| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
ALS Scan
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Excellent photo quality
Excellent high definition video quality (Later shoots)
Attractive Babe type girls
Regular updates |
| Cons: |
Vaginal shots are garish (Candy red) which is very unnatural looking.
Excessive focus on fisting
Many older videos are flagged as no longer available |
| Bottom Line: |
This site really is taste dependent. You have to like candy red vaginal shots and excessive fisting which I don't. Also, for some reason, many of the older videos are shown as no longer available for viewing. I guess the site owners don't want to spring for the extra cost of storage. |
|
11-26-07 04:16pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
27
|
Girls Out West
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Consider this site a poor relative of Abby Winters. Some of the great looking girls found on Abby Winters are also featured here. The site features both photos and movies which are updated on a regular basis.
Cost for a month membership is reasonable a reasonable $20. |
| Cons: |
Photo quality is mediocre by todays standards
Video quality is mediocre by todays standards
Many of the girls are unattractive. |
| Bottom Line: |
If you like Abby Winters, this site might be worth checking out to see more of the same girls in a different setting. However, be warned many of the girls are not as attractive as those found on Abby Winters. In addition, you might be disappointed at the mediocre photo and video quality. However, for $20 I think it is worth a shot because there are some real gems here.
Follow-Up:
I rejoined the site recently and was disappointed to find no real improvements to note. Video is still noticeably inferior by todays standards and most of the girls would still never make it on Abby Winters. One of the more popular recurring models from Abby (Paula) appears in some videos packing on quite a bit of extra baggage in the rear and thighs. I'm leaning towards giving this site a thumbs down recommendation for membership. |
|
05-13-07 05:36am
Replies (0)
|
Review
28
|
Dirty Jason
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Decent start for an amateur porn producer
Girls are decent looking |
| Cons: |
Expensive - $34.95
limited selection of girls - 15 as of now
Only average quality video
Most girls do not look or act like amateurs. |
| Bottom Line: |
Here is the premise: A pudgy farm boy from Texas (think Hoss Cartright's little brother) decides to film his dates without their knowledge. He lures the girls back to his apartment and then proceeds with a lengthy seduction ending most times in sex. There are two big problems I see with this site. First, many of the girls do not look or act like dates. In fact, many are familiar faces seen on other websites, so I am assuming everything is staged. The other big problem is the price. You pay $34.95 for only 15 girls. Here is how I got snookered. I joined a much better website "Exploited College Teens" and there was fineprint at the bottom of the signup screen which asked if I wanted to join Dirty Jason for $34.95. I thought it meant $34.95 for both sites, but it was actually $34.95 extra. In any case, the site is worth a look if you can get it for $3.95 on a trial basis. Otherwise, I advise you to pass this one up until the selection increases and the price declines. |
|
10-08-07 02:22pm
Replies (9)
|
Review
29
|
Ron Harris
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Professional skill of photographer
Worth a look for fans of the Babe look and glamour photography.
Monthly membership fee is more reasonable then other sites. |
| Cons: |
Sets are way too small.
The voice of the photographer is quite annoying in the videos. He sounds like a dirty old man.
Most of the girls are not new faces. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have to say I was quite disappointed in this website. For all the hype, there is just not that much beef. First of all, the sets are way too small. You get some high definition videos of the girls, but I was not impressed with those either. The guy filming the action, I'm assuming it was Ron Harris, sounded pretty course and obnoxious in the way he conversed with the girls during each shoot. In addition, the girls just look a little too made up for my taste. However, if you are a fan of the Babe look, maybe this site might interest you. The only reason I joined was because of the reasonable $20 fee. However, if given a chance to do it over, I would not join again. |
|
06-28-07 06:04am
Replies (0)
|
Review
30
|
Homemade Paysite
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
One of the girls (Chayden) is decent looking (At least in her earlier videos).
latest web videos are in high definition |
| Cons: |
Girls "DO NOT" look like girl next door amateurs. They look like bored looking professional strippers.
Only several girls in total for the entire website.
Poor value for the money |
| Bottom Line: |
I was quite disappointed with this website. The girls are not, as other reviewers have mentioned, "girl next door types". I would say they look more like burned out strippers. There was one good looking chick featured in early videos (Chayden). She looked about as close to a girl next door as any girl on the site. However as the videos progressed, she started looking more like a more like a bored gum chewing professional stripper. Another thing I was disappointed in was the lack of variety in girls. There are only several girls in total. While some of the scenes are hot, it would be nice to have more variety for the money you pay. There are many other sites out there with tons more girls offered at nearly the same price.
