| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I also think that newer sites should have reduced rates until the content is built up to the point it is worth the standard 29.95 per month charge demanded by established quality sites.
|
06-26-07 11:12am
|
Comment
2
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
|
06-26-07 11:25am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
3
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
mudman's Reply
Okay, maybe nobody really merits a 100%, but to me these reviews are subjective and serve as a consumer guide to potential users. The 100% is a curved grade which represents my opinion of how the site fares in comparison with all other amateur sites I have seen. Since Abby Winters is cutting edge, and appears to be so superior overall to anything else out there, this is my way of representing this site as reference standard for the amateur niche. If I were to pick one area where another site has surpassed Abby, and this was very recent, I would pick Simons Scans because they upgraded their videos to include the MOV format option coded in H.264.
|
03-14-07 11:23pm
|
Review
4
|
abbywinters
(0)
100.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This is the only true 100 on the net right now. Abby Winters is in a league by herself. This site has it all. Tons of gorgeous, natural, girl next door Australian girls, and some visitors from other countries as well; beautiful photography, great quality videos, an outstanding forum, regular updates, outstanding girl girl scenes that blow away anything else on the net; a demonstrated commitment and enviable track record for continuous quality improvement; and lastly a great price. WOW! |
| Cons: |
None |
| Bottom Line: |
Abby Winters reigns supreme as the top amateur site on the net right now. Nothing else comes close! |
|
03-14-07 03:08am
Replies (9)
|
Reply
5
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
PosterDude's Reply
Best is an objective term. My review implies the same. If you like tons and tons of garish red cherry vaginal shots and fisting. I would recommend the site to anyone who favors this style. However, I have to mention, there are few sites that tease the subscriber by showing numerous videos which are no longer available. To make it worse, they give you a link to another website where you can view the videos - for an extra fee. It is the purpose of this website to help others decide whether or not they should subscribe to the various offerings out there.
|
11-27-07 02:58pm
|
Review
6
|
ALS Scan
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Excellent photo quality
Excellent high definition video quality (Later shoots)
Attractive Babe type girls
Regular updates |
| Cons: |
Vaginal shots are garish (Candy red) which is very unnatural looking.
Excessive focus on fisting
Many older videos are flagged as no longer available |
| Bottom Line: |
This site really is taste dependent. You have to like candy red vaginal shots and excessive fisting which I don't. Also, for some reason, many of the older videos are shown as no longer available for viewing. I guess the site owners don't want to spring for the extra cost of storage. |
|
11-26-07 04:16pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
7
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of horny girl next door types. Many not seen elsewhere.
Very similar to Rodney Moore in style.
Regular updates and interesting and unusually personal Blog.
Recent upgrade in quality of videos - Windows Media Files now supported although quality is similar to the Mov files. Full movie files are also now supported, where before you could only get small clips.
The download times are very fast. |
| Cons: |
The videos are done with an annoying fisheye type lens.
Video quality could use further improvement.
Photos are below average quality (By todays standards) |
| Bottom Line: |
Not bad. One of the better amateur sites out there for videos of never before seen girl next door types. The score would improve considerably if Thomas were to ditch the fisheye lens and provide HD quality full video files of current and past models.
See Simons Scans for an example of how to do this. |
|
03-28-07 06:12am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
8
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
|
06-26-07 11:19am
Replies (0)
|
Review
9
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Outstanding quality pictures
Tons of girl next door types
Frequent updates
Reasonable price for what you get
Nicely organized by category |
| Cons: |
Could use some improvement to video quantity and quality |
| Bottom Line: |
One of the top sites on the net for real American girl next door amateurs. The best of the ATK family of sites.
Follow-Up:
This is a follow-up to my earlier review. I recently resubscribed to this site and noticed that the majority of new girls featured are now Eastern European model types. This is in my opinion a major
step backwards for the site in terms of quality. The gripe I have with these girls is that they all basically look the same. Emotionless, long legs, tons of makeup, and pronounced model like poses. This is great if this is your preference. New members can still enjoy the old stuff though. |
|
03-01-07 11:30pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
10
|
ATK Archives
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Excellent photography (Newer sets), Older sets reflect technology available at the time.
Huge selection of girls
Excellent value for the money.
