| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Video quality is outstanding
Large selection of videos and photos going back several years
Girls are very attractive, friendly, intelligent, and well adjusted.
Interview of the girls before using the machines allows viewer to get to know the each girl and how they feel about their experience. In virtually all cases, the girls are eager to get started and seem very happy afterwards.
Membership cost is very reasonable
Trial memberships with full access are available making this an even greater bargain.
Regular updates |
| Cons: |
The format of a girl getting pleased by an electronic dildo can get boring after a while. There are over a dozen other sites on the Kink network that are more interesting.
Photo quality is not emphasized on this site.
No extra sites included in membership
Download files are extremely large. You will need a fast connection to avoid waiting. |
| Bottom Line: |
If I had to name the top five networks on the internet right now, Kink would definitely be included on the list. It features an amazing assortment of high quality bondage sites, featuring top notch production quality, and gorgeous extremely positive and motivated amateurs. Fucking Machines is one the sites included in the Kink network. Unfortunately, when you subscribe to one you do not get access to the others. However, this should not deter you from joining the site. The quality here is unsurpassed by virtually any other porn site of any other kind on the net. The only downside to this particular site is that watching video after video of a girl getting plugged by an electronic machine can get boring after a while. |
|
06-05-12 01:27am
Replies (1)
|
Review
2
|
Yanks.com
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the best collections of authentic looking amateurs on the net.
Most girls are extremely attractive, intelligent, articulate, and very likable.
Huge selection of videos. Most have both interviews and individual masturbation scenes.
Excellent value
Site features written biographies of each model, similar to Abby Winters.
Site is very active and updated regularly |
| Cons: |
Video quality could use some improvement although it is totally acceptable. As with most sights that have been around for a long time, the quality improves as you go along. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is a hidden gem. I would rank it up there as one of the top amateurs sites on the net today. Here you have a very large collection of authentic looking college intellectual bohemian co-ed types primarily from the Northwest usually performing their first porn shot. Believe me, these are not the type of girls you expect to be doing a porn! In any case, The girls are usually very positive about the experience and it shows. The typical format is to open with an interview of the model in street clothes with no makeup, conducted by a very cool laid back female who really knows how to relax the girls and get them to open up about themselves. This serves as a warmup to one or more masturbation scenes. If ever there was a site that fit the term "Organic porn" this would be it. Very highly recommended!!!! |
|
06-04-12 05:29pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
3
|
Simon Scans
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Huge collection of photos going back over a decade.
Most of the girls are very attractive and can not be found on other websites.
For fans of cute girl next door british amateurs, Simon's earlier work is unmatched. |
| Cons: |
In the last several years, the type of girls found on the site has shifted radically. Less cute british amateurs, more Eastern European, or Spanish babe types in glamour photos.
Many of the photos are oversaturated (Too much red). |
| Bottom Line: |
Several years ago Simons Scans was one of my two favorite amateur sites, alongside Abby Winters. Simon used to feature numerous never before seen cute british amateurs photographed beautifully. How the times have changed. Now most of the girls are from other countries and the style of photography is less amateur and more glamour. This may or may not be a positive depending on your tastes. A few years back I posed a question to Simon as to the reason for the declining numbers of british girls on his site and he replied they are getting harder to get. My hunch is they were more expensive and he decided to go where labor is cheaper. Here is my bottom line advice. If you are a fan of cute looking british amateur photos, and have never subscribed to Simons Scans, I would highly recommend the site for the older collection which is very substantial. On the other hand, if you are a former member looking to see some new content of british amateurs, I would not recommend you do so. Even if you have been away for 2-3 years. It's not worth it! For fans of babe type girls in glamour photos, you should find enough content 4-5 years to justify the subscription price. |
|
06-03-12 09:39am
Replies (0)
|
Review
4
|
Dare Dorm
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
08-27-10 04:40am (Update History)
Reason: Needed to lower rating due to tentative recommendation.
|
| Pros: |
Earliest videos look authentic
Excellent orgy action
Most girls very attractive
HD streaming
Extra long videos (1hr approx) |
| Cons: |
No downloads - streaming only
Only 29 videos thus far
Cost - content does not justify cost for a stand alone site. Needs to be part of the RK network.
