| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
226
|
Latina Caliente
(0)
62.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
The girls, especially Lucci, are hot and the videos have good action. Other than that, there's not much more else "pro" about it. It's a part of the Adult Reality Network, giving you access to 14 other sites including Euro Bride Tryouts and Teen Hitchhikers, but the price and the cons make this a network not worth joining. |
| Cons: |
The network runs close to $40 a month. Also, the files are now DRM protected (they didn't used to be at least a year ago). That means you have to keep paying $40 a month just to continuing seeing what you already downloaded. Video quality isn't the best and alot of videos don't have a full or even 3-part downloading but rather minute clips. |
| Bottom Line: |
The cost is too much and the vids are DRM protected, which means probably no one will get their money's worth out of this website or network. Although there are a few videos worth seeing, like Lucci who has a hot video, it's pretty worthless because you have to stay a member forever to keep it. |
|
06-05-07 04:47pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
227
|
Brazilian Facials
(0)
|
|
06-01-07 09:52am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
228
|
Hush Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Woodruff's Review
Do you remember if vids were streaming only or if there was a mix of stream/download? I like the concepts of a lot of the sites but I just don't join streaming websites.
|
05-25-07 04:31pm
|
Reply
229
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
forddk's Review
why's the 3-day trial a waste of money? what do you get, is it limited or are you saying there's too much content and not enough time?
|
05-24-07 10:57am
|
Reply
230
|
Naughty Bookworms
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Comment
I was a member of this site twice: once years ago when the whole Naughty Universe network was still up-and-coming and again after they were as big as they are now. One thing is for sure - Naughty Bookworms or Bookworm Bitches as it used to be called - was great when it was BWB. The girls back then were either completely new girls or fairly new pornstars without many scenes yet like Cherry Poppens and Lisa Marie, it had a true amateur feel and was grainy as if the camera really was hidden. Now, as Naughty Bookworms, it's completely a production feel - the videos are better than perfect quality, the dialogue and scenes don't give it any type of "true" feel, and the girls look like pornstars with glasses like you said.
Pretty much, yeah, it used to be a great site with a great concept and believable girls and storylines, really playing on the "I'm a college student and don't want an F, what can I do?". Now it's just a big production and in my mind not worth it, unless you want to join the whole network which is huge and obviously worth the price.
|
05-10-07 02:19pm
|
Reply
231
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
tech101's Comment
Obviously everyone's experience is different, but I haven't had a problem with any downloads from Videosz or xmovies. I only download WMV files and haven't been a member for two months not, but my vids are still working perfectly. Not sure what the difference is between both of us. Has anyone else had problems? Just wondering if I got lucky and all my videos worked fine or if maybe something weird happened for you.
|
04-26-07 05:07pm
|
Reply
232
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I like the daily polls because if I have nothing to do during the day I can just pop on to here and answer a poll or two that I missed. Polls are fun, bottom line
|
04-22-07 08:41am
|
Reply
233
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The only sites I joined without trying the trial first were Brazilian Facials and Cathys Cravings. Both sites were excellent and I think they would do even more business if they offered a two-day, full access trial, although Cathy's website is cheap enough to not need one. But Brazilian Facials is still pretty much unknown and could do better if they let people sample it first. Trials are the easiest way to determine if to join a site - I've decided against really bad sites after sampling the area and stayed on others (videobox, bangbros) for over four months thanks to a trial.
|
04-22-07 08:33am
|
Reply
234
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
DRM protection or stream-only websites. I don't see the point in joining a stream-only site
|
04-22-07 08:29am
|
Review
235
|
Butts And Blacks
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Quick downloads
Best video quality on the network
Lots of High-res pictures for each update
Links to all 12 sites on the Brazzers Pass, meaning you get hundreds of videos
Each girl's page links to all of her other videos on the network, making it easy to see your favorites as each girl has an average of about 4 videos on the network
Biggest site on the network as in the most updates |
| Cons: |
While the quality is the best on the network, all the sites and their videos on the network come maybe an half inch smaller than other places, but it's not noticeable. |
| Bottom Line: |
Video quality for Butts and Blacks came across to me as the best quality on the Brazzers network. Overall, with 12 sites for one price with hundreds of videos, it is worth a quick shot. Ability to add favorite girls and the way they easily link all of a girls updates throughout the network keep this site in the 90's. |
|
04-22-07 08:27am
Replies (0)
|
Review
236
|
Brazzers
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Brazzers Pass comes complete with 12 sites, most of them either with a big butts, big boobs or interracial theme - most of them mixed together. It seems they probably shoot four or five scenes the same day for the different sites because each girl has multiple videos on the different sites, meaning you'll get to see a lot of your favorites.
Quick downloads and comes in full or 1-minute clips
Ability to add favorite girls so you can come back to them easily
Easy navigation with all on 1 page |
| Cons: |
Video quality on half of the network sites leaves more to be desired.
