| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Alta Heels
(0)
61.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
hot leggy models
intimate situations
models talk to camera |
| Cons: |
Download limit disables your account. They should at least warn you that you are approaching limit.
Limited selection.
Model Tiffany removed and yet she is still shown on the front page (before joining)
Instead of consolidating sites to bring more content for less money, they decided to split off content to multiple sites.
No ZIP files for pics. |
| Bottom Line: |
If you are into intimate videos of leggy women, then this site has some better models.
On the other hand, they are taking a rip off the customer approach with download limits that shutdown customer accounts, and splitting up the content. |
|
06-20-10 08:19pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
27
|
N/A
|
Reply of
FuckingGambler's Poll
softcore videos. Not necessarily HD, but certainly high quality. I mainly look for models with good facial expressions.
|
03-13-10 10:35pm
|
Reply
28
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
Eating out your woman is great. If you suck the juices of the hairy oyster, then she'll eat your hot dog of delight. Everybody's happy and you can move on to the main course.
|
07-03-09 06:00am
|
Reply
29
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I prefer vids, but I also prefer smiles and teases over anger and serious. I hate when the model looks disinterested the most.
|
05-07-09 07:59pm
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
holio.net is the one that caught my attention years ago. I still have some videos from toyvision and pornholio that show footage of models like Paris (Sharing Paris), Jewel Marceau, Cherry, and Kayle Paige to name a few. The video quality isn't the best, but the teasing is pretty good.
It seems like holio.net still exists, but does anyone use them? Even so, I wonder if they have any updates.
|
02-08-09 06:31pm
|
Reply
31
|
Exclusive Teen Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
OneMan's Review
You may not remember, but...
The site uses segpay.com as it's payment company. Is that the same payment company that it used when you signed up? How was segpay.com (segpayeu.com)?
|
01-04-09 02:47pm
|
Reply
32
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I tend to join for only a month. Sometimes I go for three days if there is a trial, but that may get me hooked or a month.
In some cases, the discount for three months has been great enough for me to lengthen my membership, but the site would have to have a lot of archive and new content (e.g. 1-by-day).
In some rare cases, I forget to cancel my membership and it goes for a few months. Sometimes it is because the site makes it complex to cancel. This is why I generally prefer well-known billing providers.
The only other exception was for "Penthouse Online" collection in 1998. This was supposed to be a "lifetime" membership for $199, but ID stopped working around 2000. I emailed them, but they gave me some lame excuse, and I never really had adequate proof of my subscription.
|
11-27-08 07:50am
|
Review
33
|
Ember 19
(0)
52.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Ember is cute.
You can download all 5 videos of her (no DRM) |
| Cons: |
The site was hacked by AKINCILAR
Only 5 videos
Videos are extremely amateurish
Attempting to access pictures leads to hacked message
No zip files for pictures |
| Bottom Line: |
I don't know what made me try the site. I have seen her on other sites and I always thought she had a great smile. Unfortunately, her site is growing mold (and hackers).
I emailed ember19@gmail.com , but I have not received a reply. I'll update if things improve. I suppose they need to rid themselves of hackers first. |
|
11-17-08 05:49pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
34
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Thanks for the reply. I never know how people will react to my reviews.
All of the Danni-vision is gone, or I can't find it. Some of it has been remastered as WMV files, but not a lot. In many cases, they just include the images from those "Live Events".
As far as I can tell, the DRM stuff is completely gone. I too built up a large collection of DRM-protected videos with the supposed "life-time guarantee". I was able to download the non-DRM versions of every one of these files. The old names were like:
13793_00_1000.wmv
and the new ones have names like:
13793_00_1000__4095.wmv
The later files are a couple of bytes smaller (minus DRM??). Unfortunately, you cannot search for content by filename, so this was a bit time-consuming.
|
07-23-08 03:44pm
|
Review
35
|
Danni.com
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
No DRM!
