDCORE VIDEOS.
EITHER SEPARATE THE HARDCORE VIDEOS FROM THE SOFTCORE TEASE, SO THE SITE IS EASIER TO USE. OR ELIMINATE ONE OF THE TWO CATEGORIES, SO THE SITE MAKES MORE SENSE THEMATICALLY. MIXING THE TWO CATEGORIES IN A RANDOM MANNER IS JUST FRUSTRATING.
BASICALLY, THE SITE IS A WASTE OF TIME AND MONEY.
IF YOU HAVE A SUBSCRIPTION TO PORN MASTERMIND, THE PARENT NETWORK, YOU CAN BROWSE THROUGH THE BANGABLE VIDEOS TO SEE IF ANYTHING CAPTURES YOUR IMAGINATION. BEFORE YOUR FRUSTRATION GETS THE BETTER OF YOU AND YOU LEAVE THE SITE.
I HAVE ACCESS TO BANGABLE THROUGH A MEMBERSHIP IN PORN MASTERMIND.
BUT I HAVE SEEN AN ADVERTISEMENT AT BANGABLE THAT OFFERS A 40% DISCOUNT TO PORN MASTERMIND MEMBERSHIP.
I DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS AN ERROR, OR THAT A BANGABLE MEMBERSHIP DOES NOT OFFER YOU ACCESS TO PORN MASTERMIND.
EITHER WAY, I WOULD NOT JOIN BANGABLE BECAUSE IT DOES NOT GIVE VALUE FOR THE PRICE CHARGED.
WITH DIRECT MEMBERSHIP IN BANGABLE, YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO GET ACCESS TO 3 OF THE SITES IN THE PORN MASTERMIND NETWORK: FUCKED HARD 18 FUCKED HARD GFS
NEW GIRL POV
SO, I DON'T KNOW HOW PAYING EXTRA FOR A PORN MASTERMIND MEMBERSHIP WILL GIVE YOU ANY BENEFIT, SINCE A BANGABLE MEMBERSHIP ALREADY INCLUDES MOST OF THE PORN MASTERMIND NETWORK.
ALSO, UNTIL THEY FIX ACCESS TO PORN MEMBERSHIP LOGIN, AND SOME OTHER PROBLEMS AT PORN MASTERMIND, I WOULD NOT JOIN THAT SITE EITHER. SAVE YOUR MONEY FOR A SITE WITH LESS PROBLEMS.
THIS IS DEFINITELY ONE OF THE MOST NEGATIVE SITE REVIEWS I HAVE WRITTEN.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Zip file for photosets.
-Multiple choice for video download quality: high, medium, low
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Can download entire site contents in a few hours (11 videos + matching photosets is the entire site contents).
-Long period before site timeout.
Cons:
-Tiny site. 11 videos with matching photosets.
-Expensive price. $29.95/month if you join site directly. But join through Teen Mega World, for $19.95/month, and you get Latin Shemales included, with over 20 other sites as well.
-Archive site. Apparently not updating. Don't know if it ever did update, because you only have 11 videos total (with matching photosets).
-Default file name for dowloading video files is high, medium or low (depending on which you choose: high, medium or low quality-definition). So need to rename file by date or model if want to save these files.
-No streaming option.
-No model bio information given, except for the age of the tranny, which is listed as 18 or 19 for each tranny. Which I find suspect, because these trannys look older than 18 or 19.
-The language is South American, not English. But there isn't a lot of conversation, it's mainly action. Some kissing at the start before getting
into bj and other things.
-No search.
CONS CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION:
Bottom Line:
CONS CONTINUED:
-Unlike other network sites, there is no link to transfer to other bonus sites in this network. You have to open a page, with the URL in the address bar, and re-enter your login information to get inside a different site in the network.
-There is a link for "bonus sites" at Latin Shemales, but it only opens a page with an advertisement/hot link for a gay dating service. It does not provide any links to the other network bonus sites you get by joining this network.
BOTTOM LINE:
This niche is definitely a different offering by the Teen Mega World
network. Many of the network sites have content that could be interchangeable, but shemales is a niche that is different from the usual pornsite offering.