Every once in a while one site - Racks and Blacks - would not let me login unless I logged into that site first. Overall it wasn't too much of a problem, I just logged on to that site first from then on but it can be a hinderance and should be fixed. |
| Bottom Line: |
They hit the ball with the navigation, as you get to scroll between websites on the network, save girls as your favorites for later, and they even include a link to her other videos on the network with each page. So if you're looking at Carmella Crush on Racks and Blacks, at the bottom of the page are the links to all of her videos on the network. Each girl has an average of 4 videos, with Mia Banng probably taking the title with about 12.
Video quality leaves a little more to be desired, although 3 sites (Hot Chicks big asses, big wet butts and butts and blacks) all have great quality. Clips are downloadable as either entire clip or 1-minute clips, and you get pages and pages of high-res pics for each update.
Overall it's a great price for the amount of content and the quality of the performances. Would recommend highly. |
|
04-22-07 08:17am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
237
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Poll
It seems that alot of things can be taken to make the trust meter better for the whole. I don't think it should be limited to members with a certain number of points (maybe at least 1 rating posted though), but I also favor an anonymous comment section that a user has to madatorily fill out for a "no" vote. This is so that the users learn what about their reviews caused someone to be skeptical, and also ensures that people who vote "no" contribute to the community by their input.
The main reason why there should be an anonymous comment section is to help keep the community active. If a user gets six no votes without knowing why, that could discourage them from participating in the site if they begin to think that what they say isn't worth anything. However, useful comments for "no" votes are a way to keep them interested in posting rather than feeling too personal.
|
04-07-07 11:58am
|
Reply
238
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Oasis's News
Sounds good! I was a member a while ago but unfortunatly haven't been a member for about a year now. Seems to be about time to catch up on my favorite Arizona woman again
|
04-01-07 09:19pm
|
Reply
239
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
DRM
|
04-01-07 09:15pm
|
Comment
240
|
Gods Girls
(0)
|
|
03-27-07 11:46am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
241
|
Ruth Blackwell
(0)
|
|
03-26-07 06:27pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
242
|
Easy Dater
(0)
76.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
A lot of videos
Fairly cheap price
About 95% amateurs, although each couple has two scenes
Great idea for an amateur site
Some hot amateurs
Over 40 videos |
| Cons: |
Only a few vidcaps for each episode, no high res
Videos are split in 2 or 3 parts, depending on video
Not always the best quality camera-wise
Is an amateur (mainly) site so you probably won't be attracted to every girl
Doesn't update often...maybe once a month or two |
| Bottom Line: |
EasyDater is a "reality" site where two people meet online for a date, but the girl says 'no' to the date and 'yes' for a quick one night stand. All except for three girls I noticed were amateurs and look like amateurs - no porn star bodies or talent but true "reality" feel.
Each couple has two scenes, meaning that you they shot two videos with two different storylines which I like becuase if you get a favorite you can see her twice. Most of the videos end with the girl kicking the guy out - either after an incidentally forgetting to pull out or husband comes home or she decides she doesn't like him. Very rarely is there a pop shot - most of the time they pretend he forgot to pull out and she kicks him out but you don't see any evidence that it really happened other than acting.
They only have vidcaps for each scene and some of the video qualities aren't that great, but at 19.99 I can muster it for a month or two which helps the rating. If you like the reality gig, this is a must try site. |
|
03-25-07 10:24am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
243
|
Banged Moms
(0)
|
Reply of
spacemanspiff's Review
How many network sites are included? Wondering to see how many sites are included at the $30 price. Also, what are the download options (minute clips, full clips, 3 parts?). I know most of their sites were filmed in Europe...is the language in English?
|
03-25-07 10:06am
|
Review
244
|
Katie Thomas
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Potential to be a great interracial site with more time
Multiple download options
Regular updates each week
High Res pics
Good uality and different scene types keeps each update fresh |
| Cons: |
No network membership
Isn't as talented as other single-girl sites, although is fresher than Spring Thomas was towards the end of her website
Doesn't seem to fully enjoy taking pop shots yet
Cost is too high for a single site |
| Bottom Line: |
Katie is picking up the torch from Spring Thomas and does it well. She's not as raunchy or talented as Spring but she looks good if not better. Updates are regular each week with High Quality pics and downloadable options for low, medium and broadband.
Membership comes with a free one-day trial for network sites but value would be much better if all sites were included. If you have time, wait until the site is a few months older so you have more vids, although there are over 20 now. |
|
03-24-07 10:54pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
245
|
Ruth Blackwell
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Made by same crew as BlacksOnBlondes, spring and glory hole so the production is good
Cameos by most of your favorite stars |
| Cons: |
High price for amount of vids
Downloading problems
Not all of girls featured on preview are in members area |
| Bottom Line: |
The most unacceptable thing for a site is to not have all the girls featured in the preview page. In this case, one of the main reasons I joined was because I was interested in just about every guest featured on the preview page, but a few of my faves that were on there weren't in the members area at all. For some reason, I also had problems downloading on this site, although I haven't had problems on the other sites run by the company (BoB, Spring, GloryHole).
