Why is it not worth arguing or discussing? Yes, that's where it is but why would a statement such as 'not worth arguing about' be stated at all from anyone? I am for saying that the age 'limit' is a bit low in my opinion and I can discuss or argue (whatever u want to call it) that many other things involving an age limit are quite misleading as well. For example, a person in the USA being able to put their life on the line and kill others in war but not being able to drink a beer legally. So, a 'woman' can get gang banged by 50 guys on film which can be shown world wide but cannot sip a beer legally? Hmm, I think that's grounds for discussion right there. I am by no means advocating that there should not be an age limit for any of these acts. However, the poll topic is involving a 17 year old and as I said earlier, I find it laughable that anyone would find a difference between a 17 or an 18 year old doing any porn as one being 'okay' while the other as 'bad'. But, I do know that 18 years old is where the legal age is at world wide and I respect it in the fact that I would not seek out or search content of 18 and under models. Nor do I think it is right for anyone to do so. Therefore, I think it can and should still be discussed or argued that the age limit may still be a little young for it to be 'okay' for a girl (yes, a girl) to be doing such acts on camera legally at 18. Personally, I think 18 is still too young but many can argue that it is okay. I think it is valid to discuss or argue this and quite interesting to get others takes on this subject. Therefore, I think there is grounds for discussion. My 2 cents....
I do know the reasons and respect the law of drawing the line somewhere when it comes to aspects of legality. This goes for pornography, alcohol, smoking, and driving. I would obviously delete the material after finding out because I consider myself a law abiding citizen. However, sometimes these ages really make me laugh as "legal" ages to do certain things. Honestly, it's almost laughable that 18 year olds (both males and females) are considered 'old enough' to do porn. Honestly, there is an extremely minute difference in maturity level of a 17 year old and a 18 year old. While all people age differently physically, I believe the majority of women look the same at 17 than at 18. As far as a so called mental maturity (at least enough to do porn and make that decision smartly) I'd so there is no difference between 17 and 18 or even so on. I'd say 21 should be the right age for it 'legal' to make porn. Personally, I can honestly say I was quite stupid at 18 even though I thought I was as smart as an adult and 21 I even felt that way. Too bad I was wrong even at those ages.
I know that it's hard to do cut offs when doing laws in terms of 'old enough' to do things but I think many are a bit young or even too old. I'm going to stick to porn because I could rant about the other things and I don't want to get off track. I have been working with youth in psychology in the age ranges of 12-18 and I can honestly say that no one in those age ranges should be doing porn. But, I'd say most children are mature in ranges of clusters. This meaning, if I had to lump maturity in terms of age ranges I'd say it goes 12-14, 15-16, and 17-18. If no stopping at 18, I'd go 17-20. I think these clusters have the same maturity level in the majority. Of course, a 17 year old could be like a 14 year old and visa versa but this is majority.
I guess the point I'm getting at is in terms of this poll, a 17 year old being featured in porn is about as laughable and creepy as an 18 year old being featured in porn. However, I do understand that 'one' is legal and one is not, so if the model was discovered to be illegal I would of course delete it. My 2 cents...
Well I can see a friend or lover asking about it but if anyone other than that asked me I would have to see them as creepy for asking in the first place. I put that it's never came up because I've never had someone from that area ask me but I have had discussions with friends about porn and even watched it with them as well. It's not like a large topic that's discussed and it is rarely watched together but it has happened. However, if it ever came up from a friend or lover I would never deny it (I'd probably deny how nasty some of the shit I watch can get) but probably state some mainstream shit that I've seen.
I'll say sometimes. To me, it's more of a star that has a huge list of multiple names on different sites. This can either be due to thier request or the site just changes it for some reason. Either way it can annoy me when I'm seeking out other work by them, especially if it's on a site that has an extremely large model index. But, sticking to the poll I'd have to say this can annoy me sometimes but if it is a common name or just first name and they keep it the same everywhere; it is extremely easier to find their content.
As long as it takes me to get everything off the site if possible. Usually I start at the model index at A and download everything I can till Z. Some sites I can get this done in half a month, while others it takes me more. Twisty's and Shemale-Yum were the largest sites I've joined and it took me almost all the time I had in the 30 days. However, I do always miss a lot of days from just doing things in my personal life. So on average, I miss anywhere from 1 to 5 or 8 days no matter what from this. I don't think I've ever joined a site and made it there every single day of my term.
