Yeah, and...??? I hope you don't feel like I'm singling you out or anything but what really is the point of comments like these? It's just lately I've found a quite a few comments like this which just seems pointless to add. Maybe they are just looking for some quick tickets or..??
After reading the 2.0 review from TBP, there is a comment about an unknown update schedule. After joining and reading other reviews, I have come to the conclusion that this site is probably recycling content or updating extremely slow. But, at least the price is right for the content provided even if the site is maybe recycling. Read TBP and PU reviews for that decision but I just want to help clarify for others who may read the 2.0 review.
Thanks for finding the review informative, there are already quite a few and I hope I added a few more details to help others. Honestly, I think the site is truly inspirational for other models/webmasters to look at in terms of content because I do find the scenes to be quite interesting. While I do find the actual erotism to be somewhat low, the fun and creativeness really makes me believe true fans of porn should watch some of these scenes before they die. Do you know of any other sites that contain scenes like these? While I would never say these types of scenes are on my all time high list but I would not mind seeing any other sites that may take this approach to their content and check them out. Thanks for the reply.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Exclusive content of Brandi and others engaging in a variety of content including voyeurism plus conventional to unconventional handjobs, blowjobs, and sex.
- No DRM.
- Updates usually come once a week.
- An 'All about me' section where you can click on her body part and it shows a video of just that part.
- A few wallpapers and comics.
- Video files offered in MPEG and WMV for all updates. All videos can be download via full movie or in clips. However, the quality can be wishy washy with new ones updated at even 480 X 336. But, some do get updated at 640 X 480 at around 2000 kbps or lower. You really don't know what you are getting really which is unfortunate.
- Pictures and screencaps available for downloading. However, while there are two seperate categories for images; both are actually taken from the captured videos.
- Scenes have a different take of conventional porn with contests, myth busting, and more in bottom line. This can be seen as good or bad I suppose.
Cons:
- Inactive blog with the last entry being 12/18/2007 at the time of this review.
- For a basic video only site, quality of videos is subpar.
- As stated above in pros, there are no actual proper photography images available and these screencaps are not available to download via zip.
- Site navigation is easy until you have to download a video. First, when clicking 'Download Movie', it takes you to a page with only clips available to download. If you want the full video, you have to click on "Download movie in 1 large file" which takes to you YET another screen which plays the videos in flash and has the links. Just too much of a hassle to get the full clip downloaded.
- Video names are not available in a meaningful naming process, they are random numbers.
- Site design appears the original with no plans to update it. Thus, it looks dated.
- When attempting to download, I get a lot of broken links that are sometimes working again later or not.
Bottom Line:
Brandi Belle offers a solo model site which compiles scenes that are clearly out of the ordinary when it comes to content. While an occasional straight forward sex, HJ, or BJ scene can be updated; they are clearly in the minority. To clarify what is offered in the majority of the content, I will explain. Brandi appears to have fun attempting to 'discover' things such as myths or rumors by herself or to let her friends in on the action which will either be in the form of just watching or participating in various scenes. These scenes can include measuring penis sizes and then seeing which feels better, testing real pussies versus fake ones, or even seeing how far a guy can squirt his cum and how much. Some other examples include hidden camera sex, sex with 'fans', apparently mailed in footage of other couples having sex, lots of unconventional handjobs, and teaching others to do certain sexual tasks. This is just a few examples of what is offered which I think clearly demonstrates that the site offers some content that is extremely different than what other sites have to offer.
However, due to the site offering unconventional themes I believe that after awhile (as stated in a few other reviews) that some scenes are kind of repeat themed with a different perspective that in the overall midst of things; is the same scene over and over again. Also, since the content can be a bit off-beat or over the top, the actual scene may not express an extreme amount of erotism than a scene that is more conventional in nature. Plus, a lot of times there is an extreme amount of voyeurism present, with both males and females there just watching a scene (sometimes demonstrating no emotion or even involvement) which can be different for most people who are used to regular ol' scenes. In effect, this can create a peculiar sense of atomsphere in the scene because everyone is constantly being watched. However, this can be a solid plus for some who may particular like these kind of scenes. In addition, Brandi can sometimes appear to show less enthusiasm in certain videos which creates a dull experience as well.
While I state quite a few pros and cons about the actual content, the overall content is quite entertaining for a first time customer. Why? Because the content is so damn different and largely innvovative. Through the mix of somewhat dull scenes, I did find some great content that was entirely erotic and distinct.
