Thanks for the reply and yes I was still looking for an answer. I hate that DivX files rarely play on the PS3 and even some WMV's. The worst thing is when I join a site that says WMV and I assume they will work for PS3 and they don't.
I appreciate the compliments and thoughts about joining sites based on reviews I've done. If you have any questions or details that would help you on any sites I've reviewed, don't hestitate to respond and I'll whip out the old hard drives to look at shit for you. After writing my response I did go to the site and noticed it looks exactly the same. What a poor site design, lol? Stinks that the Rodney Moore site is still $19.95 and this site jacked the price up, ughh.
On a side not totally off the subject of Shemale Strokers, but did you check out the bonus site for Shemale Club (Private Transsexual)? Honestly, with the combo of both of those sites together for one price I honestly think it's the best site for TS content from the Americas.
Brazzers is quite wishy washy for me. I do think that's a great price just to check out a site, I just dunno if I can do it. I've been back to an asian TS streak lately and have joined a few sites in that realm that I have never joined. Brazzers is something I may do down the road (may be a long one) because I can and will always love a big tittied (even fake) real chick!
Another fine review james4096. By the way, I don't think I mentioned this early but congrats on breaking the 100 points mark. Always appreciate the reviews and I think I share a lot of common interests as you.
As long as it takes me to get everything off the site if possible. Usually I start at the model index at A and download everything I can till Z. Some sites I can get this done in half a month, while others it takes me more. Twisty's and Shemale-Yum were the largest sites I've joined and it took me almost all the time I had in the 30 days. However, I do always miss a lot of days from just doing things in my personal life. So on average, I miss anywhere from 1 to 5 or 8 days no matter what from this. I don't think I've ever joined a site and made it there every single day of my term.
I'm guessing DDF primarily uses Euro models? I'm am still quite a novice when it comes to these types of sites and I have a few questions.
I may be a jackass at reading but I am kinda confused about the 1byday site. Is this site part of the network?
What's the network's specialization? I know you say all is covered, so is there a good ratio of all the fetishes covered or would you say one type stands out the most?
No problem brother, I'm always willing to answer stuff that I may have some insight to. I do think it is a good site and I actually scored it quite high myself, but I think we may not share the same tastes. If you have any more questions or want deeper info, I can pull out the external HD that has the sites content on it. I think I have every video and about 1/4 of the photos up to the date of the review I published. Good luck hunting man! I know how hard it is these days with the pickings we have....
Oh my, I totally misunderstood you I think. Plus, I want to add that I was not trying to argue and I know I stated that term in my response; I think I should have used debate instead. Also, I was just typing out a really long reply because I was extremely bored at that time and after re-reading it I think I came off as a bit harsh.
In regards to the price change, I am quite mad considering the site is maintained and shot by only one videographer/photographer and the site design is strictly amateur. However, I guess that's the huge advantage to the site as well because if you love Sammy Mancini's work then you will love the site, hands down. This is because a lot of other sites in this realm feature work done by a lot of videographers/photographers and you may only like 1 or 2's work.
You are right that both of these sites you mentioned probably do have more solo content available. I actually like Shemale Club a bit more when it comes to TS content because of the great ratio.
Don't get it twisted as far as knowledge, it appears that you have quite a bit yourself and I would not take what you say with a grain a salt :) One of my favorite things about Shemale Strokers is that he is revamping old videos and making them better which a lot of sites don't do. On top of this, he is adding new ones in better quality as well. However, I would never go so far to say that even his best videos that are considered 'HD' can compete with the two sites you mentioned in terms of video clarity. Sammy really needs to learn to encode cleaner or get a better camera. I think if he could get videos to look like Club or Yum, he could compete a lot more.
You mentioned Rodney Moore sites, is this a in the TS niche? I am always looking for suggestions these days on some sites to join. Be the way, thanks for your insight and replies! I love discussions with other PU's and I apologize again if I came off as arrogant or malicious :(
All the models are quite petite and the fake tits are the minority. However, these models are not as petite as models in maybe ALS Scan. Meaning, the models are usually skinny but smaller tits are not the main concern of the site. While I'd say some of the fake titty models are there, the site rarely shoots models with fake tits that are overwhelmingly big. So, if there is a shoot of a model with fake tits it is probably a model going from A to B or C or B to C but not really over this.
The only thing about the site that is my main concern is the overall routine that each scene gives a feeling of. For instance, I'd say the majority of the scenes (videos) are models going through the motions. Standard strip, masturbate, then orgasm (a lot of theatrics). Plus, the hardcore is your standard girl on bed/couch, man walks in, she sucks his cock, he goes down on her, missionary, doggy, cowgirl, reverse, jack off in her face. Also, the hardcore scenes are a minority here. I'd say about 1/4 of the content unless they have been doing a huge amount of hardcore updates since my membership.
While that may stray you away as it is from what I said, I can say that the videos and photos are at the right quality for this day and age. Plus, the lighting is quite well and the settings are colorful and bright. If you are a photo lover, I know the resolution is high and can be downloading via zip (plus the other sizes). However, I know the watermark is non-intrusive but I don't remember how much they are shopped up.
