| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
851
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
2 Free K's Review
I think the recent revamp is a success. I especially like the new comments feature.
Still looking & waiting for those user defined customisable zips though! ;0)
As regards photography, I think Sean Rs work is over rated.
He does what he does well, but his sets are far too repetetive
with a lot of identical poses which could easily be edited out without loss to the set content.
A personal thing, but for me he spends too long on the rear views & gynaecology & not enough full body shots.
A fair review of a solid site.
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-24-11 09:18am
|
Reply
852
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
The Bishop's Review
A detailed & reasoned review. A very good start, welcome to PU. :0)
I think you may have set the score a little high, but given your views & reasoning, I can understand why you did.
Like yourself, I am a photo guy, & agree that the lack of customised zips is a notable failing given the protracted length sets are getting to these days.
You list 'No sets numbers at model level, can be hard to keep track/count.' as a con. I don't know how you tend to navigate, but I tend to use the Alphabetical model index when I am playing catch-up after a lapsed membership, in conjunction with the Recent Updates index.
Cap'n. :0)
|
04-06-11 09:23am
|
Reply
853
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
The Bishop's Reply
Yes, I think a lot comes down to personal preference.
I find a lot of models shot by Sean R to be less than attractive.
Largely, I find a lot of his shots focus is detailed gynacology, which really doesn't appeal to me at all.
Cap'n. :0)
|
04-06-11 09:07am
|
Reply
854
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
The Bishop's Reply
Posting well over half a dozen repeats of the same pose in the same set is just laziness & bulking the set out for the sake of it. We are typically seeing sets of around 250 photos
IMO a properly edited set need not be over 100 phots & cover the same ground.
Cap'n.
|
04-05-11 11:34pm
|
Reply
855
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Mort's Comment
Yes there is evidence of some changes going on.
It is still primarily a pics site, & none the worse for that IMO.
The number of photosets per update is fine for me, but I do agree the pics are overly large now.
My main gripe is the number of pics.
Often they are about 250 pics per set, when 100 would cover the same ground perfectly adequately.
I think things are improving but it is still slow & not all the changes are for the better.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-08-11 04:34am
|
Reply
856
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
It is a pretty good option.
WeAreHairy is worth a look too.
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-21-10 03:03pm
|
Reply
857
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Yes, I am using similar software.
I would just rather not download 100MB & have to delete 80MB of it.
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-19-10 11:43am
|
Reply
858
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
I rejoined recently myself because I got a good promo offer.
Whilst I am pleased I did, I still think user selected zips are required.
Some sets have as many as 250 pics in, telling a story that could easliy be told in 100pics or a bit less.
These sets feature a lot of duplication of poses so could be regarded as padding.
I have started pruning after download, but I find it a PITA!
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-19-10 09:58am
|
Reply
859
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
greg909's Comment
Yes this does seem to be in a rut.
It is a shame the overly large photosets cannot be pruned down via a custom zip function.
At least then you don't have an all or nothing option.
Cap'n. :0(
|
06-08-10 07:44am
|
Reply
860
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Advent's Reply
OK Thanks for the update.....
I'll keep waiting then. :0/
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-24-10 10:15am
|
Reply
861
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Ray O's Reply
I would go for 50% fully to part clothed 20% coy nude & 30% explicit nude.
A lot of folk seem to have an odd idea of nude.
Pulled away top & skirt showing naughty bits is NOT nude!
BMB/Wanton is particularly guilty of this.
Other than that, I agree with you Ray.
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-19-10 02:25pm
|
Reply
862
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
Take a look at We Are Hairy.
Drooler's comment alerted me to it.
It looks very promising!
Cap'n. ;0)
|
02-03-10 11:36pm
|
Reply
863
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
( 'Him' is a 'Her' ;0)
Advent is Customer Relations Officer for ATK
She is a very helpful & attentive lady, I have found. )
Whilst not being a Vid Person, I can appreciate your arguments.
That said ATKNH is still primarily a photoset orientated site, thankfully for me, as they do tend to be very much in the minority these days.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-21-09 01:45pm
|
Reply
864
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Ray O's Comment
Yeah, I was a long term member, I let it run for a few years.
What made me cancel was when the zip files went huge & we were only left with the download all or nothing option, when I only wanted maybe 30% of the pics.
Still waiting on user custom zips being enabled. ;0)
|
12-02-09 12:07pm
|
Reply
865
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Advent's Reply
Well, thanks for the reply anyway.
If I hear that they have done it, I may rejoin.
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-09-09 10:55am
|
Reply
866
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I would rather do that editing prior to downloading, with custom zips. :0)
|
11-04-09 03:43pm
|
Reply
867
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
A sad state of affairs.
I largely concur with your views & have recently cancelled my subscription.
The hardcore was generally marked low, so I can only think I am not the only one that doesn't wish to see it there.
I stand by my earlier comment about the sloppy editing & I wish there were a function for user defined custom zips.
It would save a lot of disk space for me! ;0)
It is also a shame there is no dedicated forum for the site members to air their views.
|
11-03-09 11:12am
|
Reply
868
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Ray O's Reply
Well, I do like a lot of their content, as and when they get to providing the custom zip function, I certainly will be rejoining.
:0)
|
10-22-09 09:45am
|
Reply
869
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Advent's Reply
I can understand why you switched & with smaller zip files I did not really have an issue with it. 5-6 pages worth of jpgs I could live with, but 15+ pages of which I like about the equivalent of 4 pages is too much download to bother with.
User defined custom zips would be ideal!
|
10-21-09 03:03pm
|
Reply
870
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Advent's Reply
With the welcome news that you will be covering all sites.
May I ask you if there is any likelihood of user selected custom zips being implemented?
Thanks,
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-21-09 02:58pm
|
Reply
871
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Advent's Reply
Well, that is good news!
At least now I know someone is paying attention to what is being said. :0)
|
10-21-09 02:55pm
|
Reply
872
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Ray O's Reply
Well, Ray.
You do get some active webmasters on here, the webmistress from ATK Movies is particularly attentive.
I have yet to see anything directly from ATKNH though. :0/
|
10-21-09 01:45pm
|
Reply
873
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Ray O's Review
Whilst I like to see return visits for models, I agree that some are being way overused. Also with you on the recent 'mainstream' hardcore attempts. Not the way the site should be going IMO.
|
10-21-09 09:31am
|
Reply
874
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Ray O's Reply
What I was asking for was the option to download selectively, rather than having to download large files of which I only want about 20%
We had the option before.
Now it is all, or nothing.
|
10-21-09 09:27am
|
Reply
875
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
Well, no response from ATKNH.
I can't say I'm surprised.
Cancelled.
Shame after such a long continuous membership, but obviously time to move on.
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-11-09 03:04pm
|