This is hardcore tranny action: doing whatever a guy and tranny can do to each other. The guy does the tranny, the tranny does the guy, so the
tranny is definitely not just doing the woman's part, but acting like both a man and a woman, and the guy is acting like a bisexual, except he's
getting his action from a tranny instead of a man and a woman.
The action is not rough or gonzo style. It's actually friendly sex. Both partners are having a good time and enjoying themselves. No fake screams and moans. These aren't models who are just putting on a show: they are getting paid and also having a good sex experience.
High quality videos:
Frame width x height: 720x406 or 640x480
Total bitrate: 6064kbps or 3064kbps
Video runtime: 18-21 minutes
Number of videos: 11
Photosets:
Number of photosets: 11 (each photoset matches one video).
Number of photos per set: 58-111 photos, most sets are 62-77 photos.
Photo size: 30-56 KB.
Width x Height: 640x480 pixels.
Horizontal x Vertical Resolution: 96x96 dpi
The photos are low-quality screen caps.
On the TBP review page, it states content count has not changed since December 2006. That was 11 videos.
Site currently has 11 videos. So apparently the video posting dates are not accurate. Because 3 videos are dated 0000-00-00, and 3 videos are dated 2011-04-02 (today's date).
A tranny lover would probably not join this network because the contents of the one tranny site are so small. But if you belong to the network anyway, then it might be worthwhile glancing over what the site offers. Or maybe not. I looked at all the videos at this site, because there are only 11, to get an idea of the video quality of the videos. The video quality
is basically very good: clear focus and definition, good lighting, good sound, good colors of skintones. The trannies are ok-looking to nice-looking.
Bottom line: Because the site is so small, even a tranny lover will not get much satisfaction from the site. If you like tranny, you will probably like the videos, but there are only 11 of them.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No download limits.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Easy login.
-Streaming option for each video.
-Content is dated.
-No DRM. (This is a guess, based on rest of the network. I was unable to download any videos, but the rest of the network videos have no DRM, so I
assume, if you could download these site videos, as you are supposed to be able to, they would have no DRM.)
Cons:
-You are supposed to be able to download a low-quality video file for each video at the site. I tried to download 10 different videos, and each time I got the error message, "404 Not Found".
-There is no medium-quality or high-quality download option for a video.
And since none of the links for the low-quality download option work, you can't save these videos (Unless you use a special program to capture
screen images. But any video you might get using a special screen-capture program would be low quality because the streaming image itself is not high quality).
-Models not identified. No name is given for the models. So if you wanted to save videos or photosets, it would be difficult to sort them by model.
-No model bios (obviously, since the models are not named).
-No search.
-No updates for over one year.
Bottom Line:
This site is part of the Teen Mega World network.
This is an archive site: the last update was 2010-03-29, a little over a year ago.
Number of videos: 60.
Number of photosets: 60.
Video runtime: 15-35 minutes.
Video quality: low (based on file size of the video, and the visual quality of the video).
Photoset: 110-260 photos per photoset.
There is a single-size zip file available for each photoset. Each photoset is a photo record of a video shoot.
The photos are low quality in terms of photographic quality. The technical statistics for a single photo indicates the photos could be high quality if a competent photographer had taken the time to shoot them, but that wasn't the case: the photos are often blurry and out of focus, and are more like screen caps than well-shot photos. An individual photo is 300-400 KB, 1280x720 pixels. Which is just a waste of file size for blurry, poorly shot photos.
There are a number of attractive models at this site. And the videos are competently shot: good sound control, no annoying background music, OK to good lighting, OK to good colors (skin tone, background, foreground). The definition of the videos is low quality. If the definition was high
quality, a number of these videos would be worth saving. But you can't save these videos, because you get an error message when you try to save
them. Also, the video quality is low (in terms of definition).
The sex action is straight fucking. No story or plot, no buildup to the sex. It's one boy, one girl.
The site has little value. It's a small archive site, not updating. The videos and photos are poor in terms of image quality. You can't download any videos from the site (because of technical problems). The photosets are not worth downloading.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Easy login.
-Long period before site timeout.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Zip file for photosets.