Plus, as I recall you are a fan of 'keeping the bush' and I do believe most of the models here are highly trimmed or completely bald. Hope some of this helps with your decision.
Yes but the price was at $24.95 which means this site was $10 less than those sites for a long time. However, being $5 less is still better than going up to the price that the other two sites that you mentioned. But, there is something one has to realize when it comes to this site and both Shemale Club and Shemale-Yum.
Shemale Club specializes in all aspects of content and therefore should be a site that has a large variety of content when it comes to overall types of scenes. Argument: Shemale Strokers (please read the name of the site?) is a solo shemale site only featuring full masturbation to cumshot scenes and any other content you are getting from this site is considered bonus material. Therefore, of course Shemale Club is going to have hardcore and more/better of it. So, basically there is no basis for an argument when even comparing these two sites. Yes, both contain TS models but the vision of the sites are completely different. Basically, that's like going to a site like Met-Art and expecting hardcore scenes.
Shemale-Yum: The guys at grooby bring TS models from mostly the Americas and that is what basically Shemale Strokers does. Plus, I can see where many would like to compare this site and Strokers because of this. However, Shemale-Yum has a different vision as well. This site features TS models but attempts to range the material by including many different types of shoots which may include masturbation scenes but also just stripping, hardcore, lesbian, and fetish. But, Shemale Strokers is once again a site dedicated to just solo masturbation scenes. However, I think Shemale Strokers is one of the only sites featuring these types of models that does it right. You know you will get interviews, stripping, masturbation, and a climax (cumshot) during each video while Shemale-Yums solo scenes are a lot more scattered. So, I see where the sites are more closely related to each other but I'd say they are still different in many ways.
I do understand in a way where you are coming from and I agree the price going up is a bit unsettling. However, the site is still cheaper than both those sites. Plus, the new videos are like 100% better than what was offered before and the director gets these models to do a lot of kinky shit that most sites featuring solo material do not do which is probably the largest reason to join this site. But, I'd say both Shemale Club and Shemale-Yum are definitely premier sites in the TS niche; I just think all these sites being in the TS niche is the only major comparison one can make.
What a huge bummer! This site which used to charge a lower price (change must be quite recent) than most TS sites featuring great quality content appears to have upped their price to $29.95 and added a pre-check cross sale when you go to sign up. Just giving everyone a heads up about the bad news. While I still hold the same feelings as before about the site with a more decent price, this is still unfortunate news whenever a site tends to do this. If anything, sites should be going down in price :(
I was a trial member about 3 months ago and was completely dissapointed with the site when it came to download speeds. When it comes to this problem, I've really only had this problem with one other site to where I could complain. But, with this site and that one (the other was a non-affiliated site), I experienced very slow download speeds at about literally 35-75 kbps speeds. After reading TBP 2.0 review and no problems with tis, I am wondering if anyone else has had problems with this. I'm located in the Midwest of the USA and have rarely had problems in this aspect with a lot of sites over the years, so I cannot say my ISP is poor. I liked what I COULD get from the site and TBP reviewing a good score has interested me again but I can't see me joining at speeds like that. Any insight would be great, thanks.
I've never been a member here but as far as your remark about the update scheme, when I was a member of SexAsian18 they updated roughly that many in a week. However, they are not doing daily updates from what I remebered months ago. However, I do recommend this site for quality updates and great JAV for a reasonable price. Plus, they usually offer scene downloads and/or full movie downloads which is great for a DVD site IMHO. Anyways, thanks for the info about this site.
EW, I missed the d/l limit on the facts sheet. That might actually be a bother with a pic site at 2000 res with a limit at 2 GB. That might chalk my interest as it is. Plus, with the fact that PinkPanther's comment about altered images, I may have to put the site on the back burner for now. This is why I love PU and get quality info that I may have missed/not have known. Thanks for the reply.
Aw man, this kills me. I am not a fan of image altering and it appears this site is mainly photography in itself? I hope you can bare with me if you can help me better understand what you mean by lacuering of the photos? I'm guessing they make them glossy artifically? I think you are right about the archives, TBP review states they were affiliated with Asian4You at one point so that must be the right assumption. If you don't mind, when/if you were a member here, do you remember which asian countries the models were from? or, is this an Asian American site? Thanks for the feedback, brother.
Solid Review by Maggie - Anyone Got Anything to Add?
In the asian niche, good sites that are not JAV DVD sites appear to be a dime a dozen when it comes to anything other than that. This site features high resolution photography and some average quality vid content from all types of asian models. Also, it appears everything is exclusive. All-in-all, the review enticed me to seek out fellow PU's for more info. Anyone got anything else they can say about the site in terms of break down of models by countries, update scheme, worth the cost, so on and so on? Any information would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
I'll have to put more or less the same. Why? Because I believe that yes, the photo and video quality appears to be increasing but it's the same old sites that are doing this. Rarely these days, are new sites appearing doing the 'right' thing to make me feel that sites are getting better. While the same sites we have all been visiting for years are staying the same or getting a little better, they are still the same old sites. If a bunch of new sites that launched this year were starting at the right quality and were worth a membership, then I'd say that sites are improving. However, it seems like everytime I check out a new site that launches they are roughly at least over 50% (maybe even more) of the time stuck in like 2005-2007 still and may even still feature a shitload of non-exclusive material. But, I believe my favorite niches are in a minority and this may skew my outlook on things. Yes, a few sites (maybe one to three) may look quality that open up new each year but with the thousands upon thousands of sites there are, you would think this day and age it would not just be a few dozen sites that are even worth the price they offer and/or still updating.
