| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Well if they "decided" to scale back on their content, then they need to scale back on their pricing as well. If Mercedes decided to cut back on leather and AC, you'd expect them to adjust their price accordingly.
The value test is not necessarily how good something is, its how good it is compared to what you can get spending your money elsewhere. Dollar for dollar, this site is simply not worth the price, because you can get more and better content elsewhere for less money.
|
10-05-08 05:12am
|
Review
2
|
1 By Day
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Great Quality
- Unique Content
- Not your typical Scenese
- Fast Downloads |
| Cons: |
- Hardly any hardcore
- Ridiculously bad navigation
- Too much weird stuff |
| Bottom Line: |
Basically, this is an overpriced masturbation site with a sprinkling of hardcore. If you're into good looking women sticking ax handles and gun barrels into themselves then you'll probably give this a better score than me. But in one full week, there was not one new hardcore scene. There's just not enough desirable content to justify the high price.
I'm did this review 1 week into the subscription, and now I'm updating at the end. At this point I feel that this site was a complete waste of money. After pouring throught the archives, there are perhaps only 4 scenes I'd consider exceptional. Way overpriced for 80% masturbation.
I'm editing this again. I created a yahoo mail account just for this purchase. I went in to view my receipt and the mailbox is filled with porn spam. So do not give your real email to these people. |
|
10-04-08 05:35am
Replies (4)
|
Review
3
|
Adult Movie Club
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good quality videos
Lots of content
Lots of bandwidth |
| Cons: |
Some DRM protected content (mostly older stuff)
Disappointing updates
No title or text search
Gay content mixed in |
| Bottom Line: |
Finding something you like on this site can be a chore as their searches are limited in scope. DRM-protected movies (no warning on which are) don't work at all on my MAC. Lightning download speeds and super high-res on all of the latest content. Their updates tend to be bunched by studio or type, so all the updates for 3 days may be something you don't care for. Because of no searching, when you browse a category you have to look at the previews of a lot of stuff you might not want to see (like grannys, trannys and gays). |
|
02-18-07 02:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
4
|
All Reality Pass
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Lots of Content
- Some very hot sites
- Good Variety of girls |
| Cons: |
-Poor quality video (no HD or DVD quality)
-Not enough updates
-Spam Central |
| Bottom Line: |
This network has some good scenes, but there are a lot of sites and only 1 update per day for the entire network. So if you really like 2 or 3 sites, you might only get a couple of updates per month for those sites. The video quailty is very 2003, although they seem to have removed the DRM.
One thing to note is DO NOT use a real email (create a bogus one in yahoo to get your receipt), as the spam will start coming soon after signing up. I'd give them a higher rating but I hate spammers. As if paying for this low-quality stuff isn't enough that they have to sell your information also.
This site is the old in-out; watch what you like and cancel. |
|
01-14-09 05:32am
Replies (1)
|
Review
5
|
Anjali Uncovered
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Anjali is hot, and she brings in a lot of hot girls to either join her or play with her men. She looks hot with a huge cock in her mouth, and the guys have some really big ones. |
| Cons: |
She talks way too much, and frankly the dirty talk is a turn off. The companion sites generally suck and there are hardly any worthwhile updates. |
| Bottom Line: |
If you're into indian chicks, join for a month and suck down the good vids and then move on. The old in-out as they say. |
|
05-12-07 11:00am
Replies (0)
|
Review
6
|
Big Tits At School
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Good Quality
- Reality Settings
- Some hot scenes |
| Cons: |
- Too many Overstuffed girls
- Too many 28yos trying to pass as teens
- Same girls over and over |
| Bottom Line: |
Part of the Brazzer's network, this particular site just doesn't do it for me. I guess I just don't get the obvious implant thing, but they need more Amy Reids and less overstuffed slut-types. |
|
10-09-08 05:19am
Replies (1)
|
Review
7
|
Brazzers
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Lots of Content
- Good Download Speeds
- High Quality Videos
- True Reality |
| Cons: |
- Site design could use some work
- too many B rate and below chicks
- too many big fake boobs
- SPAM city |
| Bottom Line: |
The Brazzer's network has a lot of good content but after a couple of weeks you'll run out of things you want to see. There's a handful of hot girls and a lot of bad ones, unless you're into old or fat chicks.
