I had to laugh at this, jd. It's 2008 now, and some of these sites will just have to come clean about how old their models are. At some major sites you can see models' ages at anywhere between 19 and 23 who've had pics all over the net since the late nineties.
Tawny Stone should be in the World Record's book for staying 18 longer than any other human in history. A biological miracle!
Japanese women, AV models in particular, are simply some of the most beautiful women I've ever seen. I also don't care for what you describe as the "truly submissive" style in Japanese hardcore. I haven't seen that much of it, but I've surfed Japanese TGPs and have seen so many vidcaps from videos where it looks like the girl is being molested, often by serveral guys, poked and prodded and groped and treated like a lab rat. The girls don't seem to be enjoying themselves. I could never get off watching stuff like that. Of course it's not just the Japanese. Max(nolink) Hardcore is a sick fuck if I ever saw one.
On the other hand the Japanese do some stuff better than anyone. Their softcore/panty/teaser photography is amazing. One of the things I like hardcore-wise (and I don't like much hardcore) is the reverse gang-bang: one lucky dope and several women. The Japanese go all-out with that. I saw a few vids featuring one guy with more than ten women. Not one at a time: they all hover over him like happy vultures and laugh as they administer their playful "torture". And I imagine they PAY the guy for it.
Most of the girl/girl vids I saw feature what sound like American girls. A few of the solo models have accents. My favorite, Vanessa, sounds German, and she has nine or ten vids where she feasts on her own dirty undies as well as those from her "panty girlfriends", as well as masturbating feverishly with them. Unfortunately, while I think she's very hot - she reminds me of a woman I worked with once and on whom I had a terrible crush - her vids are just too whacky and hectic for me to enjoy. I prefer much more subtle stuff. BUT, if a woman "tasting herself" is your biggest fetish, you would probably like them, although her vids aren't of the best quality. The best quality vids are mostly solo/strip/tease/masturbation scenes.
I didn't mention it in my review, but there are some b/g vids as well.
From what I can see, the content at this site seems to come from several different sources.
Well, if that's your biggest fetish you are bound to find something to like at this site.
I can't look through what few videos I've kept from here since my kids are over at the moment, but may give a better answer later on...
I can't tell you if most of the girls are European. Many of them have accents, but the dialog is so silly, for the most part I usually turned the sound off. Not only that, most of what I downloaded were solo vids.
The HJ niche seems to be growing, which is odd given that most guys seem to regard a hand-job as something less than sex. To my mind, a good HJ is one of the damn nicest things a girl can do for a guy, and when you get a girl who knows how to do it, it can really be something.
Wifey from Wifey's World is the reigning queen of the HJ, in my opinion, and everyone else pales by comparison. I've been to several HJ sites and most of them are useless. Brandi Belle is pretty good, but she seems too detatched.
And, dang it, if there's a mouth or even a tongue involved, it ain't a handjob!
A lot of guys are into this. There are a lot of photoshopped pics of women squatting over stadiums and walking through cities, etc.
I don't have that fetish but I can understand it a little. I do like the idea of a strong, dominant woman in complete control, and I love the view from below of a beautiful woman towering over me. Methinks it might be some residue from infancy lurking in the psyche: The mama figure looming over the crib? That tied in with authority, appeasement, satisfaction, and obvious sexual attributes.
Thanks for the reply, but I think maybe my review is giving the wrong impression.
While the site is no doubt softcore, it's most definitely not non-nude. There is plenty of nudity; in fact, there's even a section for nude galleries and videos, though that isn't the only place nudity happens. The action between the girls is often very erotic and it seems very genuine most of the time.
About the DRM protected vids: I believe there is only one small section containing these. I would estimate at least 85-90 percent of the video here is not DRM protected. I do agree with you, though, and I avoid DRM sites as well.
Sorry you were disappointed, Mes. I feel guilty because I gushed over the site in reply to a comment of yours here.
I agree with most of what you say, although I find myself enjoying some of the pictures here more than those at any other site I've joined thus far. Why that is I can't exactly say. There are things going on at a subconscious level that we aren't quite aware of and maybe don't understand. It could just be that I love the all-fours shots, and this site gives you every conceivable angle of that view, as if you are actually there behind the model.
That being said, yes, a site like this, which is 99 percent photo-driven, absolutely needs zipfiles. Especially when the photo sets contain numerous pictures from the exact same perspective. The man behind the site needs to do a LOT more editing of sets, and he needs to get more creative. The sets are repetitive, as you said, and could be cropped by seventy percent in a lot of cases. Furthermore, the pics are not named uniquely, and saving them becomes even more of a chore.