-Content is dated.
-Photosets and videos default filename for download is the posting date.
Cons:
-No streaming option.
-Only 1 definition for video download, a low-quality.
-Only 1 definition for photoset download, a low-quality.
-Very few models at this site. You have Sasha and Dasha, and a very few other models.
-Archive site, no updates since July 2007.
-No search.
Bottom Line:
This site is part of the Diesel Access network.
This is an archive site: the last update was July 2007.
Most of the content features two models: Sasha and Dasha. There are a few other models also featured. The contents are videos and photosets that show the models in an amateur home-style shoot: one or two girls relaxing or playing with each other. The feel is strictly amateur: the site is an example of amateur home-style photo and video capture of two girls relaxing, playing, taking a shower, making out with each other.
Number of videos: 120.
Number of photosets: 210+
-Video updates: last video update was July 2007.
-Photoset updates: last photoset update was July 2007.
Videos only have 1 definition download option: a low-quality WMV file.
Photosets only have 1 definition zip file option: a low-quality photo.
The sex action is solo girl, or girl-girl. No boys at this site. There is very little sex action. What you get is brief nudity. Some kissing (is kissing or nudity sex action?).
The videos are short runtime, maybe 5-10 minutes.
87 MB for a 5 minute 30 second clip.
Frame width x height: 852x480.
Total bitrate: 4258 kbps.
The bitrate would support high quality video. But these are strictly amateur-style videos: poor definition, view often slightly out of focus,
no attempt at glamor-style shoot, the videos and photosets are a real home-style shoot of one or more girls just playing around.
The photosets are small, about 30-40 photos.
Individual photos are about 50-70 KB in size.
Width x height: 852x480 pixels.
The photos are more like screen caps than professionally shot photos.
Many of the photos are out of focus. The framing is poor. The photosets are a photo record of a video shoot. And the video shoot is very free-
form: the video guy just turns a video camera on one or two girls and captures whatever they happen to do. There is nudity involved, but it's a really amateur home-style shoot, in style and content.
Does the site have any value? Maybe for someone who is desperate to see one or two girls who are naked sometimes.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-content is exclusive to this site
-multiple downloading formats: divx, windows media player, ipod, quicktime
-The videos are in high definition, mainly clear focus, good lighting, good color
-hi def video is listed as 1280x720
-Very attractive teen models with lovely faces and slender bodies
-No DRM
-No downloading limits
-Secret word is easy to read. Some other sites I can't enter because secret word is so distorted.
-Small watermark (watermark is not a pro, but it's small, which is positive)
Cons:
-Very softcore action.
Most videos are solo model, a few have two girls. Most videos I saw were boring. Little emotion shown by the models. Solo videos show a girl moving, walking, lying down, slightly touching herself. A few videos feature 2 girls lesbian action, basically softcore: touching, kissing, licking. Sounds hotter than what it looks like.
Cons:
There are a few erotic videos because of the models, but most of the videos are a waste of time to watch, in spite of how attractive the models are.
-Login in problems: sometimes try to log in to site and username/password not accepted. Get warning message security system will block me if I try too many times. Told (on screen) to contact Support.
But I already sent an email to Support 8 days ago about about other problems and have gotten no reply.
This site has:
-small number of videos (only found 42 video titles)
-no simple listing of number of models
-no simple listing of the model that appears in a video
-no simple listing of number of videos
-no simple listing of video titles
-no simple listing of when the videos were posted
-no simple listing of the photographer for each video
-model bios and interviews: supposed to be on the site, but I can't find them.
-there is no posting date for any video that I can find
-They do not name the model/models in the video.
Bottom Line:
Cons(continued):
-lousy navigation.
-there is no search function to find models, videos, photographer
There are very few videos on the site, and it's not easy finding a specific video by model or video name. You have to click thru each browser page where they show thumbnails for 9 videos per page.
A simple upgrade to navigation would be to use the "Free Tour" updates page, which shows a thumbnail of each video available in the members area, on a single page.
But when you get into the members area, instead of one page where you can look at all 42 videos at the site, you have to search thru 5 separate pages that list 9 videos per page. Showing all the videos on a single page would make navigation/searching so much easier.