It's only one scene of the close to 20 videos, but Naomi looks completely uninterested or high, which doesn't make for good quality. Other gripes with the scenes include this being a site about how Ruth gets the other girls hooked on black guys, but most of the action is with her while the other looks on...not good in terms of what the premise is. |
|
03-24-07 10:46pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
246
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The largest IR site on the net
Over 230 videos as of late March, with only 1 or 2 repeat girls
Free trial signup for network sites
High-Res pics, not vidcaps |
| Cons: |
Bad organization/No Search feature
First 70 videos come as short clips or Full download only
No real extras...just this site and cartoons/personals sections that I didn't care for |
| Bottom Line: |
BOB is the longest running and largest IR site on the web. This means the number of videos is probably the largest anywhere (230 full scenes). However, you don't get much of anything else besides the High-Res pics accompanying each set. They give you a free one-day trial to sites like Katie Thomas, Spring Thomas and Glory Hole, but then it's 30 bucks for those too.
The earliest vidz come only as short clips or full 230 MB videos while the latest 160 videos come as short clips or downloadable into three parts, which with this full fill size of 230MB I prefer the three parts. The best videos come in the middle of the lifespan...the earliest just aren't the best quality while the newest aren't too exciting like they used to be. Some faves are Cherry Poppens, Candace Cox, Elise, Jennifer, Kasey Dean, Venus and Honey.
Join if all you want is a plethora of videos as there are plenty to keep you occupied for at least one renewal. Don't expect to use the site for much else though. |
|
03-22-07 10:29pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
247
|
Solo Interviews
(0)
|
Reply of
DivBZero's Review
I haven't checked solo interviews yet, but their network sites OyeLoca and InnocentHigh do indeed have high quality pics. Or rather, just to be safe, i'll say they are smaller in size (700x1050) but high quality regarding how they look. They don't look anything like vidcaps or amateur-ish. They look like any other sites High-Res pics but smaller in size. Video quality wasn't DVD quality like some great sites but wasn't worse than any other regular site and I never questioned it until reading the review.
I agree that this site is not as good as the other sites in the network, but does it really deserve a 51? Is that based just on the pics (it is mainly a video site)? I'd think, based on the things you pointed out that they did wrong, that the site would be in the 70's, described as: Average, some things done right, some things done wrong or 60's: does more wrong than right, low recommendation.
51 just seems low for a site costing 17.84 a month with 4 other sites included (over 100 vids all together), has a score of 78 by TBP and five 80's out of seven other sites reviews, no DRM or download limit (not anymore). Even a site with vidcaps only would be at least Average with all those added at that price, but this site DOES have actual higher quality pics, just not as high (pixels) as others which you wouldn't notice unless you used a program that showed pixels like photoshop or irfanview.
|
03-13-07 10:35pm
|
Review
248
|
Oye Loca
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Great Network
great price
Lots of girls with updates every week
High Quality Pics
Full, 3-part or 1 minute clip vids for each
Ability to save favorite scenes to easily come back later
NO DRM |
| Cons: |
Site still small (34 episodes though) and less than a year old. Not really many gripes except not all of the girls seem to be Latina. |
| Bottom Line: |
It's a Latina site but a few of the girls seem to be strictly white. But you never know. The site is still fairly new (less than a year old) but has 34 videos as of mid-March with updates each week. This along with access to other sites on the network makes this a great buy. |
|
03-13-07 01:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
249
|
Innocent High
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Great Network
great price
Lots of girls with updates every week
High Quality Pics
Full, 3-part or 1 minute clip vids for each
Ability to save favorite scenes to easily come back later
NO DRM |
| Cons: |
While I'm glad there's a lot of girls I normally like to see, storylines of them being 18 is completely unbelievable |
| Bottom Line: |
Innocent gets you access to Oye Loca, Solo Interviews, Trailertrashcuties and EuroCityLife. Innocent High gets nothing but great looking girls, although they are not 18, with many being some of your favorite internet porn girls like Kinzy Jo, Charlotte Stokely or others. Different downloading options and high quality pics please all people and regular updates make this a great buy, especially if you sign up through The Best Porn. |
|
03-13-07 01:19pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
250
|
BangBus
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
haha yes for the most part BangBus is great - good quality of pics/videos, huge quantity and probably the best quality of material for a great price. Like i said in the review, the only negatives i really have are that they deleted early material. But if you weren't a member then, then you wouldn't even know, nor does it matter with all of hte material. I do wish that they would add BrandiBelle to the network though. If I have to pick a negative it's that the file sizes are so huge for full videos. But they've even added a feature to see all videos by a star which makes it even better than it used to be. Still 100 :)
|
03-02-07 11:56am
|
