Just go to a bar and buy a few drinks for a local slut if you are that desperate to get your rocks off. Hell, at least you bought her drinks and paid money that way instead of giving her straight up money. Shit, both of these options are pretty much prostitution huh? :)
Anyways, in all honesty I cannot even think about trying one of these sites. Blind dates in themselves are creepy as it is but at least most are set up by friends so you have a bit of lee way to go by. A blind date from the internet just seems so much more creepier to me that I don't think I could do it. There must be a market if these sites do exist but at least most online friendships turned real life romance involves a lot of time or effort; just like real life. I just can't see meeting up with someone for mutual sex online as fun. While I love sex I need some type of real life exposure before I can do the nasty. My vote: never had, will, or ever try.
Thanks for the review after seeing a few machine sex at a mature site I just reviwed and being intrigued. I found that the site I was at was a contraption (sp?) that showed vaginal penetration without the whole buttox and ball banging a hardcore B/G close-up would show and it was great to say the least. How are the machines here when it comes to this? Plus, as you said with the orgasms, these machines appear to get these models off most of the time. Very good distinction when it comes to a lot of softcore sites with the model attempting to get off herself; or with help. Thanks for the review and with an 87 as a score (and you being a valued trusted member), I think I'll have to add this site to my list. Thanks again.
That's a stinker :( Were the videos for purchase webcam videos made especially for members who sent her money? I've seen a few models on their sites do that. Too bad you won't find much of those outfits here as you already know :( So I'm guessing this is the only site that features her, let alone in videos? Good thing you checked back to this site so you get snatch these up!
4 or 5 softcore sets to 1 hardcore for each model usually with an occasional model doing 2 hardcore scenes. Photo sets are good but have quite a bit of photoshopping.
Hmm I just wrote a review a few days ago and I'm hoping I covered some of this. Messmer has wrote a well founded and informative review as well, you should check them out for more information if you need it. Or you can ask me more here if you need it, my membership just cancelled yesterday and I have evey single thing you can download up to yesterdays date.
I really wanted to put quality of videos as my major reluctancy to join but I think 'not enough videos' is a good option for my answer to this poll. I understand that a site featuring photography does have plenty of expenses and is not cheap but I think a site featuring only photography is taking an easy way out. In my opinion, a site should always feature videos as well even if the site is an artsy site. While videos may not be everyones fortay, but neither are photos for everyone. I use photography kinda like an aphrodisiac but always end up watching a video/videos at the end. Within videos you get to see a model (usually) as a human and not just some still object within a picture which projects personality and a feeling that the model is still human. While I still love images I really get reluctant if a site has a small amount of videos that may feature low quality videos (res, bitrate, camera work, going through the motions, etc) or if there are only a few available to download as well.
lol I totally re-read my reply and realized I totally messed up my question (I've had a few beam and cokes :)) I meant to say have you been a member of any of their sites and have maybe not reviewed them. Lol, I totally dropped the ball on writing that text, huh? :)
haha yeah it definitely is subjective and that's why I asked your opinion as a fellow PU who enjoys older women. I fully agree on what you believe is a mature model for sure. Being a bit younger than you, I suppose I think a 'mature' model would be about 10 years older than me so that's about 37+. However, maybe mature sites think the same way and think that their target audience may be in the 18-21 range and a 10+ year old model would range around 28-35 or so. I never really thought about that until now and I think that may be why models on most 'mature' sites are getting late 20's and early 30's models and marketing them as 'mature'.
So many of these models on these mature sites could keep their original titties and natural features but be more demanding that the models keep in shape and this would result in really hot models. This is my opinion, but I hate the fact that a lot of 'mature' models tend to be early 30 somethings with huge fake tits and that means they are quality mature models. I like a natural sag as well (I think you like them a bit more and I respect that for sure) but I want my photos to feature them in the flesh as I would see them if I MET them in the flesh, ya know? For example, At Anilos, I love Chennin Blanc because of her natural look and her freckles but these are only present in the videos. If you look at her images, they are not there. A huge disapointment in my opinion :(
Now that you bring it up, I would not mind seeing a touch of gray in the hair of these models if they have it. It just adds to the natural look in older women that I love. Thanks for the insight and the reply!
