| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Monsters of Cock
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Reply
I wrote them multiple times. Perhaps they've learned from their evil ways, but at the time you only got access to 6 sites and they stated "you get access to all of our sites". So I stand by my review.
|
08-09-07 07:38pm
|
Comment
27
|
Monsters of Cock
(0)
|
|
08-08-07 03:52pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
28
|
Mr Big Dick's Hot Chicks
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Good Content with hot chicks
- Some attempt at a story line
- a lot of scenes |
| Cons: |
- Hardly any updates
- Poor Quality Videos
- Best quality is flash, which are not savable |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is part of a large package (Allrealitypass) and there is only 1 update for the entire package per weekday (none on weekends). The quality is not HD and all but the most recent movies are very low quality.
I have a particular problem with sites that have better quality trailers than the actual movies. It seems like an obvious effort to deceive, and thats always a negative. The truth is, once you've hit the archives there's really nothing to keep you wanted to renew here. Another 1 month wonder. |
|
12-07-08 06:46am
Replies (1)
|
Review
29
|
Mr. Biggz
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Lots of content
-Good quality on newer videos
-Good download speeds
-Hot chicks |
| Cons: |
-Older videos can only be downloaded in segments
-Only real good quality on latest videos
-Most of the companion sites are worthless
-Not enough updates |
| Bottom Line: |
The first thing to say is that the dude pictured on the Mr. Biggz ads only appears in the first third of the content. There's a new dude making the new ones. Still a big black cock. The girls are hot for the most part. Heavy Hangers, Jizz Bomb and Mr Biggz are the only worthwhile sites and they only get 1 update a week at most. So there isn't enough here to keep you going past the first month. The Nacho site is very disappointing as there are no updates, low quality vids, no full movie download and the chicks are mediocre looking. |
|
05-12-07 12:59pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
30
|
Ox Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Bletch's Comment
This is one of my peeves about BangBros in general. All of their "sites" say "access to ALL of our sites". But its just not the case.
|
02-16-08 07:04am
|
Review
31
|
Ox Pass
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Lots of Content
- Decent Download Speed
- Regular Updates |
| Cons: |
- Medium Quality video
- Repetitive Story lines
- Too many mediocre-looking chicks
- Started to get a lot of porn SPAM after joining
- Same dudes and chicks over and over |
| Bottom Line: |
I suppose the rude, low-class style is intended, but if you don't like skanky chicks this may not site for you. The same guys with the same mediocre girls gets old fast. The price isn't bad, and the updates are regular, but because of the diversity of the sites, its likely that only 2 or 3 of them will appeal to any given customer. Also note that you'll get an offer to remain for $19.99 when you cancel, so you might as well cancel during the first month to save some $$$ if you intend to stay. |
|
02-16-08 06:47am
Replies (0)
|
Review
32
|
Pornstars Like It Big
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- good quality
- good range of women
- good download speeds |
| Cons: |
- not so believable reality
- too many average looking girls |
| Bottom Line: |
Its not terribly believable that women who fuck big cocks for a living are going to go nutty over yet-another big cock, so it beats the old striptease and then guy-comes-in-room-for-sex type of scene. You won't find too many great ones, but several are very hot. |
|
09-24-08 02:46pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
33
|
Restrained Elegance
(0)
60.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- good amount of content
- daily updates
- glamour bondage only |
| Cons: |
- poor quality videos
- most of the "new" material is useless
- the break one "scene" up and call it multiple updates
- same models over and over
- videos don't work in Safari |
| Bottom Line: |
The point of bondage with hot women is to arouse sexuality, and most of the content on this site doesn't. Many of the "scenes" just seem half-baked; not enough "real" bondage. The videos are grainy and don't work in Safari. The photography isn't very good, and most of the photo sets don't have one really good photo. It just seems half-baked; like they are going through the motions to generate content without having any real ideas as to how to entertain their clientele. |
|
03-16-08 07:59am
Replies (0)
|
Review
34
|
Teens Like It Big
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Hot girls
- great quality
- fast downloads
- true reality |
| Cons: |
- Silly dialogue |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a very hot sequence of scenes featuring mostly gorgeous girls going gaga over big cocks. While its hot for them to say "its soooo big", they don't really need to say it 15 times. They overdo it a bit, but the scenes are great. |
|
09-24-08 02:31pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
35
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
|
12-25-07 12:21pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
36
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
videobox's Reply
And May's list:
Handjobs
upskirt diaries
Wrestle with the Devil
Dicks and Dildos
Lacta-mania
Chunky on the 4th of July
Ebony Cream Pies
Black Cream Pis
booty quake
thick black and stacked
Dude, where's my dildo
There's an old business adage - decide what you want to be and be the best at it - When you try to cater to everyone you dilute the customer base that made you successful in the first place. I'm sure you know how it affects your bottom line better than I do, but be aware that there are people who want a certain type of content, and they'd rather join a site where they know that the updates will be something that interests them. I cancelled my membership after a week where there were maybe 3 scenes that interested me.