-Advertise interviews and bios of models.
Have not found any interviews or bios for the models. If the bio is inside some video, there should be an explanation on a web page that states where the bios and interviews are located, and how to find them.
-Advertise 24/7 support staff. I sent email to support 8 days ago, still no reply. 2 other PU
members reported they sent emails to support and got no replies.
-The video run time is around 8 - 17 minutes.
-The video file size is around 400 - 700 MB in avi format. This takes a huge amount of disk space for each video.
-Updates-Advertise "12 HDV films per month"
(Can't find where I saw the advertisement for 12 HDV films per month, but that is what I wrote down as I was looking the site over. I believe that is what I saw advertised.)
-I found 42 different video titles. That is the same number reported at TBP on 09-21-08. So no updates from Sep 21 thru Dec 7.
Until I saw the TBP data on number of videos, I thought there were sections of justteenmovie that
were hidden from me, because I could not find the advertised model bios, model interviews, and other videos that are advertised that are supposed to be inside the members area.
Bottom line:
You can take the tour, where you can watch a promo trailer for the videos on the site.
If you think the promo trailers are good/interesting/erotic/whatever, then you can join for 1 month to download whatever videos you like.
In spite of hi definition videos with really attractive teen models and nice lighting and good
color, the site is a waste of money, because
-there are very few videos
-most of the videos are boring
When I watch most of these attractive young girls moving or touching themselves, I think they feel
no more emotion than if they were brushing their teeth.
This site is sister to justteensite. You join one, you get the other site included. By itself,
justteenmovie would not be worth joining. Give it a score of 55. Justtteensite is the much more valuable site, and that's where you would spend most of your time.
Justteenmovie is a real disappointment with its current content.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Multiple choices for downloading a video: High, medium, or low quality.
But the quality of the "high quality" video is not very good.
-Content is dated.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Easy login.
-Very easy switching between network sites (Do not need to re-enter your login information, just click on a hot link).
-Long time before site timeout.
Cons:
-Archive site. Last update was 2009-02-07.
-Small site.
-Models are not named in the videos.
-No model bios.
-Default filename for downloading videos is "high", "medium", or "low",
for high, medium or low quality selection. So have to manually rename videos for sorting or saving.
-But that's not a big problem, because due to low quality of even the "high" quality videos, who wants to save these videos anyway? The models
in the videos are not named, the videos are poor quality (in terms of erotic quality and video technique). I'm watching one video with a guy and
a girl, and it's not until 4 minutes after the video starts that you can easily see the face of the girl. Until then, the heads of both the guy and the girl are mainly cut out of the frame, and it's not until the 4 minute mark, when the girl drops to her knees to give the guy a blow job, that you can clearly see the girl's face.
CONS CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION
Bottom Line:
CONS CONTINUED:
-The site design has a hot link for each video, named: "Watch Picture Gallery", which is what the site calls the photoset. But every video link that I clicked on to see the "Watch Picture Gallery" led to a Picture Gallery with no pictures. So I do not think this site has any photosets. Which is OK, because I was expecting the photosets to be low quality anyway, based on the rest of the network offerings for photosets.
-Videos are supposed to be viewable in flash stream. But some links to watch the video in flash stream don't work. I kept waiting for minutes for some videos to load and play, but all they did was keep loading, without playing.
Again, this is not a big problem, because I was just testing the site to be able to write this review, and I already decided the site was basically worthless. If I had really wanted to watch these videos, I might have been frustrated.
-Slow download speeds. This is the first site in the network where I did not get my maximum download speed. Instead, I was often getting about one-half of my maximum download speed of 620-630 KB/s.
BOTTOM LINE:
The site theme is voyeur porn. The girls and couples are supposedly unaware they are being captured on film. So if that idea/niche turns you
on, maybe you will get extra satisfaction from the videos. I would prefer videos that are erotic, or well shot.
Because these are supposed to be voyeur videos, many of them show the girl apparently in the distance. She is only a small part of the frame. So you often don't see her close-up, in good detail. I guess this is supposed to add to the voyeur-sexiness of the filming, but I would prefer to see the standard closeup of the girl, where I can clearly see her face and body, instead of seeing some person in the fucking distance.