Latest videos look staged and unauthentic
Majority of female performers in latest videos do not appear to be true amateur dorm students. |
| Bottom Line: |
I had high hopes for this site after viewing the first few episodes starting at the beginning. The guys and girls in the first video looked like dorm students in a real dorm filming spontaneous action leading up to sex. However, as I moved into the newer material, the girls started looking less like students and more like porn actresses, and the action started to look more like a scripted porno. I do recommended the site because there are a good number of never before seen amateurs in some hot orgy action, however they need should focus on attaining true authenticity by staying away from using professionals. |
|
08-26-10 11:48pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
5
|
True Amateur Models
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Girls look like True amateurs
Decent quality photos (1600X1200) have a very stark realistic look to them.
Biography info on how the photographer succeeded in picking up the model
Reasonable price - $24.95 |
| Cons: |
No zip downloads of photos
Only a handful of videos
Quality of videos is mediocre
Model poses are repetitive
Too many sets of the same model |
| Bottom Line: |
I liked this site despite its shortcomings for several reasons. First, I have never seen any of the girls, except for one, on any other website. The girls appear to be right off the street, most without makeup, and some appearing to need a shower. The photography appears to be done in a home and usually starts off on a couch with subsequent sets taking place on a bed. The overall look of the photos is of a snapshot you might take at home with a flash. The flesh color of the photos, unlike other sites and this is important, does not look overly warm or oversaturated. Skin color looks close to natural which lends to the gritty amateur look. The poses of the models tend to emphasize the butt and feet. The only problem is there are too many shots of the same pose throughout several or more sets for each model. It just gets repetitive! The girls themselves are not exceptionally attractive, but neither are they unattractive. I would say average to above average. I counted about 165+sets for the website in total and several videos. For many of the girls, there is a brief biography describing how the photographer met the model and convinced them to pose. The site is updated on a regular basis, but new model debuts are infrequent. Most of the new sets are just additional ones of current models. |
|
07-07-09 02:29am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
6
|
Teen Sex Mania
(0)
|
Reply of
rome476's Reply
I was looking at AT movs before subscribing to Teen Sex Mania. What sold me was the fact that Teen Sex Mania offered a network of sites in addition to the main site subscription, while AT Movs did not offer any extras. In addition, AT MOVS is not yet advertised as offering full HD videos. I intend to subscribe to AT MOVS in the future though because if shares many of the same girls showing up on Teen Sex Mania and it's bonus sites.
|
07-03-09 01:27am
|
Review
7
|
Teen Sex Mania
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Outstanding quality and quantity of cute girls who appear to be enjoying themselves.
Excellent HD quality WMV videos, format recognized by Playstation 3.
Navigation is well thought out.
When you consider the equal quality extra sites thrown in, this is an excellent value.
Regular updates. |
| Cons: |
A small number of the videos are repeated among the bonus sites.
No Mov format |
| Bottom Line: |
If I had to put this review into one phrase I would say, the Russians are cumming and yes they are. Prior to a year ago I was really down on Russian produced sites which I am assuming this site, and the extra sites are. To be specific, they seemed a big drab to me. The girls never seemed to smile, the clothing looked a bit drab, and the poses looked forced. Not anymore. There appears to be a new wave of Russian porn that is just taking hold in this country. The sites now feature some of the cutest girls I have seen on any site. Now most sites have some blue chippers, but this one and most of the included bonus sites include an extraordinarily high percentage of them. I get the impression they must have mass auditions with hundreds of applicants providing the luxury of selecting only the very very best and boy does it show. WOW!
Not only that, but the girls all seem to be having a lot of fun performing and posing and this really makes a big difference. The sets too are very bright and cheery adding to the positive atmosphere. That amateur nervous energy you very rarely see anymore is very apparent on many of the videos. Technically, the videos are very high quality. Although Teen Sex Mania is not currently advertised as HD, it is close, and many of the bonus sites already area. The photos are very high quality also. Not the state of the art best, but close enough. Navigation is another strong point. When you click to view a video set and press the back key it does not automatically go back to the top of the page forcing you to scroll down to the where you were at. It remembers where you were which makes navigation that much easier. Also, when I try and play videos from other sites on my play station, I often get an error message stating the format is unrecognized. Not here. All the movies downloaded on this site and all the bonus sites are recognized by the PS3. In summary, I am very impressed with the latest product from Russia. This site exceeds anything produced over here. It appears there is a golden age of porn emerging over there and you would be wise to check it out. |
|
07-01-09 04:03pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
8
|
Cezar Capone
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Reply
I have the full membership and can attest to the fact this is almost exactly like Bang Brothers. They even have a bang bus where they goaround picking up girls and acting obnoxious towards them. I recommend the site with reservations. The two download per day restriction can only serve to reduce their business.