I didn't trash your site. You have a lot of good content. But if only 1/3 of the content is of interest to any given individual, then its certainly worthy of note.
|
07-17-07 07:32am
|
Review
37
|
VideoBox
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Good quality Videos
- Good navigation and searching
- Lots of updates |
| Cons: |
- too much odd content
- not enough reality type content
- bandwidth limited downloads (8/2008) |
| Bottom Line: |
While videobox offers several updates per day, so much of the content is weird stuff like midgets and squirting and fat chicks that it may be 3 days before there is something you want to see. Also, most of the content are those tiresome scenes with interview-masturbastion-dude shows up-sex with nothing to grab interest. Personally I prefer a bit of a storyline.
I cancelled my second subscription (8/2008) just in time, as it seems they've started to bandwidth limit downloads. Its too consistent to be congestion, and I simply can't get more than 700Kb/s on any download from there site. I've confirmed that i can download from other sites. Unfortunately, the speed that they allow isn't fast enough to watch DVD content in real-time, so its a huge negative. |
|
07-14-07 01:08pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
38
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
Clement's Reply
Now that I've been on the site awhile I have to reject your answer on the blurry videos. I've seen some of the videos on here on other sites at much higher quailty. What, did you buy lower res CDs than they did? And why are the clip pictures clear but the videos can't get close to that clarity? Clearly they've just been encoded at a lower res, probably for a day when not many people had broadband. You just haven't chosen to re-encode the CDs for modern viewing.
If you're going to use the high number of videos you have as a selling point, keeping them up to date should go hand and hand with that. I don't expect in 2010 to have 3/4 of the videos with 2005 download resolutions.
|
02-28-10 09:15am
|
Reply
39
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Reply
If you're rating a restaurant and the waitress gets your order wrong and brings you the wrong thing and then tells you "oh, we were out of what you ordered so we gave you something else", do you give the restaurant a good rating because what they brought you wasn't terrible?
No, you give them 1 star. Because you want to get what you ordered; not something else. 50 is the lowest rating. The rating recommendations say "Not Recommended" is 50-59. If it was 1 video that was missing I'd give a higher rating. But there are a lot of them. So you search, find something you want, and then BANG, its "Coming Soon". Its a waste of time as well as annoying.
Its purposeful deceipt. So they get the lowest possible rating. The unavailable videos should be taken out of the index; for both members and would-be members.
|
02-24-10 04:10am
|
Reply
40
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
Clement's Reply
Offering a refund so you can continue to deceiver others doesn't seem like a worthy trade off. How about if I eat the $18. and see if you
1) Change your site so it no longer indicates that videos that aren't currently available are available
2) put up the videos in 2 weeks like you indicate they will be.
Then perhaps I'll consider changing my review. In the meantime, everyone who reads this has no idea which videos are available and which aren't by the current way you're doing things.
The argument that they're being re-encoded doesn't satisfy the reasoning behind bogusly indicating that the videos are available before you pay. It should say Coming Soon BEFORE people pay as well as after.
Otherwise you are a crook, no matter how hard you try to convince yourself otherwise.
|
02-22-10 04:36pm
|
Review
41
|
VideosZ
(0)
50.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Updated: |
03-10-10 08:51am (Update History)
Reason: Final conclusions
|
| Pros: |
Lots of content
Newer Videos have good quality |
| Cons: |
-False Advertising
-Many videos not available at all
-They seem to buy videos that no-one else wants - too many chicks that aren't all that attractive
-"New" Releases are often videos that are 10 years old.
-Too many scenes are poor quality even on high quality download
-I hate their flash viewer
-you have to frequently log back in |
| Bottom Line: |
I was a member of this once before, so I guess its my fault for giving them another chance. I found something on this site that I'd been trying to find for a while, and the "Free Preview" shows that its available for download. After joining, it shows "Coming Soon" which basically means "sorry charlie, we fooled you".
A large number of videos are not available. You waste tons of time finding something and then find out its not available. Or sometimes the quality is so bad its not worth watching. Their "New Releases" are new only to the site. On March 1, 2010 College Girls Do 4, a video from 1999 was presented as new. Do I want to see Julie Meadows before she got her boobs done? I guess they get better deals buying old videos that nobody else wants. There's no way to sort on ACTUAL release date. So you have to sift through all of the old garbage. Virtually none of their "new" releases are new.