These are really cheaply made videos. Most of the videos are shot with the model by herself or with a guy, in a car, at a lake or meadow. The choice of shooting the model in a car makes for lousy camera angles, terrible framing of the girl (head or other body parts often cut out of the picture). Or the car seat or roof blocks your view of the girl. The lake and meadow locations are very windy, so there's a lot of microphone noise. Controlling lighting for an outdoor scene is more difficult than for an indoor scene. The girl's face and body goes in and out of shadow constantly, so you don't get a really clear view of the girl.
Video specs:
High quality:
Frame width x height: 1280x720
Total bitrate: 4320 kbps
The bitrate is very high, and would support high definition video. But I would classify these videos as "crap" videos. Pardon the French. Lousy
video technique. Not naming the models in the videos. Minimal erotic appeal.
Number of videos at site: 44
Videos run from 5 minutes to about 17 minutes.
-Bottom line: the site can be considered a bonus site as part of your Teen
Mega World network. But the site itself has little value. It would be better if they just eliminated the site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Easy login.
-Long period before site timeout.
-No DRM.
-Zip file for photosets.
-No download limits.
-No watermark on the videos.
-Videos are short runtime, often split into 5-minute clips.
Cons:
-Archive site. Last update January 2007.
-Quality and feel of individual photos is amateur. More like a home-shot photo than a professionally shot photo. Nothing approaching the photo quality available at a glamor site like Metart or MPL Studios.
-Medium sized, obtrusive watermark on photos. Only a true fan of site model would want to keep any of these photos. Or someone who wants a very
complete collection of any of the models that might be a visitor shown in the photos.
-OK to low resolution on the videos, which are shot like amateur videos.
-No search engine.
-Very basic navigation.
Bottom Line:
-This is a small, solo-model type site. A waste of time and effort. If they had kept the site alive with updates and improved the video and photo quality, the site might have had some value, but it's hard to see any value in this site.
Anyone paying a site membership fee for access to this solo site will probably kick himself for stupidity or carelessness.
-This site is basically a waste of time and hard drive space. I didn't save a single video or photo from this site.
Small site.
Videos: 47
Photosets: 73
Short runtime: Videos run 10-20 minutes, often split into 2 clips.
Frame width x height: 852x480
Total bitrate: 4258 kbps
With that high a bitrate, you would expect much higher definition video and sharp focus. But the camera-man does not take advantage of the large data-size of the file: the focus is not sharp and clear and is not often centered/framed on the action. The lighting is not sharp and crisp.
The site is designed as a solo-model site of a girl who has friends (male and female). The sex action is spread around: The main girl masturbates, has sex with 1 or 2 boys, has sex with some of her female friends. The female friends have male-female sex and female-female sex.
-If you get access to the site through the network, you can glance through the site contents (videos, photos). But it's doubtful you will find
anything of interest. Unless you happen to be a true collector of a few of the models that visit the site briefly (such as Dasha or Lay the Cat). But the visiting models are not clearly identified in each set they appear in, so you have to study many of the sets to guess the identity/name of some of the models in some of the videos and photosets.
The number of visiting models at this site is very small, less than 10. Few of the visiting models are well known.
None of the photos or videos are worth keeping. This site is of slight to no interest. A true collector of some of the visiting models might want to have some photos and videos where their most favorite models appear, but no one else would be interested, except to see an example of the low quality that porn sites have tried to sell online to members.
The site is like a an amateur, home shot photoset and videolog of some amateur girls who are playing at sex. It appears they are having fun at times, and really enjoying the sex as well. If you are a true fan of the girls/models, that would add some interest to viewing the photos/videos. But otherwise, the site is boring.
Very basic navigation. Files are divided into two groups: photosets and videos. The files in each group are listed in descending chronological order, most recent listed first.
A nice-sized thumbnail shows you who the model(s) in the photoset/video are. Many of the models are not specifically listed for many of the photosets and videos.
Impressive review.
Covers the details and site overview.
