| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
301
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I said: poor quality - but it could be Low bandwidth/low download speed, I guess.
...and btw: also:
Non-exclusive content!
Still and bottom line: I'll go for: Poor Quality
But any of the others is a no-no!
|
03-09-12 07:44am
|
Reply
302
|
Diabolic
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Keep those warnings coming, pat - and agree 100 pct - fine reviews/recommendations are swell - but those serious warnings are even more - much - more important.
|
03-07-12 06:40am
|
Reply
303
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
2 days - fine. 3 days maximum - I'll miss getting new poll more often, if it went up to five days...
|
03-07-12 06:35am
|
Reply
304
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Fine, fine review here, honored rearadmiral...
Found some newer downloads - free ones - from the ol' Penthouse - which, btw - has not been too keen on giving us fine quality vids in the past.
It looks like, it's changed.
The quality and the style seems to have stepped up - and thanks to your review, I'll probably give this ol' site a try - thumbs up!
|
03-06-12 08:21am
|
Reply
305
|
Cara Brett
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
Oh, oh....Melissa Debling is a looker, for sure. But your're right - it certainly looks like the same site set up and probably the same WM...
|
03-06-12 03:40am
|
Reply
306
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Did not know about those rumours - but that guy can really ruin my porn/avoid me downloading a scene with a sweet girl/model - and I just hate that.
If he's really such a jerk in general...why do the girls/models still say ok...well, it could be another thread....
|
03-05-12 07:34am
|
Reply
307
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Forgot one:
Don't know his name - and do not care much/want to go Google the name - but this in the US porn world well known over/extremely tattoed former "lover" of Tera Patrick - who went to the cute Little Lupe/Zuleidy..
Those scenes with this disgusting character that would make any Hells Angels, Bandidos, Outlaws ect.-biker blush with envy made me feel sorry for that petite Lupe... but like Willie and Waylon sings:
"Ladies love outlaws"....still: Jeeeeez - this/these scenes almost make my avoid the former great Lupe!
|
03-05-12 07:25am
|
Review
308
|
Cara Brett
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ A solo site with a very beautiful (that's of course subjective) British model.
+ Fine quality (tech) videos - download.
+ Average/ok quality streaming vids.
+ Ok/average quality pix sets
+ Some zip - see below
+ Known/reliable billing co's (CCbill and Epoch).
+ Blog
+ General feed-back from model
+ Easy navigation
+ DL manager can be used |
| Cons: |
- No "pussy-shoots" - naked, but not intimate
- No separate link to updates
- Only about half of the pix sets have zip
- So called private vids are tame
- No other models, no bonus-deals
- The price is too high
- Generally hard to find updates
- Only one download at the time |
| Bottom Line: |
There are some good things to say about this somewhat new site, but - alas - the site needs quite some work. In too many ways...
This is her own solo site, but certainly not made by herself - and boy, could she do with better guidance.
Cara Brett is a 24-25 years old British softcore model - full breasted blond - and - I think - very beautiful.
Found her first else where "out there" on a couple of very sexy clips with dirty talk (but no total nude).
So why not go for her own site - good question, but I'll say: wait.
I was very disappointed after I joined:
Her vids are mostly boring - in spite of her sexy beauty. In the (average 5-8 minutes) vids she appears in different sexy outfits - and thats nice. But you only get like half a minute of Cara in total nude - and mostly from behind - or an awkward way of avoiding seeing her clit in front..
She's got these primary deals:
Gallery
Self Shot Gallery
Videos
Behind The Scenes (vids)
Private Videos
Going for the Private Videos do not expect real dirty talk - it's more like soft, very soft tease talk.
There are at the moment 12 of these private vids.
There are 30 solo/strip vids.
All vids are to download - or stream.
1920x1080 - only in WMV (8500 kbps)
The pix sets - 32 - are in 1600x1065 and 1200x798 - strangely mixed in the same sets.
More peculiar is that, only about half have zip???
As a little extra - if anyone cares - there's Mobile Diary and Message Me.
Care Brett is a looker, but how I'd like to see someone more pro make a site for her.
And BTW-bottom line:
Her tits look somewhat real - they could be - not that typical silicone style.
But - alas - they are not. Studying some photos (oh, they'll be studied, lol) - there are small scars underneath.... |
|
03-05-12 06:35am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
309
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
When I stumbled across some scenes with faeces, I not only lost appetite for food, but also for porn - the rest of that day..
And I've been disgusted with some normally regular site scenes where the male part goes very brutal in anal porn. Think they're called gape-scenes - where this aversion of mine: the Russian male actor, Timo acts like a jerk...
Not into anal in general - but definitely not the brutal kinds - (and not talking about bondage/BDSM ect.)
|
03-05-12 05:29am
|
Reply
310
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Mostly/sometimes - depend: If it's one of the old, well known Top-sites where we all are aware of the price - a price that's been the same for years....then: normally not.
BUT: When encountering a new site, I definitely compare the content and the price - also in the score.
