messmer have you been a member of any of their review sites ever? If so, let's see a review or gimme some feedback! Seems like they may have the model selection right?
I think the description in the question is spot on, 'a quick horny look in to the camera' when it comes to how I like it if a model does this. Obviously, a scene that has this description and if the model does this every once in awhile is a good thing. So, if a model is just staring at the camera, nah not my thing. But, a few quick looks to the camera to kinda check 'if we are still here' is a turn on for me for sure. Do I love it? not especially but I don't mind it. My vote is is that it depends of the scene.
Thanks for the vote of confidence in the review, buddy ol' pal :) This is definitely a site in the forefront for quality mature content and I basically joined based on your review and feedback. And....I was not disapointed! I'm glad you took my 'imperfections' remark the right way, I had a feeling I was going to get some negative feedback on that opinion but I'm happy to hear that I am not the only one who felt that way. These so called 'imperfections' that people tend to observe creates a downfall in some sites, IMHO. One of the largest qualities in mature women is the natural freckles many have (huge turn on for me) and I saw a lot of these attributes 'washed out' with image altering which pissed me off in the photos. You can see them in the videos which is great but they are air brushed in the photos (BOOOOOOOO!!!!). This is probably one of the largest quirks of this site that I found, that and the fact that model selection are a bit young to be featured on a mature site :( Don't get me wrong, they are quite attractive but I wanna see natural older women!
I think this is the most dissatisfying thing I find in sites that are considered to be in the 'mature' niche. While the argument is there for what is a true 'mature' model, I think this site is not entirely spot on in this aspect. However, the site is great and I do feel we think the same way on this issue. What do you think are some descriptions of what makes a true 'mature' model? I'd love to hear your feedback. Thanks again for the reply and take care.
I'm glad you found Messmer and I's review useful in making a decision to join a site that I'm sure you will enjoy as a fellow PU who enjoys mature content. Can't wait to see your thoughts on the site as well!
I understand this totally and agree 100%. My main concern is why would this person even bother responded with that answer to these questions? The preview page does not include anything about these questions and it's the 'you get what you see 'saying that pissed me off. I don't see shit, so what the hell do I get? :)
Honestly, I'd rather get no response from this person than that answer. It's that attitude that creates poor sites. While the content may look okay for this niche which is quite small, just what he said has made me totally stray away from the site for now. For instance, if he probably did not respond at all I'd (honestly) probably still be interested in the site but it would be put on a back burner until I had more cash. However, if he would have took the few minutes to at least 'attempt' to write something constructive, I probably would have put it on the high up list.
I just get tired of some webmasters that have the exact attitude of what he quoted, you get what you see. Just seems like lately I can count the companies on one hand that provide even minute customer service or care these days.
BTW, I hope I am not going off on a tangent or am taking your response with a grain of salt in any way. The reason I posted this was to get others opinions to the matter and I do believe in your reply.
Well, you get what you see. The previews from the site should tell you all you need to know."
Let me clarify what the previews are: a 15 second clip for a few videos and a dated update schedule which includes how long a video update is and a short description of the model (not what's in the scene).
And here are the questions I asked about the site that I felt needed clarification. I am posting these because if anyone reads this, I would like to know if what I asked was so difficult to get an answer out of a webmaster who actually took the time to write back that statement above. The questions:
1. Is the content here exclusive?
2. I received info that the videos are all 640 X 480, ~1500 kbps. Any truth to this statement and is this for all videos? Any plans on updating the video quality or is this going to be the standard forever? (This info can help me when deciding which term I may want to join).
3. I notice the scenes are mostly masturbation scenes. Are these scenes masturbation scenes that mostly end in a cumshot or are they mostly stripping videos?
4. Is there anything else that I may want to know since the tour only provides mainly an update schedule?
I just don't understand why a webmaster would actually take the time to write me back just to tell me some reach around answer to what I feel is some easy questions to answer. I'm interested in the site, but with a response like that I may need some time to cool down before they get my money...
Facts state vids are aprox 5 mins a piece which seems bad. However, this was around 2007. There have been no reviews or comments about the site but it got a pretty good score in comparison to the other TS sites at its time. So, anyone been a member and know anything? Any information would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
More interested in other types of scenes but when I occasionally watch a lesbian scene, I think I'm more prone to liking the ones without toys. So, I put that I'm not interested but if that option was not there I believe I would put no I prefer without. I'm more in to fingering, kissing, and the 'scissor' position when it comes to lesbian stuff.
