| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
51
|
Teen Sex Mania
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Outstanding quality and quantity of cute girls who appear to be enjoying themselves.
Excellent HD quality WMV videos, format recognized by Playstation 3.
Navigation is well thought out.
When you consider the equal quality extra sites thrown in, this is an excellent value.
Regular updates. |
| Cons: |
A small number of the videos are repeated among the bonus sites.
No Mov format |
| Bottom Line: |
If I had to put this review into one phrase I would say, the Russians are cumming and yes they are. Prior to a year ago I was really down on Russian produced sites which I am assuming this site, and the extra sites are. To be specific, they seemed a big drab to me. The girls never seemed to smile, the clothing looked a bit drab, and the poses looked forced. Not anymore. There appears to be a new wave of Russian porn that is just taking hold in this country. The sites now feature some of the cutest girls I have seen on any site. Now most sites have some blue chippers, but this one and most of the included bonus sites include an extraordinarily high percentage of them. I get the impression they must have mass auditions with hundreds of applicants providing the luxury of selecting only the very very best and boy does it show. WOW!
Not only that, but the girls all seem to be having a lot of fun performing and posing and this really makes a big difference. The sets too are very bright and cheery adding to the positive atmosphere. That amateur nervous energy you very rarely see anymore is very apparent on many of the videos. Technically, the videos are very high quality. Although Teen Sex Mania is not currently advertised as HD, it is close, and many of the bonus sites already area. The photos are very high quality also. Not the state of the art best, but close enough. Navigation is another strong point. When you click to view a video set and press the back key it does not automatically go back to the top of the page forcing you to scroll down to the where you were at. It remembers where you were which makes navigation that much easier. Also, when I try and play videos from other sites on my play station, I often get an error message stating the format is unrecognized. Not here. All the movies downloaded on this site and all the bonus sites are recognized by the PS3. In summary, I am very impressed with the latest product from Russia. This site exceeds anything produced over here. It appears there is a golden age of porn emerging over there and you would be wise to check it out. |
|
07-01-09 04:03pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
52
|
True Amateur Models
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Girls look like True amateurs
Decent quality photos (1600X1200) have a very stark realistic look to them.
Biography info on how the photographer succeeded in picking up the model
Reasonable price - $24.95 |
| Cons: |
No zip downloads of photos
Only a handful of videos
Quality of videos is mediocre
Model poses are repetitive
Too many sets of the same model |
| Bottom Line: |
I liked this site despite its shortcomings for several reasons. First, I have never seen any of the girls, except for one, on any other website. The girls appear to be right off the street, most without makeup, and some appearing to need a shower. The photography appears to be done in a home and usually starts off on a couch with subsequent sets taking place on a bed. The overall look of the photos is of a snapshot you might take at home with a flash. The flesh color of the photos, unlike other sites and this is important, does not look overly warm or oversaturated. Skin color looks close to natural which lends to the gritty amateur look. The poses of the models tend to emphasize the butt and feet. The only problem is there are too many shots of the same pose throughout several or more sets for each model. It just gets repetitive! The girls themselves are not exceptionally attractive, but neither are they unattractive. I would say average to above average. I counted about 165+sets for the website in total and several videos. For many of the girls, there is a brief biography describing how the photographer met the model and convinced them to pose. The site is updated on a regular basis, but new model debuts are infrequent. Most of the new sets are just additional ones of current models. |
|
07-07-09 02:29am
Replies (0)
|
Review
53
|
Yanks.com
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the best collections of authentic looking amateurs on the net.
Most girls are extremely attractive, intelligent, articulate, and very likable.
Huge selection of videos. Most have both interviews and individual masturbation scenes.
Excellent value
Site features written biographies of each model, similar to Abby Winters.
Site is very active and updated regularly |
| Cons: |
Video quality could use some improvement although it is totally acceptable. As with most sights that have been around for a long time, the quality improves as you go along. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is a hidden gem. I would rank it up there as one of the top amateurs sites on the net today. Here you have a very large collection of authentic looking college intellectual bohemian co-ed types primarily from the Northwest usually performing their first porn shot. Believe me, these are not the type of girls you expect to be doing a porn! In any case, The girls are usually very positive about the experience and it shows. The typical format is to open with an interview of the model in street clothes with no makeup, conducted by a very cool laid back female who really knows how to relax the girls and get them to open up about themselves. This serves as a warmup to one or more masturbation scenes. If ever there was a site that fit the term "Organic porn" this would be it. Very highly recommended!!!! |
|
06-04-12 05:29pm
Replies (1)
|
|