I'll have to put more or less the same. Why? Because I believe that yes, the photo and video quality appears to be increasing but it's the same old sites that are doing this. Rarely these days, are new sites appearing doing the 'right' thing to make me feel that sites are getting better. While the same sites we have all been visiting for years are staying the same or getting a little better, they are still the same old sites. If a bunch of new sites that launched this year were starting at the right quality and were worth a membership, then I'd say that sites are improving. However, it seems like everytime I check out a new site that launches they are roughly at least over 50% (maybe even more) of the time stuck in like 2005-2007 still and may even still feature a shitload of non-exclusive material. But, I believe my favorite niches are in a minority and this may skew my outlook on things. Yes, a few sites (maybe one to three) may look quality that open up new each year but with the thousands upon thousands of sites there are, you would think this day and age it would not just be a few dozen sites that are even worth the price they offer and/or still updating.
Just go to a bar and buy a few drinks for a local slut if you are that desperate to get your rocks off. Hell, at least you bought her drinks and paid money that way instead of giving her straight up money. Shit, both of these options are pretty much prostitution huh? :)
Anyways, in all honesty I cannot even think about trying one of these sites. Blind dates in themselves are creepy as it is but at least most are set up by friends so you have a bit of lee way to go by. A blind date from the internet just seems so much more creepier to me that I don't think I could do it. There must be a market if these sites do exist but at least most online friendships turned real life romance involves a lot of time or effort; just like real life. I just can't see meeting up with someone for mutual sex online as fun. While I love sex I need some type of real life exposure before I can do the nasty. My vote: never had, will, or ever try.
I really wanted to put quality of videos as my major reluctancy to join but I think 'not enough videos' is a good option for my answer to this poll. I understand that a site featuring photography does have plenty of expenses and is not cheap but I think a site featuring only photography is taking an easy way out. In my opinion, a site should always feature videos as well even if the site is an artsy site. While videos may not be everyones fortay, but neither are photos for everyone. I use photography kinda like an aphrodisiac but always end up watching a video/videos at the end. Within videos you get to see a model (usually) as a human and not just some still object within a picture which projects personality and a feeling that the model is still human. While I still love images I really get reluctant if a site has a small amount of videos that may feature low quality videos (res, bitrate, camera work, going through the motions, etc) or if there are only a few available to download as well.
I think the description in the question is spot on, 'a quick horny look in to the camera' when it comes to how I like it if a model does this. Obviously, a scene that has this description and if the model does this every once in awhile is a good thing. So, if a model is just staring at the camera, nah not my thing. But, a few quick looks to the camera to kinda check 'if we are still here' is a turn on for me for sure. Do I love it? not especially but I don't mind it. My vote is is that it depends of the scene.
More interested in other types of scenes but when I occasionally watch a lesbian scene, I think I'm more prone to liking the ones without toys. So, I put that I'm not interested but if that option was not there I believe I would put no I prefer without. I'm more in to fingering, kissing, and the 'scissor' position when it comes to lesbian stuff.
On a side note, so far the only lesbian scenes that have truly interested me thus far were from the Tropical vacation scenes from ALS Scan.
I seriously hate camera man talking the most but I'd say the performers come second in this category. I'm not sure what if OneMan meant either of these examples or both of these examples when describing blokes talking all the time, but I'd have to say that anyone besides the model talking a lot is a no-no for me in a video.
It appears so far the argument is for being apprehensive about non-exclusive content and poor quality. For me, while I am not a network person and have actually only joined two I think that I am more for being apprehensive about poor quality. Since I rarely join networks, I usually join single sites that exclusiveness can be more expected. But, I do always get worried about the quality. Many sites these days state that 1600 res on pics is 'high res' and 720 X 480, 1000 kbps (just two examples) are HD video. So, many sites state High res photos and HD video on their tours. Sometimes this can be cleared up with an email but sometimes customer service are robots (real robots or a real human acting like one) and just re-tell you everything that's on the tour in the same words. Therefore, in the midst of the argument, I almost switched to poor customer service because if they can't clear up this than I can be apprehensive to join the site to begin with. However, I do admit that my desire for certain content can sway me to join even if the robot-like customer service is managing the site; so I have to say it's still poor quality.
One thing I can see for picture lovers that can create apprehension is if the site may not contain zip files for download. I have joined two 'picture' sites where this has happened by taking a plunge (no reviews really anymore but content looked good) and have been extremely pissed off. While I do have some programs to get the images, sometimes they don't work and I end up just never returning to the site with a feeling of wasting money. I can see having no zip option as a apprehension for picture lovers.
I dunno what to say, I don't have some routine or ritual after sex and eat anything special. Honestly, the first thing after sex that I usually think about is sleep and not a juicy burger or something. So I put nothing but maybe others have a routine they go through?
I have no kids but I have to say that this should be enforced. Of course, the curiousity of kids is quite high but there needs to be some sort of warnings for sites that contain explicit material. While of course, the classic enter your date of birth and electronic sig is easily bypassed; at least it shows that the adult material is attempting to make it harder for young ones to see it. The internet is a easy way to showcase adult material and will always be nowadays but I have to say that any way of warning should be enforced. I think the young enough ones will actually take the warning serious while the ones who are 'old' enough will be exposed eventually no matter what and the possibiliy of this is inevitable. But, I can see someone like an 8 year old boy coming across a warning and actually be a bit worried about entering, therefore making this rule rightfully enforcable.