Ah yeah I meant a review or comment on PU. I was assuming that maybe you knew the watermarks of the photos may be based on a previous membership that maybe you never reviewed/commented on. As far as the remark about any of the sites, I think (and think it is) that this company had a site that primarily was mature video content, while this particular site is mainly photography. I see now that the reply could have been taken the wrong way and I apologize, but it was a reply that was whole heartedly in good fun when I thought that maybe you were a previous/current member that may have not reviewed the site yet. Thanks for the reply :)
messmer have you been a member of any of their review sites ever? If so, let's see a review or gimme some feedback! Seems like they may have the model selection right?
I think the description in the question is spot on, 'a quick horny look in to the camera' when it comes to how I like it if a model does this. Obviously, a scene that has this description and if the model does this every once in awhile is a good thing. So, if a model is just staring at the camera, nah not my thing. But, a few quick looks to the camera to kinda check 'if we are still here' is a turn on for me for sure. Do I love it? not especially but I don't mind it. My vote is is that it depends of the scene.
Thanks for the vote of confidence in the review, buddy ol' pal :) This is definitely a site in the forefront for quality mature content and I basically joined based on your review and feedback. And....I was not disapointed! I'm glad you took my 'imperfections' remark the right way, I had a feeling I was going to get some negative feedback on that opinion but I'm happy to hear that I am not the only one who felt that way. These so called 'imperfections' that people tend to observe creates a downfall in some sites, IMHO. One of the largest qualities in mature women is the natural freckles many have (huge turn on for me) and I saw a lot of these attributes 'washed out' with image altering which pissed me off in the photos. You can see them in the videos which is great but they are air brushed in the photos (BOOOOOOOO!!!!). This is probably one of the largest quirks of this site that I found, that and the fact that model selection are a bit young to be featured on a mature site :( Don't get me wrong, they are quite attractive but I wanna see natural older women!
I think this is the most dissatisfying thing I find in sites that are considered to be in the 'mature' niche. While the argument is there for what is a true 'mature' model, I think this site is not entirely spot on in this aspect. However, the site is great and I do feel we think the same way on this issue. What do you think are some descriptions of what makes a true 'mature' model? I'd love to hear your feedback. Thanks again for the reply and take care.
I'm glad you found Messmer and I's review useful in making a decision to join a site that I'm sure you will enjoy as a fellow PU who enjoys mature content. Can't wait to see your thoughts on the site as well!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Exclusive content of older women doing mostly masturbation with fingers or toys and quite a bit of hardcore mixed in as well.
- No DRM.
- Updates daily with either a photo set or video scene.
- Videos are offered in a lot of different ways including in-browser streaming, in parts, and full scenes offered in mp4, mpeg, and WMV. Best and newest quality is WMV at 1280 X 720 at ~3650 kbps. Older videos are at 640 X 480 at ~1500 kbps.
- Photos are well done and available in two different resolutions (1200 X 800 and 2400 X 1600) with all the option to view in browser or download via zip.
- Solid bio pages for almost all models with a lot of information plus a model stats area for quick facts and info.
- Ability to add your on tags to sets and scenes for easier searches later on.
- Active forum for feedback and discussions.
- Model index for easier navigation.
- Great site design that is easy on the eyes.
- Wallpapers and niche (ass, tits, etc.) photos offered for each model.
Cons:
- While most models are certainly considered 'older' women, they are by far not what I would be call true mature models. A lot are in the late 20's and lower 30's which can sometimes look like a model featured at almost any site and not a 'mature' site.
- While many are all natural, there is a solid mix of many models with fake boobs and other minor surgeries. While obviously present because many older models probably feel they need to be more 'tight' so they look more youthful, this can stray many away looking for natural aged bodies.
- I'd say the majority of the captured scenes are great quality but some are obviously the routine solo scene with a toy and there is no emotion present. Just a model sticking it in and out for 10 minutes and a blank stare on her face.