As far as navigation goes, yes, it needs a lot of work.
I am, by turns, very pleased and very displeased with my experiences here thus far. I was wowed at first, but that feeling has waned, except for the moments when something really resonates with me.
Just had a look at LV Panty's preview. Looks like he is branching out a bit and featuring more modern, skimpy-type undies. My memory of the models was a bit fuzzy as well. They are indeed beautiful, but there are plenty of girl-next-door types we well.
First, there are quite a few more models over the age of thirty at True Amateur Models than I originally thought. The guy behind the site doesn't seem to care about age. One model is in her fiftees. He doesn't care much about looks, either. I did notice some portrait style pics in older sets, but far and away his preference is landscape. As I said, the four full sets I took so far are landscape in their entirety: no portrait shots at all.
About LVPanty: I'm glad you're thinking of joining. It's been a while since I was there, but picture-wise it is second to none in the panty-genre, if you take in all factors such as fidelity to niche, pic size, and quality. **I don't recall if the sets at LVPanty are zipped**. You might want to contact the webmaster about that. I don't remember zips there, and I have none on file. My memory is shot, however. The video section is nothing to rave about either.
Also, bear in mind LVPanty is old-school. Full-sized, and predominantly full-backed, undies are the order of the day. There is not a fixation on cotton, which I know you don't like, but there is quite a bit; but even so there is nothing teeny-bopperish whatsoever. The variety of fabrics and styles is wide. The models are beautiful. It's not an amateur site. I believe you can see a few sample pics on the preview. I know you're cautious about which sites to join and I'd hate for you to think you blew your money.
A blend of LVPanty and True Amateur Models, with a vid section on par with Panty Amateur, would be a perfect site for me and I'd stay with it permanently!
Interesting, me finding your comment here, since I gave you a passing thought almost as soon as I joined. Why? Because every single picture is in landscape format! All of 'em, at least the ones I've seen thus far, and that's four full sets with over a hundred pics each. I joined last night after seeing some dazzling pics at a TGP.
Latest pics are big, at 1500x1126, and they look great on my 22 inch monitor, even though they don't completely fill it.
BUT: **no zips**. My arm is still hurting from all the clicking I did last night. The models here run the gamut from dead plain to cute as hell. Most of them are average to nice looking young ladies you'd see anywhere: true amateurs. This site gives you a real sense of intimacy with the models, even though there are hardly any videos. I'm not a photography buff at all and I can't judge these pictures in a technical or artistic context, but they certainly are stimulating. I found myself being truly, physically turned-on, which hardly ever happens to me at an adult site anymore. I had all but given up hope! My pic collecting has for a long time been mostly a spirit-lifting hobby, without much lift anywhere else, if you get my drift.
Each to his own, they say, and this site won't be for everyone. I'm a panty-lingerie nut but there is hardly any of that here; and yet these pics still work for me, in the way that naughty pictures are supposed to work. ;)
Not many mature models, but there are a few. I will do a full review after a bit of time here. I am very happy I joined, though it is a lot of work without zips.
otoh, well-met fellow, hail! If you like sheer panties, then you are absolutely gonna love VF Academy! I cannot urge you strongly enough. If you like full-cut, full-size sheer (and I do mean, SHEER) panties, there is probably no other site on the net better than this one.
I have zero affiliations with this site, and I am only a fan, not a salesman.
You gotta go for it. Just bear in mind, there is a lot of content, but it's not a mega-motherlode of content like at some sites. I'm gonna give you the exact numbers right here:
Image sets: 94
Total images: 11,625
Videos: 116.
And remember, these are all zipped sets of big pictures, and the Hi-def vids average at nearly a half a gig each.
And don't forget, you get access to the other sites too. I haven't even scratched the surface of Pantyhosed4U yet! Of course I go about my enjoyment of this content slowly, relishing it like a fine wine.
I know you're a fan of mature women, as I am. As I said in my review, the premise of the site is good, and it's devoid of anything trashy, both of which are a plus. But if you're going to be a pictures-only site and steer clear of video, even in 2008, why not offer the best quality pictures you can? Why not offer zip-files? And why haul off a large percentage of the content to another site and charge extra for accessing it, when the content is not of premium quality to begin with? I'll admit, some of the newer pics are decent, but a lot of the older ones are smaller than 600x800. This move seems a bit stingy to me. Especially considering the 33.00 USD I paid for my month.
