One of my cons was that the camerawork wasn't the best, and I stated it was POV for the most part, so I sort of figured that covered it. But I agree the camerwork is sketchy.
It's an okay place, but if you were to join one of the two I'd go with casting couch first, I think it is defnitely better - unless you like asshole male talent, in which case you might prefer this one.
Yeah, I have edited a few of the scenes to take that content out, I have never heard of anyone who was a fan of this niche either. Perhaps my porn veiwing habits are more mainstream than I though...
Yeah he's a pretty major tool, for some reason I thought it was the same guy as backroomcastingcouch, then realized this guy didn't have the outie... I like this type of niche as well, that's why I joined, but the negatives are pretty major.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Some attractive ladies
-Interesting concept, videos typically provide both a "regular" scene and either POV or behind the scenes
-Newer videos pretty decent quality, 640x360 4150 kbps WMV was the best I saw
-Zip downloads of photosets, although photosets are pretty limited
-Decent sized collection, 156 models at time of review. A lot of the models that appear here also appear on their sister site: backroomcastingcouch.com. Most models only have 1 scene (with a POV and regular video) some have multiple.
-Better navigation than their sister site, have model index, but no search function.
-Provide model information
-Exclusive content
-No DRM
-Download managers work
Cons:
-Model attractiveness is pretty variable
-Download speeds are not great, best I have seen is 400 KB/s
-Older videos are poor quality, 480x360 1600 kbps MPG was worst I have seen so far
-Camerawork isn't the best
-Photo quality is mediocre
-Price is a little high given the quantity of content
-Too many tattoos
-The guy in the scenes is sort of a douche
-Guy censors his face, which can be distracting in the scenes
-1 update per week
-No real bonus content, some non exclusive steaming sites is all you get.
Bottom Line:
I joined this site primarily because they have a few models I liked from backroomcastingcouch, and I figured this site was bigger so it'd probably also be better. While the site does have some good content, and I like the concept of providing the POV and the regular scene, I found it to be sort of lacking compared with backroomcastingcouch. I can't really put my finger on why, perhaps the models weren't as good (although the two sites have many of the same models), perhaps I am now realizing that the dude is a pretty standard porn douchebag. He seems to get off much more on humiliation than on the other site. Edit: Just realized its a different dude than the other place.
I don't get what is sexy about having the ladies lick his ass, perhaps this is a turn-on for some, but certainly not for me. I plan on editing all that crap out of the videos - and this is not a rare occurence, I'd say almost half of the videos have this type of content.
There is definitely more anal on this site than on their other site, for those that are interested in that kind of stuff. Although I would say it is still not super-common, maybe 15-25% of the videos or so.
There are definitely some videos from this site I will keep, and there are a couple that may become favorites, so I wouldn't say this site is a total waste of money, but it definitely isn't great, and definitely could use some work. Get rid of the dude, if he doesn't want to show his face, find someone that will, or at least teach him some manners. He is starting to sound an aweful lot like those jackasses on the BangBus.
Also, merge these two sites for the same price. There are tons of sites out there that are cheaper with 10x the content, 60% of the price of these two sites combined. If they still have to source material, they really should re-encode the old stuff, that bitrate is just totally unacceptable these days.
Bottom Line, a site worth joining if you see some models you like in the preview. Although don't count on being overly impressed with the material. Certainly not worth joining for more than a month given the infrequent updates.
I have been averaging less than 200 KB/sec (total DL speed) since joining this site, hopefully it is just a technical problem, but certainly not promising. Also since logins timeout, download managers haven't been working so well (path disappears).
On the plus side, the content I have been able to download is pretty decent.
Also, in response to dracken's question, no network access from this site either - there are bonus sites but they all appear to be streaming only.
Hey man, no worries, I have brain farts all the time, I recommend you blame it on booze, almost always works (except with the ladies).
I have seen no notifications as to when HD downloads may be available, I tried all available sites with HD content to see if I could download and didn't find any. Evil Angel is not part of this network, but they may currently offer HD downloads although last I was a member they did not.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Excellent price through TBP, $9.95
-Download managers work (DTA)
-No DRM
-Huge archive, 10726 straight scenes across network (1374 are HD but streaming only). 2614 photosets.