You may be right but my experience in real life is that many watch these kinds of scenes. The reason I say this, at least from what I can gather, is when porn does get brought up amongst my friends one of the first sites that is mentioned is sites by BangBros. These sites usually feature these types of BJ's (the aggressive, gagging, slurping, etc). Even with people I do not know well (random parties, gatherings, so on) when porn is brought up after a few drinks, all the sites that feature these types of bj's are brought up. So, maybe I am just in the minority but if these sites keep being brought up, obviously these folks like the sites since they are watching these scenes (either paying or not, but whatever) and I have not heard many complaints on these models being extremely slutty aggressive as a turn off.
Now don't get me wrong, I think many enjoy the bj's that we seem to like but I think here at PU, the majority of the viewers are a bit more sophisticated in their porn opinions and views due to watching a lot more than the average viewer. Plus, I have to disagree with you a bit on the fact the porn producers are overlooking the consumer completely by featuring these types of BJ's. Honestly, if there were enough complaints I do think most mainstream sites would change their outlook on model behavior when it comes to extreme bj's. Of course, there are always exceptions but I just can't see the huge mainstream sites just doing whatever they think the viewer wants (even with an extremely large number of complaints), even if this is not what they want, and just saying screw them; they can watch or not. Just my 2 cents...
I have to agree, the blowjob in porn these days have become this overacted and savage throatjob. In my experience when a women attempts this, I am all for the 'plz relax' notion against this type of bj. However, these days in porn, the dominating bj you describe appears to be the standard and most appealing for the viewers (at least the vast majority) because this is all I see these days (mostly). I just think that most hardcore scenes attempt to showcase the model as extremely slutty and an extremely aggressive bj is what portrays this behavior the best while a small minority would like a bj how its supposed to done; sensual and slow, but joyful at the same time.
Hmm I'm kind of caught in between on things. A POV BJ, I will delete the scene all together, even if the model is giving the best one ever. I do not necessarily like BJ's in a scene, but I see it's use. Plus, I tend to at least watch maybe one minute or so if it is there. So, I picked 10% of the scene which may even be a bit high. However, I would never say to take them out all together even if the BJ is the worst ever and there is no point, I just could not imagine a porn scene where both parties undress, stare and kiss once or twice, then just get right in to penetration; it would just seem strange to me.
By the way, lol at the fact that no one has put to stop downloading as an option. If there's a will (?), there's a way, right!? Lol we are all such pervs here and I love it :)
I dunno I just save everything and keep 'em on old externals. I'm kinda weird when it comes to porn, I attempt to d/l the whole site, watch it in alphabetical order and once I get to Z, I rarely watch it again. This is unless I found something so extremely great, I will watch it every once in awhile. So, once one fills up, I just buy another drive. Currently I am on my 4th 1 TB external drive and it is about halfway full. So, I am at about 3.5 TB total for my whole porn stash. I rarely delete, but then again, I rarely watch the content that I have already seen once or twice.
I dunno, I guess if the overall outfit is a nice dress that goes with the heels; then it completes the overall look. A naked model with just heels does not do it for me. So, I guess I could not care less.
All the technical aspects of photography weigh heavily on how well a photo comes out for the public. However, I think the actual model within the captured image and her doing the correct erotic pose weighs the highest if an image is overall quality. A well lit shot with great image clarity is all fine and dandy but if the model is bent over with her legs on her ass in an ass shot, then the image has gone to waste. So, of course all these aspects need to come together for an overall decent image but the model and the pose comes first for an excellent captured image.
I'd say they are midly interesting to take a peek just out of curiousity but I am not a believer of paying for any type of sex tape, caught on film slip ups, etc etc of celebs. I think I'll stick to the good ol' porn stars :)
I am a fan of true mature sites which contain mature women. Ragingbuddhist got it right, when you pay for something expecting a certain thing and don't get it, I am pissed. There are hundreds of sites which are considered 'mature' or 'MILF' but I have only found 3 good sites that contain true mature women. MILF type sites are never right, they are mostly women in their mid 20's with a bigger bust or maybe a bit thicker and are promoted as 'mature'. This is not really mature in my opinion, I would say anyone in their mid 30's and higher as truly mature. Sites that contain true models in this age range are far and few in-between. Plus, as expected with the poll answers of 'What's the difference?" being quite large in response, I do believe that most don't even care because they think that a model not in their teens or early twenties are mature which is not true in my opinion. It's a shame that most think this way which appears to result in plenty of sites just featuring women not extremely young as 'mature' and getting away with it.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