For a site like this, with small thumbs and no zips, not to mention generally slow-loading pages, it requires a good deal of patience and work to download each pic individually and hope to get some kind of genuine enjoyment out of the experience. Despite my low score, there are some very nice pictures here, as I said in my pros, but for 33 smackers I would rather not have to squint and hunt and click so much.
And like I said, seeing all those links to sets I can't access is sort of insulting, even though there's still a good deal of content I *can* get to. It's a bad idea, and without that the score might have been at least a 70. The spirited ladies themselves can be appreciated on their own merits, even though most of them are quite frankly not my cup of tea, and more or less transcend the whole scoring thing. The 63 is for Albert.
I was a member here twice, I think, and enjoyed it both times. I ended up deleting the videos I took both times over worries whether the material was actually contrived or not. If it's real, it can't be legal, if it's legal, it can't be real, right? Or am I wrong? From my reading, I believe that candid public material is still legal, but material shot in a private setting - or a public place where privacy is expected - without the knowledge and consent of the subject, is not legal, nor should it be. The WC vids would most certainly be illegal if they were genuine, nor could I feel comfortable watching them even if it were legal to do so. If I could know for sure that it was all contrived and set-up I'd probably go back with a clearer conscience.
I've heard it many times that these kind of sites feature contrived videos, even though the site owners claim that they are real. However, I was a member at one of these voyeur sites and one vid which was set in an asian public bath-house had a small child in it, who was blurred. If this was contrived, why would there be a child present? There were also a few elderly people who I can't imagine would want to participate in such material. I emailed the webmaster at said site and he would only insist that the material was legal, but would not concede that it was contrived.
Wow, Toadsith, you sure made an excellent case for your point of view. I would reply by saying first that I don't find a pregnant woman sexy necessarily: rather, I find a woman who is sexy already *even more* sexy when she is pregnant. Case in point: my little ex-wife. She was busty for such a slight little thing anyway (four foot eight inches, 85 lbs when I married her), and when she became pregnant...DAMN! It wasn't just the size, it was the texture, the density, the color of the areolae, everything. I was in hog heaven. The rest of her perfect little body became more exciting to me as well. Even her hair. Her skin and her face were more lustrous, rich, supple, smooth, choose your modifier. Sex was hot. And I mean literally hot.
My attraction to pregnant women has nothing to do with the "miracle of child birth" or anything like that. I'm not green, I'm not politically correct, and I detest the nuttier elements of the feminist movement as much as the next guy. That being said I don't find anything grotesque about reproduction or the physical changes women undergo when they are with child. Of course I speak from the male perspective, which is an easy one. I can sympathize as best I can, however, and I completely and without reservation support and commend any woman who refuses to become a mother, for whatever reason. I'm pretty much a libertarian and believe quite forcefully that a person holds sovereignty over their own body and that the demands of society, culture, and invisible deities can go fly a kite.
The beauty of the feminine form, for me, is about a particular concert of curves, contours, and convexities: the breasts, the hips, you know what I mean. In a pregnant woman, and by that I mean one who takes care of herself, those curves, contours, and convexities are accentuated in a dramatic and often breathtaking manner. The big belly, far from being a gravid lump of shapeless fat, is round and hard and smooth and sexy as hell. Once again, this is strictly from an onlooker's point of view and I don't mean for one second to underestimate the physical and emotional strain a pregnancy puts upon a woman.
Parasite may be a technically apt term as you use it, but as a father of two I can say that I am now as dependent on my children for my well-being as they are on me. If one of them died I would want to die too, and so the host/parasite relationship doesn't fly with me. Naturally it does apply to many a parent and child in this world, and our species as a whole would most certainly benefit greatly from a concerted effort to significantly reduce the number of childbirths worldwide.
Edited to add: I think this might call for a forum thread. I'm interested to hear what others think. I think I'll go start one.
The watermark is pretty big. I actually never heard of the site until a few weeks ago. Oh, and I should say, while Cel uses landscape more than the average site, on going through the pics I'd say he still uses it much less than half the time.
1) I saw plenty of vids with higher rez than 852x480. Look in some of the newest vids.
2) I got access to only one bonus site. It seems you get access to the others only after you've been a member for a set period. Maybe it was different for you.
I ended up keeping a gazillion zips since I love skinny girls and this site offers them up in spades, and this is only the softcore stuff, since I don't watch HC. All in all I enjoyed my month and would recommend this site to just about anyone. But yes, the site was very sluggish and navigation is sometimes awful.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