Overall, the site is a good experience for a first time user. However, the site does lack stability for long time users. This includes an out dated site design, largely annoying navigation, wishy washy updates with video clarity as a guessing game, and the fact that most scenes may have been done already. But, if a scene with something new and as innovative as older material is updated, the content can be mostly well done and entertaining. So, I'd say this site boasts an above-average entertainment value with a lot holding it back to be awesome.
I dunno what to say, I don't have some routine or ritual after sex and eat anything special. Honestly, the first thing after sex that I usually think about is sleep and not a juicy burger or something. So I put nothing but maybe others have a routine they go through?
I have no kids but I have to say that this should be enforced. Of course, the curiousity of kids is quite high but there needs to be some sort of warnings for sites that contain explicit material. While of course, the classic enter your date of birth and electronic sig is easily bypassed; at least it shows that the adult material is attempting to make it harder for young ones to see it. The internet is a easy way to showcase adult material and will always be nowadays but I have to say that any way of warning should be enforced. I think the young enough ones will actually take the warning serious while the ones who are 'old' enough will be exposed eventually no matter what and the possibiliy of this is inevitable. But, I can see someone like an 8 year old boy coming across a warning and actually be a bit worried about entering, therefore making this rule rightfully enforcable.
I kind of disagree with the overall score with Maggie. This site is one of the only places that provide an extremely large of not only solo scenes but hardcore with shemales. Not only that, the bonus site to Private Transsexual gives you access to even more solo content which is HQ in my opinion. Overall, the price is high but it provides a lot of extras and quality HQ scenes plus a good res with pics. Not only that, the site is mostly South American TS models, they do mix in others which does not happen with most sites. I think this site should be a few points higher in my opinion. I wish I had the extra money to re-join and do an updated review but in my opinion, the site is a bit higher than 86. My 2 cents...
You may be right but my experience in real life is that many watch these kinds of scenes. The reason I say this, at least from what I can gather, is when porn does get brought up amongst my friends one of the first sites that is mentioned is sites by BangBros. These sites usually feature these types of BJ's (the aggressive, gagging, slurping, etc). Even with people I do not know well (random parties, gatherings, so on) when porn is brought up after a few drinks, all the sites that feature these types of bj's are brought up. So, maybe I am just in the minority but if these sites keep being brought up, obviously these folks like the sites since they are watching these scenes (either paying or not, but whatever) and I have not heard many complaints on these models being extremely slutty aggressive as a turn off.
Now don't get me wrong, I think many enjoy the bj's that we seem to like but I think here at PU, the majority of the viewers are a bit more sophisticated in their porn opinions and views due to watching a lot more than the average viewer. Plus, I have to disagree with you a bit on the fact the porn producers are overlooking the consumer completely by featuring these types of BJ's. Honestly, if there were enough complaints I do think most mainstream sites would change their outlook on model behavior when it comes to extreme bj's. Of course, there are always exceptions but I just can't see the huge mainstream sites just doing whatever they think the viewer wants (even with an extremely large number of complaints), even if this is not what they want, and just saying screw them; they can watch or not. Just my 2 cents...
I have to agree, the blowjob in porn these days have become this overacted and savage throatjob. In my experience when a women attempts this, I am all for the 'plz relax' notion against this type of bj. However, these days in porn, the dominating bj you describe appears to be the standard and most appealing for the viewers (at least the vast majority) because this is all I see these days (mostly). I just think that most hardcore scenes attempt to showcase the model as extremely slutty and an extremely aggressive bj is what portrays this behavior the best while a small minority would like a bj how its supposed to done; sensual and slow, but joyful at the same time.
Hmm I'm kind of caught in between on things. A POV BJ, I will delete the scene all together, even if the model is giving the best one ever. I do not necessarily like BJ's in a scene, but I see it's use. Plus, I tend to at least watch maybe one minute or so if it is there. So, I picked 10% of the scene which may even be a bit high. However, I would never say to take them out all together even if the BJ is the worst ever and there is no point, I just could not imagine a porn scene where both parties undress, stare and kiss once or twice, then just get right in to penetration; it would just seem strange to me.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Exclusive content of mostly North American (there are quite a few Brazilian) ebony only shemales doing mostly solo work with some hardcore mixed in.
- Updates weekly with about six photo sets and videos, all on one day. These are usually a photo set and a video scene from one model equaling six updated models a week.