Top Models
Large collection
great variety of scenes / themes
great photography and direction
keywords help search navigation
Lots of breast content |
| Cons: |
not all of the original videos have been remastered.
Some photosets are small. |
| Bottom Line: |
If you are into softcore, then you must have heard of Danni. I have been a member from time to time and the latest version has even more stuff. While they got rid of some of the old "extra content" links (like SoftBodies, etc...), I don't really miss it. Also, getting rid of DRM will get me coming back.
Danni has always maintained a wholesome, safe site, where the models seem to be having a good time. Sometimes the content is a little too safe.
The models play an active role in the content as in the "My Own Video" series.
It even reminds me of the old Playboy - with Danni playing the role of Hef. I love it for it's candy sweetness, while others may hate it for the same reason. |
|
07-22-08 10:51pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
36
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I admit I'm vain and a little shallow. I like to see the model look at the camera as though I'm right there with her. My perfect video spends 70% of the time on the model's face with her frequent looks into the camera and doing something with her mouth. Assuming she has a pretty face!
|
05-24-08 08:57pm
|
Review
37
|
LV Legs
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good photos of about 100 hot ladies
many types of nylons used
pics in 200K or 400K sizes
many models have several sets
most sets have some pics with bare breasts and pussy |
| Cons: |
no videos
no zips
primitive site layout (model index only) |
| Bottom Line: |
I love many of the photos, but I wish there were videos. Many models have great legs and asses. Many shots master the tease and understand legs and feet fetish.
I would come back if they added videos. |
|
04-06-08 08:58pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
38
|
Oliver Klozov
(0)
60.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
There are some hot girls here.
Girls play with the camera a bit - lots of teasing.
About 450 picture sets.
I signed up for 9.95 by joining Nextdoor-models
No video DRM. |
| Cons: |
Very limited video content (about 70 girls with videos)
No ZIP file download for pics
Video updates to site are infrequent
Many videos have poor resolution. They seem to be fixing that, but new softcore video updates are so infrequent. |
| Bottom Line: |
There is some rare footage of a few stars as well as some good camera interaction. I don't know, but the material seem original. I just don't think it is worth full price for most. I'm not even sure about 9.95, but I might come back in a couple of years. |
|
03-14-08 07:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
39
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
Talking may never be real, but very little about porn is real. I would rather hear chicks than music or guys. I like it when East Europe girls try to speak english. I like hearing the sounds their mouths make real close. So close that I can hear the shape of their throat and tongue. I like the sound of a tongue post hitting a dildo or anything else. I don't care what they are saying, but too often they think they know what I want to hear, but they don't. If I hear one more girl say "don't you wish this was your cock?" I'd rather hear "I wish this was your cock!" I also wish more girls would pretend to enjoy it. Laughing and playing with the audience are good. Some porn stars are experts at the tease.
Bottom line - I'd rather hear them try to talk than not. Moaning and other sounds are good too.
|
01-13-08 07:40pm
|
Review
40
|
Alta Smoking
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
select group of girls
erotic smoking
sexy videos - no DRM
quality photos
nice makup and outfits |
| Cons: |
small site
updates could be more frequent
no zip download for pics
could use higher resolution on pics and video |
| Bottom Line: |
one of my favorite smoking sites. I don't care about actual smoking - more models could pretend with an unlit cigarette. The girls are fashion model quality.
Site could be cheaper or have more content. |
|
11-02-07 11:43pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
41
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Lots of great looking women
- enough pics and videos to keep you busy for a long time
- Many of the videos are candid
- Clear authentic sound quality with some close oral sounds
- Nice hardcore. Nothing too brutal
- Plenty of softcore (my preference) |
| Cons: |
- Limited video format: split in 2 (softcore) or 4 (hc)
- Could be more creative: Kinkier stuff, more teasing by women, experiment with makup and fetishes.