Their viewer will not allow you to advance the playhead past whats been downloaded. If you do, it terminates and you have to start over. This means you can't jump past the interview or the masturbation or whatever. A real time waster.
If you buy the argument that our most valuable asset is time, this site wastes more of your time than any other I've been on. You search for something you want, and then you find out its "Coming Soon". There is so much garbage; so many unattractive women, that it takes a long time to find anything really good. Then you find out that the video was encoded 5 years ago and the quality is unwatchable. Or if you find something and you don't feel like watching 10 minutes of ass-licking you can't jump past it in their viewer.
They still have login problems. You'll be navigating around and
for no apparent reason you'll get the invitation to join page.
Another time waster and annoyance.
They get the lowest score mainly because they falsely present videos on the preview that are not available when you pay. Cheats get the lowest score. Otherwise I'd give them high 50s, mainly because they don't have real new releases, and because 2/3 of their content is encoded in low quality.
*** UPDATE ***
My month is just about up now, so I wanted to report 2 things:
1) All 3 of the videos I was interested in when I first joined are still not available, despite Clement's claim that they would be done in 2 weeks.
2) They are still advertising the videos as being available before you log in only to be Coming Soon once you do log in. So clearly they are comfortable baboozling people and they think they make more money with such a practice than they do with an honest approach.
I'm very comfortable giving them the lowest possible rating. So I guess we're even.
*** Final Update ***
None of the videos that I was interested in that were tagged "Coming Soon" when I joined was availabe on the last day of the membership. So don't believe them when they tell you it will be available in 2 weeks. Its just not the truth. |
|
02-21-10 02:09pm
Replies (15)
|
Review
42
|
VideosZ
(0)
55.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Lots of Content
good (not great) quality on downloads |
| Cons: |
Terrible customer service
cryptic userids and passwords
have to enter passwords over and over
slow downloads
xvid and flash video formats are annoying
searching needs to be improved |
| Bottom Line: |
When you join a site, you want to start using it right away, not 4 hours later. It took *hours* before I could access videos. My ID worked after 10 minutes (as they state), but there were 0MB of videos available for 3 hours. I received no response from customer service in the 3 hours (normal business hours). The formats vary from movie to movie. Xvid was not happy on my MAC; i had to download and launch VNC to watch some of them. The flash format was low quality. There aren't enough search categories and you can only search on one category (no interracial + asian for example). There is no scene search. When you search for an actress you get the videos they are in and have to cobble through the scenes.
The bottom line is that the site is a bad version of videobox at a much higher price. There's really no reason to join this one as there are way too many negatives. |
|
08-08-07 08:34am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
43
|
Vivid
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
Its fine to say you like the site, but giving a site with such terrible quality videos a 90 is simply wrong. You've totally ignored something that should be a key criteria. Obviously vivid has the capability to put up high quality videos. They don't do so on purpose. Its not like its some garage dude who can't afford a good camera. The videos aren't just not that good. They are terrible. Its a disgrace.
|
06-28-07 04:27pm
|
Reply
44
|
Vivid
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Review
I really don't see how you can give a 90 score to this site. If all Vivid content were available in good quaility it might get that score, but its simply not the case. The "new" videos are not good quality either, in fact I found that many of the older videos had better quality. But finding them is nearly impossible. This site is a waste of money unless you're viewing the videos on an ipod.
|
06-23-07 01:03pm
|
Review
45
|
Vivid
(0)
55.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of potentially excellent content.
You'll only blow $10 trying it out. |
| Cons: |
The quality is TERRIBLE. Not just bad, but purposely terrible. They really want you to buy DVDs. Crappy, streaming-only content. They also have only a subset of Vivid content, and there are no dates and no date sorting, so you can't tell if a video is new or from 1998. |
| Bottom Line: |
To me, it doesn't matter how good the content is if you can't see it. Its 2007 and there is no excuse for such poor quailty videos. New content actually has LOWER quality than some of the older stuff. They lowered their price and the quality at the same time. As far as I'm concerned, I might just as well have crumpled up a $10 bill and threw it out the window.
Follow-Up:
As a follow-up, I'm receviing a tremendous amount of SPAM from the address given to the vivid.com site. I use different yahoo addresses for each sign-up, so I'm certain that they are the ones who gave out the address. So drop another 10pts from the review. |
|
06-06-07 02:52pm
Replies (2)
|