In summary, every once in a while I hit a clinker and this was one. Don't waste your money. There is much better out there. |
|
07-22-08 01:34am
Replies (5)
|
Review
31
|
abbywinters
(0)
100.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This is the only true 100 on the net right now. Abby Winters is in a league by herself. This site has it all. Tons of gorgeous, natural, girl next door Australian girls, and some visitors from other countries as well; beautiful photography, great quality videos, an outstanding forum, regular updates, outstanding girl girl scenes that blow away anything else on the net; a demonstrated commitment and enviable track record for continuous quality improvement; and lastly a great price. WOW! |
| Cons: |
None |
| Bottom Line: |
Abby Winters reigns supreme as the top amateur site on the net right now. Nothing else comes close! |
|
03-14-07 03:08am
Replies (9)
|
Reply
32
|
Teen Sex Mania
(0)
|
Reply of
rome476's Reply
I was looking at AT movs before subscribing to Teen Sex Mania. What sold me was the fact that Teen Sex Mania offered a network of sites in addition to the main site subscription, while AT Movs did not offer any extras. In addition, AT MOVS is not yet advertised as offering full HD videos. I intend to subscribe to AT MOVS in the future though because if shares many of the same girls showing up on Teen Sex Mania and it's bonus sites.
|
07-03-09 01:27am
|
Reply
33
|
Cezar Capone
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Reply
I have the full membership and can attest to the fact this is almost exactly like Bang Brothers. They even have a bang bus where they goaround picking up girls and acting obnoxious towards them. I recommend the site with reservations. The two download per day restriction can only serve to reduce their business.
|
03-12-09 10:46am
|
Reply
34
|
Cezar Capone
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Comment
You can now download two full videos per day.
|
03-12-09 09:55am
|
Reply
35
|
Homemade Paysite
(0)
|
Reply of
Penelope's Reply
Sorry Penelope, I did not mean to hurt your feelings. However, you need to understand this site is meant to provide objective information to other potential subscribers as to whether they should join. There are hundreds and hundreds of sites out there competing for our attention and with the economy the way it is we want to get good value for our money.
|
07-23-08 03:09am
|
Reply
36
|
I Shot Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
The videos are nothing to get excited about. Too short and the quality is not up to todays high definition standards. The photos are the main attraction.
|
07-22-08 05:08pm
|
Reply
37
|
I Shot Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Reply
I'm guessing some were shot by friends.
|
07-22-08 05:05pm
|
Reply
38
|
I Shot Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Reply
I don't understand why you would get that impression. Most of the shots are closeups at angles that clearly look like they were taken by the subject.
|
07-22-08 01:13am
|
Comment
39
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
|
12-02-07 08:35am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
40
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
PosterDude's Reply
Best is an objective term. My review implies the same. If you like tons and tons of garish red cherry vaginal shots and fisting. I would recommend the site to anyone who favors this style. However, I have to mention, there are few sites that tease the subscriber by showing numerous videos which are no longer available. To make it worse, they give you a link to another website where you can view the videos - for an extra fee. It is the purpose of this website to help others decide whether or not they should subscribe to the various offerings out there.
|
11-27-07 02:58pm
|
Reply
41
|
Dirty Jason
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thanks! I found it.
|
10-09-07 11:15am
|
Reply
42
|
Dirty Jason
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
No, as mentioned it is a completed different site with different cameraman and different girls. Only the style and format is the same.
|
10-09-07 11:08am
|
Reply
43
|
Dirty Jason
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
This is http://www.exploitedcollegegirls.com. Exploitedteens.com is an entirely different site. However......they are both eerily similar in style and format. In fact, the only thing different is the guy behind the camera and the girls.
|
10-09-07 11:01am
|
Reply
44
|
Dirty Jason
(0)
|
Reply of
troglodite's Reply
I would like to put up a warning on Exploited College Teens, but this site is not yet listed on Porn User. Too bad because I would like to post a positive review of it.
|
10-08-07 04:26pm
|
Comment
45
|
Exploited Teens
(0)
|
|
09-02-07 11:07pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
46
|
So Cal Coeds
(0)
|
|
09-02-07 10:59pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
47
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I think ATK is based out of Florida. These guys used to be the kings of
girl next door American amateurs. However, in the past few years it looks like they decided to focus more on the European types. I'm guessing those Eastern European girls work very cheaply. The problem with the European girls is they all look the same. I'm guessing they are real professional models who can't find work elsewhere. If you check out the exagerated poses you know what I mean. The photo and video equipment also appears to be lower then that used for the U.S. girls also.
|
07-02-07 12:47pm
|
Reply
48
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
Regarding the quality of the HV videos, I consider the HV MOV files featured on the Simonscans website to be significantly superior to those found on Ron Harris.
|
06-28-07 04:40pm
|
Comment
49
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
|
06-26-07 11:25am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
50
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
|
06-26-07 11:19am
Replies (0)
|