Just go to a bar and buy a few drinks for a local slut if you are that desperate to get your rocks off. Hell, at least you bought her drinks and paid money that way instead of giving her straight up money. Shit, both of these options are pretty much prostitution huh? :)
Anyways, in all honesty I cannot even think about trying one of these sites. Blind dates in themselves are creepy as it is but at least most are set up by friends so you have a bit of lee way to go by. A blind date from the internet just seems so much more creepier to me that I don't think I could do it. There must be a market if these sites do exist but at least most online friendships turned real life romance involves a lot of time or effort; just like real life. I just can't see meeting up with someone for mutual sex online as fun. While I love sex I need some type of real life exposure before I can do the nasty. My vote: never had, will, or ever try.
Thanks for the review after seeing a few machine sex at a mature site I just reviwed and being intrigued. I found that the site I was at was a contraption (sp?) that showed vaginal penetration without the whole buttox and ball banging a hardcore B/G close-up would show and it was great to say the least. How are the machines here when it comes to this? Plus, as you said with the orgasms, these machines appear to get these models off most of the time. Very good distinction when it comes to a lot of softcore sites with the model attempting to get off herself; or with help. Thanks for the review and with an 87 as a score (and you being a valued trusted member), I think I'll have to add this site to my list. Thanks again.
That's a stinker :( Were the videos for purchase webcam videos made especially for members who sent her money? I've seen a few models on their sites do that. Too bad you won't find much of those outfits here as you already know :( So I'm guessing this is the only site that features her, let alone in videos? Good thing you checked back to this site so you get snatch these up!
4 or 5 softcore sets to 1 hardcore for each model usually with an occasional model doing 2 hardcore scenes. Photo sets are good but have quite a bit of photoshopping.
Hmm I just wrote a review a few days ago and I'm hoping I covered some of this. Messmer has wrote a well founded and informative review as well, you should check them out for more information if you need it. Or you can ask me more here if you need it, my membership just cancelled yesterday and I have evey single thing you can download up to yesterdays date.
I really wanted to put quality of videos as my major reluctancy to join but I think 'not enough videos' is a good option for my answer to this poll. I understand that a site featuring photography does have plenty of expenses and is not cheap but I think a site featuring only photography is taking an easy way out. In my opinion, a site should always feature videos as well even if the site is an artsy site. While videos may not be everyones fortay, but neither are photos for everyone. I use photography kinda like an aphrodisiac but always end up watching a video/videos at the end. Within videos you get to see a model (usually) as a human and not just some still object within a picture which projects personality and a feeling that the model is still human. While I still love images I really get reluctant if a site has a small amount of videos that may feature low quality videos (res, bitrate, camera work, going through the motions, etc) or if there are only a few available to download as well.
lol I totally re-read my reply and realized I totally messed up my question (I've had a few beam and cokes :)) I meant to say have you been a member of any of their sites and have maybe not reviewed them. Lol, I totally dropped the ball on writing that text, huh? :)
haha yeah it definitely is subjective and that's why I asked your opinion as a fellow PU who enjoys older women. I fully agree on what you believe is a mature model for sure. Being a bit younger than you, I suppose I think a 'mature' model would be about 10 years older than me so that's about 37+. However, maybe mature sites think the same way and think that their target audience may be in the 18-21 range and a 10+ year old model would range around 28-35 or so. I never really thought about that until now and I think that may be why models on most 'mature' sites are getting late 20's and early 30's models and marketing them as 'mature'.
So many of these models on these mature sites could keep their original titties and natural features but be more demanding that the models keep in shape and this would result in really hot models. This is my opinion, but I hate the fact that a lot of 'mature' models tend to be early 30 somethings with huge fake tits and that means they are quality mature models. I like a natural sag as well (I think you like them a bit more and I respect that for sure) but I want my photos to feature them in the flesh as I would see them if I MET them in the flesh, ya know? For example, At Anilos, I love Chennin Blanc because of her natural look and her freckles but these are only present in the videos. If you look at her images, they are not there. A huge disapointment in my opinion :(
Now that you bring it up, I would not mind seeing a touch of gray in the hair of these models if they have it. It just adds to the natural look in older women that I love. Thanks for the insight and the reply!
Ah yeah I meant a review or comment on PU. I was assuming that maybe you knew the watermarks of the photos may be based on a previous membership that maybe you never reviewed/commented on. As far as the remark about any of the sites, I think (and think it is) that this company had a site that primarily was mature video content, while this particular site is mainly photography. I see now that the reply could have been taken the wrong way and I apologize, but it was a reply that was whole heartedly in good fun when I thought that maybe you were a previous/current member that may have not reviewed the site yet. Thanks for the reply :)
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
