I know sometimes there are music tracks to a trailer video when the actual videos are silent. In the sample vids here there is a music track. Can anyone tell me: do the videos at these sites have music to them? Or are they silent, as in just ambient sounds? Or is it a mixed bag? I would like to try this site at long last, but won't if the majority of videos contain a music track.
I used to watch my ex-wife iron the clothes and wonder: I wonder how many guys out there would pay to see videos of just this very thing? Just a great-looking woman bent over with her lovely-bits all a jostle and in near-to-plain sight by virtue of the gravity-challenged blouse?
Finally, only about a dozen years later, someone has had that same light bulb over his noggin! This was one of those things that, as soon as I saw it, I joined. If there is anything more hypnotic than a gravity-challenged blouse with boobies underneath I don't know what it could be.
Will do full review soon. Downside is vids are split into bite-sized pieces and there is too much talking; but other than that this is literally a dream come true for Wee Willy.
The Brits come through once again. I say let's hoist the Union Jack here in the States and call it even. :)
Just wanted to mention that this is probably one of the best panty-sites out there. That is, IF you are into more mature models and can appreciate a tendency towards more conventional drawers (though they do seem to be including racier skivvies now). I was a member here before I joined PU and will join soon again to give a full review.
I do remember the negatives were: vids were only in Quicktime format, though I believe this is no longer the case; and photos were on the small side. I hope the site has grown and improved in my absence. I'll let you know soon.
I signed up to see the last year of vids and wow, the models have gone from stunners to mildly attractive, many on the portly side, and nearly every video is non-stop jibber-jabbering.
I'm on my second go round here and with a spankin' new PC, but my downloads are getting slower and slower. I occasionally get upwards of 700k a sec, but lately they've been hovering around 120k, sometimes lower. Not only that, the speed seems to decrease dramatically at first, then pick up very gradually.
I heard that AVG anti-virus slows down your system, and I recently installed that (not the free version). I wonder if that has something to do with it. I hope not. I notice that RB has noted slow server speeds. That's too bad, what with the large files here.
**edit: also not crazy about the prevalence of outdoors shoots for the newer models.
Joined the trial and got a good return on my investment; however, it makes me wonder how a site can operate like this one, with pictures that are non-exclusive, and many of which are plucked from pic-hosting sites like Webshots. I've seen photos from all over Netville, a few with the Teen Flood watermark still intact, for example, under their own watermark. Maybe they buy up old sets or soemthing? I don't know how this all works.
Main difficulty is this: these people need to remove children from their pics. MANY photos contain children, at beaches or pools, and they are not blurred or masked at all. One photo that needs mention is of a very-obviously under-age girl without a top in one of their topless beach sets. This is stupid practice and I'm surprised to see it.
Every candid-photo board I've ever frequented sternly reminds their posters not to upload pics with children in them, even if they are street candids or whatever.
Took the plunge, mightily glad I did. Sign-up was quick and painless, log-in no prob. Pages are loading fast, and vid DLs are coming in at 450-ish k, which isn't bad since the fastest I ever get on my connection is 700k.
I am continually flabbergasted by how beautiful these Japanese models are. I know there is airbrushing, but still! These girls are superhumanly gorgeous. I am painfully in love with Mika Kayama and Rie Sakura, and that's only because they were the first two girls I looked at. If my gast gets anymore flabbered I'll have to get a new gast. If I don't post in the next few days, it may be because my heart exploded.
Problems: I am being asked for username and password for every video, which is a pain in the arse, particularly since they are these long codes which my puny reptilian brain will never commit to memory. Never!
Also: doesn't seem like I'm going to find much, if any, softcore video. Everyone I checked out is HC. If someone could point me to some I'd be grateful. Not that I care that much. The pics are maddening enough.
I am stone cold sober and hereby declare that if you are a hetero male and don't find these women attractive, you are in desperate need of a new gast.
Don't click the links in Tao's post. I tried one and was greeted with a warning window that wouldn't go away. Something about no certificate or something, choice to accept or reject. No matter what you click, the window pops back up. Had to use control-alt-delete to exit. Sorry for the vagueness. I'm no techy.
I've never had any problem at clips 4 sale before, and I've downloaded several clips from there.
Signed up for the trial, initially very impressed with the completeness of the site insofar as browse features, DL options, quality and ammount of content...
However
I cannot tolerate a music track in videos. We experience others via the five senses. Video gives us the ability to experience a woman with only two of the five senses: sight and hearing. WHY in the world would it be considered preferable to cut this aleady limited access to the model IN HALF by drowning out the sounds she is making with horrible elevator music? Or any music?
All of the sounds the girl generates, be it the rustle of her clothing, her breathing, the sound of her shoes on the floor, increase the sense of actually being in her presence. Music tracks destroy that immediacy, that intimacy.
Off to start a thread on this subject, because I don't get it.
My constant log-in issue was finally resolved, after about four days without being to able to use the site, so I retract my "fuck them" remark. I doubt now that what happened was intentional.