|
03-12-09 10:46am
|
Reply
9
|
Cezar Capone
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Comment
You can now download two full videos per day.
|
03-12-09 09:55am
|
Review
10
|
Cezar Capone
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Some of the amateurs are real gems.
Streaming quality is exceptional (Adobe HD)
Cost is reasonable ($18 per month)
Growing site with regular updates |
| Cons: |
Limited content for now (Currently approximately 150 full scenes)
Movie downloads limited to two per day!!!
Photos are too small
Quality of photos is fair at best
Boorish behavior of male participants towards girls might offend some.
Unoriginal website layout - A clone of Bang Brothers
Unoriginal style of videos - Again a clone of Bang Brothers. |
| Bottom Line: |
Very similar to the bang brothers, but with nicer looking girls. However, there is one major flaw in that you are only allowed to download two videos per day. The exceptional streaming quality partially makes up for this, but it still is a serious shortfall. |
|
03-12-09 09:53am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
11
|
Homemade Paysite
(0)
|
Reply of
Penelope's Reply
Sorry Penelope, I did not mean to hurt your feelings. However, you need to understand this site is meant to provide objective information to other potential subscribers as to whether they should join. There are hundreds and hundreds of sites out there competing for our attention and with the economy the way it is we want to get good value for our money.
|
07-23-08 03:09am
|
Reply
12
|
I Shot Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
The videos are nothing to get excited about. Too short and the quality is not up to todays high definition standards. The photos are the main attraction.
|
07-22-08 05:08pm
|
Reply
13
|
I Shot Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Reply
I'm guessing some were shot by friends.
|
07-22-08 05:05pm
|
Review
14
|
Homemade Paysite
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
One of the girls (Chayden) is decent looking (At least in her earlier videos).
latest web videos are in high definition |
| Cons: |
Girls "DO NOT" look like girl next door amateurs. They look like bored looking professional strippers.
Only several girls in total for the entire website.
Poor value for the money |
| Bottom Line: |
I was quite disappointed with this website. The girls are not, as other reviewers have mentioned, "girl next door types". I would say they look more like burned out strippers. There was one good looking chick featured in early videos (Chayden). She looked about as close to a girl next door as any girl on the site. However as the videos progressed, she started looking more like a more like a bored gum chewing professional stripper. Another thing I was disappointed in was the lack of variety in girls. There are only several girls in total. While some of the scenes are hot, it would be nice to have more variety for the money you pay. There are many other sites out there with tons more girls offered at nearly the same price.
In summary, every once in a while I hit a clinker and this was one. Don't waste your money. There is much better out there. |
|
07-22-08 01:34am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
15
|
I Shot Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Reply
I don't understand why you would get that impression. Most of the shots are closeups at angles that clearly look like they were taken by the subject.
|
07-22-08 01:13am
|
Review
16
|
I Shot Myself
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the few megasites on the internet out there with "true" girl next door types.
Massive collection - over 3,600 folios to date.
Many many many cute girls.
Regular daily updates since 2003.
Includes detailed personal information submitted by the model herself.
3 month membership including "extras" on $45. A real bargain!!! |
| Cons: |
Non professional photography includes numerous odd angles and soft looking pictures.
There are few web videos |
| Bottom Line: |
I am surprised there is only one review of this incredible site thus far. It features a massive collection of girl next door types, mainly from Australia, and yes, some featured on the venerable Abby Winter site. Here is how it works: The girls express an interest in submitting a portfolio of themselves and the website sends the girl a camera to photograph themself. The pictures are digital snapshots, of generally high quality. The girls themselves all appears to be amateurs doing this as a form of self expression. The website also features extensive personal information submitted by the model including her reason for posing. I would say most of them look like the kind of girls you would see at a local club.