-Wide variety of content, from euro ladies to grannies to indian
-Video quality is acceptable, best I saw was 720x400 2000 kbps wmv
-Download speeds are decent, I typically got 1 MB/s using DTA
-Have scene ratings, favorites, and user comments
-Scenes have tags, but not exactly useful for a site this large
-Decent update schedule, about 1 DVD per day it seems
Cons:
-Older content is of variable quality
-Navigation can be a bit annoying, a lot of scenes duplicated across titles. Not sure if they are counting the duplicates in their total.
-No zip downloads of phototsets that I found
-Not sure why the even bother having the multiple sites. I guess it is just for organization
-Few users seem to participate in the comments, or ratings. I have yet to see a comment on any of the scenes.
-Search function consists of pull-down menus with long lists of model names, movie names, etc. Not particularly functional
-No HD video downloads, streaming only
-Largely gonzo porn, although there are some parodies to be found, and some scenes with plots.
-Material can get repetitive, and is almost entirely hardcore.
Bottom Line:
This site is definitely worth visiting, especially for the price, however its main drawback is the same as for many sites of this nature like Videobox and VideosZ, it is big and there is a lot of junk to sort through. Generally I like the content they produce, although I wouldn't suspect many would download more than 1% of it unless they had a boatload of time on their hands.
Overall I consider this a site worth joining at least once, definitely given the price. It would be nice if they made some improvements to navigation and added a more robust search function. It would be nice if more users participated with comments like on Videobox, but I guess there isn't really anything they can do to force the issue.
I generally find the model quality on this site to be slightly above their DVD competitors, but I consider their video quality to be slightly worse. The HD looked nice when streaming, but I am really not one for streaming so didn't watch too much of it. I particularly like that the model type is somewhat more variable than on similar sites, although it isn't super ethnically diverse.
If you haven't been a member before and have time to dig through it all, it is definitely a place to consider if you are into hardcore DVD content.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Wide variety of attractive ladies
- Network access to other sites, they are all in the massage niche
- Camerawork and lighting are generally good
- The video quality is good, I mostly downloaded the middle level quality mp4 (960x544 ~2000 kbps total) which was usually around ~300 MB for a scene, and crisp enough for me. There are higher quality options (1280x720 5000 kbps) certainly looks nicer, but I am running low on space these days, so I only used that for scenes I really liked
- Reasonably diverse collection of models body types and ages
- Scenes are generally interesting and fun, the performers usually look like they are having a good time
- Download managers work (DTA), I did not experience any site timeouts (but there may be one), download speeds were acceptable
- Good price with TBP discount
- Pretty large network of sites
- They have user requested fantasies, not sure how legit this is, but interesting nonetheless
Cons:
- Ethnic diversity is somewhat lacking
- Personal preference, but some of the sites are kind of odd, I don't really get the milking table thing, and some of the scenes on Nuru Massage are bordering on comical (they use a lot of lube)
- Not fond of the internal billing by "fame assist", would rather a more reputable biller, but did not have any problems with joining or cancelling
Bottom Line:
I am not really sure why I joined this site, I guess I was in a weird mood. Probably saw some interesting scenes of models I like, but I don't really remember my logic, must have been drunk and liked the price. I don't honestly typically like massage porn, but I must say I was pleasantly surprised. There are plenty of very attractive models at this site, the camerawork is generally pretty good (not too many close ups, framing shots well, not moving around too much), and the lighting is also very good.
The scenes generally revolve around the same basic concept with only slight deviations regardless except for the two sites I talk about below. Someone shows up for massage, results in some type of sex (sometimes just oral), customer leaves happy.
Although I didn't download many of the scenes, the milking table site has a slightly different setup, men seeking help with erectile or performance problems solve them through this service. Interesting alternative to Viagra I guess, but I had never really heard of this niche/kink before, didn't really do it for me, but if you are into that, it seemed pretty well done. Scenes on that site generally involve a girl giving head to a guy through a hole in the massage table to help him with his "sexual" problem, sometimes followed by intercourse.