Bottom Line:
Anilos is definitely in the forefront when it comes to one of the better sites that provides quality and real mature content to the masses. However, the site cannot be overly praised for this because I feel they have somewhat dropped the ball when it comes to finding true mature models. However, the site showcases extreme quality in a large number of traits that many sites lack. For example, the site design and navigation is awesome, the professional quality of the content is great, and the extra little features exhibits the people running the site care for the site and its future.
The models involved are usually dressed in a range of outfits but are staying within the dolled up glamour niche mostly. Usually a nice dress, lingerie, business suits, and/or everyday wear are featured. However, I'd say the majority are in dresses or business suits. A good amount of make-up is used and most of the hair is stylized. Overall, a good mix of outfits for each model.
The videos provided are well made when it comes to the technical aspects. Overall, Anilos offers a great resolution with great lighting, bright settings, and a decent range of long shots with close ups at the right time. When it comes to footage captured, I think Anilos demonstrates an honest attempt to record scenes that not only include the regular hardcore and solo with toy scenes but add sybian, machine, and bathing footage. However, the majority is still solo play with mixed results. Some models are obviously truly getting themselves off genuinely while others are going through the motions. While obviously this can be expected for most sites, I do believe there are more legit than non-legit. There are quite a few interview scenes as well which include a vocal interview and the model stripping during the scene as well. Overall, the site offers a great amount of mix it ups to create a quality amount of captured footage.
The photography is well done in terms of professionalism as well. Good lighting, a non-intrusive watermark, and range of shots make these photos something to look at. However, I did find a good amount of photoshopping which killed a lot of my favorite models pictures. These models are older and are still human so of course many have 'imperfections'. But, this is what makes someones model their favorite. Therefore, lets keep things natural. Besides that, the photography is extremely well done.
All-in-all, the site is well done and should be visited one time by fans of women in the 'older' range. While every model may not hit what many to think as a true mature model, they do have a lot of them present and they are extremely good looking. Expect plenty of great special features such as wallpapers, interviews, bios, photographer feedback, searches, tags, and dated updates which increase the overall experience. With that and a great mix of solo and hardcore footage with even a bit of lesbian mixed in, the site is above average when it comes to a mature model site.
I understand this totally and agree 100%. My main concern is why would this person even bother responded with that answer to these questions? The preview page does not include anything about these questions and it's the 'you get what you see 'saying that pissed me off. I don't see shit, so what the hell do I get? :)
Honestly, I'd rather get no response from this person than that answer. It's that attitude that creates poor sites. While the content may look okay for this niche which is quite small, just what he said has made me totally stray away from the site for now. For instance, if he probably did not respond at all I'd (honestly) probably still be interested in the site but it would be put on a back burner until I had more cash. However, if he would have took the few minutes to at least 'attempt' to write something constructive, I probably would have put it on the high up list.
I just get tired of some webmasters that have the exact attitude of what he quoted, you get what you see. Just seems like lately I can count the companies on one hand that provide even minute customer service or care these days.
BTW, I hope I am not going off on a tangent or am taking your response with a grain of salt in any way. The reason I posted this was to get others opinions to the matter and I do believe in your reply.
Well, you get what you see. The previews from the site should tell you all you need to know."
Let me clarify what the previews are: a 15 second clip for a few videos and a dated update schedule which includes how long a video update is and a short description of the model (not what's in the scene).
And here are the questions I asked about the site that I felt needed clarification. I am posting these because if anyone reads this, I would like to know if what I asked was so difficult to get an answer out of a webmaster who actually took the time to write back that statement above. The questions:
1. Is the content here exclusive?
2. I received info that the videos are all 640 X 480, ~1500 kbps. Any truth to this statement and is this for all videos? Any plans on updating the video quality or is this going to be the standard forever? (This info can help me when deciding which term I may want to join).
3. I notice the scenes are mostly masturbation scenes. Are these scenes masturbation scenes that mostly end in a cumshot or are they mostly stripping videos?
4. Is there anything else that I may want to know since the tour only provides mainly an update schedule?
I just don't understand why a webmaster would actually take the time to write me back just to tell me some reach around answer to what I feel is some easy questions to answer. I'm interested in the site, but with a response like that I may need some time to cool down before they get my money...