On a side note, so far the only lesbian scenes that have truly interested me thus far were from the Tropical vacation scenes from ALS Scan.
I seriously hate camera man talking the most but I'd say the performers come second in this category. I'm not sure what if OneMan meant either of these examples or both of these examples when describing blokes talking all the time, but I'd have to say that anyone besides the model talking a lot is a no-no for me in a video.
Hmm, I have always found that each model gets like 3-4 shoots in a huge varying amount of outfits. The categories were 9-5, elegant, housewife, and some others that I remember. With that said, I think there is a lot of content outside of glamour at this site. Read my reply to mr smut's recent review as to why I feel I get the most dissatisfied with this site (and mature sites in general).
mehh, I find the rate of finding daily updates a burden for mature sites with this site as no exception. The true 'mature' niche calls for a discrepancy amongst models and the need to update daily has put a damper on this site. With that said, this is true for the other two 'big' sites of the niche, anilos and karups mature women. As stated before amongst other convos in the forums and replies, I do see the 'plus' of daily updates for most users. However, in a niche like this where models appear to be scarce, in my opinion; the update scheme dampers the content. Don't get me wrong, I have reviewed and agreed that this site is superior in its niche but the need for such quick updates seems to create poor material in my opinion. This includes model selection and actual scene footage. I just wish that this niche would not want to update so damn quick and focus on good, quality mature models that are not only great looking but stay true to the niche. This meaning, as a member, I found a lot of these models here to be a bit unattractive. I do not believe these models are bad looking to age but I can imagine them not even be attractive while they were in their younger years. Why? because the need to update so quickly and not discriminate.
Anyways, I feel I'm ranting a bit and I want to aknowledge that this review is well founded. I can totally see why the score is as high as you gave it but I just felt as a member that the model selection could be a bit more regulated. Thanks for the review and believe me, I am a lover of mature content as well!
It appears so far the argument is for being apprehensive about non-exclusive content and poor quality. For me, while I am not a network person and have actually only joined two I think that I am more for being apprehensive about poor quality. Since I rarely join networks, I usually join single sites that exclusiveness can be more expected. But, I do always get worried about the quality. Many sites these days state that 1600 res on pics is 'high res' and 720 X 480, 1000 kbps (just two examples) are HD video. So, many sites state High res photos and HD video on their tours. Sometimes this can be cleared up with an email but sometimes customer service are robots (real robots or a real human acting like one) and just re-tell you everything that's on the tour in the same words. Therefore, in the midst of the argument, I almost switched to poor customer service because if they can't clear up this than I can be apprehensive to join the site to begin with. However, I do admit that my desire for certain content can sway me to join even if the robot-like customer service is managing the site; so I have to say it's still poor quality.
One thing I can see for picture lovers that can create apprehension is if the site may not contain zip files for download. I have joined two 'picture' sites where this has happened by taking a plunge (no reviews really anymore but content looked good) and have been extremely pissed off. While I do have some programs to get the images, sometimes they don't work and I end up just never returning to the site with a feeling of wasting money. I can see having no zip option as a apprehension for picture lovers.
Right on, I understand that because the name of the site can be misleading because of not being named "Sex Japanese 18" or something. So, with this name one can assume it contains all asian models instead of just JAV. However, as stated above from his response, he stated he was impressed with the models and wanted to let others know. I find this okay but I don't think it's an extremely relevent comment as far as what comments are made for (well at least the way he stated it). If the point was to let others know they had the extremely attractive premium JAV models and wanted to let others know this exactly, a bit more elaboration could be stated.
Anyways, as stated in my original reply I was not exactly trying to single axel2001 out because I have actually talked to this user a few times in replies and read his reviews (and even gave him a trust rating). It was just this past month I have been noticing a lot of extremely irrelevent/pointless comments which seems like people are just trying to get easy tickets in my opinion.
To axel2001: I am not attempting to dirty your name and say that you always type bad comments or are a poor PU. It's just this certain comment came at a certain time that I was waiting to say something about subpar comments and you got caught up in it. As stated above, I do respect your contributions and do trust you.
Yeah, and...??? I hope you don't feel like I'm singling you out or anything but what really is the point of comments like these? It's just lately I've found a quite a few comments like this which just seems pointless to add. Maybe they are just looking for some quick tickets or..??
After reading the 2.0 review from TBP, there is a comment about an unknown update schedule. After joining and reading other reviews, I have come to the conclusion that this site is probably recycling content or updating extremely slow. But, at least the price is right for the content provided even if the site is maybe recycling. Read TBP and PU reviews for that decision but I just want to help clarify for others who may read the 2.0 review.
