| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
351
|
The Life Erotic
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Tangub, thanks for the fine review! This is another site that's been on my list, but like you I was under the impression that it was rather racier than Met Art et al. I particularly like things like the fetish wear and mild bondage you mentioned - as such it's a disappointment to learn it's very much in the minority, as is the more explicit material the home page teases us with.
To learn that it's more similar to MA is very helpful; I have a few others that can be promoted up the list. Perhaps if there was more than just one set of Valentina Vaughn...
|
01-08-12 01:40am
|
Reply
352
|
Holly Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Aha - I was a member at Holly Randall a while back (will likely join again sometime) and remember that model. I find thenude.eu invaluable; a quick search there shows a few other sites you can find her:
http://www.thenude.eu/Tiana_4543.htm
|
01-06-12 07:28am
|
Reply
353
|
N/A
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Good call slutty.
I was going to say no, since it doesn't work for me at all. Perhaps because we (at least I) like to imagine the models as somehow attainable; suspension of disbelief is key, but seeing her pregnant stretches the point a bit much :|
But if it were my own partner, then I'm sure I'd be quite happy to, er, dive in.
|
01-05-12 05:10am
|
Reply
354
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Khan, thanks for the helpful reply! Of course I understand that the goal here is to promote and inform about actual sites, and so site-specific activity is encouraged.
As such, I didn't particularly expect forum participation to count - so I guess it's just a bonus that poll replies - such as this one ;) - do!
|
01-04-12 11:40pm
|
Reply
355
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Comment
Still my favourite site too. It's changed a bit this year; we've lost some of the variety in locations, no outdoor shoots etc; but we've made up for it with some great new models, great lingerie and a helpful webmaster providing almost made-to-order sets.
I'm sure I'll be resubscribing (and not at all defiantly... :| ) - $15 is a steal for a daily updated site, but the one year seems to have stayed the same - now equivalent to 10 months, so arguable as to whether it's a good buy?
|
01-04-12 11:14am
|
Reply
356
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Only when I have something to contribute to a particular subject (or at least I think I have something!).
Just as an aside, I wonder why forum participation doesn't qualify for a raffle ticket. I can see how site-specific contribution does, such as reviews and comments - but if eg adding trust ratings and poll replies do, shouldn't forum posts also?
|
01-04-12 11:09am
|
Reply
357
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm not really sure what kind of site we are talking about. I like some non-nude material - especially fetishwear, pinups and the like, a well-conceived lingerie or latex set can be much sexier than a poorly conceived nude one. But I'm not sure that qualifies as Amateur - maybe I'm missing something...
|
12-31-11 09:15am
|
Reply
358
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Thanks readadmiral & Denner for your replies. My opinion is of course very subjective - some folk may find the stuff here exciting and sexy - but my tastes are generally pretty tame and this just doesn't work for me at all.
I would, though, again recommend my previously reviewed site Juliland - possibly art, but creative, exciting stuff.
|
12-30-11 04:27pm
|
Reply
359
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Thanks for the reply, Cap'n. I agree about the thumbnails; it's not at all easy to find anything that leaps out from the sea of them while browsing.
After discussing the site with a friend, one other point occurred to me about the 'Met Art' look - that, by somehow desexualising the models, it somehow objectifies them even more; which bothers me slightly, since like I hope most folk here do, I have a huge respect for all the girls we ogle over. Would you agree, or am I just overanalysing? :|
|
12-30-11 07:15am
|
Reply
360
|
Hush Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
MsApril's Review
Welcome, MsApril - we don't get nearly enough reviews from girls here so good to have you on board.
