Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Poll
I say yes, in a qualified manner. If it is a small site, (like: single model/unusual niche sites often are) It is reasonable not to expect a huge amount of material for ones money and if that material is of high quality and exclusive certainly (ideally, being added to). It is also about what one is being sold. If one is being sold more than what you were to recieve, even if that material is of high quality, then no.
|
02-13-12 10:42pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Poll
I would have to say there are some Awesome scenes that I go back to. There are just some women and men who work awesomely together. Particularly ones who just get to that point of being "fuck-drunk" (not under the influence of alcohol... but just being almost out of it with pleasure) and who just really really get into it.
|
12-08-11 12:32pm
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Beware.... the number of times I have had an external HDD fail on me... Sometimes DVD's or some other storage medium are the best bet.
|
11-12-11 09:05pm
|
Reply
4
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
I would agree. Sounds very dodgy. I would be cancelling my card unless a further proper conversation with Brazzers doesn't result in
a) membership and
b) general goodness.
|
12-08-11 12:35pm
|
Reply
5
|
Meow 34JJ
(0)
|
Reply of
Hulmemedia's Reply
Oh. I was not aware of those facts. I will more than happily change my review. I do love the site and the content is excellent.
Cheers.
|
10-10-11 04:55am
|
Reply
6
|
Meow 34JJ
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
Thanks. I do my best to be balanced and to tell people what they will get for their dollars.
|
10-09-11 02:23pm
|
Reply
7
|
Scoreland
(0)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Review
Good detail. I think that your review has covered most of the bases. I am glad that I read it, I was half considering subscribing, tossing up between spending my money with Score at Scoreland or XLGirls, I think I will take the heavier option.
|
02-13-12 11:00pm
|
Reply
8
|
Sexy Samantha 38G
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
Good review! I think it sums up her site quite well, although the content has probably expanded quite considerably by now. It would be great to see a new review of the site.
|
10-12-11 11:03pm
|
Reply
9
|
Thai Girls Wild
(0)
|
Reply of
davidax's Review
Hi!
Glad you reviewed, however, if you could provide a little more detail that would be great.
~Watson
|
12-08-11 12:38pm
|
Reply
10
|
TnA Tryouts
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Hmm... That is quite bizarre. On my end at least. I was able to visit all of the other Score sites, however try as I might to connect to that one, I was unable to. I just figured that the site had ceased to exist. I will withdraw that comment. I apologise.
|
02-14-12 09:36am
|
Reply
11
|
XL Asians
(0)
|
Reply of
TheArchitect's Reply
I am, dear reader, still awaiting "Cassies first hardcore shoot" which had *just* been shot. That is something I was/am still awaiting (having been a member now for months, its not even a pending update). I have logged in regularly since joining, and am still a member therefore I do not feel like informing the owner of my username. I do not "Work" for anybody in the "Industry". As it happens I am a private person who likes BBW, and particularly Asian ones: I like the content, that isnt my beef. I am not getting anything for my thoughts, therefore I call 'em as I see 'em.
Browser issues (happy to use IE), and cam issues (who joins a niche site to Cam when its the same site that everyone else uses?) aside. I did not insinuate that the DVD material was obtained illegally as I never questioned the legal ownership of the material. As to checking the EXIF info - Most were modified 1 year ago (Jan-Nov '10), *some* "recent" updates were modified in 13-Aug to 19-Oct 2011 (still three months old for the most recent). Big gap.
As to deceptiveness: I saw the material (available ON the site AT *my* INITIAL membership, and over the course of the first month or so) in the early months of THIS, 2011, calendar year in a LEGAL collection obtained from the site. (It was this material, WHICH ENCOURAGED ME TO JOIN.)
Now, dear reader, I do not question the difficulty of aquiring the material legally I am simply suggesting that: IF MY FRIEND'S legal collection from quite a few months ago contained all the material available 1-2 months in (length of his stay), AND material found IN his collection included material listed as a "Future Update" AT MY initial date of sign up (much later than his), THEN the material is not IN FACT "new" or an "update" when the his collection existed months prior to my joining. This is what I suggest is deceptive. Particularly taken with the EXIF data in MOST (not all) of the photo zips dating them back to 2010.
I do not question that the owner/poster shot the material himself. I do not suggest that he has collected the material Illegally. I also understand that the site is small and in a niche of which there are almost no sites save a few irritatingly censored ones in Japan. But there are an awful lot of suggested "play video" buttons on the hardcore/softcore pics (~60 total, and second reason why I joined) on the tour as compared to the actual 24 vids + 49 photo sets (as at 9/12/2011) on site. I call that selling a "Sizzle" not a sausage (9 "sausages" to be precise, of which 4 were DVD material that I already owned).
My beef is that I saw the material available AT MY Signup *months* before I joined, in a legal collection belonging to a friend. I like the content. I want more of it. And I am prepared to wait. However I do not like feeling like I have signed up to a site where there are a tonne of "videos/play nows" that dont exist, and a bunch of updates I have already seen at a friends place months prior.
Sincerely
Watson.
|
12-08-11 12:06pm
|
|
