| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
201
|
Cathy's Craving
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Loads and loads of content
WMV and MPG downloadable options
High-res and vidcap pictures
Access to five sites - all Cathy but different niches
An amateur site where she truly does interact to and respond to member emails regularly
Doesn't use condoms, so great for those that love creampies
Mostly interracial content, although all of the sites aren't specifically interracial
Good mature amateur site that is organized |
| Cons: |
Some videos don't offer full downloads
Good quality vids take a lot of space (think Bang Bros high quality)
Individual site so if you don't like her there's nothing else here for you
No search option or time stamping |
| Bottom Line: |
Cathy offers a lot of content and if you either find her attractive or think her content is hot, then you will be hard pressed to find a website with a better cost-content ratio. For $15/month this is a true steal.
This is more of a video site but they do offer pictures. It's all filmed in places like hotel rooms or complexes because it truly is just a woman that likes to have sex with men. She doesn't use condoms (allergic) so many scenes end in creampies or sometimes just cumswapping. And once you see a creampie, don't assume the action is over; normally it's just halfway through.
Sign up for the weekly newsletter to get added content, status of updates and chances to meet Cathy . |
|
12-20-07 07:41pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
202
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
abbywinters's Reply
Thanks for the information to all three of you
|
12-20-07 05:06am
|
Reply
203
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
johnymac's Comment
I haven't had a problem and been a member for months. No idea why a few people have had that problem then, but just throwing it out that it's been fine for me.
|
12-11-07 06:01pm
|
Comment
204
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
|
12-11-07 05:59pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
205
|
N/A
|
Reply of
TheViking's Poll
My only problem is in their service. I like Epoch (Paycom) because you can truly search for sites and the different prices on their website. CCBill says they have a search feature but no matter what you type, you get this list of 300 sites to sort through and never find the one you're looking for. How hard is it to copy Paycom's model?
|
12-05-07 04:32am
|
Reply
206
|
Innocent High
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I haven't been a member in a while so I can't tell you if that limit is truly in place, but the limit didn't seem to be there when I was a member even though it was listed as having a limit. I download alot and never was blacklisted.
|
12-05-07 04:28am
|
Review
207
|
Vaginal Cumshots
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Who doesn't like a good creampie site that's 100% exclusive?
Loaded with bonus sites. If you do it right, you could join three network for less than 10 dollars.
Almost exclusively amateurs, Kayla Marie and Cherry Poppens are the only porn star I noticed.
Some of the girls are available in multiple videos throughout the network, giving you multiple views of a few amateurs you may like (Tara, Ashley) |
| Cons: |
Bad video quality
Doesn't update at all
Only enough videos to last one month |
| Bottom Line: |
Vaginal Cumshots is an old website. It doesn't update and the video quality is piss poor. However you can get in a few good videos here, like Tara, Ashley, Kayla and Cherry. When you join, make sure you join the other two networks as well for one month each at one dollar each. That will give you plenty of sites at a cheap price, although they all fall in the same boat regarding updates and quality.
Overall, it could be worth a quick trial to download the videos. Mostly they come in either 2 or 3 clips or a full scene. Nice good amateurs, something that's rare these days. |
|
11-25-07 04:11pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
208
|
Border Bangers
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
20 sites included in network
Great premise with latinas exchanging sex for citizenship
Only hot girls, no MILFs or average lookers
Multiple download options
Some of your favorite latinas are available |
| Cons: |
Doesn't update
Some videos have a porn feel rather than reality feel
Not too mnay videos/updates
No full scenes
Older videos look a little grainy |
| Bottom Line: |
Border Bangers does what so many good reality sites do - has a good premise and reality feel and then changes to a strictly porn video look. The site began simple enough with girls getting caught and then having sex with INS for citizenship. Early favorites that you might notice include Sonia Lopez, Chance, Domino and Megan Martinez. There's also videos of Sophia Costello and Sativa (I was able to get her a couple of years ago when i first joined). Don't expect to see "girl next door" type latinas running from the law - they're all 10's which kind of is a bummer.
Where this site really falls off is that it hasn't updated in forever. Not only that but it's not like there was a plethora of videos in the first place. Also, there are no full scene download options.
You do get access to about 20 other sites and most follow the reality gig, including College Fuck Fest, Black Bros White Hos and Teen Brazil (not reality though).
Overall, you can get enough content at the price to make you happy, but don't plan on staying a member forever because eventually you'll run out of reasons to stay since they don't update. |
|
11-25-07 03:52pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
209
|
Big Fat Creampie
(0)
|
|
11-25-07 03:35pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
210
|
Real Drunken Girls
(0)
|
|
11-20-07 08:18pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
211
|
Real Drunken Girls
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Extremely real and the amount of vomiting in these videos shows that its not acting.
New videos give multiple options-Middle, High and DVD quality
Delivers what the tour and premise promises
Eight bonus sites included (I had to e-mail them and get the password to work though)
More content than you could get through in a one month subscription |
| Cons: |
Not in English
The worst members-site organization ever
A lot of scenes don't have a full video option, and those that do are split into two "full video" parts - drinking and fluffing & the drunk action.
Cost is too high for a site that takes forever to find what you're looking for. |
| Bottom Line: |
Real Drunken Girls delivers what is promised - video of guys getting these girls completely hammered and then taking advantage of them. One word to the wise, the site is not filmed in USA and as a result there is no English so no enjoying the set-up. Obviously 95% of "reality" sites on the internet are staged, but I would honestly put my money that this site is the real deal. They show the massive amounts of alcohol consumed and in every video the girls vomit from the alcohol - and it's not a cut scene where they have time to prep. They blow it out of nowhere and in one or two scenes it actually ended the action b/c of how messy it got.