Just a shame that, based on the above review and your favourite site of the network, all those comments from girls about size not mattering could be white lies at best :)
Anyway, thanks for this and your other review - look forward to reading more!
|
12-29-11 12:49am
|
Reply
361
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Probably less. Although I don't spend too much time on smut, it's part of a routine, and that routine is altered over the holidays, so I end up doing other stuff.
|
12-28-11 07:47am
|
Reply
362
|
Giant Fem
(0)
|
Reply of
yonboy40's Comment
Thanks for pointing this site out! I'm quite fond of tall, leggy girls, despite (because of?) being quite short myself. Looks like there could be some fun content here.
|
12-27-11 09:44am
|
Reply
363
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As per Cap'n, not really my cup of tea (although tea isn't my cup of tea either)- It's a bit too extreme for my tastes.
I almost went for the next option, because although I'm interested in and very tolerant of what turns folk on, I feel that as it becomes more mainstream - (or at least less fringe than it once was) models will feel pressured into doing something that they are not at all OK with and could actually hurt them :|
|
12-26-11 05:24am
|
Reply
364
|
N/A
|
Reply of
bacardiancoke's Reply
Once again, bacardiancoke has echoed my sentiments. Maybe a membership a new year present would be better!
|
12-24-11 06:30am
|
Reply
365
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Exactly as bacardiancoke said.
I suspect most of us join most sites for just a month and so the backlist of material is far more of a draw than whatever turns up during that month. It hasn't happened yet, but I'd happily join a non-updating site if it has material I like.
|
12-22-11 01:25am
|
Reply
366
|
Secretease
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
This looks appealing, and from the preview, it seems to cover my definition of nudity (ie all the relevant, er, bits on display) - even if not yours (not a stitch on) :)
Just thought it worth noting since you compared it to the Only sites, which AFAIK don't show much of anything - I see that as far more of a divide.
|
12-21-11 07:08am
|
Reply
367
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
VLC (Mac) - Plays everything!
|
12-20-11 01:14am
|
Reply
368
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
lutin's Review
As others have said, a good review, thanks. I think your score is fair; mine is much higher because the material particularly appeals to me which is obviously very subjective.
Agree about the webmaster/photographer - I'm pretty sure he's not in it for the money as such, more for fun, which gives the site quite a personal appeal.
Hope you're still around there for the end of the month, when Emma - both the oldest model there and one of the sexiest - returns!
|
12-18-11 10:41am
|
Reply
369
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
LePornoisseur's Comment
Another site now nudged significantly up my queue :)
|
12-18-11 10:38am
|
Reply
370
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
LePornoisseur's Review
Again, thanks for the review - this is another site on my list as I quite like the level it's pitched at - from what I've seen it's explicit but not hardcore but there's an element of risky locations and no cheesy BGM (are all the videos without music?) both of which I like.
|
12-18-11 10:28am
|
Reply
371
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm not sure if I can call on it being cheating or not - I don't think so, my best reply is to agree with Cybertoad that it's ideologically the same as going to a lapdancing bar - whatever you think about the strippers there, then spending time with cam models is no more or less cheating than that.
|
12-18-11 10:26am
|
Reply
372
|
Prolapse Party
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
Although my own tastes are pretty tame, I'm fairly open minded to those of others and have a healthy curiosity for what turns folk on.
But this one... I saw it listed but is one of the few that I didn't dare even click on the link, I suspect I wouldn't be able to unsee whatever is waiting there :|
|
12-15-11 04:16am
|
Reply
373
|
The Rubber Clinic
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
I guess that would be sounding... make my eyes water just to think of it :|
No idea on the DRM, though, sorry...
|
12-15-11 02:20am
|
Reply
374
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
Hmm... I said 'Yes and I have' since I won $100 in one of the first draws I had tickets - I just had 4 I think.
Sadly, since then, I've been rather unlucky... it looks like on average, most folk who enter regularly have won $1/ticket entered... I'm on less than half that.
I know, grumpy old man etc :)
|
12-14-11 12:24am
|
Reply
375
|
Ero Berlin
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Review
I've not joined Ero Berlin yet but it's been on my list... one of the angles I liked was the public/risky locations - how does the site fare in those terms? I wasn't sure if eg Femjoy as you mentioned has anything comparable?
|
12-12-11 11:41pm
|