But bottom line: Capn is right - it's Value For Money...
|
03-02-12 08:37am
|
Reply
311
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Put this poll up for one main reason: The - sometimes - totally confused search for certain models...(we've had threads on this item several times).
And - as we've had some inputs from webmasters earlier - stating that some models insists on choosing their alias/"stagename".
Other webmasters have told me in mails, that it's not the question. Some sites choose the "stagename" in order to get some exclusive names...
And if that's really the case....some sites, some webmasters really keep us in a black hole in our ongoing search!!!!!
|
02-28-12 05:55am
|
Reply
312
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
Surprise, surprise....agree with Droolers input...
AND apart from the fake deals in body surgery - the "fake" deals in production, editing, stupid remarks ect. is taking over - generally to the worse...
A few - too few - sites are avoiding that negative development in porn.
|
02-26-12 08:15am
|
Reply
313
|
Creampie Thais
(0)
|
Reply of
Doctor Blues's Comment
You may want to take a looks at this little ol' link:
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=45906
|
02-24-12 12:25am
|
Reply
314
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
Maybe it's a question of the entire setup at this site - it may seem attractive to some - and it may be attractive when you join and get overwhelmed - by the amount. And then to some: A disapointment of quality in general.
Still it should come as no surprise with the very different scores - this site in particular has been debated over and over again - with all it's "plus and minus"
Will not go into details - the details have been around about Videobox as long as TBP/PU - but guess it still comes down to the gap between "the amount" and "the quality" - it does to this user, anyway.....
|
02-23-12 06:52am
|
Reply
315
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Nada, no interest. Not even for sapphic erotica...
|
02-23-12 06:44am
|
Reply
316
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
It's a somewhat difficult site - I am and always has been partial to full body vids - and In The Crack have them for sure, great ones - maybe the best - but as the name goes: Crack - alas too, way too many loooooong close-up vids that would make some hospital/doctor happy....
And no - I'm not a gynecologists and not into it - so ten minuttes of insides do not appeal to me..
Still those full body vids... great - and for those I could maybe still go to a top score like this 95, maybe...
But: They also - still - got that damn regional pricing - and if you want to avoid that - you got to make bank payments - no deal, here.
Been a member a couple of times, but fed up with paying more from Europe.
|
02-21-12 07:25am
|
Reply
317
|
Body Parts.biz
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
Bummer, RB - plain Bummer........
BTW, of course: Thanks for the warning.
|
02-21-12 07:16am
|
Reply
318
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Ambivalent - really like them when "authentic" on Latina models....
Otherwise don't care much
|
02-21-12 03:15am
|
Reply
319
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
It's a hard one - (oh, yes - I know I submitted the poll) - still:
Looking back over quite some years - and looking at my saved stash, Nubiles has probably supplied some of my most favorite vids. Ok, from way time back.
The same goes for Teendreams - vids from both these sites are those I go back to and watch when fed up hunting for new material.
In spite of the quality (mostly) of DDF and 21Sextury vids, I'm a bit surprised how seldom I turn back to watch those...
|
02-15-12 05:12am
|
Reply
320
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Poll
Today, I definitely choose to wait - to make a review - at a new/till now an unknown site with low/small content normally needs more focus....
And some of those so called top scores - you got to handle with care when it comes to entirely new sites.
Remember you have an obligation towards your fellow PUs...
So: No, review them later .....OR be patience for at least a couple of weeks to get to know the site before a review.
|
02-12-12 09:17am
|
Reply
321
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
paulmarkham's Reply
Sorry to hear about your health - hope for the best...
And sorry - also for us - to hear about the site.
In many ways the site has supplied me with a lot of fine material in the past - man, you even got vids of great Misty McCain - who has now "banned" all her earlier material...
All the best
Denner
|
02-10-12 08:27am
|
Reply
322
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The "I consider it a few days" - is pretty good...so that's my vote.
And of course, it's the content - but that's what it's all about, is it not?.
So a new site (never joined before) or a well known one, I do not rush into it - anymore. Yes, the term "consider" is the deal...
|
02-10-12 08:21am
|
Reply
323
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Well, no - and just like RBs conclusion: Boring.
With one exption, at least at first glance: The clips you can find everywhere with the gorgeous Marisa Tomei from The Wrestler.
|
02-09-12 06:57am
|
Reply
324
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Laptopbs's Comment
Is the billing local(Brazzers own)?
Anyway, it's not good for any user (PU) to get that kind of hassle.....and again why has this particular site had so many problems from users for such a long time...?
Just take a look at the comments, where we find words from users like: scam, con artists, crooks...
Bottom line: STRANGE - that a site with so much fine content and so much attention is so BAD at it's handling of paying members. SHAME...
|
02-07-12 08:34am
|
Reply
325
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
"I live here"
Visit it more than once almost every day - for the reviews, the comments, the polls, the forum ect...
For a porn-addict it would be frustrating if PU wasn't around.
Fine poll, BTW
|
02-06-12 05:54am
|
