| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
351
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Of course - I check it out often...
|
01-15-12 06:31am
|
Reply
352
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
dieselman's Reply
Thanks!
Well, yes - got to join very soon - look forward to the content.
Hope you get those issues solved. But then again I'm confident to get a feedback if any problems occur....thumbs up for the reply!
|
01-15-12 06:29am
|
Reply
353
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Jent's Comment
With the risk of getting yet another - what do you call it in English - "reprimand" from the webmaster of the Diesel Media I got this input:
It's a damn shame with those access problems - a deal that'd make me turn away - fast and furious...and ask: WHY??
BUT: I've been browsing the content of both Young Legal Porn and 18 Only Girls - and that content looks better and better.
I want to join again - one of these two sites - but I'd like to get some answer to Jents input here - from the webmaster...
When I join and pay for a site, I think it's obvious that you get access without delay...
|
01-14-12 09:14am
|
Reply
354
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Sandstone's Reply
BTW, Sandstone - something that came up later on: Of course the video re-editing is a long and probably slow process when we think about the amount here - even going back to that one single HC-vid with Eve Angel in the bathroom - or the great vids of Dana/Vera..ect..
BUT: Like Rusty J - I was not able to find any links at the "Fanclub" section - to those lists.....
Another BTW: I'm overwhelmed by the great download-speed (best around) - but mostly it takes quite some time to browse the sites, the search??
|
01-11-12 07:27am
|
Reply
355
|
GiGi Spice
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
Splendid review there, Marcus!
This even makes me consider yet another join of one of the site from Pacino...
Bottom line: A really fine review for latina fans...
And got to say this:
Marcus is new here, it seems - December 2011 - and guess some newer PUs could learn from this guy about serious, well founded and thorough reviews...
Welcome to PU - and keep it up - there's a lot of mutual help here.
|
01-11-12 07:12am
|
Reply
356
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Contrary to most of my above esteemed fellow PUs, I'd say any download limit is unacceptable...
Anyway - I have not yet join a site with download limits - and no matter what they are. And guess I never will - hate limitations of any kind.
|
01-11-12 07:07am
|
Reply
357
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Sandstone's Reply
Thanks, Sandstone
|
01-10-12 11:37pm
|
Comment
358
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
|
01-10-12 05:36am
Replies (6)
|
Reply
359
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's not the webmaster I'm generally interested in - but the site content...
And some webmasters CAN be a bit too sensitive towards criticism/less fine reviews - I do not care much.
Except one time here at PU a particular webmaster (and producer) canceled my access because of some inputs here - it's rather an old story and I got a lot of backup here and even from TBP - so amigos, PU/TBP is the place to be.
But bottom line: It's a two way street - and the majority of webmasters seem to look out for the "clients", too... and if we're reasonable - it normally goes for the webmasters, too.
|
01-09-12 06:26am
|
Reply
360
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Sometimes those vid-files are annoyingly large - at some sites - a size of 2,5 Gb - I hate those.
Typical:
In the crack
21. sextury
and others..
It takes too long to download even with a reasonable connection - AND mostly those gigantic vid-files are a hassle to work with - and takes up too much space.
A 2,5 Gb vid file normally gives problems to view - way too slow "fast forward" - for one.
And why - from those same sites I've downloaded the same scene in less than 1 Gb - typical 750 Mb - and the viewing quality is about the same, so....
|
01-07-12 07:44am
|
Comment
361
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
|
01-06-12 06:29am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
362
|
Holly Randall
(0)
|
|
01-06-12 06:08am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
363
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Before I read any answers here - I had the exact same thought as slutty....well put...
|
01-05-12 07:31am
|
Comment
364
|
Pink Visual Pass
(0)
|
|
01-04-12 07:47am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
365
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
Met Art is our old time kind-of-site here, for sure.
And the fact that this site just keeps going on and on with so many updates is just great....but:
Like otoh points out in the bottom line area hits the fan:
"..........that the material here just isn't exciting."
Exactly!
Met Art is a goldmine for models - but it drowns in some weird kind of massiveness - too much, but not too sexy/erotic.
A lot - lately tends to be way too: la,la,la in order to keep up the massive updates. Jeeeez, no problems with massive updates....but may be it's a question of quantity/quality...
Thanks, otoh - FINE review!!!
|
12-30-11 09:07am
|
Reply
366
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
You got some fetish sites like: "sex fully dressed" or alike, you got some mediocre sites with fully latex-dressed teens ect..ect..
Not bad - but still a very limited way of porn...I'm old fashioned, properly - this: to me porn is female body - naked - and/or with lingerie ect....but covered up in clothes: no, thank you...
|
12-30-11 08:55am
|
Reply
367
|
Foot Fetish Daily
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Happy New Year to you, too, Ze Droolah...
And in spite of what all those pessimists say about a "shitty" economical 2012 - and in spite of all the ditto fears - we still got our porn to tend to and to lean back on - AND that's a relief....and I wish I could add: Fuck the rest...
|
12-29-11 07:35am
|
Reply
368
|
ATK Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
It helped a lot.
Thanks, Cap'n!!!
|
12-29-11 06:30am
|
Reply
369
|
Foot Fetish Daily
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Thanks for a review I normally would not have payed much attention to.
But ok, we're a bit into what some of our fellow PUs writes - and I thought: Drooler - foot fetish???????
Read every line and went to the preview: looking good - and fine models.
Not a BIG foot fetish fan, but.... and the pros and cons and especially the bottom line - are a great help. Thumbs up for this one!
|
12-29-11 06:27am
|
Comment
370
|
ATK Archives
(0)
|
|
12-29-11 06:02am
Replies (6)
|
Reply
371
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Less - many (too many) family X-mas deals.
|
12-28-11 07:11am
|
Reply
372
|
Only All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Review
Good to see you back here.....and again with a fine, no nonsense review...
What did trick you?
Anyway hope for more roseman reviews, inputs, comments ect. in the future - let's get some new/old blood back to this site.....let new things happen.
|
12-23-11 08:23am
|
Reply
373
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Generally: NO!
But when and if I find a site with a good/some amount of productions, vids and sets, of favorite models - maybe.
Been looking at this one - and it certainly do not look like it's updating:
https://www.thebestporn.com/review/mollysbedroom/
But Molly, alias this and this, has done some great stuff at Nubiles as Diane...
|
12-22-11 06:10am
|
Reply
374
|
Double View Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
pat362 is less lazy than I am and have been lately doing reviews here - and this review is good - I've been a member recently and maybe half a year ago or so.
First: The selection of models are fine - and the site even give us fans of somewhat more erotic and kind of high heels-theme somewhat to look at.
But foremost it's a site with - generally - fine easteuro models in danm fine vids quality.
BUT: I really agree with one thing here in this review: GIMMICK!
It's certainly somewhat a gimmick with these TWO so called different scenes for each, oh yes: scenes.
Those - so called "Double View Castings" comes down to this:
A bit - and yes, just a BIT - different scene in each production.
Got a few of my favorite models in my stash from this site - but not really sure what is what in the so called "Double".....It's too close to the same!
BTW: A congrats to pat362 now going to numero 4 here at the fine PU MOST POINTS....
|
12-21-11 09:13am
|
Reply
375
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Got three major video players in work:
1) GOM Player - I like the style, the almost no frames and easy handling.
2) VLC - it plays all - and plays vids easy (almost) DURING download. And it's the best in fast forward..
3) Media Player Classic - Home Cinema (which comes along with the K-Lite codecs package) - it's probably the easiest to handle, but still have it's flaws with some codecs....
|
12-21-11 08:18am
|