There are only a handful of websites which feature a huge quantity of genuine girl next door types. Abby Winters is the most famous, but this one has the same quality of girls, and more quantity to boot. The photographic quality and navigation is not up to Abby Winters standards, but I still recommend this site highly. All in all, this site is a tremendous value at $45 for 3 months. You can opt for a $29 membership, but does not include additional sets submitted by the girls. Trust me, you want to spend the extra $16 over 3 months to see the additional sets. It's worth it!!!!!!!!!! |
|
07-21-08 02:36pm
Replies (9)
|
Comment
17
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
|
12-02-07 08:35am
Replies (1)
|
Review
18
|
My Precious Virgins
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large selection (Approx 300-350 sets) of cute fresh faced (mostly European - If you believe the biographical data) teen amateurs
Updated weekly
Very sexy poses |
| Cons: |
Site is mostly softcore tease
No Videos available
Photographic quality is slightly below average.
The information regarding country of origin for each model seems phony. Girls listed from Korea, China, Mexico, etc.. look European to me. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is a bit hard to classify. You might call it an amateur teen photo site, mostly softcore tease, with enough lingerie and feet shots to fall under the fetish banner. The site is updated weekly and there are currently over 300 sets available. I would like to see better quality photography, high definition web videos of the girls, and more credible biography information. However, I would still consider a subscription well worth the money, just as is.
Follow-Up:
I noticed this site now features hard core HDV videos. It looks like they started adding this feature in January of 2008, so the selection is still limited. |
|
12-02-07 03:46am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
19
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
PosterDude's Reply
Best is an objective term. My review implies the same. If you like tons and tons of garish red cherry vaginal shots and fisting. I would recommend the site to anyone who favors this style. However, I have to mention, there are few sites that tease the subscriber by showing numerous videos which are no longer available. To make it worse, they give you a link to another website where you can view the videos - for an extra fee. It is the purpose of this website to help others decide whether or not they should subscribe to the various offerings out there.
|
11-27-07 02:58pm
|
Review
20
|
ALS Scan
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Excellent photo quality
Excellent high definition video quality (Later shoots)
Attractive Babe type girls
Regular updates |
| Cons: |
Vaginal shots are garish (Candy red) which is very unnatural looking.
Excessive focus on fisting
Many older videos are flagged as no longer available |
| Bottom Line: |
This site really is taste dependent. You have to like candy red vaginal shots and excessive fisting which I don't. Also, for some reason, many of the older videos are shown as no longer available for viewing. I guess the site owners don't want to spring for the extra cost of storage. |
|
11-26-07 04:16pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
21
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Excellent selection of authentic looking college girls - All never before seen.
Videos are extra long
Viewer offered choice of camera angle. POV or off to the side (One file for each angle)
Videos can be streamed or downloaded by individual scene or in total. |
| Cons: |
Video quality is only average by todays standards
No photos
Style and format of videos is copied from Exploitedteens.com which may bother some individuals |
| Bottom Line: |
I highly recommend this site to anyone looking for fresh faced amateur college girls. I counted 45 with no familiar faces. They all look and sound like they just stepped off of campus. Supposedly the girls are all from Arizona State. Anyway, I really need to mention something strange about this site. It seems the style and format is almost exactly like that of Exploitedteens which is one of my favorite sites. The only thing different is the guy behind the camera and the girls. The script is almost word for word
from Exploitedteens which by the way is very unique. I'm thinking either "Mike" from Exploitedteens is franchising his schtick or this is a blantant ripoff of another site. I don't have the answer, but I can say this is a great site and well worth the price of admission. |
|
10-09-07 11:30am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
22
|
Dirty Jason
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thanks! I found it.
|
10-09-07 11:15am
|
Reply
23
|
Dirty Jason
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
No, as mentioned it is a completed different site with different cameraman and different girls. Only the style and format is the same.
|
10-09-07 11:08am
|
Reply
24
|
Dirty Jason
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
This is http://www.exploitedcollegegirls.com. Exploitedteens.com is an entirely different site. However......they are both eerily similar in style and format. In fact, the only thing different is the guy behind the camera and the girls.
|
10-09-07 11:01am
|
Reply
25
|
Dirty Jason
(0)
|
Reply of
troglodite's Reply
I would like to put up a warning on Exploited College Teens, but this site is not yet listed on Porn User. Too bad because I would like to post a positive review of it.
|
10-08-07 04:26pm
|