If there was a prize for best review of the month (which was discussed, but nothing came of it), I'd nominate this review for the reward.
Excellent review.
I think Adult Time is one of the best bargains in internet porn.
I got a free add-on to Adult Time when I joined 21 Sextury late last year.
At the time, the Adult Time network was still in beta testing.
They finished beta testing in January 2019.
So membership in Adult Time was being given out on a random basis, when joining sites that were included in the Adullt Time network.
Now, when you go to the public pages for 21 Sextury, they explicitly state that you get Adult Time membership when you join 21 Sextury.
The same holds true for the public pages for Devils Film: they state you get access to Adult Time when you join Devils Film.
Not all sites in the Adult Time network have public pages that state you also get the Adult Time access as a free add-on.
My guess is that they are slowly changing the public pages of the sites included in Adult Time to show that Adult Time access is included.
Which is a good thing, because Adult Time is the crown jewel, for any membership in a single site, or a network site, that is part of the Adult Time network.
"The models are some of the very best looking Euro pornstars ever to do a porn scene."
You should take a look at The White Boxxx, part of the LetsDoeIt network (used to be called PornDoePremium network).
At The White Boxxx, they take care to make most of the models look like movie stars: I mean, the models are fucking gorgeous, far more so than when they appear at other sites.
@Selena,
My login problem was fixed.
Thanks for the help.
I appreciate your fast response, and think that MetArt customer service is one of the best services available.
Very nice review.
I personally think Pure Taboo is the best site in the Adult Time network, because I really enjoy the videos, which can be dark in tone and lighting (maybe a little too dark in lighting).
REVIEW(CONTINUES):
Analyzing the Chloe Cherry-James Deen video: James Deen gives his usual performance of treating the model rough: he forces her to gag on his cock deep in her throat, smear her dripping saliva over her face, shove his fingers into her mouth to dominate and show her who's the boss, choking her, grabbing her hair and pulling, etc.
Chloe is a cute girl, and she seems to go along willingly with her abuse.
So the video features Deen's style of dominance and sadism, while the model submits to his rough treatment.
I would categorize Deen as a slightly softer version of Pierre Woodman, who seems to enjoy forcing women beyond their normal limits to submit to his rough treatment.
In some videos, I've seen Woodman forcing the model to drink his piss, which, along with his slaps, forcible anal intercourse which often seems like rape, and other rough treatment, just adds to Woodman's enjoyment. But models put up with it, and even smile and kiss Woodman at the end of most of his videos.
So I have some trouble watching James Deen or Pierre Woodman perform in a video.
There are too many stories about James Deen abusing porn performers.
And Pierre Woodman built his reputation forcing women to have rough sex. Sometimes against their will, which might or might not be scripted.
But both performers seem to get off treating the women they work with as pieces of meat to be degraded and/or treated roughly, in a domineering fashion.
Their attitude seems to be: I'm big, tough, and will fuck these women harshly, and the women will enjoy it and worship me.
I remember one video where the woman tells Woodman she doesn't want to be filmed, so he tells her he is stopping the video, and he shuts off a light, but continues to film her anyway.
So, Woodman can tell you one thing, and do the opposite. Which is common in real life.
But it drains my enjoyment of any scene with James Deen or Pierre Woodman because I believe they enjoy degrading women: on the other hand, I do enjoy sites like Pure Taboo, where there is a twisted pleasure in abusing women, but that seems more scripted, and I believe the sex is more consensual, so that's just me, where I don't believe the models are being treated harshly in real life.
Fantasy BSDM is fine, but when it moves into real life, the boundaries blur, and I have a problem watching or enjoying it.
The New Sensations network does not have a lot of BDSM videos, but I guess they add a few to give some variety to the storylines.
My preference is more in the heartcore line, where the performers are trying to please each other, hopefully with some affection or tenderness and lots of kissing.
At the same time, the Pure Taboo site at Adult Time is one of my favorite sites in the network, because of the element of tension in some of the videos, as well as the offbeat, twisted stories and the cinematic-style of the videos which is first class.
Giving the site a score or 85. Good site, but network access raises the score.