- No DRM protection.
- Video quality is reasonable from 2006 on (WMV only at 1280 X 720 to 640 X 480, ~2000 to ~4000 kbps). 2005 and under are understandably subpar (AVI, WMV, or even Real Media at 320 X 240, ~500 to ~1000 kbps). There is a lower quality option.
- Photo quality is professional with resolutions at 1280 X 800 in the present, 1024 X 680 around 2005-2007, and 760 X 570 or lower under 2005.
- Quality navigation with a model index, correct search features, and favorites tab.
- Active forum for suggestions.
- Good rating system and comment feedback for models and content to see what other members are thinking or saying.
- Excellent customer service.
Cons:
- Photo resolution for a site that has been around for 10+ years should be extremely higher. 1280 is not cutting it, especially if the company claims to be in the premier of shemale content. However, the photography is well founded with good lighting and crisp pics.
- While some videos are updated at 1280 finally, it is still wishy washy. Some are still updated at 640 X 480 or 720 X 480. While the picture quality and cameras used are good, the res should just be higher this day and age.
- Updates are done a bit different than other sites, varying between strip teases, masturbation, masturbation with a cumshot, and hardcore action. The only quirk I have personally is the fact that not all solo shoots end in a cum shot or an attempt (obviously some models cannot cum due to hormones). Usually, when a solo scene in shemale content is done, it is a full strip to masturbation with cumshot shoot. Just takes a bit of getting used to.
- The price is a bit high at $35 without using tickets.
Bottom Line:
I can express extreme gratitude to the guys at grooby for creating a site dedicated to showcasing black only TS models. I'm not sure there is another site doing this and they are doing it quite well. With 10+ years under their belt, the site details in mostly solo content which may or may not end in a cum shot with quite a few hardcore scenes as well. Plus, with this long time in activity with constant updates, the model quantity is substantial as well being in the upper 700's. As far as the content goes, there is a lot for everyone but I believe some can be hit or misses.
With that being said, the videos are well done. While the site showcases quite a few videographers/cameramen, some are good at both while others are better at just one thing or the other. Therefore, you get both sides of the spectrum when viewing the videos. While I believe they all use good cameras and provide adaquete lighting, different guys will talk more and even provide the dreaded POV cameraman sex/blowjobs. Also, some videos even have the flash for photos going off which in my book is a no-no during a video shoot. Interviews are provided for most models as well, if that's your fortay. The best thing about this is that they have these interviews usually as a seperate file in case you want to skip out on them. The actual content is stripping to masturbation either ending in a cumshot or not, with most being without. However, almost every model will get an update with a cumshot captured, just not usually the first update. Also, hardcore scenes usually with another man are thrown in the mix quite a bit as well. While not a bulk of the content, you can get some hardcore here.
The photography is usually done in a professional manner. No matter what, I think the site provides all around great photos. As stated in the cons, the res should be higher but all the sets can be downloaded via zip. Plus, some models may not even have video updates so in reality there is more photo content than video content. They don't provide too many repeat photos and the watermark is usually non-intrusive. There is usually no over use of make-up (which can be hard sometimes in TS content), the outfits vary and range from everyday clothes to glamour, and the models tend to be enjoying themselves. Overall, I can't say there is much wrong with these photos besides the fact they should be bigger.
This site is doing a lot more right than wrong. The first being they stuck to the niche and are doing it right by providing such a variety of different ebony models with all sorts of body shape and personalities. The second being that they provide a large amount of updates to keep you an active member if you want to. This is important because the price is pretty high for a site these days. Finally, the site caters to the shemale fan itself by providing all sorts of content in both the photos and videos. They provide active communication and appear to be enjoying what they do. I'd recommend this site.
By the way, lol at the fact that no one has put to stop downloading as an option. If there's a will (?), there's a way, right!? Lol we are all such pervs here and I love it :)
I dunno I just save everything and keep 'em on old externals. I'm kinda weird when it comes to porn, I attempt to d/l the whole site, watch it in alphabetical order and once I get to Z, I rarely watch it again. This is unless I found something so extremely great, I will watch it every once in awhile. So, once one fills up, I just buy another drive. Currently I am on my 4th 1 TB external drive and it is about halfway full. So, I am at about 3.5 TB total for my whole porn stash. I rarely delete, but then again, I rarely watch the content that I have already seen once or twice.