Also, I am finding myself somewhat impressed by a few of the vids here. There is a silent, slow-building subtlety to them which I find appealing, and the women are gorgeous. They do not come across as trashy in the least (at least in the few vids I've seen thus far), though the action is anything but soft. I also like how the males are decidedly secondary to the female model being focused on and how they are given as little attention by the camera as possible (difficult as that must be with b/g porn!) And so far I haven't heard a peep from any of them. What I most certainly do not like is the way the girls often appear to be unhappy about being pawed at and groped. Even though it's an act I find it off-putting.
Pictures are classy and varied. Lots of lovely undies on drop-dead beautiful girls. Full review maybe in a few weeks' time.
I joined a few days ago, all was working fine. I disliked the site (endless parade of yawn-inspiring videos, though pics were okay), so I cancelled. Now, I am getting a prompt to re-enter user ID and password for EVERY SINGLE PICTURE. Click thumb, log-in page comes up, enter info, pic comes up, repeat, for EVERY SINGLE PICTURE! (sorry for yelling.)
Naturally, I gave up after two or three pics, figuring it was a system glitch. Tried three major browsers (all independently), same thing happened.
If this is accidental, Okay. If this is how they treat people who cancel early, then sincerely, fuck them. It isn't the money, it's the sheer stupidity of it.
I signed up for this site because I love Latinas and I like softcore. The pics are nice. The videos are next to unwatchable, however, due to the placement of the site's URL in big white letters in every single one, for every single second. The URL is not placed at the bottom of the screen, but a good ways up from the bottom. It is usually - not sometimes, but USUALLY - blocking the best parts of the model from view.
A good case of a company's wanting to protect their property to the point of making said property nearly useless as a commodity. A silly and stupid decision, which should result in a lot of disgruntled customers.
Oh well. Went for the 2.95 3 day trial. Username and password failed to work. Cancelled. Tried again to access site, after checking with confirmation email from Epoch, and this time I was told I was banned for excessive failed log-in attempts.
The people who operate these systems need to get their shit together. My belief is that this site probably sucks, and unfortunately I won't be able to have this intuition confirmed. Or find that I was wrong.
I'm considering joining Karup's PC, as I greatly enjoyed their Hometown Amateurs site. Just one question: is there shared content across both sites, or is the content wholly different? I notice several models in the welcome tour that it seems to me appeared at the HA site. If there is a small amount of shared content, I can live with that, but would be disappointed if there is too much.
Sullivan's review states: no cheesy music. I've downloaded over a dozen vids so far, all solo, and four or five of them have music, cheese-factor very high, extra sharp, no holes.
Not to slight Sullivan. Maybe I've gotten unlucky so far. Maybe he's talking about the HC vids. I dunno. I just know I hate music in my vids. It makes me turn them off.
Also, someone mentioned the "orange" hue of the photos. I do get a very orangy feel myself. Not that I wouldn't love to spend even one minute with these amazing orange women.
All that aside, this is a great site and it's very welcome after having dropped a lot of cash on crappy sites recently.
Aria Giovanni! I'm in love with her and it's worth the money just for her alone. She's perfect! I even like that "inny" she's got on the left.
The English version of this site is a wee bit different in that there are far fewer pictures on offer, and no complete picture sets. The vid sections are the same, it seems. I can access both versions with my membership, simply by going into the address bar and erasing the /eng/ part of the URL, then hitting enter. The Japanese-text site contains three photo sections with several complete picture sets, but not enough considering the price, though there are TONS of vids; the English version gives you only four or five sample pics of each model from the complete sets. There seems to be a lot more going on in the Japanese site, but you're flying blind if you can't decode the links.
I was very miffed when I saw in my email confirmation that I had paid for two months, amounting to 90 USD. It could be that I made an error. In any case, I contacted CCBill but they have apparently ignored me.
The 18 U.S.C. 2257 link appears on every page, but the way these models act and the way they are dressed makes me a bit uncomfy. The videos are nearly all marred by a saccharine music track which adds nothing to the experience except the need to turn off the volume. Other than that the vids are pretty decent, except that the girls often seem upset when they are being groped and prodded. Whether this is an act or genuine it's a turn-OFF for me, in a big way. Most of the time it looks obviously put-on.
NOT worth the money. They need to cut the price in half.
I figured i'd make this a comment rather than edit my review, since I doubt anyone would notice that.
I'm going through the older pic archives and for many sets, probably more than a dozen so far, the first four or five pages are simply repeated, extending the set to eight or nine pages. Naturally this makes the zip-file larger and you wind up with a bunch of superfluous files.
Is this an accident or is it done intentionally? If it's accidental, might I suggest fixing it? If it's intentional, I'd ask what the purpose of it is?
I've avoided downloading certain zips I otherwise would have wanted because of this doubling-up issue.
This site is a must IF: you really like big breasts and are more into pics than video. I was disappointed at first, after plunking down the 26 USD, because I went to the vid section immediately. Stupid music in some, and the annoying and intrusive male voice, sometimes both. Vid quality also not very good, though excellent in some newer vids.