Facts state vids are aprox 5 mins a piece which seems bad. However, this was around 2007. There have been no reviews or comments about the site but it got a pretty good score in comparison to the other TS sites at its time. So, anyone been a member and know anything? Any information would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
More interested in other types of scenes but when I occasionally watch a lesbian scene, I think I'm more prone to liking the ones without toys. So, I put that I'm not interested but if that option was not there I believe I would put no I prefer without. I'm more in to fingering, kissing, and the 'scissor' position when it comes to lesbian stuff.
On a side note, so far the only lesbian scenes that have truly interested me thus far were from the Tropical vacation scenes from ALS Scan.
I seriously hate camera man talking the most but I'd say the performers come second in this category. I'm not sure what if OneMan meant either of these examples or both of these examples when describing blokes talking all the time, but I'd have to say that anyone besides the model talking a lot is a no-no for me in a video.
Hmm, I have always found that each model gets like 3-4 shoots in a huge varying amount of outfits. The categories were 9-5, elegant, housewife, and some others that I remember. With that said, I think there is a lot of content outside of glamour at this site. Read my reply to mr smut's recent review as to why I feel I get the most dissatisfied with this site (and mature sites in general).
mehh, I find the rate of finding daily updates a burden for mature sites with this site as no exception. The true 'mature' niche calls for a discrepancy amongst models and the need to update daily has put a damper on this site. With that said, this is true for the other two 'big' sites of the niche, anilos and karups mature women. As stated before amongst other convos in the forums and replies, I do see the 'plus' of daily updates for most users. However, in a niche like this where models appear to be scarce, in my opinion; the update scheme dampers the content. Don't get me wrong, I have reviewed and agreed that this site is superior in its niche but the need for such quick updates seems to create poor material in my opinion. This includes model selection and actual scene footage. I just wish that this niche would not want to update so damn quick and focus on good, quality mature models that are not only great looking but stay true to the niche. This meaning, as a member, I found a lot of these models here to be a bit unattractive. I do not believe these models are bad looking to age but I can imagine them not even be attractive while they were in their younger years. Why? because the need to update so quickly and not discriminate.
Anyways, I feel I'm ranting a bit and I want to aknowledge that this review is well founded. I can totally see why the score is as high as you gave it but I just felt as a member that the model selection could be a bit more regulated. Thanks for the review and believe me, I am a lover of mature content as well!
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Exclusive content of Japanese only shemale models doing everything from stripping, masturbation, and hardcore.
- Updates twice a week with a photo set and video each.
- No DRM protection.
- Videos look good with ranging resolutions (WMV: 1280 X 720 and 864 X 480 with varying bitrates averaging around ~2200 kbps).
- Photos are done well at ~ 1280 X 804 resolution with a non-intrusive watermark.
- Site design is well made with above average navigation including a search engine, user tags, voting system, and comments.
- Quality customer service if needed.
- Photo and video files are properly named for easy downloading without having to rename files.
- No mosaic if you are worried about that. It is authentic Japanese models as well if you are worried about that too.
- Probably the only place you can get Japanese shemale content outside of buying DVD's or joining a Japanese DVD site that may feature shemale DVD's for download (I have not found much myself).
Cons:
- For a newer site that is finally getting adjusted, the site still holds some technical problems such as the photo resolution should be higher. 1280 is just extremely low these days.
- There is a lot of chitter chatter amongst the camera man and the models during scenes. Plus, (which was stated in a earlier review would be fixed), there is still photography flashes sometimes present in video shoots.
- Update scheme is a bit different than other sites but consistant with most Grooby sites by updating video scenes with stripping, stripping and masturbation, stripping and masturbation with cumshot, and hardcore. While it creates a lot of updates, there are a lot of scenes of just stripping with no real climax.
- A lot of fondling between the camera man and model with a focus on POV handjobs and blowjobs. I put this as a con because it is not my fortay and I will explain this more in the bottom line.
Bottom Line:
Shemale-Japan is a site that is finally coming in to it's own. In the beginning, the camera man featured (Named Hiro) was inexperienced and it showed. However, during this time he did managed to create some decent footage but the lack of experience did show. But, he has obviously gained this for the updates now and the site has improved. Can I say it has improved dramatically? No. Why? Because of some key areas that I will explain.