The other site that was kind of weird was Nuru massage. Not really my scene, for some reason I find an excess of lube kind of disgusting, and some of these scenes are like 55 gallon drum of lube on Amazon excessive. To me they are often bordering on comical, like two people trying to have sex on a lubed up slip 'n slide. But again, it was well produced, so if this is your thing, seems like a good place to get it.
Overall I was pretty surprised I liked this site as much as I did, I wish they used a 3rd party biller and had a bit more diversity. But they certainly seem to do what they do well, if you are into this niche, it is certainly worth a look.
Excellent review exotics, your sentiments perfectly express mine from the last time I was a member, although I hadn't realized they updated so infrequently. Even though you and I seem to tend to like different model figures, I also have not been impressed with their models lately (compared to the first time I joined where I feel like I downloaded like half of them).
Since several reviews seemed to complain of poor download speeds I just wanted to note that their download speeds have been excellent for me so far: 1.2 MB/sec.
No problem, when I joined I looked through all the company sites listed on PU to see if any had Fuck Studies as a bonus site, and none of them did, so I just joined that site directly. Unfortunately it seems full price is the only option for now...
When I was a member, I got all of the sites you listed as bonus content. However, be careful when you join, as this company often switches bonus content around, and sometimes you don't get the same set of bonus sites if you use the PU discount. In my experience what is listed on the join page is what you get.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Decennt video quality, most I downloaded were 1280x720, 5000 kbps, reasonably crisp.
-Okay download speeds, maxed at over 1MB/sec
-Attractive young ladies
-Good bonus content, although the score I am giving here is for this site alone
-Multiple file formats, although best quality only in WMV (flash, wmv, mp4 (for mobile) and 3gp (for mobile, never heard of this)
-Download managers work
-Logins don't time out, no capcha.
-Reasonable price, given bonus content
-Zip downloads of photos, decent quality 1000x1400 typical
Cons:
-Small site, only 35 scenes at time of review
-Slowish updates, about 3 per month for the past month. Although the network updates at more like 10 a month from the looks of things.
-Camerawork can be a bit sketchy
-Navigation of the site and network are still pretty bad, although it is improving. The seem to have fixed some of the model name problems they used to have.
-Adds for other sites are throughout, kind of annoying.
-There are some navigation glitches (adds covering up thumbs and such).
Bottom Line:
Joined this site, as I guess it was added after the last time I was a member of this network of sites (teensexmania, teenstarsonly, atmovs, etc.). I wasn't sure if this site was a part of the 19.95 deal for joining teensexmania as it is not listed as a bonus, so joined it directly - although it probably is included, I didn't feel like taking the chance.
The ladies are attractive, and the theme of the site is loosly teacher based, although I'd say it is primarily a gonzo site. All of the models listed do hardcore material, with about half doing anal. The scenes are for the most part pretty good, on par or better than most of these newbie euro sites.
If you haven't been a member of this network of sites, it is definitely worth joining, although I'd probably join through teensexmania and get the discount, if this site isn't one of the bonus sites you get, it isn't much of a loss. If you have been a member of this network before, I wouldn't say this site is reason enough to join.
Assuming this site is part of the network, see my review of teensexmania for my opinions on the network as a whole, although I wrote that 6 months ago, the info still applies.
I joined this site primarily cause I was bored, hadn't joined a site in a while and they have a few models I liked so I figured what the hell.
The site itself is pretty good, and I still think the network is great. I wish they would spend a little more time fixing some of the navigation issues (adding search, indexing the models, etc.), especially since the network is getting pretty large, 736 scenes at the time of this review.
Billed through segpay (I find to be the most suspect of the billers - I used a card on one of their sites and somehow the card number was stolen, I just sort of assumed it is because of them, but can't be sure) - used a virtual card this time...