Very good navigation
Sets featured here are no longer available on ATK's main websites. |
| Cons: |
Quality of web videos looks increasingly outdated by todays standards. |
| Bottom Line: |
Just a few years ago ATK Galleria and ATK Hairy were two of the best amateur sites out there. These sites featured a huge selection of mostly American girl next door amateurs. However, in recent years the use of European babe types has increased dramatically. Finding a real amateur American girl on these sites is now more of an exception then a rule. Anyway, if you have never seen the old ATK websites, the ATK archives is a treasure trove of the type of material that made ATK famous. Even if you previously visited the older ATK sites, you might want to revisit the Archives to see some of your old favorites.
I will admit, some of the older material from the late 90's does look a bit primitive compared to today's technology, but they are still worth viewing and you can see the improvement in quality as you move forward through the years. I highly recommend this site. |
|
06-28-07 05:22am
Replies (0)
|
Review
11
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Huge amount of content
Daily updates |
| Cons: |
In the last year or so the switch has been to more Eastern European professional model types. Prior to this switchover there were many more sets featuring American girl next door types. For this reason I would rate the latest version as having declined from being perfect to very good. Thumbs down! |
| Bottom Line: |
Great site for fans of Eastern European professional model types with natural bushes. Fans of girl next door American types can still find tons of material in the archives, but don't expect any more significant updates |
|
02-28-07 11:33pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
12
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I think ATK is based out of Florida. These guys used to be the kings of
girl next door American amateurs. However, in the past few years it looks like they decided to focus more on the European types. I'm guessing those Eastern European girls work very cheaply. The problem with the European girls is they all look the same. I'm guessing they are real professional models who can't find work elsewhere. If you check out the exagerated poses you know what I mean. The photo and video equipment also appears to be lower then that used for the U.S. girls also.
|
07-02-07 12:47pm
|
Review
13
|
ATK Premium
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good selection of models (Mostly European) many seen before on ATK's other sites
Written Biographies for each model with hobbies, likes, dislikes etc..
Offers MOV and WMV format videos |
| Cons: |
Photo quality and size does not justify "Premium" label.
Video quality is only average by todays standards.
Should offer HDV to justify premium label.
Many of the models are not attractive enough to be included on a supposed "Premium" ATK site.
Too little depth provided for each model. |
| Bottom Line: |
When I first subscribed to ATK premium a few years back, I was impressed at the concept. Take ATK's best models (Josie, Karen, Kimber etc..) were the first examples), and feature them on a website which allows the subscriber to get to know each of them much more in depth. Similar to what FTV girls is doing now. In addition, the photography and video quality was a cut above that found on the standard ATK sites. Coming back to revisit this site after a few years is a shock. There are now many more girls, but it clearly a case of increased quantity and decreased quality. The majority of girls do not belong on so called "Premium" site. Photo quality is no better then ATK's other sites (1536 X 1024) and video quality for the latest movie update was only 640 X 480 for both WMV and MOV formats. By todays standards, you need to offer HDV video and large format photos for a regular site just to keep up with the competition. Another gripe I have is that background info for most models now includes just a written biography and thats it. In summary, I think this site needs a total rework in all areas just to justify being called "Premium". Very disappointing!!! |
|
07-02-07 04:16am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
14
|
Cezar Capone
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Reply
I have the full membership and can attest to the fact this is almost exactly like Bang Brothers. They even have a bang bus where they goaround picking up girls and acting obnoxious towards them. I recommend the site with reservations. The two download per day restriction can only serve to reduce their business.
|
03-12-09 10:46am
|
Reply
15
|
Cezar Capone
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Comment
You can now download two full videos per day.
|
03-12-09 09:55am
|
Review
16
|
Cezar Capone
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Some of the amateurs are real gems.
Streaming quality is exceptional (Adobe HD)
Cost is reasonable ($18 per month)
Growing site with regular updates |
| Cons: |
Limited content for now (Currently approximately 150 full scenes)
Movie downloads limited to two per day!!!
Photos are too small
Quality of photos is fair at best
Boorish behavior of male participants towards girls might offend some.
Unoriginal website layout - A clone of Bang Brothers
Unoriginal style of videos - Again a clone of Bang Brothers. |
| Bottom Line: |
Very similar to the bang brothers, but with nicer looking girls. However, there is one major flaw in that you are only allowed to download two videos per day. The exceptional streaming quality partially makes up for this, but it still is a serious shortfall. |
|
03-12-09 09:53am
Replies (1)
|
Review
17
|
Dare Dorm
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
08-27-10 04:40am (Update History)
Reason: Needed to lower rating due to tentative recommendation.
|
| Pros: |
Earliest videos look authentic
Excellent orgy action
Most girls very attractive
HD streaming
Extra long videos (1hr approx) |
| Cons: |
No downloads - streaming only
Only 29 videos thus far
Cost - content does not justify cost for a stand alone site. Needs to be part of the RK network.