I had to log in every time I visited the site, which was highly annoying. It also required a re-login while navigating after logging in occasionally. Luckily their CAPTCHA doesn't work (simply leaving it blank works fine), so its not as annoying as it could be.
I started to get a TON of spam right after signing up for this service. Luckily I use a bogus yahoo address. I suggest you do the same if you don't want to get buried in SPAM. |
|
08-04-08 08:40am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
8
|
Fling.com
(0)
|
Reply of
stargazinc's Reply
This is clearly a spam "reply". It would be good to have a way to report such things.
|
03-16-08 08:01am
|
Review
9
|
Fling.com
(0)
62.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Nicely done site. Nudity allowed. Chat rooms with videos. |
| Cons: |
-clunky searching, can't search by last login
-spammer/scammer central
-hideous customer service. My trial didn't *take*, so I had to call 3 numbers and got a guy who I couldn't hear (I think he was in a space module or something). i had to batter customer service to get them to set it up |
| Bottom Line: |
Fling.com would be pretty good if the people on it were real, but for the most part they're not. There are fat chicks on CAM, cute girls on CAM that are paid to hang out in chat rooms all day, and most of the responses you'll get are those girls stuck in Africa, or girls with *webcams* trying to get your credit card info. Most other guys i chatted with thought the site was a complete waste of time as well as a waste of money. |
|
03-08-07 06:13am
Replies (4)
|
Comment
10
|
Freaks Of Cock
(0)
|
|
07-13-07 07:17pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
11
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Tons of Content
- Hot Girls, and not the same ones over and over
- Entire Barely Legal Library |
| Cons: |
- Search could be better. When searching for a girl it only returns the video and you won't know which scene she is in
- no previews or clips
- not many updates
- quality is only medium
- downloads are medium speed
- can't sort videos so browsing can be tedious
- downloads have DRM if you use the provided download links |
| Bottom Line: |
IMO, Barely Legal is the best porn series ever devised, so most of my points are for access to the 250+ scenes in this series. I also have a tool which allows me to save them without the DRM, so if you dont' have one of those then you might be disappointed. There's about 4 updates a week, thats 4 full videos so 16-20 scenes, but Barely legal updates are only about 1 per month, if that. Quality is watchable but not what you'd hope for from a site in 2007. Searching can be a pain, and there are no previews so you have to start watching each scene to see if its of interest. It could be a lot better, but the content is excellent. Mr Beaver is a hoot. |
|
06-23-07 10:21am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
12
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Ok, well I "ass"ume he shot digitally, and he used a 1024 save-size or maybe just used a 1 megapixel camera. SLR multi-megapixel cams were mega-bucks until recently. I doubt he shoots with film or a point and shoot.
|
09-22-07 11:41am
|
Reply
13
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Its business. Notice they have a special price?
The concept that Matt's "couldn't be better" is patently absurd, so getting 4 90s completely discredits EVERY ONE of TBP's reviews. They should consider what these deal's are doing to the integrity of their site. A good review site MUST be detached from doing business with the sites they are reviewing. While getting special deals for their readers is a good thing, the price they pay: the believability of their reviews, might be a bad financial move in the long run. They should learn a lesson from Rodney.
|
09-22-07 11:23am
|
Reply
14
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
what I meant, is that you can't convert 1024 pixel photos to 1600 without stretching them. You can't add detail. So its just not a reasonable expectation. He'd have to reshoot.
|
09-22-07 10:23am
|
Reply
15
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
how can he "re-publish" in 1600px? Do you want bigger, blurry pixelated photos?
|
09-22-07 08:26am
|
Review
16
|
Matt's Models
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of models
Models are wholesome, no tattoed pierced skanks
Relatively inexpensive |
| Cons: |
Few of the models are model-quality
poor photography
most of the videos are poor quality |
| Bottom Line: |
The first thing here is that the name of the website implies that "Matt" is a photographer, but clearly he's not. Not only the models are amateurs, but so is the photographer. Red-eye in most of the photos, many of the photos aren't scaled properly. And the sequences aren't interesting. You'd think after photographing so many girls he'd develop some sort of style.