Definitely worth joining if you are a fan of natural, thin, euro ladies - especially if you haven't joined the network before. However, if you are a fan of plots, large breasted women, or pictures, you are best served looking elsewhere. Also, if your internet connection isn't very good, you could certainly get frustrated, the typical scene on the network is between 500 MB and 1 GB.
she's still cute, the back tattoo isn't that bad (not nearly as bad as belicia's anyway). looked around a bit and didn't see any photos showing her huge feet, so i'll have to take your word for it on that one...
If they fixed all their problems it could be a decent site, of course the problem is that it would take them a while to build up a catalog free of those problems.
Thanks RA, I'm sure you will find some stuff there you like (as I did), just be prepared to do some video editing yourself, and to be frustrated with it at times!
My guess is the guys that run the site are just lazy, video editing and site design are very amateur, it seems like they just film it and throw it up there. It is a pity, as they have many attractive ladies there, they just don't present the material well.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Some very attractive models
-I can't recall having seen any of these models elsewhere
-Download managers work (DTA)
-Good download speeds (2MB/s)
-I like the concept
-Reputable biller (I had CCBill)
-Long site timeouts, it doesn't appear to ever timeout
-Few if any fake breasts
Cons:
-Camerawork is not the best
-Lighting is not the best
-Scenes are repetitive, almost all progress in the same fashion
-Navigation is very basic, just a page with 6 scenes on it, many scenes aren't even really labelled (no model names?!)
-Site is sort of small for the price (200 scenes at the time of review)
-Video encoding on many scenes is poor (see BL)
-HD only available after 30 days, a stupid gimmick given the size/update rate of the site
-They say one update per week, seems right for as long as I have been a member, but since scenes aren't dated it is hard to tell
-No photos
-Some videos are zipped, is this 2001? Zip a wmv all you want, you ain't saving any space.
-Some odd stuff in a few of the videos (showing a girl go buy Plan B)
-No bonus material
-Streaming starts instantly when you go to a page (to all webmasters: please stop doing this)
Bottom Line:
I like the idea of this site, and it is nice to see some new faces, but I will admit I joined primarily due to the Miss Teen Delaware thing intriguing me enough to give it a look. Generally I think the models are attractive. Typically athletic, skinny, and generally on the smaller breasted side - no fake breasts that I could tell. My type of woman, so I figured 'what the hell' and joined.
The main negative for me with the site is the camerawork, lots of stationary shots as though it were filmed on a tripod, and shots I am not particularly fond of (long stretches of showing cowgirl from behind, which an ass man might appreciate I suppose, but I find it boring and a poor angle choice). The lighting can be a bit iffy at times, but they do appear to have put in some effort by bringing in some of their own lighting gear as seen in many of the shots, but all scenes are shot in a hotel room, so obviously not the best.
My second main gripe is the video encoding on this site, encoding a video that is filmed in 16:9 in 4:3 is unacceptable, and it hasn't been for several years. Basically forces you to have black bars on all sides. On widescreen monitors this will leave half or so of your screen as black space. This is particularly egregious since it is FILMED in 16:9. My only guess for why anyone would do this is that it was easier for them to do with their 30 days for HD policy. Perhaps these videos are encoded properly if you hang around for this period, but given their update schedule that is a tough pill to swallow. I used avidemux to crop the videos properly, but this is not something one should have to do at a pay site.
The scenes themselves are very repetitive, generally an interview, fully clothed oral, fully clothed doggy, naked cowgirl or reverse cowgirl, doggy, end. I have no idea why they spend so long on almost every film showing the girl from behind when she is on top, I prefer to see the girl not her back.
Overall, I think the site is a good concept, with some quite attractive original women, but the execution is too poor for me to recommend it. If they got rid of their HD policy, filmed scenes better, encoded the videos properly, and updated their navigation to at least include model names it would be a step in the right direction.
I know what you mean lk2, I had a model I liked filed under two different names for almost a year before I found EBI and realized it was the same girl, I guess that is the one and only advantages of girls with ugly tattoos!
EBI has those two movies listed as her (Barbariska), so I would assume it is, I couldn't find it in the preview, well, I got tired of clicking through the pages (why can't places give a tour index alphabetically?).
Also, I saw some ladies that looked like they were 40+ in there, so I can see what you mean about them being older...
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