Thanks for finding the review informative, there are already quite a few and I hope I added a few more details to help others. Honestly, I think the site is truly inspirational for other models/webmasters to look at in terms of content because I do find the scenes to be quite interesting. While I do find the actual erotism to be somewhat low, the fun and creativeness really makes me believe true fans of porn should watch some of these scenes before they die. Do you know of any other sites that contain scenes like these? While I would never say these types of scenes are on my all time high list but I would not mind seeing any other sites that may take this approach to their content and check them out. Thanks for the reply.
I dunno what to say, I don't have some routine or ritual after sex and eat anything special. Honestly, the first thing after sex that I usually think about is sleep and not a juicy burger or something. So I put nothing but maybe others have a routine they go through?
I have no kids but I have to say that this should be enforced. Of course, the curiousity of kids is quite high but there needs to be some sort of warnings for sites that contain explicit material. While of course, the classic enter your date of birth and electronic sig is easily bypassed; at least it shows that the adult material is attempting to make it harder for young ones to see it. The internet is a easy way to showcase adult material and will always be nowadays but I have to say that any way of warning should be enforced. I think the young enough ones will actually take the warning serious while the ones who are 'old' enough will be exposed eventually no matter what and the possibiliy of this is inevitable. But, I can see someone like an 8 year old boy coming across a warning and actually be a bit worried about entering, therefore making this rule rightfully enforcable.
I kind of disagree with the overall score with Maggie. This site is one of the only places that provide an extremely large of not only solo scenes but hardcore with shemales. Not only that, the bonus site to Private Transsexual gives you access to even more solo content which is HQ in my opinion. Overall, the price is high but it provides a lot of extras and quality HQ scenes plus a good res with pics. Not only that, the site is mostly South American TS models, they do mix in others which does not happen with most sites. I think this site should be a few points higher in my opinion. I wish I had the extra money to re-join and do an updated review but in my opinion, the site is a bit higher than 86. My 2 cents...
You may be right but my experience in real life is that many watch these kinds of scenes. The reason I say this, at least from what I can gather, is when porn does get brought up amongst my friends one of the first sites that is mentioned is sites by BangBros. These sites usually feature these types of BJ's (the aggressive, gagging, slurping, etc). Even with people I do not know well (random parties, gatherings, so on) when porn is brought up after a few drinks, all the sites that feature these types of bj's are brought up. So, maybe I am just in the minority but if these sites keep being brought up, obviously these folks like the sites since they are watching these scenes (either paying or not, but whatever) and I have not heard many complaints on these models being extremely slutty aggressive as a turn off.
Now don't get me wrong, I think many enjoy the bj's that we seem to like but I think here at PU, the majority of the viewers are a bit more sophisticated in their porn opinions and views due to watching a lot more than the average viewer. Plus, I have to disagree with you a bit on the fact the porn producers are overlooking the consumer completely by featuring these types of BJ's. Honestly, if there were enough complaints I do think most mainstream sites would change their outlook on model behavior when it comes to extreme bj's. Of course, there are always exceptions but I just can't see the huge mainstream sites just doing whatever they think the viewer wants (even with an extremely large number of complaints), even if this is not what they want, and just saying screw them; they can watch or not. Just my 2 cents...
I have to agree, the blowjob in porn these days have become this overacted and savage throatjob. In my experience when a women attempts this, I am all for the 'plz relax' notion against this type of bj. However, these days in porn, the dominating bj you describe appears to be the standard and most appealing for the viewers (at least the vast majority) because this is all I see these days (mostly). I just think that most hardcore scenes attempt to showcase the model as extremely slutty and an extremely aggressive bj is what portrays this behavior the best while a small minority would like a bj how its supposed to done; sensual and slow, but joyful at the same time.
Hmm I'm kind of caught in between on things. A POV BJ, I will delete the scene all together, even if the model is giving the best one ever. I do not necessarily like BJ's in a scene, but I see it's use. Plus, I tend to at least watch maybe one minute or so if it is there. So, I picked 10% of the scene which may even be a bit high. However, I would never say to take them out all together even if the BJ is the worst ever and there is no point, I just could not imagine a porn scene where both parties undress, stare and kiss once or twice, then just get right in to penetration; it would just seem strange to me.
By the way, lol at the fact that no one has put to stop downloading as an option. If there's a will (?), there's a way, right!? Lol we are all such pervs here and I love it :)
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
