| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1051
|
Double View Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
joekramer08's Review
Well, you have obviously spent some time on this. Kudos for that! :0)
I would suggest though, more stats to make the review more useful to folk who may be interested.
Also is it primarily video or photo?
Cap'n. :0)
|
09-27-11 04:16pm
|
Reply
1052
|
Dry Humping.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
Looking at the tour page, I would tend to agree!
Cap'n. :0/
|
04-02-10 03:38am
|
Reply
1053
|
Dynamix
(0)
|
Reply of
Nookiemonster's Reply
I thought as much.
Thanks for the info!
Cap'n. :0)
|
06-18-10 08:08am
|
Reply
1054
|
Dynamix
(0)
|
Reply of
Nookiemonster's Review
I find the traditional Jap blurring of naughty bits a real irritation, is there much of that going on at this site, please?
Cap'n. :0)
|
06-17-10 01:47pm
|
Reply
1055
|
Elegant Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
slategrey's Reply
That makes more sense.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-01-11 11:35pm
|
Reply
1056
|
Elegant Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
slategrey's Review
Your score seems high, if you are only rating the site average.
Should be mid 70s surely?
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-01-11 03:40pm
|
Reply
1057
|
Ero Berlin
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
A very comprehensive review.
It must have taken quite some time to research & compile that little lot!
Nice work! :0)
|
09-07-09 01:48pm
|
Reply
1058
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
" I think most people had the impression that it was just the smaller inferior sister site of Met Art where they dumped the content that didn't make the grade to be showcased on Met Art. "
...but isn't that really essentially what it is?
Even if the site is wearing smarter clothes! :0S
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-26-12 03:17pm
|
Reply
1059
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
I thought as much.
Thanks for the additional information anyway!
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-10-11 09:00am
|
Reply
1060
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Interesting review.
A shame about this regional pricing issue coming up again.
A very odd situation.
Why request regional pricing & then bypass it immediately someone complains?
I take it there is little in the way of stripping content?
It looks as if it is mainly nude, glam wear or lingerie?
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-10-11 07:12am
|
Reply
1061
|
Erotic Wifes
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
Another grammar casualty.
What concerns me more though, is that what with 'text speak' we seem to have developed an illiterate generation.
Cap'n. :0/
|
06-17-11 05:29am
|
Reply
1062
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
Looking in the tour area, it does look to be good quality photography.
Do they ever break out of the cliched nude glamour shoot approach though?
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-19-10 09:51am
|
Reply
1063
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
A very lucid assesment.
Worthy of being the start of a thread in the forum, I reckon! ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-19-10 09:45am
|
Reply
1064
|
Euro Teen Movs
(0)
|
Reply of
Rotterdam854's Comment
Very few sites have exclusive models.
Any career model is likely to pop up at various sites from time to time.
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-27-11 04:55am
|
Reply
1065
|
Euro Teen Movs
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Personally, I can't see how you cannot do that.
To exaggerate somewhat, something that is worth £10 cannot be recommended if it is being sold at £50.
I appreciate value is subjective, but I do think it has to be factored in somewhere.
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-27-11 04:51am
|
Reply
1066
|
European Glamour Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Are they usually starting out fully clothed or only partially?
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-13-11 09:23am
|
Reply
1067
|
European Glamour Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Another question,
From the tour it looks to be pretty well exclusively nude material, with the exception of the odd set of hose.
Is there any proper stripteas material here?
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-12-11 04:06pm
|
Reply
1068
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
I'm not sure that an attempt to move into mainstream social media is wise.
I don't use it myself at all, but I know folk who do & I think that they would be wary of compromising their wholesome clean social media accounts with reference to our more secret side displayed around here! ;0)
Cap'n :0)
|
09-02-12 08:19am
|
Reply
1069
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
A customer shouldn't need to find work arounds to get a fair deal.
Cap'n :0/
|
07-22-12 02:44am
|
Reply
1070
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Off your list for good I would hope!
Cap'n. :0E
|
07-22-12 02:26am
|
Reply
1071
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
A real curate's egg then ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
06-20-13 02:35pm
|
Reply
1072
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
A well weighted & considered review, my friend.
I may be tempted to take a look myself.
I suspect it would be the hardcore nature that would put me off though.
Cap'n. :0/
|
06-20-13 11:25am
|
Reply
1073
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
No stills here either then?
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-16-12 09:01am
|
Reply
1074
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks for the extra info, Pat.
Appreciated.
I think I'll pass on this one.
Cap'n. :0/
|
02-18-10 11:28pm
|
Reply
1075
|
Exploited Moms
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
That copyright being stuck at 2006 is ominous.
That sounds as suspicious as another site I ran across recently which had samples of recent updates.
The watermark on the phots were dated 2005!
To answer you question, I don't know for sure, but I would put the chances around 95% that it is dead in the water.
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-31-11 04:08am
|