At the time of my review and membership, the type of Ladyboys that were used were not nearly in the prime as I felt the models from the main site were. Plus, the male models that were used were quite over the top in my opinion; with a guy who huffed and puffed too much and a guy wearing a latex suit while having sex. During this time, the focus of the models were primarily femboys and borderline crossdressers which are not my main fortay when it comes to model selection. While I know this is my opinion, this was the reasons why I did not give the site as much kudos as I did as the other sites within this company. But, this was over 6 months if not almost a year since my membership, so things may have changed since then. I will truthfully say as well, that shemale content involving hardcore is not my primary concern when it comes to shemale content and I may have bias as well when it comes to that as well.
However, I can say the sites within this company have some of the most crisp, great lighting, and wonderful quality when it comes to both the videos and photography. If you do want this, I can vouch for the site being great in this category. Plus, as with my concerns stated above, there are some great models here and content. But, I think the overall model selection was not superior and the male selection for hardcore was borderline horrendous that it swayed me away from the site.
One thing I can say, a 79 is actually an above average score for me and I do think the site is good. If you have anymore questions/concerns, I can go back and take a look at the content I have and give you more insight. Thanks for the kind words as well.
Interesting concept. While the actual 'crying' is possibly acting, has anyone actually seen the content and can comment on how well the acting is. Or, are the scenes actually quite real and is there 'acting' that maybe is not taking place? Any insight on the content would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
I did a trial of this site a few months ago and my download speeds were out of control at like 40 kb/s using a manager and even just raw to test. This was even on off hours. I'm glad you maybe? got some better speeds than this but this was possibly the worst site that I have ever had when it came to download speeds.
This is great news, let me know if you find anything out. I should have done this myself but I always check if anyone knows anything from here first. Webmasters/etc/etc usually always say, HD quality and HIGH res or something. They can never give a straight answer. At least, most of them :(
I love watching women dance being a fan of electronic. Adding masturbating may seem like a gimmick but somewhat innovative to an extent in content. Can anyone give me any info about the site in terms of basically anything, but primarily what can I expect with the material. Plus, what format are the videos in with the resolution size and bitrate or an opinion on how well these videos may look?
I was a member of ALS Scan and the videos that were not HD did not work on my PS3 due to certain codecs. Anyone who is a current member or recent, can u give me a reasonable estimate when HD videos started to update so I know how many may play on my PS3. Plus, if anyone uses a PS3 to view videos on their TV, can anyone tell me if these videos are supported with the PS3? Any information would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
I dunno, I guess if the overall outfit is a nice dress that goes with the heels; then it completes the overall look. A naked model with just heels does not do it for me. So, I guess I could not care less.
All the technical aspects of photography weigh heavily on how well a photo comes out for the public. However, I think the actual model within the captured image and her doing the correct erotic pose weighs the highest if an image is overall quality. A well lit shot with great image clarity is all fine and dandy but if the model is bent over with her legs on her ass in an ass shot, then the image has gone to waste. So, of course all these aspects need to come together for an overall decent image but the model and the pose comes first for an excellent captured image.
Anyone been a member since '05 and can tell me more about the site? The one person who reviewed this site has not responded since I asked a question 6 months ago so I thought this would be the best approach. Any info on video size/bitrate, image quality, amount of updates a week, if updating, etc etc would be greatly appreciated to anyone who knows and has read this. Thanks.
I'd say they are midly interesting to take a peek just out of curiousity but I am not a believer of paying for any type of sex tape, caught on film slip ups, etc etc of celebs. I think I'll stick to the good ol' porn stars :)
I am a fan of true mature sites which contain mature women. Ragingbuddhist got it right, when you pay for something expecting a certain thing and don't get it, I am pissed. There are hundreds of sites which are considered 'mature' or 'MILF' but I have only found 3 good sites that contain true mature women. MILF type sites are never right, they are mostly women in their mid 20's with a bigger bust or maybe a bit thicker and are promoted as 'mature'. This is not really mature in my opinion, I would say anyone in their mid 30's and higher as truly mature. Sites that contain true models in this age range are far and few in-between. Plus, as expected with the poll answers of 'What's the difference?" being quite large in response, I do believe that most don't even care because they think that a model not in their teens or early twenties are mature which is not true in my opinion. It's a shame that most think this way which appears to result in plenty of sites just featuring women not extremely young as 'mature' and getting away with it.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
