| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
BenThruston's Review
Just thought I'd chime in with my impressions. I've been a member of this site for over a month and haven't had any shady billing issues yet. Like people have said, they do some tricky things to make you think you have access to things you don't, but if you're careful and only click on things that are part of the "BangBros Pack" then you should be fine. It is frustrating though.
The main "HOME" page of the members area is full of sites you don't have access to, but it's displayed in a way that could trick you into thinking you have access to those sites. At the top of this "HOME" page it says: "Your Library - Listing of the products you have access to", but you don't actually have access to most of these sites unless you pay another $19.95. When they say "Listing of the products you have access to", they don't actually mean these sites are part of your current membership, they mean you can get access these sites if you pay more. This wording is somewhat deceptive, but problems can be avoided if you are careful and have read the warnings in the comments and reviews here on The Best Porn.
Rather than just take you to the area where you actually have true access (such as the "BANGBROS" tab or "ALL WEBSITES" tab at the top of the site), they start you out in an area full of sites that you don't have access to yet. However, the thumbnails for these sites have small lettering under the image that says "get full access for $19.95", so there is at least something there to indicate that you don't have access yet...but if you don't pay attention, I can see how you'd think you had access to one of these upsell sites.
Basically all you need to know is - when you enter the members area, go to the top and click on the "ALL WEBSITES" tab - this will take you to the sites that you actually have access to with your current membership. This is the area that should be the "HOME" page, not the area they have now.
Also, when you watching streaming videos, there will be thumbnails for other videos along the side that might be for sites you don't currently have access to. Or when you click on a certain girl's profile, it will show all of her videos - but there may be videos mixed in there that are on sites you don't have access to. So you have to be aware of the sites that are part of your "BangBros Pack" and make sure to only click on those videos. I haven't clicked on the wrong video yet, so I can't confirm if you are automatically billed for sites just by clicking on the video.
|
03-31-14 05:32pm
|
Reply
2
|
Gloryhole Swallow
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Nice review. I joined this site a while ago, but I never got around to putting up a review on here. I agree with your assessment - the realness of the scenes is what makes this site unique - the girls look and feel like real amateur girls - they don't come off as pornstars (though there are 1 or 2 porn girls on here, like Proxy Paige)...but for the most part, the girls on this site appear to be real amateurs, and that is what drew me to the site. A girl on this site named Tiffany was one of my personal favorites - not super attractive, but cute and full figured - she just seemed like a real girl you'd pass on the street who likes to get kinky on the side. You could tell she loved sucking dick and was very sensual with her technique.
Due to the fact that these girls appear to be amateurs, the quality of the scenes can vary depending on the oral skills of the girl...but when you come upon a girl on this site who's really horny and into it, and she has good oral technique, it's super hot - and I'd say there are enough of the hot scenes here to make it worth joining.
|
03-13-14 08:36am
|
Reply
3
|
WCP Club
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
thanks for the review. I've been a fan of West Coast Productions for a long time. Their camera work is great - I just love how they film their scenes...and this is the only place where you can get their scenes, so I was excited when I found out this studio finally created their own membership site. It does suck that they have so few of their dvd's available here, but I imagine it takes a while to add all of those dvd's, considering that they only just recently created this site. Hopefully they'll add a lot more of their dvd's in the coming year.
|
03-01-14 11:36am
|
Reply
4
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
EverNight's Review
I agree with your review. The content on this network is simply the best I have found on the entire internet. Their camera work is impeccable and that is what separates them from every other site. They keep the camera steady and don't move it around too much, which allows you to see everything better. They also get nice, zoomed-out camera angles so you can get a nice view of the girl's whole body - too many other sites are "close-up-heavy" and just zoom in on the girl's crotch while ignoring the rest of her. I like porn where the camera is zoomed out and you can see the girl's face and whole body while she's being fucked, and this network is one of the only sites that uses this type of filming style. With the annoying "Mike Adriano extreme close-up" filming style taking over the porn industry, it's nice that there's still somebody out there who knows how to shoot porn. Although their site design may be outdated, the teen core club scenes are simply the best you'll find anywhere.
|
01-26-14 06:07pm
|
Reply
5
|
Teens Analyzed
(0)
|
Reply of
stingerxxx's Reply
the "smoothness" of the movement is noticeably better on videos with 29 fps. i prefer the smoother movement of 29 fps videos. if you are used to 25 fps in Europe, then you won't know the difference, but if you watch a bunch of 29 fps videos, then switch to a 25 fps video, you can instantly see that at 25 fps the movement looks choppy and strains the eyes slightly. the "picture clarity" or "crispness" may be the same (this is determined by the bit rate), but the MOVEMENT is smoother and looks better at 29 fps.
|
12-15-13 10:46am
|
Reply
6
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Yeah, I just started using DownThemAll recently and it has worked well for me. It's an extension for the Firefox browser, not a separate program...so that's convenient since you don't have to download an install a whole program.
|
04-05-13 05:27pm
|
Reply
7
|
Sineplex
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
yeah, i don't get this site either...i almost seems like the site's videos have DRM attached to them...so even if you can download them, it might not be worth the hassle of DRM. I wish they'd do a review or at least update the site facts on thebestporn.com so we could know what the download situation on this site.
|
03-03-13 09:16am
|
Reply
8
|
Teens Analyzed
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I've been wanting to join this network for a while and I probably will in the next month or so. I like the look of their scenes. The lighting is kind of amateurish, but I like how they shoot their scenes zoomed out to show off the girl's body. I can get over an amateurish look if the scene does a good job of showing me the girl.
|
02-18-13 04:55pm
|
Reply
9
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
wow....that sucks. hopefully they can all just move to another country like Hungary and produce it from there. I love the girls on the European sites, so hopefully they can figure a way to continue production. it would be a shame if no one got to see those beautiful girls because of that law.