Latest videos look staged and unauthentic
Majority of female performers in latest videos do not appear to be true amateur dorm students. |
| Bottom Line: |
I had high hopes for this site after viewing the first few episodes starting at the beginning. The guys and girls in the first video looked like dorm students in a real dorm filming spontaneous action leading up to sex. However, as I moved into the newer material, the girls started looking less like students and more like porn actresses, and the action started to look more like a scripted porno. I do recommended the site because there are a good number of never before seen amateurs in some hot orgy action, however they need should focus on attaining true authenticity by staying away from using professionals. |
|
08-26-10 11:48pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
18
|
Dirty Jason
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thanks! I found it.
|
10-09-07 11:15am
|
Reply
19
|
Dirty Jason
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
No, as mentioned it is a completed different site with different cameraman and different girls. Only the style and format is the same.
|
10-09-07 11:08am
|
Reply
20
|
Dirty Jason
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
This is http://www.exploitedcollegegirls.com. Exploitedteens.com is an entirely different site. However......they are both eerily similar in style and format. In fact, the only thing different is the guy behind the camera and the girls.
|
10-09-07 11:01am
|
Reply
21
|
Dirty Jason
(0)
|
Reply of
troglodite's Reply
I would like to put up a warning on Exploited College Teens, but this site is not yet listed on Porn User. Too bad because I would like to post a positive review of it.
|
10-08-07 04:26pm
|
Review
22
|
Dirty Jason
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Decent start for an amateur porn producer
Girls are decent looking |
| Cons: |
Expensive - $34.95
limited selection of girls - 15 as of now
Only average quality video
Most girls do not look or act like amateurs. |
| Bottom Line: |
Here is the premise: A pudgy farm boy from Texas (think Hoss Cartright's little brother) decides to film his dates without their knowledge. He lures the girls back to his apartment and then proceeds with a lengthy seduction ending most times in sex. There are two big problems I see with this site. First, many of the girls do not look or act like dates. In fact, many are familiar faces seen on other websites, so I am assuming everything is staged. The other big problem is the price. You pay $34.95 for only 15 girls. Here is how I got snookered. I joined a much better website "Exploited College Teens" and there was fineprint at the bottom of the signup screen which asked if I wanted to join Dirty Jason for $34.95. I thought it meant $34.95 for both sites, but it was actually $34.95 extra. In any case, the site is worth a look if you can get it for $3.95 on a trial basis. Otherwise, I advise you to pass this one up until the selection increases and the price declines. |
|
10-08-07 02:22pm
Replies (9)
|
Review
23
|
Donny's Girls
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Photography by the sites founder (Donavan Philips) is top notch. Very sharp photos, with natural skin colors. Girls for the most part were attractive girl next door types. Detailed biographies of the models added depth and character to the photos. |
| Cons: |
The sites founder appears to have left the porn business. Site is still updated regularly, but much of the "newer" material is just technically enhanced older stuff. The actual new material is not up to the standards set by the sites founder. To be specific, the girls are not as attractive and lack the girl next door quality which made the site a success in the beginning. |
| Bottom Line: |
A mixed bag. Recommended for an initial subscription to view the top notch photography and fresh faced amateurs featured by the sites founder. Not recommended for subsequent subscription due to the
lower quality of the sites new operators. |
|
04-30-07 04:43am
Replies (0)
|
Review
24
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Excellent selection of authentic looking college girls - All never before seen.
Videos are extra long
Viewer offered choice of camera angle. POV or off to the side (One file for each angle)
Videos can be streamed or downloaded by individual scene or in total. |
| Cons: |
Video quality is only average by todays standards
No photos
Style and format of videos is copied from Exploitedteens.com which may bother some individuals |
| Bottom Line: |
I highly recommend this site to anyone looking for fresh faced amateur college girls. I counted 45 with no familiar faces. They all look and sound like they just stepped off of campus. Supposedly the girls are all from Arizona State. Anyway, I really need to mention something strange about this site. It seems the style and format is almost exactly like that of Exploitedteens which is one of my favorite sites. The only thing different is the guy behind the camera and the girls. The script is almost word for word
from Exploitedteens which by the way is very unique. I'm thinking either "Mike" from Exploitedteens is franchising his schtick or this is a blantant ripoff of another site. I don't have the answer, but I can say this is a great site and well worth the price of admission. |
|
10-09-07 11:30am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
25
|
Exploited Teens
(0)
|
|
09-02-07 11:07pm
Replies (2)
|