Organization is where this site loses at least 10 overall points. There's no way to describe it except to say that the videos are organized chronologically, except it's the worst possible structure. There's no way to just click a girl/scene and then go to the videos or pictures of that one. Each scene has about 8 or 9 updates and they are all listed side-by-side on about 30 pages, making it impossible to find a particular season.
Eight bonus sites are included, including Pregnant Wishes. However they all follow the same site design, meaning good luck finding a certain scene you may have liked in the tour/preview.
Video quality for the most part is High Def on the "full scene" videos and middle to high on the minute clips. Overall, a great site if organization gets fixed so you can find whatever scene you want to see. |
|
11-20-07 08:15pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
212
|
Tokyo Group Sex
(0)
|
|
11-18-07 01:52pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
213
|
Old Man Tales
(0)
|
Reply of
Shakermaker's Review
So is the trial membership full or limited/restricted?
|
08-15-07 08:04pm
|
Reply
214
|
N/A
|
Reply of
DivBZero's Poll
I prefer Paycom. Their customer support and site search features are lightyears ahead of CCBill. But I will also join CCBill sites but that's about it for high priced sites. Lower priced sites (19.99 or less), then I can experiment.
|
08-13-07 08:00pm
|
Reply
215
|
Monsters of Cock
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Comment
I joined one individual site - Bang Bus - and have access to 15 different sites: big mouthfuls, bang bus, monsters of cock, ballhoneys, milflesson, assparade, blowjob ninjas, bang bros clips, big tits round asses, spring break, tugjobs, moms anal adventure, bang bros worldwide, boobsquad and mr. cameltoe.
I don't know what happened in your situation...did you e-mail them and tell them the problem? When I first joined my user and pass didn't work for the first day, but then I e-mailed and got my access and the 15 sites (some great, some can do without) are worth the price.
|
08-09-07 07:14pm
|
Reply
216
|
Porn Oasis
(0)
|
Reply of
OUMarcus's Comment
Haven't been a member in a year. The video quality wasn't anything you'll find on a big/network site or anything mainly because it really is just Oasis with her husband filming and maybe a sound guy or two. However, there is tons and tons of content - pics and vids. In the event you decide to try, you should also give Cathy's Cravings a shot, although the content type is slightly different. They often feature each other in sets on each other's websites because they're friends outside of the business, but Cathy's I would say is a better value. Both are very affordable though, under $15
|
08-06-07 05:21pm
|
Reply
217
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
I don't agree that reasons should be moderated...other users can look at the reasons and judge for themselves if they think it was warranted enough of a reason or not. There should just be mandotory "no" reasons to help out the users being rated.
|
07-14-07 02:31pm
|
Reply
218
|
Freaks Of Cock
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Comment
Agreed. I hate the concept/execution of this site.
|
07-13-07 07:52pm
|
Reply
219
|
BangBus
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
I've actually given that alot of thought since that initial review (which was one of my firsts). While I can't change that review, I can give it a follow up review and change the score. I actually went to do that today until I saw the help guidelines for ways to score websites when I saw:
"100 Perfect Site is perfect, could do little to improve. Top recommendation."
While I know 99% of people will believe (as I normally would have) that no site deserves a 100, the review guidelines show that some sites in fact do merit a 100, which in this case Bang Bus does. Actually, the network deserves the 100 b/c it's simply so much content with so many download options and picture options and the ability to save your favorite scenes for later, they keep adding new sites to the network and it's still cheaper than alot of sites that only give membership to one place.
All that coupled warrants in my mind the 100 because there is little they can do to improve (some things maybe like a Next Week's Update) but that's all I can think of. The network deserves a top recommendation but I just happened to do it all for bang bus instead of reviewing each individual site.
|
06-27-07 07:29pm
|
Reply
220
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jd1961's Poll
Like earlier, I think that a "Yes" trust rating is fine as is...if someone trusts you then you don't need much more reason. If there's a "No" trust rating, they should be required to fill out a comment telling why, but the author of the comment (and the rating itself) could still be anonymous. You don't need to know who rated/gave you a comment, users would probably just like to know why they received a certain rating/comment to help them in their later reviews.
|
06-25-07 12:44pm
|
Reply
221
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
I'm still in favor of a mandatory anonymous comment if someone votes "no" on your trust rating. This helps users understand the community and what it is that makes people not trust their reviews so they can improve in the future.
Maybe it's also because I've received two "No's" recently without having written a review in the past month. I have no idea why I have no's, and therefore I can't fix it with my next reviews.
|
06-23-07 06:33am
|
Reply
222
|
Ox Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
That's what I thought. Thanks for the official; I don't think someone believed it when I said it
|
06-17-07 03:23pm
|
Reply
223
|
Ox Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Boobs4ever's Comment
While obviously you can join these different names, I've always been under the impression that they were run by the same people and are essentially the same network. No matter which one I've joined (because I can't remember which one but I've been a member of the networks various times) I've never had a problem logging in to any of the sites. I pretty much just think they're the same thing, just different names which is good marketing because it gets it out there that much more.
|
06-16-07 10:58am
|
Reply
224
|
Naughty At Home
(0)
|
Reply of
BostonPJR's Review
Stumbled across a preview for this today and it definately looks like a very good site. I'm an avid fan of Cathy at Cathys Cravings but based on the reviews I may have to try Des...although the price is twice as much as Cathy.
|
06-05-07 09:46pm
|
Comment
225
|
Squirt Hunter
(0)
|
|
06-05-07 05:17pm
Replies (2)
|
