| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I tend not to believe any of it on most sites but some are obviously more acurate (FTVGirls is a perfect example). If the girl is one of my favourites I tend to at least investigate her real name, age and where she comes from.
I agree with the others - who cares what her favourite colour is as long as she can take three dicks at once?!
|
08-26-09 03:46pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Ace DDF's Reply
How would the re-billing work with this based on a 3 month sign-up?
|
08-20-09 11:18am
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I don't think that I could handle the thought of my mates going home and whacking one off over her videos and pictures. No....I'd keep it to myself.
|
08-20-09 11:14am
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
If a website says exclusively teens then yes - it really should only feature 18-19 yr olds. Personally I'm not bothered and am very happy look any girl naked as long as she's hot.
|
08-18-09 02:38am
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Porn should be about appreciating the female form. Implants ruin the natural line of a woman's body and yes...it also shows a lack of confidence in ones own body and low self-esteem. Both a big turn-off.
|
08-15-09 11:28am
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
I chose other - simply because I like anywhere except outdoor scenes generally. This is because I tend to find outdoor scenes not to be lit as well. Massive generalisation but I certainly find it's often the case that the clearest, sharpest videos are made on an indoor specifically lit set.
Once you're inside - I don't care where it is as long as the titties bound and the lips get spread :-P
|
08-08-09 04:23pm
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I'm going through a war movie phase at the moment but otherwise - all the above.
|
08-06-09 09:47am
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
hehe - OK...to be slightly more lucid:
I never look at the jpg content of a site online if I can help it. In fact - I often turn off image display in my browser to speed up pages and keep my cache nice and clean. Simply download the zips and look ath thumbnails using ACDSee. As the meercat wouldsay - "simples" (sorry - it's a UK thing)!
|
08-05-09 06:44am
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
Reply of
atrapat's Poll
There are things I care about less but...right now I just can't think of any
|
08-04-09 03:53pm
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I've a feeling this will be a resounding NO. What's the point?
Maybe some webmasters will read this and learn from it.
|
07-19-09 01:29am
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I joined suzenet back in 1995 (ish...I think). Can't say I've gone back there and looked recently though to be honest.
|
07-09-09 07:23am
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
Reply of
fortherecord777's Reply
Woah - 65"!!! I didn't know you could get LCD that big! Man I'd love to see some of those MetArt girls on that! You're a lucky man!
|
06-19-09 04:58pm
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
Full screen on my 26" TV mounted on the wall as a second display.
|
06-19-09 07:41am
|
Reply
14
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Use an Onkyo 7.1 system here which I'm very happy with. Detached house means I can turn it up as loud as I want but it does keep my daughter (who sleeps above the TV room) awake sometimes. Oh well - we all make sacrifices for others sometimes ;-)
|
06-06-09 10:41am
|
Reply
15
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
Much as I agree with GCode that the creators of the art should be most deserving of recognition, I said musicians, mainly as I don't put writers in the "celebrity" box. Celebrities are people who seek adulation and recognition. Being a muso myself and knowing how damn hard it is and would much rather create something worthwhile and know in my heart it was good rather than stand in front of an audience and get their opinion.
|
06-04-09 02:45pm
|
Reply
16
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Errr....12Tb and counting!
|
04-14-09 04:40pm
|
Reply
17
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Ace DDF's Reply
Thanks Endre - good to know it's not a permanent thing. Looking forward to HD eye candy!!
|
08-14-09 03:40pm
|
Comment
18
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
|
08-13-09 12:59pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
19
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Reply
Thanks Draken. Please be aware that the rolback server is now off - for good. But a site admin commenting here in PornUsers has stated that the timout issue regarding download managers IS being looked into...so....watch this space.
The updates are currently still only 1 per day although there are occasionally secondary photo only sets from a sister site. A welcome addition recently is also a backstage video in addition to the main video but this is only available in relatively low-res wmv format.
Enjoy!
|
08-10-09 04:32pm
|
Reply
20
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Ace DDF's Reply
Great news that you're trying to fix it. That really would be a great example of web admins listening to their userbase - very impressed.
Don't suppose there's anyway of having the rolback server back until you'vegot a fix is there?!?!?
|
07-07-09 04:11am
|
Reply
21
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Ace DDF's Reply
Thanks for the response Endre,
The use of the download manager isn't really the problem. The issue is with being able to schedule downloads. FDM still works fine to multithread download and resume from 1byday.
I (like many I suspect) are limited by our ISP's to certain download limits. My ISP lifts those limits between midnight and 8am. If I was always awake at these times there'd be no problem. I've used managers to schedule downloads to get around this issue.
The use of session timeouts and more importantly the web form requiring a physical presence at a PC breaks the scheduled downloads.
I've spent the day looking at various download managers and can find none that auto login to your site unless you have already used a browser to pass the web login form.
Please - if you've got any advice on how to get GetRight, DTA or any other manager working with sessions and web forms I (and I'm sure many others here) would love to hear. Until then I still believe form based login sites are to be avoided.
|
07-06-09 08:37am
|
Comment
22
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
|
06-30-09 07:28am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
23
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
monty2222's Reply
Hi Monty222 - DDF is the production company.
http://ddfprod.com/2257.htm
Stands for Denys DeFrancesco the photographer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denys_Defrancesco
Thanks for reading,
Z
|
04-26-09 02:14pm
|
Review
24
|
1 By Day
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Mostly gorgeous girls.
- Great quality videos
- Full dated complete archive going back to 1st Jan 2001!!
- one click zip downloads
- Download managers supported (using the rollback site - see below)
- Casting videos and pic sets for a lot of the models
- Good mix of soft/hard/lesbian/indoor/outdoor etc. |
| Cons: |
- Horrible new site design (slow to load and uses a login form that stops download mangers from working efficiently. At time of writting however you can still access the site using the rollback server - rollback.1by-day.com - who knows how long they'll keep this online though!)
- Updates dropped to 1 per day rather than the advertised 2 per day as of April 09
- Some sets can be a little formularic (but it's a minor gripe)
- fortnightly "jokes" small picture update instead of a new model with a full video. |
| Bottom Line: |
Hey - it's 1byDay. If you have never been a member at some point then you can't really be a porn hound. Some of the (IMHO) most gorgeous girls in the business started here before they got too much surgery (Juditta), stopped doing hardcore (Eve Angel), or sturated the market (Sandra Shine). Fortunately a lot of those sets are still in the archive. Including the previousl mentioned "used to be perfect" Juditta (I bought a dildo from one of her sets when I was a member back in 2002(ish) and it's still a prised posession.
The girls are often gorgeous (not always it has to be said but more often than not) and are often pretty exclusive to 1BD sites. I've never been a fan of the other niche ddf sites so can't comment on duplicated sets.
The sets are often original concepts with interesting camera work and the vids have the right kind of balance between tease, closeup, full nudity, postions etc.
Everyone should have some DDF content in their collection and 1BD is a good place to start...and maybe even stay!?! |
|
04-26-09 11:19am
Replies (6)
|
Comment
25
|
Ann Angel XXX
(0)
|
|
03-14-13 06:09pm
Replies (0)
|