I'm currently a member of 5 different sites in the MetArt network.
There's supposed to be a way of switching between sites with a drop-down menu.
Currently, if I try to switch to a different site, instead of switching, I get a webpage stating:
Update Your Account Details
Three easy steps to simplify your login process.
In the past, when I've updated my login details (by creating a new username and password), I've usually been locked out of the network, until I email customer service and ask for a new username and password.
Which takes a couple of days, sometimes.
So, currently, I can't use the simple drop-down menu to switch sites.
Irritating.
To make things easier, they mess up my account access.
As I get older, I wish they didn't force these changes on me, which make using the sites more difficult.
Also, not only can't I use the dropdown menu to switch sites, but I can't enter the sites directly (using username and password), because I get the same run-around of "Update Your Account Details".
Also, I should add that the update process is faulty:
When I click on the "continue" hot link, nothing happens: I do not advance to the next step in the update process.
So I am locked out of the MetArt sites. MetArt, you used to be a first-class network.
But there are problems with your network, off and on.
Some of them are created by you.
Excellent warning.
I've never heard of Aeron Pay, but if I see it listed anywhere, I hope to remember your warning and stay away.
PU and TBP should look into this, and issue a warning that the PU/TBP sites are not doing business with any of the sites using Aeron Pay.
And the PU and TBP sites need to change their practice of just delisting a company without giving a warning.
They can make it simple, such as "PU and TBP no longer do business with these sites", as a hint/reminder that the sites are doing something wrong.
Because if PU and TBP just delist a site, without any warning or explanation, some other members might fall into the trap.
Note: if you don't see the prices I listed, use a Google search for discounted membership to Evil Angel.
There are discounts available: it just depends on how you find them, and what prices are shown.
I would guess that on holiday specials, the discounted price might go as low as $63/year. But that would take some searching to find.
If you really enjoy the site and plan on staying longer, a 1-year membership for $89.45 would be a cheaper way to go.
Or you can wait for a holiday (all kinds of holidays throughout the year) and find a special discounted membership for a month or a year.
I used the PU link to the Evil Angel site today, hit the join page, and see:
$9.95 for 1 month, single payment, for streaming and downloading.
$67.50 for 3 months, single payment, for streaming and downloading.
$89.45 for 12 months, single payment, for streaming and downloading.
There might be holiday specials that would be even lower, but you have to search them out, and it's hit or miss if you find one.
But $89.45 for 1 year would save you money on your current plan, I'm thinking.
I noticed you won second place in the weekly raffle.
You should get an emailed coupon that is $50 you can spend at Amazon.
If you don't get the coupon by Friday or Saturday, post a short note at the Porn Users Forum ยป Raffle Winners thread that you didn't get your coupon, and Freddie (PU staff member) should send it to your current email address.
Computers can be mysterious beasts.
For me, anyway.
Can you use a different computer with the same internet connection, to see if the erratic download speeds are repeated?
If you get better results from a different computer, using the same internet connection, that would seem to point to some software/hardware blockage in the computer you normally use.
Excellent review, as usual.
I agree that Adult Time is one of the best deals for online porn, because of the massive amount of content, most of which is excellent quality, and the low membership price, especially during holiday discounts.
I also like all the specific details you gave on the Fantasy Massage network.
In my mind, I haven't decided how to view what used to be the older networks like Fantasy Massage or the Devils Film network: since they, and other fine networks, are now included in the Adult Time network, should these older networks be considered networks any longer, or just sites (or channels) in the Adult Time network?
For marketing purposes, or better yet, from membership purposes, you can join Fantasy Massage or Devils Film directly, or you can join the Adult Time network directly, and whichever way you join, you still get the same access to the Adult Time network.
But I also think, from the PU viewpoint, these old sites/networks still exist, even if the membership you join is basically through the Adult Time network, since those old network have been folded into the Adult Time network.
OK.
I'm rambling.
Good review.
Gives a clear view of the Fantasy Massage network.
And explains that Adult Time can be considered a bonus in the Fantasy Massage network.
Or better still, that Adult Time is the main value, and that Fantasy Massage is a small part of that value.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