The video work is not as great as the other videographers that Grooby offers from their other sites. The videographer here clearly loves Japanese shemale models and the excitement shows. But, I believe this has created an aura of which he is doing things in the scenes that he wants to see. For example, he talks a lot to the models during a strip scene. I dunno if it is direction because my Japanese is still low, but if it is, this should be taken care of before a shoot. Plus, there is a lot of fondling and POV handjobs and blowjobs. While I understand there is a niche for POV porn, I don't believe this is the vision of Grooby because it is only shown on this site. With this and the constant touching of the models, the scenes become camera man centered which I believe takes away from the viewer in terms of what they want.
However, there is some great footage that is captured. The hardcore scenes are extremely well done and I have yet to see a bad scene captured here in that category. While I find the stripping scenes to be somewhat lackluster, the masturbation scenes can be pretty good. The videographer has captured some great cumshots with some even at several angles and tends to keep quiet during these shoots. However, sometimes the camera is stagnant on a tripod with him obviously taking photos which can take away from the scene a bit. But, all-in-all, the masturbation to cumshot scenes are the better scenes shot on the site.
The photography is well enough but the resolution is just downright low for a site these days. But, they are available to download via zip and the lighting is actually good. While the shoots tend to be shot in a hotel room or bedroom, they offer a wide variety of positions and angles. While the setting could be improved, the outfits offered range from cosplay, glamour, to standard and are well done in these terms. Overall, I can't say the photography is all that bad, they just need to offer a higher resolution.
The site has improved in many key areas since they first started. In time, the site has come across a lot of quality models that will probably never be seen anywhere else outside Japan. Hiro has gained experienced and it shows but some things I consider big no-no's in scenes come across in a few of his video scenes still. But, the niche is so unique and the models are so different when compared to the standard ones from Thailand and the Americas, that I have to recommend the site at least once for any lover of TS material. With even more improvements, it could get even better.
It appears so far the argument is for being apprehensive about non-exclusive content and poor quality. For me, while I am not a network person and have actually only joined two I think that I am more for being apprehensive about poor quality. Since I rarely join networks, I usually join single sites that exclusiveness can be more expected. But, I do always get worried about the quality. Many sites these days state that 1600 res on pics is 'high res' and 720 X 480, 1000 kbps (just two examples) are HD video. So, many sites state High res photos and HD video on their tours. Sometimes this can be cleared up with an email but sometimes customer service are robots (real robots or a real human acting like one) and just re-tell you everything that's on the tour in the same words. Therefore, in the midst of the argument, I almost switched to poor customer service because if they can't clear up this than I can be apprehensive to join the site to begin with. However, I do admit that my desire for certain content can sway me to join even if the robot-like customer service is managing the site; so I have to say it's still poor quality.
One thing I can see for picture lovers that can create apprehension is if the site may not contain zip files for download. I have joined two 'picture' sites where this has happened by taking a plunge (no reviews really anymore but content looked good) and have been extremely pissed off. While I do have some programs to get the images, sometimes they don't work and I end up just never returning to the site with a feeling of wasting money. I can see having no zip option as a apprehension for picture lovers.
Right on, I understand that because the name of the site can be misleading because of not being named "Sex Japanese 18" or something. So, with this name one can assume it contains all asian models instead of just JAV. However, as stated above from his response, he stated he was impressed with the models and wanted to let others know. I find this okay but I don't think it's an extremely relevent comment as far as what comments are made for (well at least the way he stated it). If the point was to let others know they had the extremely attractive premium JAV models and wanted to let others know this exactly, a bit more elaboration could be stated.
Anyways, as stated in my original reply I was not exactly trying to single axel2001 out because I have actually talked to this user a few times in replies and read his reviews (and even gave him a trust rating). It was just this past month I have been noticing a lot of extremely irrelevent/pointless comments which seems like people are just trying to get easy tickets in my opinion.
To axel2001: I am not attempting to dirty your name and say that you always type bad comments or are a poor PU. It's just this certain comment came at a certain time that I was waiting to say something about subpar comments and you got caught up in it. As stated above, I do respect your contributions and do trust you.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