|
10-15-12 07:56pm
|
Reply
10
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Can someone fill me in on what's going on in Russia? Why are they banning porn there? This sucks, as I'm a fan of Eastern European porn.
|
10-07-12 01:47pm
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I like anal scenes a lot. It just adds more variety when you're getting tired of seeing the same old thing after a while. I like a nice mix in my scenes - start with vag, move to anal. The more variety the better, I say.
|
10-06-12 06:12am
|
Reply
12
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
I hate pussy closeups, in movies and in pictures. I wish all porn producers would just stop doing them. I want to see the whole girl - not just her pussy. idiots.
|
10-01-12 02:59pm
|
Reply
13
|
Casual Teen Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
Meniss Limited's Reply
Ok, thank you for clearing that up. I will definitely be joining this site soon! I've been wanting to join the Meniss sites for a while now - I love the zoomed out camera angles that show off the girl's body.
|
09-17-12 04:44pm
|
Reply
14
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I never download pics. they just don't interest me.
|
08-23-12 10:34am
|
Reply
15
|
First Anal Quest
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
nice review. I'm glad somebody else is speaking out about the annoying camera work and excessive closeups on these European sites.
I have a question - have they improved their camera angles in their newer videos? I was a member a while ago and have been wondering if they improved since I last joined. I recently checked out their new scenes on their tour page, and the camera angles seem to be a bit better based on the preview clips I watched, but it's hard to tell from just a 30 second preview clip.
|
08-21-12 04:49pm
|
Reply
16
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Poll
i don't usually talk to people about porn...it would be nice if people were laid back enough to openly discuss porn, but it's still a taboo topic.
|
08-21-12 04:32pm
|
Reply
17
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Thanks for the review. I have been thinking about checking this network out for a while. Maybe I will get around to it some day.
|
08-12-12 08:19pm
|
Reply
18
|
Euro Teen Movs
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I often wonder if any of the European sites have truly exclusive content...they all just re-use the same scenes from what I have seen - all of the Euro porn seems to come from the same creator who just leases out the same scenes to different sites. i have seen the same scenes duplicated on so many different Euro sites and networks it's not even funny.
|
08-12-12 07:07am
|
Reply
19
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
depends on how forceful it is....i don't like gagging and "face fucking"...but a slow sensual deep-throat is good.
|
08-12-12 07:02am
|
Reply
20
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
i don't really care to be honest. i'm into petite white girls, and there are plenty of those in porn so i'm happy. i suppose there are enough specialty sites out there to satisfy anyone's tastes.
|
08-10-12 05:53pm
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I HATE pov scenes because you never really get good camera angles...it's just the same repetitive shot over and over again...looking down at the girl's pussy with no view of the rest of her. I don't even bother downloading pov scenes.
|
07-31-12 05:27pm
|
Reply
22
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
dieselman's Reply
Thanks for responding, Dieselman. I do have a complaint about the scenes on the site, however. Like I mentioned, the camera angles on all of the scenes are too focused on closeups of the girl, but I'd rather see her whole body at once. It is very frustrating watching the scenes when all I can see is her breasts, or her face. Please zoom the camera out and just show her whole body for most of the scene. I assume that the camera man is doing the closeups to try make the scene more "interesting", but closeups aren't interesting - they're frustrating. seeing the girl's body is interesting. Her body is enough to keep me interested. Just zoom out, leave the camera alone and let her do her thing.
|
07-05-12 05:56pm
|
Reply
23
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
2 Free K's Reply
I agree. I really don't like many of the girls in American porn anymore - too many tattoos, breast implants, lip injections, fat asses, and women in their mid 30's.
I have moved to mostly European sites like Try Teens. These Euro sites have beautiful, natural looking girls who are 18-20 years old.
|
06-30-12 10:20pm
|
Reply
24
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
The main problem with sites today is bad camera angles. This is a problem that plagues so many sites. They don't know what people want to see. I hate when they waste so much time on closeups of a girl's face. In real life I can see a girl's face any time I want - I watch porn because I want to see a girl's body. I hate that whenever the girl gives a blowjob, they zoom in real close and just show her head - how about you zoom out and show me her face AND her body at the same time?...what a novel idea. I also hate when they feel the need to zoom in on just her vagina during penetration - you don't need to be 2 inches from her vag to show me the penetration - you can zoom out to show me the penetration AND her whole body at the same time!!!...let me SEE the whole girl, not just parts of her - it's not rocket science, but most sites get it wrong.
Try Teens spoiled me. Their camera angles are just so right. Once I saw their scenes, every other site started to annoy me with all the worthless closeup shots.
|
06-27-12 04:43pm
|
Reply
25
|
Try Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
I actually liked the "formulaic" nature of the videos. They choose sexual positions and camera angles that are best for showing off the girl's body. So I don't mind that it's repetitive, because I know that for each girl I'm going to get some excellent full-body angles of her that really show off her figure.
I also like the "static" camera work. For me there's nothing worse than when a girl is stripping and the camera man zooms in really close on just her face, or just on her ass. I can't appreciate a girl's figure when the camera is two inches from her butt cheeks and is looking up at her. There is a benefit to just having the camera sit still for a while so you can take in a girl's body. Most sites spend so much time zooming in on ass cracks that by the end of the scene I could barely even tell you what the girl looks like other than her ass crack. In scenes from other producers I often feel like the camera man is on crack and has A.D.D., like he can't sit still and let the camera linger for a bit. When I watch porn, I want to see a lot of long shots to get a feel for the girl's entire figure. Anyway, to each his own...but some of things you considered negatives are actually positives for me.
|
05-18-12 04:09pm
|