- needs better search engine (not big issue)
- more oral teasing and and oral sex. |
| Bottom Line: |
Great site with lots of good content. I like more solo videos and shots. They are focusing on the amateur angle, but they could take more chances on new angles. |
|
10-01-07 08:18pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
Reply of
DivBZero's Poll
agreed on ccbill and paycom. I would like to see a category for reviewing billing companies. When entering card info, I always check the name on the SSL certificate. I don't like it when porn sites take "up-front" info before passing off to billing site (like zip code or full name).
|
08-12-07 08:09pm
|
Rating
43
|
Reel Pass
(0)
86.0
|
No Review.
|
08-07-07 07:32pm
|
Reply
44
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
Reply of
DpornGuy's Reply
It is a blowjob / handjob scene. She's real cute, but she didn't seem overly excited.
|
07-08-07 09:09pm
|
Rating
45
|
Real Peachez
(0)
93.0
|
No Review.
|
07-08-07 09:05pm
|
Reply
46
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I don't mind if a model wants to get a fresh image and chooses a new name. Sometimes its even like a game of match the model to the name. I CAN understand why an individual model would want to change the name she is known by. If I think that this was exclusively at the model's discression, then my respect for the site actually increases!
I have also seen sites that use new names for every model. Even in this case it doesn't annoy me. But it does make me wonder what's up with that? I even wonder if some cheesy web sites use fake names because they are using stolen content. Maybe they are trying to defeat web crawlers that agencies use to locate stolen content. My other theory is that some web sites are so cheesy that none of the models would want their names associated with the site.
Also, if I only liked meat-loaf prepared one way, then I would seek out the restaurants that served it that way. I probably wouldn't care what they called it, though.
|
05-24-07 08:37pm
|
Review
47
|
Babes.tv
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Hot top models looking super glamorous in video and photos.
Models often masterbate with dildos.
Discounted access to other glamour sites from same company.
Clear audio on most videos.
Music doesn't overpower sounds of models.
Jessica Jaymes rocks! |
| Cons: |
Not the most content (not the least either)
Video updates are once or twice per week?
Content could be more daring. |
| Bottom Line: |
Great softcore content. The class is dripping in most scenes. Showcases some of my favorite models. While it may not be the only site with these models, it seems to have a lot of original content. |
|
03-20-07 09:47pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
48
|
VideoBox
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Huge video catalogue in multiple resolutions.
Fully downloadable.
Many categories of video.
Has both hardcore and softcore.
Download just the parts of the movie that you want.
Many top porn stars.
Many ways to navigate through content. |
| Cons: |
Could use more softcore.
Indexes could include a few more categories.
Site was down (overloaded?) two times that I tried to connect. Seems to have been resolved.
Some of the movie choices have more violent hardcore than I care for. |
| Bottom Line: |
Has many of the movies that pay-per-view sites offer, but fully downloadable without restriction. I often click on the suggested scenes, because they are what I am looking for.
I disagree with some of the comments that the movie choices are too narrow. There is a lot of variation in the types of movies. |
|
03-20-07 09:18pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
49
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I prefer to see condom use, because they represent regular guys in porn. The ones without condoms have to go through regular testing or they are just a-holes who could be spreading disease. By employing condoms, a greater variety of hot women would consider hardcore.
|
03-01-07 08:22pm
|
Review
50
|
Draggin Ladies
(0)
67.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Models interact with camera very well.
- Sexy clothing
- Good masterbation scenes.
- Most vids are 640x480 and good bit rate.
- Sounds come from models: talking dirty, moaning, sucking noises.
- No DRM.
- The previews really show you what you get. |
| Cons: |
- Unusual payment company, but they did honor my advance cancellation of autorebill.
- Models could spend more time with unlit cigarette - tease with it (some do).
- They might attract a wider variety of model types by not requiring the the models actually smoke the cigarettes.
|
| Bottom Line: |
There were only a few models that really did it for me, but they were worth it. I would rejoin if they brought back Ashley Fires or Cassie Young for new stuff.
I also love sites that give lots of free stuff up front. |
|
01-08-07 08:36pm
Replies (1)
|