When I spent time in the pics sections, I was very impressed by both the physical quality (newer sets) and the esthetic quality of these photos. There are quite a few pregnant models and to me there is nothing sexier on earth than a good-looking woman who is pregnant. Cel makes good use of the landscape format and you get a lot of views of the model hovering over you, which is great with busty models.
While I find lactation sexy to some extent I find lactation videos boring and silly. Not only that, it's a waste of food. I'm reminded of the comedian Gallagher and his smashing watermelons. A big mess and a waste of food. Silly. But these women generate their own milk and it's their right to do with it what they please, and I have no real say in the matter beyond that.
Watching a bearded guy suck a woman's breast is as entertaining as watching paint dry.
This is NOT for guys who are into calendar-model types, or for glamorous types. Stretch marks and flab abound. It is also devoid of toys and hardcore.
May post a full review after going through the site more thoroughly.
Opted for trial, so far so good. Lots of vids in various formats, though most of the material looks dated. Very dated.
Downloaded vid of Audra Mitchell, a shower/bath scene. Ignored the measly 490-ish bitrate and tried to enjoy the beautiful woman. Things are going along swimmingly until 11:42, at which point Audra rises from the suds and the camera does a slow tilt to the left and finally stops when the rim of the bath-tub is running *vertically* from top to bottom of screen, which means Audra's head is on the right of the screen, her hips on the left, so that we are now viewing Audra sideways, as if we have taken an axe-blow to the neck and our heads are lolling on our left shoulders. The perspective stays this way until 13:08, when Audra lies back down in the water and the camera slowly straightens out.
I'll admit the vid is five years old, but it still fascinates me. What possible reason could there be for the camera-man to inflict this kind of arbitrary silliness on the viewer? I can see how alternate points of view can be purposeful in certain contexts, like uskirts for instance, but in this particular case there is no reason to be viewing the model from such an angle. It doesn't make anything more interesting, all it does is cause over a minute of purposeless frustration and in this case it pretty much blew what would have been the best part of the vid.
I think its mainly about image: "If I tilt the camera this way, people will think I'm a real artist."
My neck hurts from constantly having to cock my head to the side while watching these vids. I'm starting with the oldest vids and working my way up. Whenever the girl is shot walking around, the camera records the action from a ridiculous angle so that her body goes *diagonally* across the screen instead of up and down. I don't mind the odd tilt for change of perspective, but this is a headache. There is one vid showing several minutes of a girl on a treadmill. Most of the footage is shot with this cock-eyed, neck-straining angle.
I know this is fairly common but I can't see why. Is it supposed to look more artistic? More cutting-edge? If the rest of the vids are shot this way I'll just cancel and snap up as much of the pics as I can before my sub runs out.
It's been way more than 6 months since I was a member here so I can't do a full review, but since there's virtually no info about this place here, I figured I'd put in a plug:
I've been a member of JJ1's Jumpers three times and will join again in the future. I really like the Flash animated pictures, of which there are samples on the preview pages. The actual Flash presentations are much bigger than the samples, by the way, and there are tons of them. I'd say a few hundred, by this time probably a great deal more. Size-wise they are not much bigger than large jpegs (older ones are smaller than 1 meg) and once downloaded they can be played in your browser anytime and for as long as you like. Some are inter-active and/or mouse activated, and some just auto-play.
The best thing is there are many top-shelf models here, including Aria Giovanni, Shay Laren, Amy Ried, Sydney Moon, Jelena Jensen, Penny Flame, Erica Campbell, and many more. While not as intimate as video, it's nonetheless very pleasant, even mezmerizing, to sit there and watch a pair of beautiful breasts bobble away right in front of you. Don't let the jumping-jacks thing throw you off. There are a wide variety of things to see, involving all parts of the body and all different POVs. There are also insertions, lots of em.
Apart from that there are tons of high-quality vidcaps and professional pic-sets. Sounds like I'm working for them doesn't it? Yikes. I'm not. This is a fun site and worth the money.
Sometimes when I do a review I forget that most people are much more into video than pictures, so when I say the site is not for the hardcore fan, I am mainly refering to the picture content. The video sites at this network fall into the hardcore category, particularly Lipstick BJ and Exploited Secretaries, but the amount of vids at either site is still pretty small and the content is not extreme in any sense. Panty Jobs is more tease oriented, but still hardcore by definition, I suppose.
The picture sites at this network are pretty decidedly softcore despite some stronger material. Bottom line is, I wouldn't recommend this site to someone who is primarily interested in hardcore video.
Don't bother with the trial here. All you have access to are trailer vids which run about a minute and a slew of vidcaps. I probably would have upgraded if the vid-quality was satisfactory. I like multi-girl on one guy material, and find the CFNM thing erotic as hell, being as it's been a fantasy of mine to be in that type of situation (as the male, that is) long before I ever heard of CFNM. And Brandi is so damned cute.
But come on, don't take people's money for stuff that ought to be reserved for a guest tour.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