Some of the sets look like they've been decorated from a dumpster; he's got to be making some money from this, so the poor photographer excuse shouldn't apply here. If you're a horny guy in your 20s you'll probably love this site, but there aren't enough girls on here that I'd be dying to see naked. |
|
09-22-07 08:24am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
17
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Mayvary's Reply
I'm a professional photographer, and you're obviously some horny dude who has probably never seen a real women naked. So who is incompetent?
You can't download just the photos you want in high resolution. You have to download the entire tarball. Or at least you did when I wasted my money on the site.
|
05-31-08 08:48am
|
Reply
18
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Mayvary's Reply
Clearly you know nothing about modeling or photography. The photos are amateurish and the models aren't models because they don't know how to pose. Most of the sets don't have a single quality shot. Its a site for horny losers. 97 implies that it could not be better, which is clearly not the case.
|
05-17-08 03:14pm
|
Reply
19
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Mayvary's Review
Is this a plant? Fess up. 97? Surely you jest.
|
02-25-08 09:41am
|
Review
20
|
MC Nudes
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Lots of Content
- Good Quality Images
- Fast Downloads
- Nice Layout |
| Cons: |
- Lousy Photography
- Disappointing Model Quality
- Can't download just the photos you like |
| Bottom Line: |
For the price of a full fledged porn site, you can see a bunch of amateur girls who can't pose to save their lives. You'd think in the silicone age a nude photography site would have more women with outstanding boobs; but the pickings are slim. Some of the shoots are so embarrassing that there isn't one decent pose. When shooting nudes, its important to control body lines. Most of the sessions are just a bunch of shots with no apparent plan. Lastly, you have to download the entire tarball in order to get the full-sized images, and then its a pain to find the one you wanted. |
|
02-06-08 12:46pm
Replies (4)
|
Comment
21
|
Mega Cock Cravers
(0)
|
|
01-07-09 09:54am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
22
|
MILF Hunter
(0)
|
Reply of
OUMarcus's Comment
I find the "new" sites completely useless. VIP has been part of the "Milfhunter" network for a long time.
|
12-03-07 06:42am
|
Reply
23
|
MILF Hunter
(0)
|
Reply of
mediafan's Reply
So your argument is that because its better than sites that really, really suck, its a 95? 90s ratings imply the site is the best that it can be. There's no HD or DVD quality content, slow downloads (VERY slow when you reviewed it) and an archaic password scheme. At least read what the ratings mean. A 95 implies that you don't think the site can be improved. The fact that they completely revamped the interface and got more bandwidth AFTER your review implies that even Reality Kings didn't agree with you, or they wouldn't have bothered.
|
11-21-07 08:57am
|
Reply
24
|
MILF Hunter
(0)
|
Reply of
mediafan's Review
I assume you've never been on any modern porn sites? Giving a site with so many problems a 95 is just plain irresponsible.
|
11-16-07 05:58am
|
Review
25
|
MILF Hunter
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of Content
Good Bonus Sites
Hot Chicks |
| Cons: |
Low Quality Video
Clunky View/Download setup
Watch/Download links only for clips
Cryptic UserIDs and Passwords
Doesn't Work well on a MAC |
| Bottom Line: |
The new user interface raises this from an annoying site in the 60s to a high 70s IMO. But they still have some issues. Still with the cryptic user IDs, and you still have to log in 3 times your first time in. Navigation is clunky. Its just poorly thought-out in general.
Download speeds have been dramatically increased recently. However, the video launch/authentication doesn't work on a MAC with Flippit WMV plug-in, so the entire clip has to be downloaded in order to view.
They have a lot of good content, but their site still needs some work. Some advice to the owners; spend some of the money you're making on a real programmer with a proven track record on user interface rather than the usual clunk-heads that do porn sites. |
|
11-16-07 05:55am
Replies (0)
|
